AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (6.1 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

AI for tribology: Present and future

Nian YIN1,2, Pufan YANG2, Songkai LIU2, Shuaihang PAN3, Zhinan ZHANG1,2( )
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

With remarkable learning capabilities and swift operational speeds, artificial intelligence (AI) can assist researchers in swiftly extracting valuable patterns, trends, and associations from subjective information. Tribological behaviors are characterized by dependence on systems, evolution with time, and multidisciplinary coupling. The friction process involves a variety of phenomena, including mechanics, thermology, electricity, optics, magnetics, and so on. Hence, tribological information possesses the distinct characteristics of being multidisciplinary, multilevel, and multiscale, so that the application of AI in tribology is highly extensive. To delineate the scope, classification, and recent trends of AI implementation in tribology, this review embarks on exploration of the tribology research domain. It comprehensively outlines the utilization of AI in basic theory of tribology, intelligent tribology, component tribology, extreme tribology, bio-tribology, green tribology, and other fields. Finally, considering the emergence of "tribo-informatics" as a novel interdisciplinary field, which combines tribology with informatics, this review elucidates the future directions and research framework of "AI for tribology". In this paper, tribo-system information is divided into 5 categories: input information (I), system intrinsic information (S), output information (O), tribological state information (Ts), and derived state information (Ds). Then, a fusion method among 5 types of tribo-system information and different AI technologies (regression, classification, clustering, and dimension reduction) has been proposed, which enables tribo-informatics methods to solve common problems such as tribological behavior state monitoring, behavior prediction, and system optimization. The purpose of this review is to offer a systematic comprehension of tribo-informatics and to inspire new research ideas of tribo-informatics. Ultimately, it aspires to enhance the efficiency of problem-solving in tribology.

Keywords

artificial intelligence (AI)tribologymachine learningtribo-informaticsAI for tribology

