Review Article
Open Access
Issue
Published:
05 May 2023
Open Access
Issue
Published:
05 May 2023
A review of recent advances in the effects of surface and interface properties on marine propellers
Liran MA(
)
)
Cite this article:
ZHU M, MA L.
A review of recent advances in the effects of surface and interface properties on marine propellers.
Friction,
2024, 12(2): 185-214.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-022-0716-4
Download citation
179
Views
10
Downloads
Citations
1
Crossref
1
WoS
1
Scopus
0
CSCD
Marine propellers are important propulsion devices for both surface ships and underwater vehicles. Increasingly severe environmental problems have required further performance enhancement for propellers. Nowadays, traditional methods to improve propeller performances through geometrical and structural optimizations have been extensively investigated, while the underlying mechanisms of the effects of surface and interface properties on marine propellers are still far from being fully understood. This paper presented a comprehensive review of recent advances in the effects of surface and interface properties, such as surface roughness and surface wettability, on marine propellers with an emphasis on the significant improvements in both hydrodynamic and cavitation performances, hoping to arouse more in-depth investigations in the field of surface/interface science and technologies on marine propellers, and also promote the state-of-the-art technologies, such as superlubricity technology, into practical applications.
menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article
A review of recent advances in the effects of surface and interface properties on marine propellers
Liran MA(
)
)
Abstract
Marine propellers are important propulsion devices for both surface ships and underwater vehicles. Increasingly severe environmental problems have required further performance enhancement for propellers. Nowadays, traditional methods to improve propeller performances through geometrical and structural optimizations have been extensively investigated, while the underlying mechanisms of the effects of surface and interface properties on marine propellers are still far from being fully understood. This paper presented a comprehensive review of recent advances in the effects of surface and interface properties, such as surface roughness and surface wettability, on marine propellers with an emphasis on the significant improvements in both hydrodynamic and cavitation performances, hoping to arouse more in-depth investigations in the field of surface/interface science and technologies on marine propellers, and also promote the state-of-the-art technologies, such as superlubricity technology, into practical applications.
Keywords:
surface roughness, cavitation, hydrodynamics, surface wettability, marine propellers
References(166)
[1]
Carlton J S. Marine Propellers and Propulsion, 3rd edn. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012.
[2]
Stark C, Shi W C, Atlar M. A numerical investigation into the influence of bio-inspired leading-edge tubercles on the hydrodynamic performance of a benchmark ducted propeller. Ocean Eng 237: 109593 (2021)
[3]
Qin D H, Pan G, Huang Q G, Zhang Z D, Ke J J. Numerical investigation of different tip clearances effect on the hydrodynamic performance of pumpjet propulsor. Int J Comput Meth 15(5): 1850037 (2018)
[4]
Koronowicz T, Krzemianowski Z, Tuszkowska T, Szantyr J A. A complete design of tandem co-rotating propellers using the new computer system. Pol Marit Res 17(4): 17–25 (2010)
[5]
Grassi D, Brizzolara S, Viviani M, Savio L, Caviglia S. Design and analysis of counter-rotating propellers-comparison of numerical and experimental results. J Hydrodyn 22(5): Supplement 1 570–576 (2010)
[6]
Cao Q M, Hong F W, Tang D H, Hu F L, Lu L Z. Prediction of loading distribution and hydrodynamic measurements for propeller blades in a rim driven thruster. J Hydrodyn 24(1): 50–57 (2012)
[7]
Lynes M. International energy outlook 2016: Transportation sector. In: Report No. DOE/EIA-0484, Washingtion, USA, 2016: DOE/EIA-0484.
[8]
UK-IMO. Third IMO GHG study 2014. IMO, 2015.
