AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Effects of Intermittent Sprint-Based Heat Acclimation at Various Pedal Resistances on Physiological Responses During Incremental Exercise

Callum McGregor1 ( )Andrew Marley1John Babraj1
Division of Sport and Exercise Science, School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

Standard heat acclimation (HA) protocols (low-moderate intensity over a continuous 7–14 days) restore performance and thermoregulation but lack specificity and practicality for intermittent sports athletes. This study compared different pedal resistances in a 3-week intermittent sprint-based HA protocol.

Methods

Fourteen physically active adults were assigned to a sprint pedal resistance training group (TG): 0.075 kg/kg (7.5TG, 6 males, 1 female) or 0.085 kg/kg (8.5TG, 5 males, 2 females). Participants completed baseline incremental time to exhaustion test (TTE), continued with own training for 3 weeks before post-control TTE, then carried out 6 × 15 s cycle sprints with 30 s recovery followed by 30 min low intensity cycling thrice weekly for 3 weeks before completing post-HA TTE test. Testing and HA were completed at 38 ℃ and 30% relative humidity.

Results

Both groups improved TTE from baseline to post-HA (7.5TG: 9.6% ± 10.8%, 8.5TG: 7.4% ± 3.1%) and post-control to post-HA (7.5TG: 11.0% ± 11.7%, 8.5TG: 6.7% ± 3.9%). Maximal power improved from baseline to post-HA (7.5TG: 293 ± 40 W vs. 321 ± 46 W, 8.5TG: 318 ± 90 W vs. 339 ± 96 W), while only 7.5TG improved maximal power from post-control to post-HA (289 ± 42 W vs. 321 ± 46 W). From baseline to post-HA and post-control to post-HA, only 7.5TG increased time till maximum skin temperature (460 ± 76 s vs. 509 ± 75 s, 461 ± 72 s vs. 509 ± 75 s, respectively) and minimum core-skin gradient (461 ± 71 s vs. 510 ± 74 s, 455 ± 75 s vs. 510 ± 74 s, respectively), while exercising core temperature remained unchanged in both groups. Both groups increased sweat rate (7.5TG: 7.0 ± 3.4 mg/cm2/min vs. 9.6 ± 4.1 mg/cm2/min, 8.5TG: 5.7 ± 3.6 mg/cm2/min vs. 8.3 ± 4.3 mg/cm2/min). Only 7.5TG delayed the onset of blood lactate accumulation from baseline to post-HA (259 ± 126 s vs. 354 ± 86 s).

Conclusion

Intermittent sprint-based HA improves TTE performance and sweat rate while a lighter sprint pedal resistance offers, greater thermal adaptation and fatigue tolerance.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Pages 54-63

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
McGregor C, Marley A, Babraj J. Effects of Intermittent Sprint-Based Heat Acclimation at Various Pedal Resistances on Physiological Responses During Incremental Exercise. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2026, 8(1): 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-024-00324-6

0

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 28 June 2024
Accepted: 14 November 2024
Published: 17 January 2025
© Crown 2024

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.