Review Article
Issue
Published:
08 September 2018
Survey of the electrostatic tractor research for reorbiting passive GEO space objects
M. Bengtson(
),
),
Keywords:
control, electrostatics, geosynchronous orbit, debris
Cite this article:
Bengtson M, Wilson K, Hughes J, et al.
Survey of the electrostatic tractor research for reorbiting passive GEO space objects.
Astrodynamics,
2018, 2(4): 291-305.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-018-0030-0
Download citation
763
Views
22
Downloads
Citations
29
Crossref
22
WoS
0
Scopus
0
CSCD
The number of operational satellites and debris objects in the valuable geosynchronous ring has increased steadily over time such that active debris removal missions are necessary to ensure long-term stability. These objects are very large and tumbling, making any mission scenarios requiring physical contact very challenging. In the last 10 years, the concept of using an electrostatic tractor has been investigated extensively. With the electrostatic tractor concept, active charge emission is employed to simultaneously charge the tug or services vehicle, while aiming the charge exhaust onto the passive space debris object to charge it as well. The resulting electrostatic force has been explored to actuate this debris object to a disposal orbit or to detumble the object, all without physical contact. This paper provides a survey of the related research and reviews the charging concepts, the associated electrostatic force and torque modeling, and the feedback control developments, as well as the charge sensing research.
menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article
Survey of the electrostatic tractor research for reorbiting passive GEO space objects
M. Bengtson(
),
),
Abstract
The number of operational satellites and debris objects in the valuable geosynchronous ring has increased steadily over time such that active debris removal missions are necessary to ensure long-term stability. These objects are very large and tumbling, making any mission scenarios requiring physical contact very challenging. In the last 10 years, the concept of using an electrostatic tractor has been investigated extensively. With the electrostatic tractor concept, active charge emission is employed to simultaneously charge the tug or services vehicle, while aiming the charge exhaust onto the passive space debris object to charge it as well. The resulting electrostatic force has been explored to actuate this debris object to a disposal orbit or to detumble the object, all without physical contact. This paper provides a survey of the related research and reviews the charging concepts, the associated electrostatic force and torque modeling, and the feedback control developments, as well as the charge sensing research.
Keywords:
control, electrostatics, geosynchronous orbit, debris
References(110)
[1]
Schaub, H., Moorer, D. F. Jr. Geosynchronous large debris reorbiter: challenges and prospects. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2012, 59(1-2): 161-176.
[2]
Schaub, H., Sternovsky, Z. Active space debris charging for contactless electrostatic disposal maneuvers. Advances in Space Research, 2014, 53(1): 110-118.
[3]
Hogan, E. A., Schaub, H. Relative motion control for two-spacecraft electrostatic orbit corrections. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2013, 36(1): 240-249.
[4]
Lai, S. T. Fundamentals of spacecraft charging: spacecraft interactions with space plasmas. Princeton University Press, 2011.
[5]
Chen, F. F. Introduction to plasma physics and controlled fusion: volume 1: plasma physics, 2nd ed. Plenum Press, 1984.
[6]
Schaub, H., Sternovsky, Z. Active space debris charging for contactless electrostatic disposal maneuvers. The 6th European Conference on Space Debris, 2013.
[7]
Denton, M. H., Thomsen, M. F., Korth, H., Lynch, S., Zhang, J. C., Liemohn, M. W. Bulk plasma properties at geosynchronous orbit. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005, 110(A7): A07223.
[8]
Seubert, C. R., Stiles, L. A., Schaub, H. Effective coulomb force modeling for spacecraft in earth orbit plasmas. Advances in Space Research, 2014, 54(2): 209-220.
[9]
Murdoch, N., Izzo, D., Bombardelli, C., Carnelli, I., Hilgers, A., Rodgers, D. Electrostatic tractor for near earth object deflection. The 59th International Astronautical Congress, 2008.
[10]
Murdoch, N., Izzo, D., Bombardelli, C., Carnelli, I., Hilgers, A., Rodgers, D. The electrostatic tractor for asteroid deflection. The 58th International Astronautical Congress, 2008.