[9]
McWhinnie L, Smallshaw L, Serra-Sogas N, O’Hara P D, Canessa R. The grand challenges in researching marine noise pollution from vessels: A horizon scan for 2017. Front Mar Sci 4: 31 (2017)
[10]
Wilcock W S D, Stafford K M, Andrew R K, Odom R I. Sounds in the ocean at 1–100 Hz. Annu Rev Mar Sci 6: 117–140 (2014)
[11]
Sandhya M, Rajarajeswari K, Seetaramaiah P. Detecting inception of hydrodynamic cavitation noise of ships using quadratic phase coupling index as an indicator. Defence Sci J 65(1): 53–62 (2015)
[12]
Bagheri M R, Mehdigholi H, Seif M S, Yaakob O. An experimental and numerical prediction of marine propeller noise under cavitating and non-cavitating conditions. Brodogradnja 66(2): 29–45 (2015)
[13]
Yao H L, Liu Y, Zhang H X, Zhang Q. Comparative study on hydrodynamic performance and induced pressure of new canard tandem propellers and conventional propellers. Ocean Eng 221: 108566 (2021)
[14]
Belhenniche S E, Aounallah M, Omar I, Çelik F. Effect of geometric configurations on hydrodynamic performance assessment of a marine propeller. Brodogradnja 67(4): 31–48 (2016)
[15]
Lee C S, Choi Y D, Ahn B K, Shin M S, Jang H G. Performance optimization of marine propellers. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 2(4): 211–216 (2010)
[16]
Razaghian A H, Ebrahimi A, Zahedi F, Javanmardi M R, Seif M S. Investigating the effect of geometric parameters on hydrodynamic and hydro-acoustic performances of submerged propellers. Appl Ocean Res 114: 102773 (2021)
[17]
Ghassemi H, Gorji M, Mohammadi J. Effect of tip rake angle on the hydrodynamic characteristics and sound pressure level around the marine propeller. Ships Offshore Struc 13(7): 759–768 (2018)
[18]
Gao H T, Zhu W C, Liu Y T, Yan Y Y. Effect of various winglets on the performance of marine propeller. Appl Ocean Res 86: 246–256 (2019)
[19]
Zhu W C, Gao H T. A numerical investigation of a winglet–propeller using an LES model. J Mar Sci Eng 7(10): 333 (2019)
[20]
Kang J G, Kim M C, Kim H U, Shin I R. Study on propulsion performance by varying rake distribution at the propeller tip. J Mar Sci Eng 7(11): 386 (2019)
[21]
Hu J, Zhang W P, Wang C, Sun S L, Guo C Y. Impact of skew on propeller tip vortex cavitation. Ocean Eng 220: 108479 (2021)
[22]
Ji B, Luo X W, Wu Y L. Unsteady cavitation characteristics and alleviation of pressure fluctuations around marine propellers with different skew angles. J Mech Sci Technol 28(4): 1339–1348 (2014)
[23]
Zhu W C, Gao H T. Hydrodynamic characteristics of bio-inspired marine propeller with various blade sections. Ships Offshore Struc 16(2): 156–171 (2021)
[24]
Cheng H Y, Ji B, Long X P, Huai W X, Farhat M. A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control. J Hydrodyn 33(2): 226–242 (2021)
[25]
Liu Y B, Tan L. Influence of C groove on suppressing vortex and cavitation for a NACA0009 hydrofoil with tip clearance in tidal energy. Renew Energy 148: 907–922 (2020)
[26]
Liu Y B, Tan L. Method of C groove on vortex suppression and energy performance improvement for a NACA0009 hydrofoil with tip clearance in tidal energy. Energy 155: 448–461 (2018)
[27]
Liu Y B, Tan L. Method of T shape tip on energy improvement of a hydrofoil with tip clearance in tidal energy. Renew Energy 149: 42–54 (2020)
[28]
Cheng H Y, Long X P, Ji B, Peng X X, Farhat M. Suppressing tip-leakage vortex cavitation by overhanging grooves. Exp Fluids 61(7): 159 (2020)
[29]
Sun Y, Liu W, Li T Y. Numerical investigation on noise reduction mechanism of serrated trailing edge installed on a pump–jet duct. Ocean Eng 191: 106489 (2019)
[30]
Qin D H, Pan G, Lee S, Huang Q G, Shi Y. Underwater radiated noise reduction technology using sawtooth duct for pumpjet propulsor. Ocean Eng 188: 106228 (2019)
[31]
Jin H C, Tian L M, Bing W, Zhao J, Ren L Q. Bioinspired marine antifouling coatings: Status, prospects, and future. Prog Mater Sci 124: 100889 (2022)
[32]
Maan A M C, Hofman A H, Vos W M, Kamperman M. Recent developments and practical feasibility of polymer-based antifouling coatings. Adv Funct Mater 30(32): 2000936 (2020)
[33]