References

[1]
Meng Y G, Xu J, Jin Z M, Prakash B, Hu Y Z. A review of recent advances in tribology. Friction 8(2): 221–300 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Bhushan B, Ko P L. Introduction to tribology. Appl Mech Rev 56(1): B6–B7 (2003)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Grützmacher P G, Profito F J, Rosenkranz A. Multi-scale surface texturing in tribology—Current knowledge and future perspectives. Lubricants 7(11): 95 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Hinton G E, Salakhutdinov R R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786): 504–507 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Xu L D. Introduction: Systems science in industrial sectors. Syst Res 30(3): 211–213 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Bommasani R, Hudson D A, Adeli E, Altman R, Arora S, von Arx S, Bernstein M S, Bohg J, Bosselut A, Brunskill E, et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 (2021)
Google Scholar
[7]
Zhang C M, Lu Y. Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects. J Ind Inf Integr 23: 100224 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Ramakrishna S, Zhang T Y, Lu W C, Qian Q, Low J S C, Yune J H R, Tan D Z L, Bressan S, Sanvito S, Kalidindi S R. Materials informatics. J Intell Manuf 30(6): 2307–2326 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Hwang B, Lee J H, Bang D. Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics pipelines. Exp Mol Med 50(8): 1–14 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Zhang Z N, Yin N, Chen S, Liu C L. Tribo-informatics: Concept, architecture, and case study. Friction 9(3): 642–655 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Yin N, Xing Z G, He K, Zhang Z N. Tribo-informatics approaches in tribology research: A review. Friction 11(1): 1–22 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Chen X W, Lin X T. Big data deep learning: Challenges and perspectives. IEEE Access 2: 514–525 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Mozaffar M, Liao S H, Xie X Y, Saha S, Park C, Cao J, Liu W K, Gan Z T. Mechanistic artificial intelligence (mechanistic-AI) for modeling, design, and control of advanced manufacturing processes: Current state and perspectives. J Mater Process Tech 302: 117485 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Tremmel S, Marian M. Machine learning in tribology— More than buzzwords? Lubricants 10(4): 68 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Voukantsis D, Karatzas K, Mihailidis A, Gatsios S, Sahanas C, Bakolas V, Hoffinger C. Application of computational intelligence to the analysis of friction measurements. Tribol Trans 53(5): 748–754 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Marian M, Tremmel S. Current trends and applications of machine learning in tribology—A review. Lubricants 9(9): 86 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Tallian T E. Tribological design decisions using computerized databases. J Tribol 109(3): 381–386 (1987)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Jones S P, Jansen R, Fusaro R L. Preliminary investigation of neural network techniques to predict tribological properties. Tribol Trans 40(2): 312–320 (1997)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Wu D Z, Jennings C, Terpenny J, Gao R X, Kumara S. A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: Tool wear prediction using random forests. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(7): 071018 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Chen J X. The evolution of computing: AlphaGo. Comput Sci Eng 18(4): 4–7 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Haenlein M, Kaplan A. A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. Calif Manag Rev 61(4): 5–14 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Paturi U M R, Palakurthy S T, Reddy N S. The role of machine learning in tribology: A systematic review. Arch Comput Meth Eng 30(2): 1345–1397 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Rosenkranz A, Marian M, Profito F J, Aragon N, Shah R. The use of artificial intelligence in tribology—A perspective. Lubricants 9(1): 2 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Kurdi A, Alhazmi N, Alhazmi H, Tabbakh T. Practice of simulation and life cycle assessment in tribology-A review. Materials 13(16): 3489 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Huang X Y, Lin L, Zheng Q S. Theoretical study of superlubric nanogenerators with superb performances. Nano Energy 70: 104494 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Najm S M, Trzepieciński T, Kowalik M. Modelling and parameter identification of coefficient of friction for deep-drawing quality steel sheets using the CatBoost machine learning algorithm and neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124(7): 2229–2259 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Hasan M S, Nosonovsky M. Triboinformatics: Machine learning algorithms and data topology methods for tribology. Surf Innov 10(4–5): 229–242 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Ciulli E. Tribology and industry: From the origins to 4.0. Front Mech Eng 5: 55 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Kareh K M. A tantalizing trip through tribology. Nat Phys 18: 123 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Malazdrewicz S, Sadowski Ł. An intelligent model for the prediction of the depth of the wear of cementitious composite modified with high-calcium fly ash. Compos Struct 259: 113234 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Dai Z D, Tong J, Ren L Q. Researches and developments of biomimetics in tribology. Chin Sci Bull 51(22): 2681–2689 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Assenova E, Vencl A. Tribology and self-organization in reducing friction: A brief review. Tribomat 1(1): 35–41 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Popov V L, Li Q, Lyashenko I A, Pohrt R. Adhesion and friction in hard and soft contacts: Theory and experiment. Friction 9(6): 1688–1706 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Lisiecki A. Tribology and surface engineering. Coatings 9(10): 663 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Vasudev H, Singh G, Bansal A, Vardhan S, Thakur L. Microwave heating and its applications in surface engineering: A review. Mater Res Express 6(10): 102001 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Kumar R, Antonov M. Self-lubricating materials for extreme temperature tribo-applications. Mater Today Proc 44: 4583–4589 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Greiner C, Gagel J, Gumbsch P. Solids under extreme shear: Friction-mediated subsurface structural transformations. Adv Mater 31(26): e1806705 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Shah R, Woydt M, Martini A, Wong H. Green tribology. Tribol Ind 42(4): 592–596 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Freschi M, Paniz A, Cerqueni E, Colella G, Dotelli G. The twelve principles of green tribology: Studies, research, and case studies—A brief anthology. Lubricants 10(6): 129 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Wagner R M F, Maiti R, Carré M J, Perrault C M, Evans P C, Lewis R. Bio-tribology of vascular devices: A review of tissue/device friction research. Biotribology 25: 100169 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Zhang X G, Zhang Y L, Jin Z M. A review of the bio-tribology of medical devices. Friction 10(1): 4–30 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Ji Y Y, Bao J S, Yin Y, Ma C. Applications of artificial intelligence in tribology. Recent Pat Mech Eng 9(3): 193–205 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Rouf S, Raina A, Ul Haq M I, Naveed N. Sensors and tribological systems: Applications for industry 4.0. Ind Robot Int J Robot Res Appl 49(3): 442–460 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Kügler P, Marian M, Schleich B, Tremmel S, Wartzack S. tribAIn—Towards an explicit specification of shared tribological understanding. Appl Sci 10(13): 4421 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Kilic K, Toriya H, Kosugi Y, Adachi T, Kawamura Y. One-dimensional convolutional neural network for pipe jacking EPB TBM cutter wear prediction. Appl Sci 12(5): 2410 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Chou J S, Yang K H, Lin J Y. Peak shear strength of discrete fiber-reinforced soils computed by machine learning and metaensemble methods. J Comput Civ Eng 30(6): 04016036 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Milukow H A, Binns A D, Adamowski J, Bonakdari H, Gharabaghi B. Estimation of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor for ungauged streams using gene expression programming and extreme learning machines. J Hydrol 568: 311–321 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Nguyen T A, Ly H B, Pham B T. Backpropagation neural network-based machine learning model for prediction of soil friction angle. Math Probl Eng 2020: 8845768 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Kwak N S, Ko T Y. Machine learning-based regression analysis for estimating Cerchar abrasivity index. Geomech Eng 29(3): 219–228 (2022)
Google Scholar
[50]
Morad D, Hatzor Y H, Sagy A. Rate effects on shear deformation of rough limestone discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(6): 1613–1622 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Wang L, Zhang D, Wang D, Feng C. A review of selected solutions on the evaluation of coal-rock cutting performances of shearer picks under complex geological conditions. Appl Sci 12(23): 12371 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Ren C X, Dorostkar O, Rouet-Leduc B, Hulbert C, Strebel D, Guyer R A, Johnson P A, Carmeliet J. Machine learning reveals the state of intermittent frictional dynamics in a sheared granular fault. Geophys Res Lett 46(13): 7395–7403 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Ma G, Mei J Z, Gao K, Zhao J D, Zhou W, Wang D. Machine learning bridges microslips and slip avalanches of sheared granular gouges. Earth Planet Sci Lett 579: 117366 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Liu Z B, Shao J F, Xu W Y, Chen H J, Zhang Y. An extreme learning machine approach for slope stability evaluation and prediction. Nat Hazards 73(2): 787–804 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]
Lin Y, Zhou K P, Li J L. Prediction of slope stability using four supervised learning methods. IEEE Access 6: 31169–31179 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]
Wang K, Johnson C W, Bennett K C, Johnson P A. Predicting fault slip via transfer learning. Nat Commun 12: 7319 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Cammarata A, Polcar T. Control of energy dissipation in sliding low-dimensional materials. Phys Rev B 102(8): 085409 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]
Peng Y P, Cai J H, Wu T H, Cao G Z, Kwok N, Zhou S X, Peng Z X. A hybrid convolutional neural network for intelligent wear particle classification. Tribol Int 138: 166–173 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]
Qiao Q, He H, Yu J, Zhang Y, Qi H. Applicability of machine learning on predicting the mechanochemical wear of the borosilicate and phosphate glass. Wear 476(SI): 203721 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]
Sahraoui T, Guessasma S, Fenineche N E, Montavon G, Coddet C. Friction and wear behaviour prediction of HVOF coatings and electroplated hard chromium using neural computation. Mater Lett 58(5): 654–660 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]
Thankachan T, Soorya Prakash K, Kavimani V, Silambarasan S R. Machine learning and statistical approach to predict and analyze wear rates in copper surface composites. Met Mater Int 27(2): 220–234 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]
Wang H W, Zhang C H, Yu X W, Li Y Y. Evaluating wear volume of oligoether esters with an interpretable machine learning approach. Tribol Lett 71(2): 43 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[63]
Macioł A, Macioł P, Mrzygłód B. Prediction of forging dies wear with the modified Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy identification method. Mater Manuf Process 35(6): 700–713 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[64]
