AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article

Reliability and Validity of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment when Assessed in Real-Time: A Study in Primary and Secondary Children

Daniel González-Devesa1 ( )Carlos Ayán-Pérez2,3Pedro Vicente-Vila3,4Rocío Carballo-Afonso3,4Abel Patiño-Rodríguez4Borja Piñeiro-Aboy4Óscar Álvarez-González4José Carlos Diz-Gómez2,3
Facultad de Humanidades y Educación, Universidad Católica de Ávila, Ávila 05005, Spain
Well-Move Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo 36310, Spain
Departamento de Didácticas Especiáis, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo 36310, Spain
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y del Deporte, Universidad de Vigo, Pontevedra 36005, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed at identifying the reliability and validity of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA), when assessed in real-time.

Method

A sample of 70 primary and 356 secondary students participated voluntarily. Anthropometric variables, CAMSA, 10×5-m shuttle run test and 10×4-m shuttle run test results of all participants were analysed.

Results

Higher internal consistency values were observed among secondary children (α: 0.737–0.864) compared to primary students (α: 0.360–0.762). Absolute and relative reliability values were in general low, with only the CAMSA-S demonstrating fair reliability (ICC: 0.717). A fair significant association between CAMSA-S and agility measured by the 10×4-m and 10×5-m shuttle tests (Rho=0.422) was found. This association was moderate in primary students (Rho=0.649) and fair in secondary students (Rho=0.382). A fair association with the time component of CAMSA (Rho=0.402), and a weaker fair association with the skill component (Rho=0.260) was observed.

Conclusion

The CAMSA demonstrated low test-retest reliability and fair validity when assessed in real-time, in a sample of primary and secondary children.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Pages 147-155

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
González-Devesa D, Ayán-Pérez C, Vicente-Vila P, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment when Assessed in Real-Time: A Study in Primary and Secondary Children. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2026, 8(2): 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-024-00322-8

4

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 04 July 2024
Accepted: 01 November 2024
Published: 04 December 2024
© Beijing Sport University 2024