Lee C, Choi C H, Kim C J. Superhydrophobic drag reduction in laminar flows: A critical review. Exp Fluids 57(12): 176 (2016)
[34]
Park H, Choi C H, Kim C J. Superhydrophobic drag reduction in turbulent flows: A critical review. Exp Fluids 62(11): 229 (2021)
[35]
Feng X M, Sun P F, Tian G Z. Recent developments of superhydrophobic surfaces (SHS) for underwater drag reduction opportunities and challenges. Adv Mater Interfaces 9(2): 2101616 (2022)
[36]
Zaresharif M, Ravelet F, Kinahan D J, Delaure Y M C. Cavitation control using passive flow control techniques. Phys Fluids 33(12): 121301 (2021)
[37]
Luo J B, Liu M, Ma L R. Origin of friction and the new frictionless technology—Superlubricity: Advancements and future outlook. Nano Energy 86: 106092 (2021)
[38]
Wang H D, Liu Y H. Superlubricity achieved with two-dimensional nano-additives to liquid lubricants. Friction 8(6): 1007–1024 (2020)
[39]
Meng Y G, Xu J, Jin Z M, Prakash B, Hu Y Z. A review of recent advances in tribology. Friction 8(2): 221–300 (2020)
[40]
Chen X C, Li J J. Superlubricity of carbon nanostructures. Carbon 158: 1–23 (2020)
[41]
Ge X Y, Li J J, Luo J B. Macroscale superlubricity achieved with various liquid molecules: A review. Front Mech Eng 5: 2 (2019)
[42]
Song Y M, Qu C Y, Ma M, Zheng Q S. Structural superlubricity based on crystalline materials. Small 16(15): 1903018 (2020)
[43]
Chen X C, Yin X, Qi W, Zhang C H, Choi J, Wu S D, Wang R, Luo J B. Atomic-scale insights into the interfacial instability of superlubricity in hydrogenated amorphous carbon films. Sci Adv 6(13): eaay1272 (2020)
[44]
Liu S W, Wang H P, Xu Q, Ma T B, Yu G, Zhang C H, Geng D C, Yu Z W, Zhang S G, Wang W Z, et al. Robust microscale superlubricity under high contact pressure enabled by graphene-coated microsphere. Nat Commun 8: 14029 (2017)
[45]
Chen X C, Zhang C H, Kato T, Yang X A, Wu S D, Wang R, Nosaka M, Luo J B. Evolution of tribo-induced interfacial nanostructures governing superlubricity in a-C:H and a-C:H:Si films. Nat Commun 8(1): 1675 (2017)
[46]
Erdemir A. Genesis of superlow friction and wear in diamondlike carbon films. Tribol Int 37(11–12): 1005–1012 (2004)
[47]
Martin J M, Donnet C, Le Mogne T, Epicier T. Superlubricity of molybdenum disulphide. Phys Rev B 48(14): 10583–10586 (1993)
[48]
Hirano M, Shinjo K. Atomistic locking and friction. Phys Rev B 41(17): 11837–11851 (1990)
[49]
Han T Y, Zhang C H, Li J J, Yuan S H, Chen X C, Zhang J Y, Luo J B. Origins of superlubricity promoted by hydrated multivalent ions. J Phys Chem Lett 11(1): 184–190 (2020)
[50]
Han T Y, Zhang C H, Luo J B. Macroscale superlubricity enabled by hydrated alkali metal ions. Langmuir 34(38): 11281–11291 (2018)
[51]
Li J J, Zhang C H, Ma L R, Liu Y H, Luo J B. Superlubricity achieved with mixtures of acids and glycerol. Langmuir 29(1): 271–275 (2013)
[52]
Li J J, Zhang C H, Luo J B. Superlubricity achieved with mixtures of polyhydroxy alcohols and acids. Langmuir 29(17): 5239–5245 (2013)
[53]
Li J J, Liu Y H, Luo J B, Liu P X, Zhang C H. Excellent lubricating behavior of Brasenia schreberi mucilage. Langmuir 28(20): 7797–7802 (2012)
[54]
Chen M, Kato K, Adachi K. Friction and wear of self-mated SiC and Si3N4 sliding in water. Wear 250(1–12): 246–255 (2001)
[55]
Klein J, Kumacheva E, Mahalu D, Perahia D, Fetters L J. Reduction of frictional forces between solid surfaces bearing polymer brushes. Nature 370(6491): 634–636 (1994)
[56]
Wang H D, Liu Y H, Liu W R, Liu Y M, Wang K P, Li J J, Ma T B, Eryilmaz O L, Shi Y J, Erdemir A, et al. Superlubricity of polyalkylene glycol aqueous solutions enabled by ultrathin layered double hydroxide nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(22): 20249–20256 (2019)
[57]
Ge X Y, Li J J, Wang H D, Zhang C H, Liu Y H, Luo J B. Macroscale superlubricity under extreme pressure enabled by the combination of graphene-oxide nanosheets with ionic liquid. Carbon 151: 76–83 (2019)
[58]
Wang W, Xie G X, Luo J B. Superlubricity of black phosphorus as lubricant additive. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(49): 43203–43210 (2018)
[59]