Marian M, Mursak J, Bartz M, Profito F J, Rosenkranz A, Wartzack S. Predicting EHL film thickness parameters by machine learning approaches. Friction 11(6): 992–1013 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[65]
Zhao Y, Guo L, Wong P P L. Application of physics-informed neural network in the analysis of hydrodynamic lubrication. Friction 11(7): 1253–1264 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[66]
Jadhao V, Robbins M O. Rheological properties of liquids under conditions of elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Tribol Lett 67(3): 66 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[67]
Cheng F, Zhai S C, Dong J Y. Investigation of Gaussian mixture clustering model for online diagnosis of tip-wear in nanomachining. J Manuf Process 77: 114–124 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[68]
Tran A, Furlan J M, Pagalthivarthi K V, Visintainer R J, Wildey T, Wang Y. WearGP: A computationally efficient machine learning framework for local erosive wear predictions via nodal Gaussian processes. Wear 422–423: 9–26 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[69]
Sose A T, Joshi S Y, Kunche L K, Wang F X, Deshmukh S A. A review of recent advances and applications of machine learning in tribology. Phys Chem Chem Phys 25(6): 4408–4443 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[70]
Zhao X P, Qin R Q, Zhang J, Liu Z G, Wang D, Huang H Y, Gao L, Su Y J, Qiao L J. Machine learning method to predict the interlayer sliding energy barrier of polarized MoS2 layers. Comput Mater Sci 220: 112062 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[71]
Hossain N, Chowdhury M A, Al Masum A, Islam M S, Shahin M, Irfan O M, Djavanroodi F. Effects of self-lubricant coating and motion on reduction of friction and wear of mild steel and data analysis from machine learning approach. Materials 14(19): 5732 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[72]
Sieberg P M, Kurtulan D, Hanke S. Wear mechanism classification using artificial intelligence. Materials 15(7): 2358 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[73]
Broitman E. The nature of the frictional force at the macro-, micro-, and nano-scales. Friction 2(1): 40–46 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[74]
Duan L L, Li J, Duan H T. Nanomaterials for lubricating oil application: A review. Friction 11(5): 647–684 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[75]
Zheng Z J, Guo Z G, Liu W M, Luo J B. Low friction of superslippery and superlubricity: A review. Friction 11(7): 1121–1137 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[76]
Zheng Z W, Liu X L, Huang G W, Chen H J, Yu H X, Feng D P, Qiao D. Macroscale superlubricity achieved via hydroxylated hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets with ionic liquid at steel/steel interface. Friction 10(9): 1365–1381 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[77]
Saber D, Taha I B M, El-Aziz Kh A. Wear behavior prediction for Cu/TiO2 nanocomposite based on optimal regression methods. Mater Res-Ibero-Am J 26: e20220263 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[78]
Sadoun A M, Najjar I M R, Fathy A, Abd Elaziz M, Al-qaness M A A, Abdallah A W, Elmahdy M. An enhanced Dendritic Neural Algorithm to predict the wear behavior of alumina coated silver reinforced copper nanocomposites. Alex Eng J 65: 809–823 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[79]
Kumar S, Singh K S K, Singh K K. Data-driven modeling for predicting tribo-performance of graphene-incorporated glass-fabric reinforced epoxy composites using machine learning algorithms. Polym Compos 43(9): 6599–6610 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[80]
Turkoglu T, Çelik S. Process optimization for enhanced tribological properties of Al/MWCNT composites produced by powder metallurgy using artificial neural networks. Surf Topogr-Metrol 9(4): 045032 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[81]
Sattari Baboukani B, Ye Z J, G Reyes K, Nalam P C. Prediction of nanoscale friction for two-dimensional materials using a machine learning approach. Tribol Lett 68(2): 57 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[82]
Perčić M, Zelenika S, Mezić I. Artificial intelligence-based predictive model of nanoscale friction using experimental data. Friction 9(6): 1726–1748 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[83]
Cellini F, Lavini F, Berger C, de Heer W, Riedo E. Layer dependence of graphene-diamene phase transition in epitaxial and exfoliated few-layer graphene using machine learning. 2D Mater 6(3): 035043 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[84]
Najjar I R, Sadoun A M, Fathy A, Abdallah A W, Elaziz M A, Elmahdy M. Prediction of tribological properties of alumina-coated, silver-reinforced copper nanocomposites using long short-term model combined with golden jackal optimization. Lubricants 10(11): 277 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[85]
Hasan M S, Wong T, Rohatgi P K, Nosonovsky M. Analysis of the friction and wear of graphene reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites using machine learning models. Tribol Int 170: 107527 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[86]
Jaza R, Mollon G, Descartes S, Paquet A, Berthier Y. Lessons learned using machine learning to link third body particles morphology to interface rheology. Tribol Int 153: 106630 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[87]
Albayrak M G, Evin E, Yiğit O, Toğaçar M, Ergen B. Experimental and artificial intelligence approaches to measuring the wear behavior of DIN St28 steel boronized by the box boronizing method using a mechanically alloyed powder source. Eng Appl Artif Intell 120: 105910 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[88]
Ulas M, Altay O, Gurgenc T, Özel C. A new approach for prediction of the wear loss of PTA surface coatings using artificial neural network and basic, kernel-based, and weighted extreme learning machine. Friction 8(6): 1102–1116 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[89]
Cavaleri L, Asteris P G, Psyllaki P P, Douvika M G, Skentou A D, Vaxevanidis N M. Prediction of surface treatment effects on the tribological performance of tool steels using artificial neural networks. Appl Sci 9(14): 2788 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[90]
Partovi A, Wang H M, Sadeghi B, Wu P D. A machine learning approach for determination of coefficient of friction from ring compression test. Tribol Int 180: 108198 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[91]
Kolodziejczyk T, Toscano R, Fouvry S, Morales-Espejel G. Artificial intelligence as efficient technique for ball bearing fretting wear damage prediction. Wear 268(1–2): 309–315 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[92]
Hasan M S, Kordijazi A, Rohatgi P K, Nosonovsky M. Machine learning models of the transition from solid to liquid lubricated friction and wear in aluminum-graphite composites. Tribol Int 165: 107326 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[93]
Hasan M S, Kordijazi A, Rohatgi P K, Nosonovsky M. Triboinformatic modeling of dry friction and wear of aluminum base alloys using machine learning algorithms. Tribol Int 161: 107065 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[94]
Mohammed A S, Dodla S, Katiyar J K, Samad M A. Prediction of friction coefficient of Su-8 and its composite coatings using machine learning techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 237(4): 943–953 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[95]
Boidi G, da Silva M R, Profito F J, Machado I F. Using machine learning radial basis function (RBF) method for predicting lubricated friction on textured and porous surfaces. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 8(4): 044002 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[96]
Zambrano V, Brase M, Hernández-Gascón B, Wangenheim M, Gracia L A, Viejo I, Izquierdo S, Valdés J R. A digital twin for friction prediction in dynamic rubber applications with surface textures. Lubricants 9(5): 57 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[97]
Zhu B, Zhang W X, Zhang W S, Li H X. Generative design of texture for sliding surface based on machine learning. Tribol Int 179: 108139 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[98]
Costa H L, Schille J, Rosenkranz A. Tailored surface textures to increase friction—A review. Friction 10(9): 1285–1304 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[99]
Li M, Shi W B, Shi J, Wang T, Shi L P, Wang X L. Regulation and control of wet friction of soft materials using surface texturing: A review. Friction 11(3): 333–353 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[100]
Kumar M, Shankar Mukherjee P, Mohan Misra N. Advancement and current status of wear debris analysis for machine condition monitoring: A review. Ind Lubr Tribol 65(1): 3–11 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[101]
Ramachandran R. Machine learning model to map tribocorrosion regimes in feature space. Coatings 11(4): 450 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[102]
Wang S, Wu T H, Wang K P, Sarkodie-Gyan T. Ferrograph analysis with improved particle segmentation and classification methods. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 20(2): 021001 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[103]
Peng Z X. An integrated intelligence system for wear debris analysis. Wear 252(9–10): 730–743 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[104]
Peng Y P, Cai J H, Wu T H, Cao G Z, Kwok N, Peng Z X. WP-DRnet: A novel wear particle detection and recognition network for automatic ferrograph image analysis. Tribol Int 151: 106379 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[105]
Wu H K, Kwok N M, Liu S L, Li R W, Wu T H, Peng Z X. Restoration of defocused ferrograph images using a large kernel convolutional neural network. Wear 426–427: 1740–1747 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[106]
Bouchot A, Ferrieux-Paquet A, Mollon G, Descartes S, Debayle J. Segmentation and morphological analysis of wear track/particles images using machine learning. J Electron Imaging 31(5): 051605 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[107]
Bouchot A, Ferrieux A, Debayle J, Mollon G, Descartes S. Image processing applied to tribological dry contact analysis. Wear 476: 203748 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[108]
Agrawal R, Mukhopadhyay A. The use of machine learning and metaheuristic algorithm for wear performance optimization of AISI 1040 steel and investigation of corrosion resistance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 237(4): 701–717 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[109]
Cheng G L, Xiang C, Guo F, Wen X H, Jia X H. Prediction of the tribological properties of a polymer surface in a wide temperature range using machine learning algorithm based on friction noise. Tribol Int 180: 108213 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[110]
Strablegg C, Summer F, Renhart P, Grün F. Prediction of friction power via machine learning of acoustic emissions from a ring-on-disc rotary tribometer. Lubricants 11(2): 37 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[111]
Lisha Pattanaik M, Kumar S, Choudhary R, Agarwal M, Kumar B. Predicting the abrasion loss of open-graded friction course mixes with EAF steel slag aggregates using machine learning algorithms. Constr Build Mater 321: 126408 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[112]
McDonnell M D T, Arnaldo D, Pelletier E, Grant-Jacob J A, Praeger M, Karnakis D, Eason R W, Mills B. Machine learning for multi-dimensional optimisation and predictive visualisation of laser machining. J Intell Manuf 32(5): 1471–1483 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[113]
Zhang Y, Zhou W, Ma G, Cheng R, Chang X. The structure–property relationship of granular materials with different friction coefficients: Insight from machine learning. Extreme Mech Lett 54: 101759 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[114]
