AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Dynamic Strength Index in Basketball Players: Age and Position Differences, Seasonal Variation and Association with Sprinting and Change of Direction Performance

Jernej Pleša1,3Filip Ujaković2,3Chris Bishop4Žiga Kozinc1,5Nejc Šarabon1,6,7 ( )
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola SI-6310, Slovenia
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
Basketball club Cedevita Olimpija, Vojkova 100, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
Faculty of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London NW4 1RL, UK
University of Primorska, Andrej Marušič Institute, Muzejski trg 2, Koper SI-6000, Slovenia
Human Health Department, InnoRenew CoE, Livade 6a, Izola 6310, Slovenia
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Neugebäudeplatz 1, St. Pölten 3100, Austria
Show Author Information

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in bilateral and unilateral dynamic strength index (DSI) between age categories (seniors and juniors), player positions (guards and forwards), its variation during the basketball season, and its association with sprint and change of direction (CoD) performance. Highly trained basketball players (n = 32) performed bilateral and unilateral countermovement jumps (CMJ), bilateral and unilateral isometric squats, 10-m sprint, and 505 CoD test. DSI was calculated from CMJ and isometric peak force, while 10-m sprint and 505 test were used to calculate the CoD deficit. Two-way factorial analysis showed larger isometric peak force in seniors, and larger bilateral DSI in juniors, while guards had higher DSI values and larger peak force in both metrics compared to forwards. Two-way mixed model ANOVA showed a significant increase in unilateral isometric squat and CMJ peak force force (g =–0.08 to –0.64) and increase in bilateral DSI values. Post-hoc analysis showed that isometric squat force significantly increased only in seniors (g = 0.88), resulting in decreased bilateral DSI values (g = 0.52), with bilateral and unilateral DSI values increasing in juniors. Similar trends were observed in guards and forwards, with guards exhibiting a more pronounced increase in all variables compared to forwards. Furthermore, correlation analysis for in-season testing showed moderate associations between isometric squat peak force and CoD ability (r =–0.43 to –0.54; P < 0.001), and weak associations between DSI and CoD ability (r = 0.36 to 0.39; P < 0.05), while associations were not significant for sprint performance. The relationships were lower or absent during pre-season testing. Further interventional studies are needed to determine the usefulness of DSI to guide training related decision-making.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Pages 217-226

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Pleša J, Ujaković F, Bishop C, et al. Dynamic Strength Index in Basketball Players: Age and Position Differences, Seasonal Variation and Association with Sprinting and Change of Direction Performance. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2026, 8(2): 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-023-00244-x

4

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 24 March 2023
Accepted: 25 July 2023
Published: 03 November 2023
© The Author(s) 2023

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.