Ge X Y, Li J J, Luo R, Zhang C H, Luo J B. Macroscale superlubricity enabled by the synergy effect of graphene-oxide nanoflakes and ethanediol. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(47): 40863–40870 (2018)
[60]
Lin W F, Klein J. Recent progress in cartilage lubrication. Adv Mater 33(18): e2005513 (2021)
[61]
Jahn S, Seror J, Klein J. Lubrication of articular cartilage. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 18: 235–258 (2016)
[62]
Seror J, Zhu L Y, Goldberg R, Day A J, Klein J. Supramolecular synergy in the boundary lubrication of synovial joints. Nat Commun 6: 6497 (2015)
[63]
Raviv U, Giasson S, Kampf N, Gohy J F, Jérôme R, Klein J. Lubrication by charged polymers. Nature 425(6954): 163–165 (2003)
[64]
Liu Y M, Wang K, Xu Q, Zhang J, Hu Y Z, Ma T B, Zheng Q S, Luo J B. Superlubricity between graphite layers in ultrahigh vacuum. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(38): 43167–43172 (2020)
[65]
Lin B, Ding M, Sui T Y, Cui Y X, Yan S, Liu X B. Excellent water lubrication additives for silicon nitride to achieve superlubricity under extreme conditions. Langmuir 35(46): 14861–14869 (2019)
[66]
Wang H D, Liu Y H, Chen Z, Wu B B, Xu S L, Luo J B. Layered double hydroxide nanoplatelets with excellent tribological properties under high contact pressure as water-based lubricant additives. Sci Rep 6: 22748 (2016)
[67]
Luo J B, Zhou X. Superlubricitive engineering—Future industry nearly getting rid of wear and frictional energy consumption. Friction 8(4): 643–665 (2020)
[68]
Sheng Z B. Principles of Ships, 2nd edn. Shanghai (China): Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
[69]
Huang S. Marine Propulsion Energy Saving Technology and Special Propeller, 2nd edn. Harbin (China): Harbin Engineering University Press, 2007. (in Chinese)
[70]
Sun Y, Su Y M, Wang X X, Hu H Z. Experimental and numerical analyses of the hydrodynamic performance of propeller boss cap fins in a propeller–rudder system. Eng Appl Comp Fluid Mech 10(1): 145–159 (2016)
[71]
Kehr Y Z, Xu H J, Kao J H. An innovative propeller with experimental and sea trial verifications. J Mar Sci Technol 25(2): 609–619 (2020)
[72]
Asnaghi A, Svennberg U, Bensow R E. Numerical and experimental analysis of cavitation inception behaviour for high-skewed low-noise propellers. Appl Ocean Res 79: 197–214 (2018)
[73]
Ebrahimi A, Razaghian A H, Seif M S, Zahedi F, Nouri-Borujerdi A. A comprehensive study on noise reduction methods of marine propellers and design procedures. Appl Acoust 150: 55–69 (2019)
[74]
Wen S Z, Huang P. Surface topography and contact. In: Principles of Tribology, 2nd edn. Wen S Z, Huang P, Eds. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd, 2017: 209–224.
[75]
Young T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Proc Roy Soc Lond 1: 171–172 (1832)
[76]
Wenzel R N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28(8): 988–994 (1936)
[77]
Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Transactions of the Faraday Society 40: 546–551 (1944)
[78]
Liu K S, Cao M Y, Fujishima A, Jiang L. Bio-inspired titanium dioxide materials with special wettability and their applications. Chem Rev 114(19): 10044–10094 (2014)
[79]
Law K Y, Zhao H. Surface Wetting: Characterization, Contact Angle, and Fundamentals. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Cham, 2016.
[80]
Qiu H Y, Feng K, Gapeeva A, Meurisch K, Kaps S, Li X, Yu L M, Mishra Y K, Adelung R, Baum M. Functional polymer materials for modern marine biofouling control. Prog Polym Sci 127: 48 (2022)
[81]
Liu M, Ma L R. Drag reduction methods at solid–liquid interfaces. Friction 10(4): 491–515 (2022)
[82]
Bremond N, Arora M, Ohl C D, Lohse D. Cavitation on surfaces. J Phys-Condens Mat 17(45): S3603–S3608 (2005)
[83]
Belova-Magri V, Brotchie A, Cairós C, Mettin R, Möhwald H. Micropatterning for the control of surface cavitation: Visualization through high-speed imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(7): 4100–4108 (2015)
[84]
Franc J P, Michel J M. Fundamentals of Cavitation. Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Springer Dordrecht, 2004.
