AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article

Reliability and Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometer and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer for Testing Shoulder Isometric External and Internal Rotator Muscles Strength

Francesco Bettariga1,2,3 ( )Nicola Francesco Lopomo4Fabio Civera5,6Stefano Giuseppe Lazzarini7Lisa Mantovani3Luca Maestroni6,8
Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia
StudioErre, Via della Badia 18, Brescia 25127, Italy
Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Centro Medico e Fisioterapico, Via Roma 28, Gorle, Bergamo 24020, Italy
ReAct, Via Madonna della Neve 24, Bergamo 24121, Italy
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
London Sport Institute, School of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, Greenlands Lane, London, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Shoulder strength evaluation is a recommended procedure in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

Aim

To examine hand-held sphygmomanometer (HHS) and hand-held dynamometer (HHD) intra- and inter-rater reliability during isometric shoulder external and internal rotation strength testing in prone rotation position in asymptomatic participants, and to compare these two testing modalities.

Design

Reliability study.

Methods

A total of 20 asymptomatic participants (27.7 ± 7.4 years; 77.1 ± 10.1 kg) attended a strength assessment consisting of HHS and HHD tests. Reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), coefficient of variation (CV) with 95%CI, and standard error of measurement (SEM). Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis were used to compare HHS and HHD testing modalities.

Results

“Good” to “excellent” intra (ICC range = 0.896 to 0.979) and inter-rater reliability scores (ICC range = 0.850 to 0.978) were displayed during both HHS and HHD tests during internal and external rotation strength assessments. Linear relationships between HHS and HHD measures were found, with coefficients of determination (R2) ranging between 0.60 and 0.79.

Conclusion

HHS and HHD resulted to be reliable strength assessment modalities for clinical practice. These assessment modes can be equally valid in assessing intra and inter-limb asymmetries in isometric shoulder rotation strength. The affordability and availability of HHS in ordinary clinical settings can facilitate its implementation in musculoskeletal practice.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Pages 386-393

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Bettariga F, Lopomo NF, Civera F, et al. Reliability and Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometer and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer for Testing Shoulder Isometric External and Internal Rotator Muscles Strength. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2024, 6(4): 386-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-023-00232-1

1234

Views

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 22 September 2022
Accepted: 16 April 2023
Published: 28 June 2023
© Beijing Sport University 2023