AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article

Effect of Intermittent Recovery Periods on the Magnitude of the VO2 Slow Component During Heavy Intensity Exercise

Timothy R. Rotarius1 ( )Jakob D. Lauver1 Britton C. Scheuermann2Barry W. Scheuermann3 
Department of Kinesiology, Conway Medical Center College of Health and Human Performance, Coastal Carolina University, 100 Chanticleer Dr. E, Conway, SC 29528, USA
Department of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
Department of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

The slow component of O2 uptake (VO2SC) is attenuated when brief periods of recovery are initiated at exercise onset but the impact of introducing intermittent recovery periods after the primary increase in VO2 on the VO2SC are unknown.

Purpose

This study examined the effect of brief bouts of recovery initiated after the primary rise in VO2 on the amplitude of the VO2SC.

Methods

Seven healthy men [30 ± 10 years, 179 ± 8 cm, 89.2 ± 8.2 kg (± SD)] performed 6 bouts of cycling exercise; 2 bouts of continuous exercise (CONT) and 4 bouts of intermittent exercise (INT, HINT) with work-recovery intervals of 10 s and 3 s. CONT and INT trials consisted of step-transitions from 20 W to a work rate (WR) corresponding to 50% of the difference between VO2peak and gas exchange threshold (Δ50). The WR for HINT was calculated to match the total work performed in the CONT condition.

Results

The VO2SC, indicated by ΔVO2(6–3 min), was eliminated INT (-81 ± 201 mL/min) compared to CONT (597 ± 164 mL/min) and HINT (409 ± 212 mL/min) although there were no differences between the phase Ⅱ VO2 kinetic parameters.

Conclusion

Introducing 3 s of recovery every 10 s following 3 min of heavy intensity exercise eliminated the VO2SC in INT but had no effect on HINT. These findings demonstrate that introducing brief intermittent exercise-recovery periods during heavy intensity exercise lowers exercise intensity domain; however, work-matched intermittent heavy intensity exercise results in similar dynamics to CONT.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Pages 41-53

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Rotarius TR, Lauver JD, Scheuermann BC, et al. Effect of Intermittent Recovery Periods on the Magnitude of the VO2 Slow Component During Heavy Intensity Exercise. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2026, 8(1): 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-024-00308-6

2

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 28 November 2023
Accepted: 02 August 2024
Published: 13 September 2024
© Beijing Sport University 2024