[85]
Song S, Demirel Y K, Atlar M. Penalty of hull and propeller fouling on ship self-propulsion performance. Appl Ocean Res 94: 102006 (2020)
[86]
Demirel Y K, Turan O, Incecik A. Predicting the effect of biofouling on ship resistance using CFD. Appl Ocean Res 62: 100–118 (2017)
[87]
Schultz M P. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling 23(5): 331–341 (2007)
[88]
Owen D, Demirel Y K, Oguz E, Tezdogan T, Incecik A. Investigating the effect of biofouling on propeller characteristics using CFD. Ocean Eng 159: 505–516 (2018)
[89]
Sezen S, Uzun D, Ozyurt R, Turan O, Atlar M. Effect of biofouling roughness on a marine propeller’s performance including cavitation and underwater radiated noise (URN). Appl Ocean Res 107: 102491 (2021)
[90]
Balaure P C, Grumezescu A M. Recent advances in surface nanoengineering for biofilm prevention and control. Part I: Molecular basis of biofilm recalcitrance. Passive anti-biofouling nanocoatings. Nanomaterials 10(6): 1230 (2020)
[91]
Barletta M, Aversa C, Pizzi E, Puopolo M, Vesco S. Design, manufacturing and testing of anti-fouling/foul-release (AF/FR) amphiphilic coatings. Prog Org Coat 123: 267–281 (2018)
[92]
Selim M S, Shenashen M A, El-Safty S A, Higazy S A, Selim M M, Isago H, Elmarakbi A. Recent progress in marine foul-release polymeric nanocomposite coatings. Prog Mater Sci 87: 1–32 (2017)
[93]
Cao S, Wang J D, Chen H S, Chen D R. Progress of marine biofouling and antifouling technologies. Chinese Sci Bull 56(7): 598–612 (2011)
[94]
Atlar M, Glover E J, Candries M, Mutton R J, Anderson C D. The effect of a foul release coating on propeller performance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine Science and Technology for Environmental Sustainability, Newcastle, UK, 2002: 1041319.
[95]
Candries M, Atlar M, Mesbahi E, Pazouki K. The measurement of the drag characteristics of tin-free self-polishing co-polymers and fouling release coatings using a rotor apparatus. Biofouling 19: Supplement 1 27–36 (2003)
[96]
Korkut E, Atlar M. An experimental investigation of the effect of foul release coating application on performance, noise and cavitation characteristics of marine propellers. Ocean Eng 41: 1–12 (2012)
[97]
Bagheri M R, Seif M S, Mehdigholi H. An experimental study on the effect of IS700 coating on the cavitation inception and development, and noise reduction of a marine propeller. J Appl Mech Eng 6(3): 1000267 (2017)
[98]
Daniello R J, Waterhouse N E, Rothstein J P. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 21(8): 085103 (2009)
[99]
Henoch C, Krupenkin T N, Kolodner P, Taylor J A, Hodes M S, Lyons A M, Peguero C, Breuer K. Turbulent drag reduction using superhydrophobic surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, San Francisco, USA, 2006: 2006-3192.