Jagadeesh G V, Setti S G. Tribological characterization of ball burnished magnesium alloy by wear-burnishing maps, wear maps and artificial intelligence technique. Arab J Sci Eng 48(3): 3111–3131 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[115]
Rajesh Kanna S K, Sundar G N, Ganesan R, Mallireddy N, Shingadia H, Anandaram H, De Poures M V, Paramasivam P. Artificial intelligence investigation on (Al–Si–Fe) alloy reinforced with nanoceramic particles by RSM. J Nanomater 2022: 2892738 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[116]
Babič M, Prsić D, Jurković Z, Lajos B, Ipšič-Martinčić S, Lhotská L, Ocampo L. A novel method for statistical pattern recognition using the network theory and a new hybrid system of machine learning. Mater Tehnol 53(1): 95–100 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[117]
Lifar M S, Guda S A, Kudryakov O V, Guda A A, Pashkov D M, Rusalev Y V, Migal Y F, Soldatov A V, Kolesnikov V I. Relationships between synthesis conditions and TiN coating properties discovered from the data driven approach. Thin Solid Films 768: 139725 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[118]
Baydoun S, Fartas M, Fouvry S. Comparison between physical and machine learning modeling to predict fretting wear volume. Tribol Int 177: 107936 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[119]
Altay O, Gurgenc T, Ulas M, Özel C. Prediction of wear loss quantities of ferro-alloy coating using different machine learning algorithms. Friction 8(1): 107–114 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[120]
Sahraoui T, Guessasma S, Fenineche N E. Friction moment prediction of HVOF coatings and Electroplated Hard Chromium. Mater Lett 62(3): 473–477 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[121]
Wang G Q, Ruan Y L, Wang H X, Zhao G, Cao X X, Li X M, Ding Q J. Tribological performance study and prediction of copper coated by MoS2 based on GBRT method. Tribol Int 179: 108149 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[122]
Chowdhury M A, Hossain N, Al Masum A, Islam M S, Shahin M, Hossain M I, Shuvho M B A, Ali M R, Ahmed A K M F, Nandee M R. Surface coatings analysis and their effects on reduction of tribological properties of coated aluminum under motion with ML approach. Mater Res Express 8(8): 086508 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[123]
Nugraha R D, He K, Liu A, Zhang Z N. Short-term cross-sectional time-series wear prediction by deep learning approaches. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 23(2): 021007 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[124]
Pang J S, Chen Y M, He S Z, Qiu H H, Wu C L, Mao L B. Classification of friction and wear state of wind turbine gearboxes using decision tree and random forest algorithms. J Tribol 143(9): 091702 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[125]
Fan S L, Zhang T H, Guo X X, Wulamu A. FFWR-Net: A feature fusion wear particle recognition network for wear particle classification. J Mech Sci Technol 35(4): 1699–1710 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[126]
Li W, Zhang L C, Chen X P, Wu C H, Cui Z X, Niu C. Predicting the evolution of sheet metal surface scratching by the technique of artificial intelligence. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112(3): 853–865 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[127]
Plascencia G, Díaz–Damacillo L, Robles-Agudo M. On the estimation of the friction factor: A review of recent approaches. SN Appl Sci 2(2): 163 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[128]
Shevchik S A, Saeidi F, Meylan B, Wasmer K. Prediction of failure in lubricated surfaces using acoustic time–frequency features and random forest algorithm. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 13(4): 1541–1553 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[129]
Zhang G P, Liu X J, Lu W L. A parameter prediction model of running-in based on surface topography. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 227(9): 1047–1055 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[130]
Ge G Y, Liu F F, Zhang G P. Optimization of running-in surface morphology parameters based on the AutoML model. PLoS One 16(10): e0257850 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[131]
Hasan M S, Kordijazi A, Rohatgi P K, Nosonovsky M. Triboinformatics approach for friction and wear prediction of Al–graphite composites using machine learning methods. J Tribol 144(1): 011701 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[132]
Selvaraj S K, Raj A, Dharnidharka M, Chadha U, Sachdeva I, Kapruan C, Paramasivam V. A cutting-edge survey of tribological behavior evaluation using artificial and computational intelligence models. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2021: 9529199 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[133]
Aydin F, Durgut R, Mustu M, Demir B. Prediction of wear performance of ZK60/CeO2 composites using machine learning models. Tribol Int 177: 107945 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[134]
Pashkov D M, Belyak O A, Guda A A, Kolesnikov V I. Reverse engineering of mechanical and tribological properties of coatings: Results of machine learning algorithms. Phys Mesomech 25(4): 296–305 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[135]
Jaini S N B, Lee D, Lee S, Kim M, Kwon Y. Tool monitoring of end milling based on gap sensor and machine learning. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12(12): 10615–10627 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[136]
Wang G F, Yang Y W, Li Z M. Force sensor based tool condition monitoring using a heterogeneous ensemble learning model. Sensors 14(11): 21588–21602 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[137]
Olalere I O, Olanrewaju O A. Tool and workpiece condition classification using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) with Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT) of vibration signals and machine learning models. Appl Sci 13(4): 2248 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[138]
Rajasekaran T, Palanikumar K, Latha B. Investigation and analysis of surface roughness in machining carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites using artificial intelligence techniques. Carbon Lett 32(2): 615–627 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[139]
de Farias A, de Almeida S L R, Delijaicov S, Seriacopi V, Bordinassi E C. Simple machine learning allied with data-driven methods for monitoring tool wear in machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(9): 2491–2501 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[140]
Wang P, Liu Z Y, Gao R X, Guo Y B. Heterogeneous data-driven hybrid machine learning for tool condition prognosis. CIRP Ann 68(1): 455–458 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[141]
Bustillo A, Pimenov D Y, Mia M, Kapłonek W. Machine-learning for automatic prediction of flatness deviation considering the wear of the face mill teeth. J Intell Manuf 32(3): 895–912 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[142]
Murashima M, Yamada T, Umehara N, Tokoroyama T, Lee W Y. Novel friction stabilization technology for surface damage conditions using machine learning. Tribol Int 180: 108280 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[143]
Sun Y, Xu S T, Xu Z Q, Tian J M, Bai M M, Qi Z Y, Niu Y, Aung H H, Xiong X L, Han J F, et al. Mesoscopic sliding ferroelectricity enabled photovoltaic random access memory for material-level artificial vision system. Nat Commun 13: 5391 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[144]
Zhou R, Ma R, Bao L Y, Cai M R, Zhou F, Li W M, Wang X B. “Lubrication Brain”―A machine learning framework of lubrication oil molecule design. Tribol Int 183: 108381 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[145]
Lantada A D, Franco-Martínez F, Hengsbach S, Rupp F, Thelen R, Bade K. Artificial intelligence aided design of microtextured surfaces: Application to controlling wettability. Nanomaterials 10(11): 2287 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[146]
Yang S S, Wang S L, Yi L L, Xue H, Cao Y, Sun S L. A novel monitoring method for turning tool wear based on support vector machines. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 230(8): 1359–1371 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[147]
Siddhpura A, Paurobally R. A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1): 371–393 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[148]
Tabaszewski M, Twardowski P, Wiciak-Pikuła M, Znojkiewicz N, Felusiak-Czyryca A, Czyżycki J. Machine learning approaches for monitoring of tool wear during grey cast-iron turning. Materials 15(12): 4359 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[149]
Ragai I, Abdalla A S, Abdeltawab H, Qian F, Ma J. Toward smart manufacturing: Analysis and classification of cutting parameters and energy consumption patterns in turning processes. J Manuf Syst 64: 626–635 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[150]
Segreto T, D’Addona D, Teti R. Tool wear estimation in turning of Inconel 718 based on wavelet sensor signal analysis and machine learning paradigms. Prod Eng 14(5): 693–705 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[151]
Lei Z, Zhu Q S, Zhou Y Q, Sun B T, Sun W F, Pan X M. A GAPSO-enhanced extreme learning machine method for tool wear estimation in milling processes based on vibration signals. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 8(3): 745–759 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[152]
Ostasevicius V, Karpavicius P, Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene A, Jurenas V, Mystkowski A, Cesnavicius R, Kizauskiene L. A machine learning approach for wear monitoring of end mill by self-powering wireless sensor nodes. Sensors 21(9): 3137 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[153]
Aghazadeh F, Tahan A, Thomas M. Tool condition monitoring using spectral subtraction and convolutional neural networks in milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(9): 3217–3227 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[154]
Hesser D F, Markert B. Tool wear monitoring of a retrofitted CNC milling machine using artificial neural networks. Manuf Lett 19: 1–4 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[155]
Dhobale N, Mulik S, Jegadeeshwaran R, Patange A. Supervision of milling tool inserts using conventional and artificial intelligence approach: A Review. Sound & Vibration 55(2): 87–116 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[156]
Kothuru A, Nooka S P, Liu R. Application of audible sound signals for tool wear monitoring using machine learning techniques in end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9): 3797–3808 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[157]
Pimenov D Y, Bustillo A, Mikolajczyk T. Artificial intelligence for automatic prediction of required surface roughness by monitoring wear on face mill teeth. J Intell Manuf 29(5): 1045–1061 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[158]
Li K M, Lin Y Y. Tool wear classification in milling for varied cutting conditions: With emphasis on data pre-processing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125(1): 341–355 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[159]
Huang Z W, Shao J J, Guo W C, Li W D, Zhu J M, Fang D J. Hybrid machine learning-enabled multi-information fusion for indirect measurement of tool flank wear in milling. Measurement 206: 112255 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[160]
Savkovic B, Kovac P, Rodic D, Strbac B, Klancnik S. Comparison of artificial neural network, fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm for cutting temperature and surface roughness prediction during the face milling process. Adv Produc Engineer Manag 15(2): 137–150 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[161]
Hegab H, Hassan M, Rawat S, Sadek A, Attia H. A smart tool wear prediction model in drilling of woven composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110(11): 2881–2892 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[162]
