AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Relationship Between Individual and Composite FMSTM Scores with the Anthropometric and Physical Characteristics of Elite Touch (Rugby) Players

Cari Thorpe1 ( )Nick Dobbin1Craig Twist2Michael Callaghan1
Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and compare the movement patterns, anthropometric and physical characteristics of male and female Touch players; and examine the relationships between Functional Movement Screening (FMSTM) scores and the anthropometric and physical characteristics.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study with 35 elite Touch players (18 males, age = 24.7 ± 4.9 years; 17 females, age = 26.7 ± 5.2 years). Anthropometric (stature, body mass) and physical characteristics (sprint times, glycolytic change-of-direction test, and countermovement jump (CMJ) flight time and peak power) were assessed alongside movement patterns using the FMSTM battery. Data were analysed for between-sex differences (independent t-test, Mann–Whitney U) and relationships (Spearman’s correlation coefficient).

Results

Between-sex differences in body mass (t = 6.082, P < 0.001), stature (t = 9.247, P < 0.001), CMJ flight time (t = 3.576, P = 0.001), relative CMJ peak power (t = 6.578, P < 0.001), 10 m sprint time (t = 15.861, P < 0.001), glycolytic change of direction test time (t =−11.831, P < 0.001) and Yo–Yo IR1 (t = 6.842, P < 0.001) were observed. There were minimal differences for deep squat (Z =−1.036, P = 0.443), in-line lunge (Z =−1.284, P = 0.303), shoulder mobility (Z =−0.173, P = 0.883), trunk stability push-up (Z =−0.896, P = 0.483) and rotary stability (Z =−1.537, P = 0.273). The correlation between total and individual FMSTM scores with anthropometric and physical characteristics ranged from trivial-to-moderate (r =−0.502 to 0.488).

Conclusion

The lack of difference for the FMSTM composite score and small-to-trivial differences in individual scores allows a comparison between mixed populations within Touch. Whilst many of the correlations were trivial-to-small, there were differences between sexes in the associations and evidence that improvements in functional deficiencies could translate into improved physical performance.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Pages 301-310

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Thorpe C, Dobbin N, Twist C, et al. Relationship Between Individual and Composite FMSTM Scores with the Anthropometric and Physical Characteristics of Elite Touch (Rugby) Players. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2026, 8(3): 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-024-00282-z

7

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 25 September 2023
Accepted: 12 March 2024
Published: 26 April 2024
© The Author(s) 2024

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.