[100]
Xu M C, Grabowski A, Yu N, Kerezyte G, Lee J W, Pfeifer B R, Kim C J. Superhydrophobic drag reduction for turbulent flows in open water. Phys Rev Appl 13(3): 034056 (2020)
[101]
Xu M C, Yu N, Kim J, Kim C J. Superhydrophobic drag reduction in high-speed towing tank. J Fluid Mech 908: A6 (2021)
[102]
Balasubramanian A K, Miller A C, Rediniotis O K. Microstructured hydrophobic skin for hydrodynamic drag reduction. AIAA J 42(2): 411–414 (2004)
[103]
Aljallis E, Sarshar M A, Datla R, Sikka V, Jones A, Choi C H. Experimental study of skin friction drag reduction on superhydrophobic flat plates in high Reynolds number boundary layer flow. Phys Fluids 25(2): 025103 (2013)
[104]
Bidkar R A, Leblanc L, Kulkarni A J, Bahadur V, Ceccio S L, Perlin M. Skin-friction drag reduction in the turbulent regime using random-textured hydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 26(8): 085108 (2014)
[105]
Gose J W, Golovin K, Boban M, Tobelmann B, Callison E, Barros J, Schultz M P, Tuteja A, Perlin M, Ceccio S L. Turbulent skin friction reduction through the application of superhydrophobic coatings to a towed submerged SUBOFF body. J Ship Res 65(3): 266–274 (2021)
[106]
Li H Y, Ji S S, Tan X K, Li Z X, Xiang Y L, Lv P Y, Duan H L. Effect of Reynolds number on drag reduction in turbulent boundary layer flow over liquid–gas interface. Phys Fluids 32(12): 122111 (2020)
[107]
Lee J, Kim H, Park H. Effects of superhydrophobic surfaces on the flow around an NACA0012 hydrofoil at low Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids 59(7): 111 (2018)
[108]
Sooraj P, Jain S, Agrawal A. Flow over hydrofoils with varying hydrophobicity. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 102: 479–492 (2019)
[109]
Katsuno E T, Dantas J L D, Silva E C N. Analysis of hydrophobic painting in model-scale marine propeller. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 2018: OMAE2018-78209.
[110]
Katsuno E T, Dantas J L D, Silva E C N. Topology optimization of low-friction painting distribution on a marine propeller. Struct Multidiscip O 65(9): 269 (2022)
[111]
Choi H, Lee J, Park H. Wake structures behind a rotor with superhydrophobic-coated blades at low Reynolds number. Phys Fluids 31(1): 015102 (2019)
[112]
Pan H C, Zeng R, Tian X Q, Taalab E, Lv M, Zhu Z F. Performance of a propeller coated with hydrophobic material. J Mar Sci Eng 10(2): 236 (2022)
[113]
Wang J D, Wang B, Chen D R. Underwater drag reduction by gas. Friction 2(4): 295–309 (2014)
[114]
Gupta S K. The influence of porosity and contact angle on incipient and desinent cavitation. Master’s Thesis. Philadelphia (USA): The Pennsylvania State Universtiy, 1969.
[115]
Holl J W. The inception of cavitation on isolated surface irregularities. J Basic Eng 82(1): 169–183 (1960)
[116]
Arndt R E A, Ippen A T. Rough surface effects on cavitation inception. J Basic Eng 90(2): 249–261 (1968)
[117]
Harvey E N, Barnes D K, McElroy W D, Whiteley A H, Pease D C, Cooper K W. Bubble formation in animals. I. Physical factors. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 24(1): 1–22 (1944)
[118]
Groß T F, Pelz P F. Diffusion-driven nucleation from surface nuclei in hydrodynamic cavitation. J Fluid Mech 830: 138–164 (2017)
[119]
Groß T F, Bauer J, Ludwig G, Fernandez Rivas D, Pelz P F. Bubble nucleation from micro-crevices in a shear flow. Exp Fluids 59(1): 12 (2018)
[120]
Groß T F, Ludwig G, Pelz P F. Experimental evidence of nucleation from wall-bounded nuclei in a laminar flow. J Phys Conf Ser 656: 012034 (2015)
[121]
Guennoun F, Farhat M, Ait Bouziad Y, Avellan F, Pereira F. Experimental investigation of a particular traveling bubble cavitation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2003), Osaka, Japan, 2003: GS-2-012.
[122]
Van Rijsbergen M. A review of sheet cavitation inception mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC 2016), Honolulu, USA, 2016: hal-01890067.