Duo A, Basagoiti R, Arrazola P J, Aperribay J, Cuesta M. The capacity of statistical features extracted from multiple signals to predict tool wear in the drilling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(5): 2133–2146 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[163]
Jegorowa A, Kurek J, Antoniuk I, Krupa A, Wieczorek G, Świderski B, Bukowski M, Kruk M. Automatic estimation of drill wear based on images of holes drilled in melamine faced chipboard with machine learning algorithms. Forests 14(2): 205 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[164]
Pandiyan V, Shevchik S, Wasmer K, Castagne S, Tjahjowidodo T. Modelling and monitoring of abrasive finishing processes using artificial intelligence techniques: A review. J Manuf Process 57: 114–135 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[165]
Lee C H, Jwo J S, Hsieh H Y, Lin C S. An intelligent system for grinding wheel condition monitoring based on machining sound and deep learning. IEEE Access 8: 58279–58289 (2800)
Crossref Google Scholar
[166]
Azizi A, Rooki R, Mollayi N. Modeling and prediction of wear rate of grinding media in mineral processing industry using multiple kernel support vector machine. SN Appl Sci 2(9): 1469 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[167]
Verma S, Misra J P, Popli D. Modeling of friction stir welding of aviation grade aluminium alloy using machine learning approaches. Int J Model Simul 42(1): 1–8 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[168]
Mishra A, Tiwari A, Dubey N K. Machine learning approach to determine corrosion potential of friction stir welded joints. J Image Processing Pattern Recognit Prog 7(1): 5–17 (2020)
Google Scholar
[169]
Vendan S A, Kamal R, Karan A, Gao L, Niu X D, Garg A. Supervised machine learning in friction stir welding (FSW). Welding and Cutting Case Studies with Supervised Machine Learning. Singapore: Springer, 2020: 119–185.
Crossref
[170]
Banda T, Farid A A, Li C, Jauw V L, Lim C S. Application of machine vision for tool condition monitoring and tool performance optimization–A review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 121(11): 7057–7086 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[171]
Zhu Q S, Sun W F, Zhou Y Q, Gao C. A tool wear condition monitoring approach for end milling based on numerical simulation. Eksploatacja I Niezawodność 23(2): 371–380 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[172]
Agostini C E, Sampaio M A. Probabilistic neural network with Bayesian-based, spectral torque imaging and deep convolutional autoencoder for PDC bit wear monitoring. J Petrol Sci Eng 193: 107434 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[173]
Chen B X, Chen Y C, Loh C H, Chou Y C, Wang F C, Su C T. Application of generative adversarial network and diverse feature extraction methods to enhance classification accuracy of tool-wear status. Electronics 11(15): 2364 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[174]
Zhang Y, Zhu K P. Tool wear estimation with a data-driven physics coupling approach. Manuf Lett 34: 38–42 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[175]
Bergs T, Holst C, Gupta P, Augspurger T. Digital image processing with deep learning for automated cutting tool wear detection. Procedia Manuf 48: 947–958 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[176]
Peng C, Wang L, Liao T W. A new method for the prediction of chatter stability lobes based on dynamic cutting force simulation model and support vector machine. J Sound Vib 354: 118–131 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[177]
Zhang J L, Starly B, Cai Y, Cohen P H, Lee Y S. Particle learning in online tool wear diagnosis and prognosis. J Manuf Process 28: 457–463 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[178]
Pimenov D Y, Kumar Gupta M, da Silva L R R, Kiran M, Khanna N, Krolczyk G M. Application of measurement systems in tool condition monitoring of Milling: A review of measurement science approach. Measurement 199: 111503 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[179]
Gao Z, Hu Q G, Xu X Y. Condition monitoring and life prediction of the turning tool based on extreme learning machine and transfer learning. Neural Comput Appl 34(5): 3399–3410 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[180]
Li C, Zhao X, Cao H, Li L, Chen X. A data and knowledge-driven cutting parameter adaptive optimization method considering dynamic tool wear. Robot CIM-Int Manuf 81: 102491 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[181]
Rao C S, Srikant R R. Tool wear monitoring—An intelligent approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 218(8): 905–912 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[182]
Zegarra F C, Vargas-Machuca J, Coronado A M. Tool wear and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction based on reduced feature set and Bayesian hyperparameter optimization. Prod Eng 16(4): 465–480 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[183]
Ou J Y, Li H K, Huang G J, Yang G W. Intelligent analysis of tool wear state using stacked denoising autoencoder with online sequential-extreme learning machine. Measurement 167: 108153 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[184]
Colantonio L, Equeter L, Dehombreux P, Ducobu F. A systematic literature review of cutting tool wear monitoring in turning by using artificial intelligence techniques. Machines 9(12): 351 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[185]
Pimenov D Y, Bustillo A, Wojciechowski S, Sharma V S, Gupta M K, Kuntoğlu M. Artificial intelligence systems for tool condition monitoring in machining: Analysis and critical review. J Intell Manuf 34(5): 2079–2121 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[186]
Cheng M H, Jiao L, Yan P, Li S Y, Dai Z C, Qiu T Y, Wang X B. Prediction and evaluation of surface roughness with hybrid kernel extreme learning machine and monitored tool wear. J Manuf Process 84: 1541–1556 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[187]
Li Z X, Liu R, Wu D Z. Data-driven smart manufacturing: Tool wear monitoring with audio signals and machine learning. J Manuf Process 48: 66–76 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[188]
Li B. A review of tool wear estimation using theoretical analysis and numerical simulation technologies. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 35: 143–151 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[189]
Jin Y Q, Wang X Y, Fox E A, Xie Z W, Neogi A, Mishra R S, Wang T H. Numerically trained ultrasound AI for monitoring tool degradation. Adv Intell Syst 4(5): 2100215 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[190]
Karri V, Kiatcharoenpol T. A monitoring system of drill wear states using a hybrid neural network. Mater Sci Forum 471–472: 697–701 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[191]
Serin G, Sener B, Ozbayoglu A M, Unver H O. Review of tool condition monitoring in machining and opportunities for deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(3): 953–974 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[192]
Gupta A K, Guntuku S C, Desu R K, Balu A. Optimisation of turning parameters by integrating genetic algorithm with support vector regression and artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(1): 331–339 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[193]
Pu X B, Jia L X, Shang K D, Chen L, Yang T T, Chen L W, Gao L B, Qian L M. A new strategy for disc cutter wear status perception using vibration detection and machine learning. Sensors 22(17): 6686 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[194]
Ross N S, Sheeba P T, Shibi C S, Gupta M K, Korkmaz M E, Sharma V S. A novel approach of tool condition monitoring in sustainable machining of Ni alloy with transfer learning models. J Intell Manuf 35(2): 757–775 (2024)
Crossref Google Scholar
[195]
Balazinski M, Czogala E, Jemielniak K, Leski J. Tool condition monitoring using artificial intelligence methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 15(1): 73–80 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[196]
Zhang X Y, Liu L L, Wan X, Feng B W. Tool wear online monitoring method based on DT and SSAE-PHMM. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 21(3): 034501 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[197]
Tran M Q, Doan H P, Vu V Q, Vu L T. Machine learning and IoT-based approach for tool condition monitoring: A review and future prospects. Measurement 207: 112351 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[198]
Taha H A, Yacout S, Shaban Y. Autonomous self-healing mechanism for a CNC milling machine based on pattern recognition. J Intell Manuf 34(5): 2185–2205 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[199]
Zhang X D, Han C, Luo M, Zhang D H. Tool wear monitoring for complex part milling based on deep learning. Appl Sci 10(19): 6916 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[200]
Kong D D, Chen Y J, Li N. Gaussian process regression for tool wear prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 104: 556–574 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[201]
He Z, Shi T, Xuan J, Li T. Research on tool wear prediction based on temperature signals and deep learning. Wear 478–479: 203902 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[202]
Wang J J, Wang P, Gao R X. Enhanced particle filter for tool wear prediction. J Manuf Syst 36: 35–45 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[203]
Caggiano A. Tool wear prediction in Ti–6Al–4V machining through multiple sensor monitoring and PCA features pattern recognition. Sensors 18(3): 823 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[204]
Kong D D, Chen Y J, Li N, Duan C Q, Lu L X, Chen D X. Relevance vector machine for tool wear prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 127: 573–594 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[205]
Jin F, Bao Y, Li B H, Jin X L. Tool wear prediction in edge trimming of carbon fiber reinforced polymer using machine learning with instantaneous parameters. J Manuf Process 82: 277–295 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[206]
Murua M, Suárez A, de Lacalle L N L, Santana R, Wretland A. Feature extraction-based prediction of tool wear of Inconel 718 in face turning. Insight 60(8): 443–450 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[207]
Yuan W, Chin K S, Hua M, Dong G N, Wang C H. Shape classification of wear particles by image boundary analysis using machine learning algorithms. Mech Syst Signal Process 72: 346–358 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[208]
Kubik C, Becker M, Molitor D A, Groche P. Towards a systematical approach for wear detection in sheet metal forming using machine learning. Prod Eng 17(1): 21–36 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[209]
Pandiyan V, Prost J, Vorlaufer G, Varga M, Wasmer K. Identification of abnormal tribological regimes using a microphone and semi-supervised machine-learning algorithm. Friction 10(4): 583–596 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[210]
Ravikumar S, Ramachandran K I, Sugumaran V. Machine learning approach for automated visual inspection of machine components. Expert Syst Appl 38(4): 3260–3266 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[211]
Twardowski P, Tabaszewski M, Wiciak-Pikuła M, Felusiak-Czyryca A. Identification of tool wear using acoustic emission signal and machine learning methods. Precis Eng 72: 738–744 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[212]
García-Ordás M T, Alegre E, González-Castro V, Alaiz-Rodríguez R. A computer vision approach to analyze and classify tool wear level in milling processes using shape descriptors and machine learning techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(5): 1947–1961 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[213]
Schueller A, Saldaña C. Generalizability analysis of tool condition monitoring ensemble machine learning models. J Manuf Process 84: 1064–1075 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[214]
Shen Y, Yang F, Habibullah M S, Ahmed J, Das A K, Zhou Y, Ho C L. Predicting tool wear size across multi-cutting conditions using advanced machine learning techniques. J Intell Manuf 32(6): 1753–1766 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[215]