[11]
Cover, J. H. Jr., Knauer, W., Maurer, H. A. Lightweight reflecting structures utilizing electrostatic inflation: USA, 3546706. 1970-12-08.
[12]
King, L. B., Parker, G. G., Deshmukh, S., Chong, J. H. Spacecraft formation-flying using inter-vehicle coulomb forces. NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, 2002.
[13]
Kong, E. M. C., Miller, D. W., Sedwick, R. J. Exploiting orbital dynamics for aperture synthesis using distributed satellite systems: applications to visible earth imager system. Proceedings of AAS/AIAA Space flight Mechanics Meeting, 1999.
[14]
King, L. B., Parker, G. G., Deshmukh, S., Chong, J. H. Study of interspacecraft coulomb forces and implications for formation flying. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2003, 19(3): 497-505.
[15]
Schaub, H., Parker, G. G., King, L. B. Challenges and prospect of coulomb formations. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2004, 52(1-2): 169-193.
[16]
Natarajan, A., Schaub, H. Linear dynamics and stability analysis of a two-craft coulomb tether formation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(4): 831-839.
[17]
Berryman, J., Schaub, H. Analytical charge analysis for two- and three-craft coulomb formations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(6): 1701-1710.
[18]
Schaub, H., Hall, C. D., Berryman, J. Necessary conditions for circularly-restricted static coulomb formations. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2006, 54(3-4): 525-541.
[19]
Vasavada, H., Schaub, H. Analytic solutions for equal mass four-craft static coulomb formation. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2008, 56(1): 17-40.
[20]
Moorer, D. F., Schaub, H. Hybrid electrostatic space tug: USA, 8210480. 2012-07-03.
[21]
Moorer, D. F., Schaub, H. Electrostatic spacecraft reorbiter: USA, WO/2011/019830. 2011-02-17.
[22]
Bennett, T., Stevenson, D., Hogan, E., Schaub, H. Prospects and challenges of touchless electrostatic detumbling of small bodies. Advances in Space Research, 2015, 56(3): 557-568.
[23]
Yasaka, T., Hanada, T., Hirayama, H. Geo debris environment: a model to forecast the next 100 years. Advances in Space Research, 1999, 23(1): 191-199.
[24]
IADC. Proceedings of the 15th Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee Meeting, NASA JSC, Houston, TX, 1997.
[25]
Johnson, N. L. Protecting the GEO environment: policies and practices. Space Policy, 1999, 15(3): 127-135.
[26]
Jehn, R., Agapov, V., Hernndez, C. The situation in the geostationary ring. Advances in Space Research, 2005, 35(7): 1318-1327.
[27]
Schaub, H., Jasper, L. E. Z., Anderson, P. V., McKnight, D. S. Cost and risk assessment for spacecraft operation decisions caused by the space debris environment. Acta Astronautica, 2015, 113: 66-79.
[28]
Oltrogge, D. L., Kelso, T. S. Getting to know our space population from the public catalog. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2011.
[29]
Anderson, P. V., Schaub, H. Local orbital debris flux study in the geostationary ring. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 51(12): 2195-2206.
[30]
Anderson, P. V., Schaub, H. Local debris congestion in the geosynchronous environment with population augmentation. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 94(2): 619-628.
[31]
McKnight, D. S., Di Pentino, F. R. New insights on the orbital debris collision hazard at GEO. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 85: 73-82.
[32]
McKnight, D. Pay me now or pay me more later: start the development of active orbital debris removal now. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2010.
[33]
Chrystal, P., McKnight, D., Meredith, P. L., Schmidt, J., Fok, M., Wetton, C. Space debris: on collision course for insurers? Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, 2011.
[34]
Oltrogge, D. L., Alfano, S., Law, C., Cacioni, A., Kelso, T. S. A comprehensive assessment of collision likelihood in geosynchronous earth orbit. The 68th International Astronautical Congress, 2017.
[35]
Carlson, E., Casali, S., Chambers, D., Geissler, G., Lalich, A., Leipold, M., Mach, R., Parry, J., Weems, F. Final design of a space debris removal system. NASA-CR-189976, NASA, 1990.