[123]
Tao R, Xiao R F, Farhat M. Effect of leading edge roughness on cavitation inception and development on thin hydrofoil. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 35(11): 921–926, 940 (2017)
[124]
Chen Q, Liu Y Q, Wu Q, Wang Y, Liu T T, Wang G Y. Global cavitation patterns and corresponding hydrodynamics of the hydrofoil with leading edge roughness. Acta Mech Sin 36(6): 1202–1214 (2020)
[125]
Chen J, Hu C L, Zhang M J, Huang B, Zhang H Z. The influence of micro vortex generator on inception cavitation. Phys Fluids 33(10): 103312 (2021)
[126]
Asnaghi A, Svennberg U, Gustafsson R, Bensow R E. Investigations of tip vortex mitigation by using roughness. Phys Fluids 32(6): 065111 (2020)
[127]
Krüger C, Kornev N, Greitsch L. Influence of propeller tip roughness on tip vortex strength and propeller performance. Ship Technol Res 63(2): 110–120 (2016)
[128]
McCormick B W. On cavitation produced by a vortex trailing from a lifting surface. J Basic Eng 84(3): 369–378 (1962)
[129]
Svennberg U, Asnaghi A, Gustafsson R, Bensow R E. Experimental analysis of tip vortex cavitation mitigation by controlled surface roughness. J Hydrodyn 32(6): 1059–1070 (2020)
[130]
Asnaghi A, Svennberg U, Gustafsson R, Bensow R E. Propeller tip vortex mitigation by roughness application. Appl Ocean Res 106: 102449 (2021)
[131]
Sezen S, Uzun D, Turan O, Atlar M. Influence of roughness on propeller performance with a view to mitigating tip vortex cavitation. Ocean Eng 239: 109703 (2021)
[132]
Belova V, Gorin D A, Shchukin D G, Möhwald H. Controlled effect of ultrasonic cavitation on hydrophobic/hydrophilic surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(2): 417–425 (2011)
[133]
Belova V, Gorin D A, Shchukin D G, Möhwald H. Selective ultrasonic cavitation on patterned hydrophobic surfaces. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(39): 7129–7133 (2010)
[134]
Onishi K, Matsuda K, Miyagawa K. Influence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic coating on hydrofoil performance. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, Maui, USA, 2017: hal-02349523.
[135]
Ezzatneshan E. Study of surface wettability effect on cavitation inception by implementation of the lattice Boltzmann method. Phys Fluids 29(11): 113304 (2017)
[136]
Hao J F, Zhang M D, Huang X. Experimental study on influences of surface materials on cavitation flow around hydrofoils. Chin J Mech Eng 32(1): 45 (2019)
[137]
Ye Y M, Klimchuk S, Shang M W, McDonald K, Niu J J. Acoustic bubble suppression by constructing a hydrophilic coating on HDPE surface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(18): 16944–16950 (2019)
[138]
Petkovšek M, Hočevar M, Gregorčič P. Surface functionalization by nanosecond-laser texturing for controlling hydrodynamic cavitation dynamics. Ultrason Sonochem 67: 105126 (2020)
[139]
Huang H B, Long Y, Ji B. Experimental investigation of vortex generator influences on propeller cavitation and hull pressure fluctuations. J Hydrodyn 32(1): 82–92 (2020)
[140]
Kawanami Y, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, Tanimura M, Tagaya Y. Mechanism and control of cloud cavitation. J Fluids Eng 119(4): 788–794 (1997)
[141]
Che B X, Chu N, Schmidt S J, Cao L L, Likhachev D, Wu D Z. Control effect of micro vortex generators on leading edge of attached cavitation. Phys Fluids 31(4): 044102 (2019)
[142]
Che B X, Chu N, Cao L L, Schmidt S J, Likhachev D, Wu D Z. Control effect of micro vortex generators on attached cavitation instability. Phys Fluids 31(6): 064102 (2019)
[143]
Kadivar E, Timoshevskiy M V, Nichik M Y, el Moctar O, Schellin T E, Pervunin K S. Control of unsteady partial cavitation and cloud cavitation in marine engineering and hydraulic systems. Phys Fluids 32(5): 052108 (2020)
[144]
Kadivar E, el Moctar O, Javadi K. Stabilization of cloud cavitation instabilities using Cylindrical Cavitating-bubble Generators (CCGs). Int J Multiphas Flow 115: 108–125 (2019)
[145]
Kadivar E, Timoshevskiy M V, Pervunin K S, el Moctar O. Cavitation control using Cylindrical Cavitating-bubble Generators (CCGs): Experiments on a benchmark CAV2003 hydrofoil. Int J Multiphas Flow 125: 103186 (2020)
[146]
Coutier-Delgosha O, Devillers J F, Leriche M, Pichon T. Effect of wall roughness on the dynamics of unsteady cavitation. J Fluids Eng 127(4): 726–733 (2005)