Wang D S, Hong R J, Lin X C. A method for predicting hobbing tool wear based on CNC real-time monitoring data and deep learning. Precis Eng 72: 847–857 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[216]
Wang D D, Liu Q Y, Wu D Z, Wang L Q. Meta domain generalization for smart manufacturing: Tool wear prediction with small data. J Manuf Syst 62: 441–449 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[217]
Bahador A, Du C L, Ng H P, Dzulqarnain N A, Ho C L. Cost-effective classification of tool wear with transfer learning based on tool vibration for hard turning processes. Measurement 201: 111701 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[218]
Esch P, Werner-Jäger F. Application of an artificial neural network for determination wear on cutting tools AI-applicable data preparation for training a neural network. At-Autom 70(7): 635–645 (2022)
Google Scholar
[219]
Bustillo A, Reis R, Machado A R, Pimenov D Y. Improving the accuracy of machine-learning models with data from machine test repetitions. J Intell Manuf 33(1): 203–221 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[220]
Chan Y W, Kang T C, Yang C T, Chang C H, Huang S M, Tsai Y T. Tool wear prediction using convolutional bidirectional LSTM networks. J Supercomput 78(1): 810–832 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[221]
Hung C W, Lee C H, Kuo C C, Zeng S X. SoC-based early failure detection system using deep learning for tool wear. IEEE Access 10: 70491–70501 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[222]
Sun I C, Cheng R C, Chen K S. Evaluation of transducer signature selections on machine learning performance in cutting tool wear prognosis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119(9): 6451–6468 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[223]
Mohanraj T, Yerchuru J, Krishnan H, Nithin Aravind RS, Yameni R. Development of tool condition monitoring system in end milling process using wavelet features and Hoelder’s exponent with machine learning algorithms. Measurement 173: 108671 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[224]
Yang Y, Zhao X F, Zhao L. Research on asymmetrical edge tool wear prediction in milling TC4 titanium alloy using deep learning. Measurement 203: 111814 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[225]
He J L, Yin C, He Y, Pan Y, Wang Y L. Deep multi-task network based on sparse feature learning for tool wear prediction. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci: 095440622211162 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[226]
Alajmi M S, Almeshal A M. Predicting the tool wear of a drilling process using novel machine learning XGBoost-SDA. Materials 13(21): 4952 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[227]
Sandeep R, Natarajan A. Prediction of peak temperature value in friction lap welding of aluminium alloy 7475 and PPS polymer hybrid joint using machine learning approaches. Mater Lett 308: 131253 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[228]
Lei Z, Zhou Y Q, Sun B T, Sun W F. An intrinsic timescale decomposition-based kernel extreme learning machine method to detect tool wear conditions in the milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(3): 1203–1212 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[229]
Rafezi H, Hassani F. Drill bit wear monitoring and failure prediction for mining automation. Int J Min Sci Technol 33(3): 289–296 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[230]
Ganeshkumar S, Deepika T, Haldorai A. A supervised machine learning model for tool condition monitoring in smart manufacturing. Def Sc J 72(5): 712–720 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[231]
Brito L C, da Silva M B, Duarte M A V. Identification of cutting tool wear condition in turning using self-organizing map trained with imbalanced data. J Intell Manuf 32(1): 127–140 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[232]
Yang W A, Zhou Q, Tsui K L. Differential evolution-based feature selection and parameter optimisation for extreme learning machine in tool wear estimation. Int J Prod Res 54(15): 4703–4721 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[233]
Erdik T, Şen Z. Prediction of tool wear using regression and ANN models in end-milling operation a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(7): 765–766 (2009)
Crossref Google Scholar
[234]
Alajmi M S, Almeshal A M. Estimation and optimization of tool wear in conventional turning of 709M40 alloy steel using support vector machine (SVM) with Bayesian optimization. Materials 14(14): 3773 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[235]
Shaban Y, Yacout S, Balazinski M, Jemielniak K. Cutting tool wear detection using multiclass logical analysis of data. Mach Sci Technol 21(4): 526–541 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[236]
Wang G, Zhang F. A sequence-to-sequence model with attention and monotonicity loss for tool wear monitoring and prediction. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70: 3525611 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[237]
Kuo P H, Lin C Y, Luan P C, Yau H T. Dense-block structured convolutional neural network-based analytical prediction system of cutting tool wear. IEEE Sens J 22(21): 20257–20267 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[238]
Javed K, Gouriveau R, Li X, Zerhouni N. Tool wear monitoring and prognostics challenges: A comparison of connectionist methods toward an adaptive ensemble model. J Intell Manuf 29(8): 1873–1890 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[239]
Gao C, Sun B T, Wu H, Peng M J, Zhou Y Q. New tool wear estimation method of the milling process based on multisensor blind source separation. Math Probl Eng 2021: 9985870 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[240]
Uhlmann E, Holznagel T, Schehl P, Bode Y. Machine learning of surface layer property prediction for milling operations. J Manuf Mater Process 5(4): 104 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[241]
Pedrammehr S, Hejazian M, Chalak Qazani M R, Parvaz H, Pakzad S, Ettefagh M M, Suhail A H. Machine learning-based modelling and meta-heuristic-based optimization of specific tool wear and surface roughness in the milling process. Axioms 11(9): 430 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[242]
Mohanta N, Singh R K, Katiyar J K, Sharma A K. A novel fluid–structure interaction (FSI) modeling approach to predict the temperature distribution in single-point cutting tool for condition monitoring during turning process. Arab J Sci Eng 47(7): 7995–8007 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[243]
Cica D, Sredanovic B, Lakic-Globocki G, Kramar D. Modeling of the cutting forces in turning process using various methods of cooling and lubricating: An artificial intelligence approach. Adv Mech Eng 5: 798597 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[244]
Bustillo A, Pimenov D Y, Matuszewski M, Mikolajczyk T. Using artificial intelligence models for the prediction of surface wear based on surface isotropy levels. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 53: 215–227 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[245]
Zhang Y W, Li B Z, Yang J G, Liu X, Zhou J Q. Silicon carbide surface quality prediction based on artificial intelligence methods on multi-sensor fusion detection test platform. Mach Sci Technol 23(1): 131–152 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[246]
Elsheikh A H. Applications of machine learning in friction stir welding: Prediction of joint properties, real-time control and tool failure diagnosis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 121: 105961 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[247]
Rabe P, Schiebahn A, Reisgen U. Deep learning approaches for force feedback based void defect detection in friction stir welding. J Adv Join Process 5: 100087 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[248]
Mishra D, Gupta A, Raj P, Kumar A, Anwer S, Pal S K, Chakravarty D, Pal S, Chakravarty T, Pal A, et al. Real time monitoring and control of friction stir welding process using multiple sensors. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 30: 1–11 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[249]
Zhang Y, Xu X J. Machine learning cutting force, surface roughness, and tool life in high speed turning processes. Manuf Lett 29: 84–89 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[250]
Aggogeri F, Pellegrini N, Tagliani F L. Recent advances on machine learning applications in machining processes. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 11(18): 8764 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[251]
Jurkovic Z, Cukor G, Brezocnik M, Brajkovic T. A comparison of machine learning methods for cutting parameters prediction in high speed turning process. J Intell Manuf 29(8): 1683–1693 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[252]
Xu K, Li Y G, Zhang J C, Chen G X. ForceNet: An offline cutting force prediction model based on neuro-physical learning approach. J Manuf Syst 61: 1–15 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[253]
Alajmi M S, Almeshal A M. Modeling of cutting force in the turning of AISI 4340 using Gaussian process regression algorithm. Appl Sci 11(9): 4055 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[254]
Singh G, Appadurai J P, Perumal V, Kavita K, Ch Anil Kumar T, Prasad D, Azhagu Jaisudhan Pazhani A, Umamaheswari K. Machine learning-based modelling and predictive maintenance of turning operation under cooling/lubrication for manufacturing systems. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2022: 9289320 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[255]
Mandal N K, Singh N K, Tarafdar N H, Hazra A. Correlating tool wear and surface integrity of a CNC turning process using Naïve based classifiers. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 235(5): 772–781 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[256]
Dubey V, Sharma A K, Pimenov D Y. Prediction of surface roughness using machine learning approach in MQL turning of AISI 304 steel by varying nanoparticle size in the cutting fluid. Lubricants 10(5): 81 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[257]
Eren B, Ali Guvenc M, Mistikoglu S. Artificial intelligence applications for friction stir welding: A review. Met Mater Int 27(2): 193–219 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[258]
Lambiase F, Grossi V, Paoletti A. Machine learning applied for process design of hybrid metal–polymer joints. J Manuf Process 58: 92–100 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[259]
Vitanov V I, Voutchkov I I, Bedford G M. Neurofuzzy approach to process parameter selection for friction surfacing applications. Surf Coat Technol 140(3): 256–262 (2001)
Crossref Google Scholar
[260]
Mishra A, Morisetty R. Determination of the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of friction stir welded similar AA6061 joints by using supervised machine learning based algorithms. Manuf Lett 32: 83–86 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[261]
Verma S, Msomi V, Mabuwa S, Merdji A, Misra J P, Batra U, Sharma S. Machine learning application for evaluating the friction stir processing behavior of dissimilar aluminium alloys joint. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl: 146442072110531 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[262]
Bahedh A S, Mishra A, Al-Sabur R, Jassim A K. Machine learning algorithms for prediction of penetration depth and geometrical analysis of weld in friction stir spot welding process. Metall Res Technol 119(3): 305 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[263]
Maalekian M, Cerjak H. Thermal-phase transformation modelling and neural network analysis of friction welding of non-circular eutectoid steel components. Weld World 53(3): R44–R51 (2009)
Crossref Google Scholar
[264]
Guan W, Zhao Y H, Liu Y C, Kang S, Wang D P, Cui L. Force data-driven machine learning for defects in friction stir welding. Scr Mater 217: 114765 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[265]