[36]
Reed, J., Barraclough, S. Development of harpoon system for capturing space debris. The 6th European Conference on Space Debris, 2013.
[37]
Dudziak, R., Tuttle, S., Barraclough, S. Harpoon technology development for the active removal of space debris. Advances in Space Research, 2015, 56(3): 509-527.
[38]
Loughman, J. J. Overview and analysis of the soldier satellite concept for removal of space debris. AIAA Space 2010 Conference & Exposition, 2010.
[39]
Forshaw, J. L., Aglietti, G. S., Salmon, T., Retat, I., Roe, M., Burgess, C., Chabot, T., Pisseloup, A., Phipps, A., Bernal, C. et al. Final payload test results for the removedebris active debris removal mission. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 138: 326-342.
[40]
Jasper, L. Z., Schaub, H. Input shaped large thrust maneuver with a tethered debris object. The 6th European Conference on Space Debris, 2013.
[41]
Jasper, L. E. Z., Seubert, C. R., Schaub, H., Trushkyakov, V., Yutkin, E. Tethered tug for large low earth orbit debris removal. AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, 2012.
[42]
Jasper, L., Schaub, H. Input shaped large thrust maneuver with a tethered debris object. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 96: 128-137.
[43]
Nishida, S. I., Kawamoto, S., Okawa, Y., Terui, F., Kitamura, S. Space debris removal system using a small satellite. Acta Astronautica, 2009, 65(1-2): 95-102.
[44]
Nishida, S. I., Kikuchi, N. A scenario and technologies for space debris removal. The 12th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, 2014.
[45]
Castronuovo, M. M. Active space debris removal—a preliminary mission analysis and design. Acta Astronautica, 2011, 69(9-10): 848-859.
[46]
Smith, D. A., Martin, C., Kassebom, M., Petersen, H., Shaw, A., Skidmore, B., Smith, D., Stokes, H., Willig, A. A mission to preserve the geostationary region. Advances in Space Research, 2004, 34(5): 1214-1218.
[47]
Lennon, J. A., Henshaw, C. G., Purdy, W. An architecture for autonomous control of a robotic satellite grappling mission. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2008.
[48]
Couzin, P., Teti, F., Rembala, R. Active removal of large debris: rendez-vous and robotic capture issues. The 2nd European Workshop on Active Debris Removal, 2012.
[49]
Karavaev, Y. S., Kopyatkevich, R. M., Mishina, M. N., Mishin, G. S., Papushev, P. G., Shaburov, P. N. The dynamic properties of rotation and optical characteristics of space debris at geostationary orbit. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2004, 119: 1457-1466.
[50]
DeLuca, L. T., Bernelli, F., Maggi, F., Tadini, P., Pardini, C., Anselmo, L., Grassi, M., Pavarin, D., Francesconi, A., Branz, F. et al. Active space debris removal by a hybrid propulsion module. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 91: 20-33.
[51]
Schonenborg, R. A. C., Schoyer, H. F. R. Solid propulsion de-orbiting and re-orbiting. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Space Debris, 2009.
[52]
Vetrisano, M., Thiry, N., Vasile, M. Detumbling large space debris via laser ablation. 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2015.
[53]
Ortiz Gómez, N., Walker, S. J. I. Eddy currents applied to de-tumbling of space debris: analysis and validation of approximate proposed methods. Acta Astronautica, 2015, 114: 34-53.
[54]
Bombardelli, C., Peláez, J. Ion beam shepherd for contactless space debris removal. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2011, 34(3): 916-920.
[55]
Bombardelli, C., Urrutxua, H., Merino, M., Ahedo, E., Peláez, J., Olympio, J. Dynamics of ion-beam-propelled space debris. The 22nd International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, 2011.
[56]
Merino, M., Ahedo Galilea, E., Bombardelli, C., Urrutxua, H., Pélaez Álvarez, J., Summerer, L. Space debris removal with an ion beam shepherd satellite: target-plasma interaction. The 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2011.
[57]
Schaub, H., Jasper, L. E. Z. Circular orbit radius control using electrostatic actuation for 2-craft configurations. AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, 2011.
[58]
Schaub, H., Stevenson, D. Prospects of relative attitude control using coulomb actuation. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2013, 60(3-4): 258-277.