[147]
Churkin S A, Pervunin K S, Kravtsova A Y, Markovich D M, Hanjalić K. Cavitation on NACA0015 hydrofoils with different wall roughness: High-speed visualization of the surface texture effects. J Visual 19(4): 587–590 (2016)
[148]
Kim J, Lee J S. Numerical study of cloud cavitation effects on hydrophobic hydrofoils. Int J Heat Mass Transf 83: 591–603 (2015)
[149]
Kwok C T, Man H C, Cheng F T, Lo K H. Developments in laser-based surface engineering processes: With particular reference to protection against cavitation erosion. Surf Coat Tech 291: 189–204 (2016)
[150]
Tang C H, Cheng F T, Man H C. Laser surface alloying of a marine propeller bronze using aluminium powder. Part II: Corrosion and erosion–corrosion synergism. Surf Coat Tech 200(8): 2594–2601 (2006)
[151]
Tang C H, Cheng F T, Man H C. Laser surface alloying of a marine propeller bronze using aluminium powder. Part I: Microstructural analysis and cavitation erosion study. Surf Coat Tech 200(8): 2602–2609 (2006)
[152]
Qiao X N, Chen R R, Zhang H S, Liu J Y, Liu Q, Yu J, Liu P L, Wang J. Outstanding cavitation erosion resistance of hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane-based polyurethane coatings. J Appl Polym Sci 136(25): 47668 (2019)
[153]
Pham-Thanh N, van Tho H, Yum Y J. Evaluation of cavitation erosion of a propeller blade surface made of composite materials. J Mech Sci Technol 29(4): 1629–1636 (2015)
[154]
Paik B G, Kim K S, Kim K Y, Ahn J W, Kim T G, Kim K R, Jang Y H, Lee S U. Test method of cavitation erosion for marine coatings with low hardness. Ocean Eng 38(13): 1495–1502 (2011)
[155]
Al-Hashem A, Caceres P G, Riad W T, Shalaby H M. Cavitation corrosion behavior of cast nickel-aluminum bronze in seawater. Corrosion 51(5): 331–342 (1995)
[156]
Li D G, Wang J D, Chen D R, Liang P. The role of passive potential in ultrasonic cavitation erosion of titanium in 1 M HCl solution. Ultrason Sonochem 29: 279–287 (2016)
[157]
Gonzalez-Avila S R, Nguyen D M, Arunachalam S, Domingues E M, Mishra H, Ohl C D. Mitigating cavitation erosion using biomimetic gas-entrapping microtextured surfaces (GEMS). Sci Adv 6(13): eaax6192 (2020)
[158]
Liu F B, Wang J D, Chen D R, Xu Y J, Zhao M. The cavitation erosion of the 45# carbon steels implanted with titanium and nitrogen. Tribol Trans 53(2): 239–243 (2010)
[159]
Chen H S, Li J, Liu F B, Chen D R, Wang J D. Experimental study of cavitation damage on hydrogen-terminated and oxygen-terminated diamond film surfaces. Wear 264(1–2): 146–151 (2008)
[160]
Jiang N N, Liu S H, Chen D R. Effect of roughness and wettability of silicon wafer in cavitation erosion. Chinese Sci Bull 53(18): 2879–2885 (2008)
[161]
Cong W W, Wang K, Jiang J M, Yu X Y, Zhang H Q, Guo Y D, Lv Z, Gui T J. An experimental investigation of the composite coating for marine propellers on cavitation characteristics and fouling release property. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 504: 012030 (2019)
[162]
Atlar M, Anzbock R, Leer-Andersen M, Jang J H, Kai H, Carillo E. Specialist committee on surface treatment, final report and recommendations to the 26th ITTC. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2011: 419–481.
[163]
Xiang Y L, Huang S L, Huang T Y, Dong A, Cao D, Li H Y, Xue Y H, Lv P Y, Duan H L. Superrepellency of underwater hierarchical structures on Salvinia leaf. PNAS 117(5): 2282–2287 (2020)
[164]
Barthlott W, Schimmel T, Wiersch S, Koch K, Brede M, Barczewski M, Walheim S, Weis A, Kaltenmaier A, Leder A, et al. The Salvinia paradox: Superhydrophobic surfaces with hydrophilic pins for air retention under water. Adv Mater 22(21): 2325–2328 (2010)
[165]
Domingues E M, Arunachalam S, Nauruzbayeva J, Mishra H. Biomimetic coating-free surfaces for long-term entrapment of air under wetting liquids. Nat Commun 9(1): 3606 (2018)
[166]
Yao W H, Wu L, Sun L D, Jiang B, Pan F S. Recent developments in slippery liquid-infused porous surface. Prog Org Coat 166: 106806 (2022)
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions
Publication history
Received: 30 April 2022
Revised: 16 August 2022
Accepted: 28 October 2022
Published:
05 May 2023
Issue date: February 2024
Copyright
© The author(s) 2022.
Acknowledgements
The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51922058).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
FEEDBACK 
TOP