Journal Home > Volume 3 , Issue 3

This paper deals with the optimization of the transfer trajectory of a solar sail-based spacecraft between circular and coplanar heliocentric orbits. The problem is addressed using both a direct and an indirect approach, while an ideal and an optical force model are used to describe the propulsive acceleration of a flat solar sail. In the direct approach, the total flight time is partitioned into arcs of equal duration, within which the sail attitude is assumed to be constant with respect to an orbital reference frame, and a nonlinear programming solver is used to optimize the transfer trajectory. The aim of the paper is to compare the performance of the two (direct and indirect) approaches in term of optimal (minimum) flight time. In this context, the simulation results show that a direct transcription method using a small number of arcs is sufficient to obtain a good estimate of the global minimum flight time obtained through the classical calculus of variation.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Comparison between direct and indirect approach to solar sail circle-to-circle orbit raising optimization

Show Author's information Andrea CarusoAlessandro A. Quarta( )Giovanni Mengali
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, I-56122, Italy

Abstract

This paper deals with the optimization of the transfer trajectory of a solar sail-based spacecraft between circular and coplanar heliocentric orbits. The problem is addressed using both a direct and an indirect approach, while an ideal and an optical force model are used to describe the propulsive acceleration of a flat solar sail. In the direct approach, the total flight time is partitioned into arcs of equal duration, within which the sail attitude is assumed to be constant with respect to an orbital reference frame, and a nonlinear programming solver is used to optimize the transfer trajectory. The aim of the paper is to compare the performance of the two (direct and indirect) approaches in term of optimal (minimum) flight time. In this context, the simulation results show that a direct transcription method using a small number of arcs is sufficient to obtain a good estimate of the global minimum flight time obtained through the classical calculus of variation.

Keywords: trajectory optimization, flat solar sail, circle-to-circle transfer, heliocentric mission analysis

References(22)

[1]
Garwin, R. L. Solar sailing: a practical method of propulsion within the solar system. Journal of Jet Propulsion, 1958, 28(3): 188-190.
[2]
Tsu, T. C. Interplanetary travel by solar sail. ARS Journal, 1959, 29(6): 422-427.
[3]
Sauer, C. G. Jr. Optimum solar-sail interplanetary trajectories. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, 1976, DOI: .
DOI
[4]
Otten, M., McInnes, C. R. Near minimum-time trajectories for solar sails. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2001, 24(3): 632-634.
[5]
Hughes, G. W., McInnes, C. R. Solar sail hybrid trajectory optimization for non-Keplerian orbit transfers. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25(3): 602-604.
[6]
Betts, J. T. Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1998, 21(2): 193-207.
[7]
Conway, B. A. A survey of methods available for the numerical optimization of continuous dynamic systems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2012, 152(2): 271-306.
[8]
Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A. Optimal three-dimensional interplanetary rendezvous using non-ideal solar sail. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2005, 28(1): 173-177.
[9]
Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A. Solar sail trajectories with piecewise-constant steering laws. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2009, 13(8): 431-441.
[10]
Dachwald, B., Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A., Macdonald, M. Parametric model and optimal control of solar sails with optical degradation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(5): 1170-1178.
[11]
Dachwald, B., Macdonald, M., McInnes, C. R., Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A. Impact of optical degradation on solar sail mission performance. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2007, 44(4): 740-749.
[12]
Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A., Circi, C., Dachwald, B. Refined solar sail force model with mission application. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(2): 512-520.
[13]
Wright, J. L. Space Sailing. Gordon and Breach, Philadelphia, 1992, 223-233.
[14]
McInnes, C. R. Solar Sailing: Technology, Dynamics and Mission Applications. Springer, 1999, 46-51.
[15]
Heaton, A. F., Artusio-Glimpse, A. B. An update to the NASA reference solar sail thrust model. In: Proceedings of AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition, 2015, DOI: .
DOI
[16]
Bryson, A. E. Jr., Ho, Y. C. Applied Optimal Control. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1975, 71-89.
[17]
Stengel, R. F. Optimal Control and Estimation. Dover Publications, 1994, 222-254.
[18]
Lawden, D. F. Optimal Trajectories for Space Navigation. Butterworths, 1963, 54-60.
[19]
Niccolai, L., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Analytical solution of the optimal steering law for non-ideal solar sail. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 62: 11-18.
[20]
Shampine, L. F., Gordon, M. K. Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: The Initial Value Problem. W. H. Freeman, 1975.
[21]
Shampine, L. F., Reichelt, M. W. The MATLAB ODE suite. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1997, 18(1): 1-22.
[22]
Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Semi-analytical method for the analysis of solar sail heliocentric orbit raising. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35(1): 330-335.
Publication history
Copyright

Publication history

Received: 09 August 2018
Accepted: 14 November 2018
Published: 13 April 2019
Issue date: September 2019

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press 2019
Return