Matitopanum S, Pitakaso R, Sethanan K, Srichok T, Chokanat P. Prediction of the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of asymmetric friction stir welding using ensemble machine learning methods. Processes 11(2): 391 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[266]
Lambiase F, Grossi V, Scipioni S I, Paoletti A. Prediction of the power supplied in friction-based joining process of metal–polymer hybrids through machine learning. J Manuf Process 68: 750–760 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[267]
Khoshaim A B, Moustafa E B, Bafakeeh O T, Elsheikh A H. An optimized multilayer perceptrons model using grey wolf optimizer to predict mechanical and microstructural properties of friction stir processed aluminum alloy reinforced by nanoparticles. Coatings 11(12): 1476 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[268]
Sefene E M, Tsegaw A A, Mishra A. Process parameter optimization of 6061AA friction stir welded joints using supervised machine learning regression-based algorithms. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 6(1): 127–137 (2022)
Google Scholar
[269]
Gupta S K, Pandey K N, Kumar R. Artificial intelligence-based modelling and multi-objective optimization of friction stir welding of dissimilar AA5083-O and AA6063-T6 aluminium alloys. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 232(4): 333–342 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[270]
Yadav P K, Khurana M K. Experimental investigation and optimization of quality characteristics during friction stir welding of Al- and Zn-based magnesium alloy using artificial intelligence. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 236(2): 345–360 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[271]
Thapliyal S, Mishra A. Machine learning classification-based approach for mechanical properties of friction stir welding of copper. Manuf Lett 29: 52–55 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[272]
Mishra A, Dasgupta A. Supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms for forecasting the fracture location in dissimilar friction-stir-welded joints. Forecasting 4(4): 787–797 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[273]
Du Y, Mukherjee T, Mitra P, DebRoy T. Machine learning based hierarchy of causative variables for tool failure in friction stir welding. Acta Mater 192: 67–77 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[274]
Ciaburro G. Machine fault detection methods based on machine learning algorithms: A review. Math Biosci Eng 19(11): 11453–11490 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[275]
Chuo Y S, Lee J W, Mun C H, Noh I W, Rezvani S, Kim D C, Lee J, Lee S W, Park S S. Artificial intelligence enabled smart machining and machine tools. J Mech Sci Technol 36(1): 1–23 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[276]
Nasir V, Sassani F. A review on deep learning in machining and tool monitoring: Methods, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115(9): 2683–2709 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[277]
Xu X J, Zhao Z Z, Xu X B, Yang J B, Chang L L, Yan X P, Wang G D. Machine learning-based wear fault diagnosis for marine diesel engine by fusing multiple data-driven models. Knowl Based Syst 190: 105324 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[278]
Kim Y, Hong J, Shin J, Kim B. Shield TBM disc cutter replacement and wear rate prediction using machine learning techniques. Geomech Eng 29(3): 249–258 (2022)
Google Scholar
[279]
Mohd Ghazali M H, Rahiman W. Vibration analysis for machine monitoring and diagnosis: A systematic review. Shock Vib 2021: 9469318 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[280]
Ntalampiras S. One-shot learning for acoustic diagnosis of industrial machines. Expert Syst Appl 178: 114984 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[281]
Lalik K, Wątorek F. Predictive maintenance neural control algorithm for defect detection of the power plants rotating machines using augmented reality goggles. Energies 14(22): 7632 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[282]
Schlagenhauf T, Burghardt N. Intelligent vision based wear forecasting on surfaces of machine tool elements. SN Appl Sci 3(12): 858 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[283]
Wang W, Shen G, Zhang Y M, Zhu Z C, Li C Y, Lu H. Dynamic reliability analysis of mechanical system with wear and vibration failure modes. Mech Mach Theory 163: 104385 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[284]
Jia D, Duan H T, Zhan S P, Jin Y L, Cheng B X, Li J. Design and development of lubricating material database and research on performance prediction method of machine learning. Sci Rep 9(1): 20277 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[285]
Bhaumik S, Pathak S D, Dey S, Datta S. Artificial intelligence based design of multiple friction modifiers dispersed castor oil and evaluating its tribological properties. Tribol Int 140: 105813 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[286]
Kałużny J, Świetlicka A, Wojciechowski Ł, Boncel S, Kinal G, Runka T, Nowicki M, Stepanenko O, Gapiński B, Leśniewicz J, et al. Machine learning approach for application-tailored nanolubricants' design. Nanomaterials 12(10): 1765 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[287]
Slavkovic R, Jugovic Z, Dragicevic S, Jovicic A, Slavkovic V. An application of learning machine methods in prediction of wear rate of wear resistant casting parts. Comput Ind Eng 64(3): 850–857 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[288]
Gurgenc T, Altay O, Ulas M, Ozel C. Extreme learning machine and support vector regression wear loss predictions for magnesium alloys coated using various spray coating methods. J Appl Phys 127(18): 185103 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[289]
Kugalur Palanisamy N, Rivière Lorphèvre E, Gobert M, Briffoteaux G, Tuyttens D, Arrazola P J, Ducobu F. Identification of the parameter values of the constitutive and friction models in machining using EGO algorithm: Application to Ti6Al4V. Metals 12(6): 976 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[290]
Manabe K, Yang M, Yoshihara S. Artificial intelligence identification of process parameters and adaptive control system for deep-drawing process. J Mater Process Technol 80–81: 421–426 (1998)
Crossref Google Scholar
[291]
Shozib I A, Ahmad A, Rahaman M S A, Abdul-Rani A M, Alam M A, Beheshti M, Taufiqurrahman I. Modelling and optimization of microhardness of electroless Ni–P–TiO2 composite coating based on machine learning approaches and RSM. J Mater Res Technol 12: 1010–1025 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[292]
Yilmaz S, Ilhan R, Feyzullahoğlu E. Estimation of adhesive wear behavior of the glass fiber reinforced polyester composite materials using ANFIS model. J Elastomers Plast 54(1): 86–110 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[293]
Gangwar S, Pathak V K. Dry sliding wear characteristics evaluation and prediction of vacuum casted marble dust (MD) reinforced ZA-27 alloy composites using hybrid improved bat algorithm and ANN. Mater Today Commun 25: 101615 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[294]
Gurgenc T. Microstructure, mechanical properties and ELM based wear loss prediction of plasma sprayed ZrO2–MgO coatings on a magnesium alloy. Mater Test 61(8): 787–796 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[295]
Wang S Y, Liang Z, Liu L, Wan P, Qian Q H, Chen Y T, Jia S, Chen D. Artificial intelligence-based rapid design of grease with chemically functionalized graphene and carbon nanotubes as lubrication additives. Langmuir 39(1): 647–658 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[296]
Banerjee T, Dey S, Sekhar A P, Datta S, Das D. Design of alumina reinforced aluminium alloy composites with improved tribo-mechanical properties: A machine learning approach. Trans Indian Inst Met 73(12): 3059–3069 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[297]
Zeng Q F, Jiang H, Liu Q, Li G K, Ning Z K. Design of a high-temperature grease by BP neural network and its preparation and high-temperature performance studies. Ind Lubr Tribol 74(5): 564–571 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[298]
Wierzcholski K. Fuzzy logic tools in intelligent micro-bearing systems. J Appl Math Comput 17(2): 123–131 (2009)
Google Scholar
[299]
Walker J, Questa H, Raman A, Ahmed M, Mohammadpour M, Bewsher S R, Offner G. Application of tribological artificial neural networks in machine elements. Tribol Lett 71(1): 3 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[300]
Katsaros K P, Nikolakopoulos P G. Performance prediction model for hydrodynamically lubricated tilting pad thrust bearings operating under incomplete oil film with the combination of numerical and machine-learning techniques. Lubricants 11(3): 113 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[301]
Hess N, Shang L Z. Development of a machine learning model for elastohydrodynamic pressure prediction in journal bearings. J Tribol 144(8): 081603 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[302]
Li S B, Babin A, Shutin D, Kazakov Y, Liu Y F, Chen Z B, Savin L. Active hybrid journal bearings with lubrication control: Towards machine learning. Tribol Int 175: 107805 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[303]
Pandiyan V, Akeddar M, Prost J, Vorlaufer G, Varga M, Wasmer K. Long short-term memory based semi-supervised encoder—Decoder for early prediction of failures in self-lubricating bearings. Friction 11(1): 109–124 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[304]
Zavos A, Katsaros K P, Nikolakopoulos P G. Optimum selection of coated piston rings and thrust bearings in mixed lubrication for different lubricants using machine learning. Coatings 12(5): 704 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[305]
Sadık Ünlü B, Durmuş H, Meriç C. Determination of tribological properties at CuSn10 alloy journal bearings by experimental and means of artificial neural networks method. Ind Lubr Tribol 64(5): 258–264 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[306]
Zhou Y K, Wang Z Y, Zuo X, Zhao H. Identification of wear mechanisms of main bearings of marine diesel engine using recurrence plot based on CNN model. Wear 520–521: 204656 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[307]
Badawi M B, Awad T H, El Fahham I M. Application of artificial intelligence for the prediction of plain journal bearings performance. Alex Eng J 61(11): 9011–9029 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[308]
Rossopoulos G N, Papadopoulos C I. A journal bearing performance prediction method utilizing a machine learning technique. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 236(10): 1993–2003 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[309]
Kazakov Y N, Kornaev A V, Shutin D V, Li S B, Savin L A. Active fluid-film bearing with deep Q-network agent-based control system. J Tribol-T ASME 144(8): 081803 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[310]
Katsaros K P, Nikolakopoulos P G. On the tilting-pad thrust bearings hydrodynamic lubrication under combined numerical and machine learning techniques. Lubr Sci 33(3): 153–170 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[311]
Patil S, Phalle V. Fault detection of anti-friction bearing using ensemble machine learning methods. Int J Eng 31(11): 1972–1981 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[312]
Moschopoulos M, Rossopoulos G N, Papadopoulos C I. Journal bearing performance prediction using machine learning and octave-band signal analysis of sound and vibration measurements. Pol Marit Res 28(3): 137–149 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[313]
Desai P S, Granja V, Higgs C F III. Lifetime prediction using a tribology-aware, deep learning-based digital twin of ball bearing-like tribosystems in oil and gas. Processes 9(6): 922 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[314]
König F, Marheineke J, Jacobs G, Sous C, Zuo M J, Tian Z G. Data-driven wear monitoring for sliding bearings using acoustic emission signals and long short-term memory neural networks. Wear 476: 203616 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[315]