[59]
Garrett, H. B., Whittlesey, A. C. Guide to mitigating spacecraft charging effects. Wiley, 2012.
[61]
Whipple, E. C. Potentials of surfaces in space. Reports on Progress in Physics, 1981, 44(11): 1197-1250.
[62]
Mullen, E. G., Gussenhoven, M. S., Hardy, D. A., Aggson, T. A., Ledley, B. G., Whipple, E. Scatha survey of high-level spacecraft charging in sunlight. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1986, 91(A2): 1474-1490.
[63]
Lai, S. T., Tautz, M. F. Aspects of spacecraft charging in sunlight. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2006, 34(5): 2053-2061.
[64]
Smythe, W. R. Static and dynamic electricity, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1968.
[65]
Stevenson, D., Schaub, H. Multi-sphere method for modeling spacecraft electrostatic forces and torques. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 51(1): 10-20.
[66]
Peck, M. A. Prospects and challenges for lorentz-augmented orbits. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2005.
[67]
Hogan, E. A., Schaub, H. Impacts of hot space plasma and ion beam emission on electrostatic tractor performance. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2015, 43(9): 3115-3129.
[68]
Hogan, E. A., Schaub, H. Space weather influence on relative motion control using the touchless electrostatic tractor. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2016, 63(3): 237-262.
[69]
Hughes, J., Schaub, H. Prospects of using a pulsed electrostatic tractor with nominal geosynchronous conditions. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2017, 45(8): 1887-1897.
[70]
Hughes, J., Schaub, H. Orbital and solar storm analysis of the pulsed electrostatic tractor. The 7th European Conference on Space Debris, 2017.
[71]
Stevenson, D. Optimization of sphere population for electrostatic multi sphere model. The 12th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference, 2012.
[72]
Lekner, J. Electrostatics of two charged conducting spheres. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2012, 468: 2829-2848.
[74]
Ingram, G., Hughes, J., Bennett, T., Reily, C., Schaub, H. Autonomous volume multi-sphere-model development using electric field matching. AAS Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, 2017.
[75]
Chow, P., Hughes, J., Bennett, T., Schaub, H. Automated sphere geometry optimization for the volume multi-sphere method. AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, 2016.
[76]
Stevenson, D., Schaub, H. Optimization of sphere population for electrostatic multi-sphere method. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2013, 41(12): 3526-3535.
[77]
Maxwell, J. C. A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Clarendon Press, 1873.
[78]
Jackson, J. D. Classical electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
[79]
Price, S. L., Stone, A. J., Alderton, M. Explicit formulae for the electrostatic energy, forces and torques between a pair of molecules of arbitrary symmetry. Molecular Physics, 1984, 52(4): 987-1001.
[80]
Hou, X. Y., Scheeres, D. J., Xin, X. S. Mutual potential between two rigid bodies with arbitrary shapes and mass distributions. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2017, 127(3): 369-395.
[81]
Hughes, J., Schaub, H. Spacecraft electrostatic force and torque expansions yielding appropriate fidelity measures. AAS Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, 2017.
[82]
Berryman, J., Schaub, H. Static equilibrium configurations in GEO coulomb spacecraft formations. The 15th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, 2005.
[83]
Schaub, H. Stabilization of satellite motion relative to a coulomb spacecraft formation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2005, 28(6): 1231-1239.
[84]
Wang, S. Q., Schaub, H. Spacecraft collision avoidance using coulomb forces with separation distance and rate feedback. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2008, 31(3): 740-750.
[85]
Hussein, I. I., Schaub, H. Invariant shape solutions of the spinning three craft coulomb tether problem. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2006, 96(2): 137-157.
[86]
Hussein, I., Schaub, H. Stability and control of relative equilibria for the three-spacecraft coulomb tether problem. Acta Astronautica, 2009, 65(5-6): 738-754.
[87]
Schaub, H., Hussein, I. I. Stability and reconfiguration analysis of a circularly spinning two-craft coulomb tether. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2010, 46(4): 1675-1686.