Laubichler C, Kiesling C, Marques da Silva M, Wimmer A, Hager G. Data-driven sliding bearing temperature model for condition monitoring in internal combustion engines. Lubricants 10(5): 103 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[316]
Moder J, Bergmann P, Grün F. Lubrication regime classification of hydrodynamic journal bearings by machine learning using torque data. Lubricants 6(4): 108 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[317]
Mokhtari N, Pelham J G, Nowoisky S, Bote-Garcia J L, Gühmann C. Friction and wear monitoring methods for journal bearings of geared turbofans based on acoustic emission signals and machine learning. Lubricants 8(3): 29 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[318]
Konieczny J, Łatas W, Stojek J. Classification of wear state for a positive displacement pump using deep machine learning. Energies 16(3): 1408 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[319]
Rasol M, Schmidt F, Ientile S. FriC-PM: Machine learning-based road surface friction coefficient predictive model using intelligent sensor data. Constr Build Mater 370: 130567 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[320]
Han J Y, Kwon J H, Lee S, Lee K C, Kim H J. Experimental evaluation of tire tread wear detection using machine learning in real-road driving conditions. IEEE Access 11: 32996–33004 (2996)
Crossref Google Scholar
[321]
Šabanovič E, Žuraulis V, Prentkovskis O, Skrickij V. Identification of road-surface type using deep neural networks for friction coefficient estimation. Sensors 20(3): 612 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[322]
Xia S Q, Xia Y M, Xiang J W. Piston wear detection and feature selection based on vibration signals using the improved spare support vector machine for axial piston pumps. Materials 15(23): 8504 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[323]
Xu X, Guan Z G, Li Z X, Sulowicz M, Królczyk G, Dai T C, Zhao X Z. Machine learning calculation model for hydrodynamic lubrication characteristics of a miter gate bottom pivot. Eng Anal Bound Elem 142: 1–9 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[324]
Chen K, Zu L, Wang L. Prediction of preload attenuation of ball screw based on support vector machine. Adv Mech Eng 10(9): 168781401879916 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[325]
Baş H S, Karabacak Y E. Triboinformatic modeling of the friction force and friction coefficient in a cam-follower contact using machine learning algorithms. Tribol Int 181: 108336 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[326]
Wang M Q, Jia S X, Chen E L, Yang S P, Liu P F, Qi Z. Research and application of neural network for tread wear prediction and optimization. Mech Syst Signal Process 162: 108070 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[327]
Zhang M, Zhang X J, Mo J L, Xiang Z Y, Zheng P W. Brake uneven wear of high-speed train intelligent monitoring using an ensemble model based on multi-sensor feature fusion and deep learning. Eng Fail Anal 137: 106219 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[328]
Najeh T, Lundberg J, Kerrouche A. Deep-learning and vibration-based system for wear size estimation of railway switches and crossings. Sensors 21(15): 5217 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[329]
Yasmin F, Tamrin K F, Sheikh N A, Barroy P, Yassin A, Khan A A, Mohamaddan S. Laser-assisted high speed machining of 316 stainless steel: The effect of water-soluble sago starch based cutting fluid on surface roughness and tool wear. Materials 14(5): 1311 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[330]
Bustillo A, Correa M. Using artificial intelligence to predict surface roughness in deep drilling of steel components. J Intell Manuf 23(5): 1893–1902 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[331]
Salari S, Behnia F, Polycarpou A A, Beheshti A. Elevated temperature contact creep and friction of nickel-based superalloys using machine learning assisted finite element analysis. Mech Mater 171: 104346 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[332]
Qiao L, Zhu J C. Machine learning-guided design of pearlitic steel with promising mechanical and tribological properties. Adv Eng Mater 23(12): 2100505 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[333]
Roberts E W. Space tribology: Its role in spacecraft mechanisms. J Phys D: Appl Phys 45(50): 503001 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[334]
Bashandeh K, Tsigkis V, Lan P X, Polycarpou A A. Extreme environment tribological study of advanced bearing polymers for space applications. Tribol Int 153: 106634 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[335]
Rickert C A, Hayta E N, Selle D M, Kouroudis I, Harth M, Gagliardi A, Lieleg O. Machine learning approach to analyze the surface properties of biological materials. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 7(9): 4614–4625 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[336]
Van Der Heide E, Zeng X, Masen M A. Skin tribology: Science friction? Friction 1(2): 130–142 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[337]
Mehta S, Singh G, Singh H, Saini A. A review of tribological behavior of different bio-implant materials. ECS Trans 107(1): 5147–5153 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[338]
Shan L T, Liu Y Q, Zhang X H, Li E L, Yu R J, Lian Q M, Chen X, Chen H P, Guo T L. Bioinspired kinesthetic system for human-machine interaction. Nano Energy 88: 106283 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[339]
Zheng K, Liu H J. Investigation on wear prediction model of dental restoration material based on ensemble learning. Mater Res Innov 18(sup2): S2–987–S2–991 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[340]
Suryawanshi A, Behera N. Prediction of wear of dental composite materials using machine learning algorithms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 27(3): 400–410 (2024)
Crossref Google Scholar
[341]
Singh J, Singh S, Verma A. Artificial intelligence in use of ZrO2 material in biomedical science. J Electrochem Sci Eng 13(1): 83–97 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[342]
Anaya-Isaza A, Zequera-Diaz M. Detection of diabetes mellitus with deep learning and data augmentation techniques on foot thermography. IEEE Access 10: 59564–59591 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[343]
Hu X B, Song J, Liao Z H, Liu Y H, Gao J, Menze B, Liu W Q. Morphological residual convolutional neural network (M-RCNN) for intelligent recognition of wear particles from artificial joints. Friction 10(4): 560–572 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[344]
Kurtz M A, Yang R Y, Elapolu M S R, Wessinger A C, Nelson W, Alaniz K, Rai R, Gilbert J L. Predicting corrosion damage in the human body using artificial intelligence: in vitro progress and future applications. Orthop Clin North Am 54(2): 169–192 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[345]
Almeida L, Santos V, Ferreira J. Learning-based analysis of a new wearable 3D force system data to classify the underlying surface of a walking robot. Int J Human Robot 17(3): 2050011 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[346]
Li Y, Zhao M J, Yan Y D, He L X, Wang Y Y, Xiong Z P, Wang S Q, Bai Y Y, Sun F Q, Lu Q F, et al. Multifunctional biomimetic tactile system via a stick–slip sensing strategy for human–machine interactions. NPJ Flex Electron 6: 46 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[347]
Bi D, Li Y F, Tso S K, Wang G L. Friction modeling and compensation for haptic display based on support vector machine. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 51(2): 491–500 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[348]
Borjali A, Monson K, Raeymaekers B. Predicting the polyethylene wear rate in pin-on-disc experiments in the context of prosthetic hip implants: Deriving a data-driven model using machine learning methods. Tribol Int 133: 101–110 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[349]
Milone D, Risitano G, Pistone A, Crisafulli D, Alberti F. A new approach for the tribological and mechanical characterization of a hip prosthesis trough a numerical model based on artificial intelligence algorithms and humanoid multibody model. Lubricants 10(7): 160 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[350]
Vinoth A, Dey S, Datta S. Designing UHMWPE hybrid composites using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms. Compos Struct 267: 113898 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[351]
Vinoth A, Datta S. Design of the ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites with multiple nanoparticles: An artificial intelligence approach. J Compos Mater 54(2): 179–192 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[352]
Zhang S W. Green tribology: Fundamentals and future development. Friction 1(2): 186–194 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[353]
Sun Y W, Yan X P, Yuan C Q, Bai X Q. Insight into tribological problems of green ship and corresponding research progresses. Friction 6(4): 472–483 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[354]
Ali Khan M, Farooq F, Javed M F, Zafar A, Ostrowski K A, Aslam F, Malazdrewicz S, Maślak M. Simulation of depth of wear of eco-friendly concrete using machine learning based computational approaches. Materials 15(1): 58 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[355]
Rushd S, Gazder U, Qureshi H J, Arifuzzaman M. Advanced machine learning applications to viscous oil–water multi-phase flow. Appl Sci 12(10): 4871 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[356]
Mahakur V K, Bhowmik S, Patowari P K. Tribo-informatics evaluation of dry sliding friction of silanized jute filler reinforced epoxy composites using machine learning techniques. Tribol Int 183: 108388 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[357]
Bhaumik S, Mathew B R, Datta S. Computational intelligence-based design of lubricant with vegetable oil blend and various nano friction modifiers. Fuel 241: 733–743 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[358]
Xie Y B. On the tribology design. Tribol Int 32(7): 351–358 (1999)
Crossref Google Scholar
[359]
Choi D, Lee Y, Lin Z H, Cho S, Kim M, Ao C K, Soh S, Sohn C, Jeong C K, Lee J, et al. Recent advances in triboelectric nanogenerators: From technological progress to commercial applications. ACS Nano 17(12): 11087–11219 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[360]
Xu Y H, Yang W X, Lu X H, Yang Y F, Li J P, Wen J M, Cheng T H, Wang Z L. Triboelectric nanogenerator for ocean wave graded energy harvesting and condition monitoring. ACS Nano 15(10): 16368–16375 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[361]
Chen L P, Yuan K, Chen S Y, Huang Y J, Askari H, Yu N H, Mo J Y, Xu N, Wu M Z, Chen H, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerator sensors for intelligent steering wheel aiming at automated driving. Nano Energy 113: 108575 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[362]
Ra Y, Oh S, Lee J, Yun Y, Cho S, Choi J H, Jang S, Hwang H J, Choi D, Kim J G, et al. Triboelectric signal generation and its versatile utilization during gear-based ordinary power transmission. Nano Energy 73: 104745 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[363]
Xie H B, Wang Z J, Qin N, Du W H, Qian L M. Prediction of friction coefficients during scratch based on an integrated finite element and artificial neural network method. J Tribol 142(2): 021703 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 12 Issue 6,
June 2024
Pages 1060-1097
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-024-0879-2
Cite this article:
YIN N, YANG P, LIU S, et al. AI for tribology: Present and future. Friction, 2024, 12(6): 1060-1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-024-0879-2

599

Views

49

Downloads

11

Crossref

11

Web of Science

10

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 13 July 2023
Revised: 13 November 2023
Accepted: 29 January 2024
Published: 12 March 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return