[88]
Hogan, E. A., Schaub, H. Collinear invariant shapes for three-spacecraft coulomb formations. Acta Astronautica, 2012, 72: 78-89.
[89]
Hogan, E. A., Schaub, H. Linear stability and shape analysis of spinning three-craft coulomb formations. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2012, 112(2): 131-148.
[90]
Jasch, P. D., Hogan, E. A., Schaub, H. Out-of-plane stability analysis of collinear spinning three-craft coulomb formations. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 88: 89-97.
[91]
Schaub, H., Jasper, L. E. Z. Orbit boosting maneuvers for two-craft coulomb formations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2013, 36(1): 74-82.
[92]
Stevenson, D. Remote spacecraft attitude control by coulomb charging. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, 2015.
[93]
Shibata, T., Bennett, T., Schaub, H. Prospects of a hybrid magnetic/electrostatic sample container retriever. The 9th International Workshop on Satellite Constellations and Formation Flying, 2017.
[94]
Aslanov, V. S., Yudintsev, V. V. Relative motion control of space pusher-tug during debris removal by a coulomb force. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017.
[95]
Seubert, C. R., Schaub, H. Closed-loop charged relative motion experiments simulating constrained orbital motion. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(6): 1856-1865.
[96]
Seubert, C. R., Schaub, H. Electrostatic force model for terrestrial experiments on the coulomb testbed. The 61st International Astronautical Congress, 2010.
[97]
Bennett, T., Schaub, H. Touchless electrostatic three-dimensional detumbling of large axi-symmetric debris. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2015, 62(3): 233-253.
[98]
Bennett, T., Schaub, H. Capitalizing on relative motion in electrostatic detumble of axi-symmetric geo objects. The 6th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques, 2016.
[99]
Aslanov, V. S. Exact solutions and adiabatic invariants for equations of satellite attitude motion under coulomb torque. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 90(4): 2545-2556.
[100]
Stevenson, D., Schaub, H. Terrestrial testbed for remote coulomb spacecraft rotation control. International Journal of Space Science and Engineering, 2014, 2(1): 96-112.
[101]
Bennett, T., Stevenson, D., Hogan, E., McManus, L., Schaub, H. Prospects and challenges of touchless debris despinning using electrostatics. The 3rd European Workshop on Space Debris Modeling and Remediation, 2014.
[102]
Hogan, E. A., Schaub, H. Space debris reorbiting using electrostatic actuation. The 35th Annual Guidance and Control Conference, 2012.
[103]
Hughes, J., Schaub, H. Monte-carlo analysis of the pulsed electrostatic tractor strength. The 14th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference, 2016.
[104]
Anderson, P. V., Schaub, H. Conjunction challenges of low-thrust geosynchronous debris removal maneuvers. Acta Astronautica, 2016, 123: 154-164.
[105]
Bennett, T. J. On-orbit 3-dimensional electrostatic detumble for generic spacecraft geometries. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, 2017.
[106]
Ferguson, D. C., Murray-Krezan, J., Barton, D. A., Dennison, J. R., Gregory, S. A. Feasibility of detecting spacecraft charging and arcing by remote sensing. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2014, 51(6): 1907-1913.
[107]
Engwerda, H. J. A., Hughes, J., Schaub, H. Remote sensing for planar electrostatic characterization using the multi-sphere method. Final Stardust Conference, 2016.
[108]
Engwerda, H. J. A. Remote sensing for spatial electrostatic characterization using the multi-sphere method. Master Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2017.
[109]
Halekas, J. S., Mitchell, D. L., Lin, R. P., Hood, L. L., Acua, M. H., Binder, A. B. Evidence for negative charging of the lunar surface in shadow. Geophysical Research Letters, 2002, 29(10): 1435.
[110]
Halekas, J. S., Delory, G. T., Lin, R. P., Stubbs, T. J., Farrell, W. M. Lunar prospector observations of the electrostatic potential of the lunar surface and its response to incident currents. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008, 113(A9): A09102.
Publication history
Copyright
Publication history
Received: 17 March 2018
Accepted: 10 May 2018
Published:
08 September 2018
Issue date: December 2018
Copyright
© Tsinghua University Press 2018
FEEDBACK 
TOP