AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
View PDF
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A numerical study on tread wear and fatigue damage of railway wheels subjected to anti-slip control

Yunfan YANGLiang LINGJiacheng WANGWanming ZHAI( )
State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Tread wear and rolling contact fatigue (RCF) damage propagated on railway wheels are the two extremely important focal points as they can tremendously deteriorate wheel/rail interactions and hunting stability and destroy wheel surface materials, and subsequently, cut down the lifetime of the wheels. The on-board anti-slip controllers are of essence aiming to hold back the striking slipping of the powered wheelsets under low-adhesion wheel/rail conditions. This paper intends to investigate the impact of anti-slip control on wheel tread wear and fatigue damage under diverse wheel/rail friction conditions. To this end, a prediction model for wheel wear and fatigue damage evolution on account of a comprehensive vehicle–track interaction model is extended, where the wheel/rail non-Hertzian contact algorithm is used. Furthermore, the effect of frictional wear on the fatigue damage at wheel surface is considered. The simulation results indicate that the wheel/rail contact is full-slip under the low-adhesion conditions with braking effort. The wear amount under the low-adhesion conditions is observably higher than that under the dry condition. It is further suggested that the wheel tread is prone to suffering more serious wear and fatigue damage issues with a higher anti-slip control threshold compared to that with a lower one.

References

[1]
Zhai W M, Jin X S, Wen Z F, Zhao X. Wear problems of high-speed wheel/rail systems: Observations, causes, and countermeasures in China. Appl Mech Rev 72(6): 060801 (2020)
[2]
Meng Y G, Xu J, Jin Z M, Prakash B, Hu Y Z. A review of recent advances in tribology. Friction 8(2): 221–300 (2020)
[3]
Krishna V V, Hossein-Nia S, Casanueva C, Stichel S, Trummer G, Six K. Rail RCF damage quantification and comparison for different damage models. Railway Eng Sci 30(1): 23–40 (2022)
[4]
Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce R S. Wear mechanisms and transitions in railway wheel steels. P I Mech Eng J-J Eng 218(6): 467–478 (2004)
[5]
Lewis R, Magel E, Wang W J, Olofsson U, Lewis S, Slatter T, Beagles A. Towards a standard approach for the wear testing of wheel and rail materials. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai 231(7): 760–774 (2017)
[6]
Hardwick C, Lewis R, Eadie D T. Wheel and rail wear— Understanding the effects of water and grease. Wear 314(1–2): 198–204 (2014)
[7]
Eadie D T, Elvidge D, Oldknow K, Stock R, Pointner P, Kalousek J, Klauser P. The effects of top of rail friction modifier on wear and rolling contact fatigue: Full-scale rail–wheel test rig evaluation, analysis and modelling. Wear 265(9–10): 1222–1230 (2008)
[8]
Wang W J, Lewis R, Yang B, Guo L C, Liu Q Y, Zhu M H. Wear and damage transitions of wheel and rail materials under various contact conditions. Wear 362–363: 146–152 (2016)
[9]
Ma L, He C G, Zhao X J, Guo J, Zhu Y, Wang W J, Liu Q Y, Jin X S. Study on wear and rolling contact fatigue behaviors of wheel/rail materials under different slip ratio conditions. Wear 366–367: 13–26 (2016)
[10]
Pearce T G, Sherratt N D. Prediction of wheel profile wear. Wear 144(1–2): 343–351 (1991)
[11]
Zobory I. Prediction of wheel/rail profile wear. Vehicle Syst Dyn 28(2–3): 221–259 (1997)
[12]
Enblom R, Berg M. Simulation of railway wheel profile development due to wear—Influence of disc braking and contact environment. Wear 258(7–8): 1055–1063 (2005)
[13]
Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce R S, Bruni S. A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear 261(11–12): 1253–1264 (2006)
[14]
Ignesti M, Innocenti A, Marini L, Meli E, Rindi A. Development of a model for the simultaneous analysis of wheel and rail wear in railway systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 31(2): 191–240 (2014)
[15]
Sun Y, Guo Y, Zhai W M. Prediction of rail non-uniform wear—Influence of track random irregularity. Wear 420–421: 235–244 (2019)
[16]
Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Pereira M, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce R, Ariaudo C, Kuka N. A study on wear evaluation of railway wheels based on multibody dynamics and wear computation. Multibody Syst Dyn 24(3): 347–366 (2010)
[17]
Tao G Q, Ren D X, Wang L F, Wen Z F, Jin X S. Online prediction model for wheel wear considering track flexibility. Multibody Syst Dyn 44(3): 313–334 (2018)
[18]
Shebani A, Iwnicki S. Prediction of wheel and rail wear under different contact conditions using artificial neural networks. Wear 406–407: 173–184 (2018)
[19]
Apezetxea I S, Perez X, Casanueva C, Alonso A. Modelling stochastic excitations for a fast wear calculation methodology. Vehicle Syst Dyn 58(11): 1657–1674 (2020)
[20]
Zeng Y C, Song D L, Zhang W H, Zhou B, Xie M Y, Tang X. A new physics-based data-driven guideline for wear modelling and prediction of train wheels. Wear 456–457: 203355 (2020)
[21]
Polach O. Wheel profile design for target conicity and wide tread wear spreading. Wear 271(1–2): 195–202 (2011)
[22]
Ye Y G, Qi Y Y, Shi D C, Sun Y, Zhou Y C, Hecht M. Rotary-scaling fine-tuning (RSFT) method for optimizing railway wheel profiles and its application to a locomotive. Railway Eng Sci 28(2): 160–183 (2020)
[23]
Fröhling R, Ekberg A, Kabo E. The detrimental effects of hollow wear—Field experiences and numerical simulations. Wear 265(9–10): 1283–1291 (2008)
[24]
Spangenberg U, Fröhling R D, Els P S. The effect of rolling contact fatigue mitigation measures on wheel wear and rail fatigue. Wear 398–399: 56–68 (2018)
[25]
Fu B, Hossein-Nia S, Stichel S, Bruni S. Study on active wheelset steering from the perspective of wheel wear evolution. Vehicle Syst Dyn 60(3): 906–929 (2022)
[26]
Ekberg A, Kabo E. Fatigue of railway wheels and rails under rolling contact and thermal loading—An overview. Wear 258(7–8): 1288–1300 (2005)
[27]
Ekberg A, Åkesson B, Kabo E. Wheel/rail rolling contact fatigue—Probe, predict, prevent. Wear 314(1–2): 2–12 (2014)
[28]
Makino T, Kato T, Hirakawa K. The effect of slip ratio on the rolling contact fatigue property of railway wheel steel. Int J Fatigue 36(1): 68–79 (2012)
[29]
Hu Y, Zhou L, Ding H H, Lewis R, Liu Q Y, Guo J, Wang W J. Microstructure evolution of railway pearlitic wheel steels under rolling–sliding contact loading. Tribol Int 154: 106685 (2021)
[30]
Li S G, Wu J, Petrov R H, Li Z L, Dollevoet R, Sietsma J. “Brown etching layer”: A possible new insight into the crack initiation of rolling contact fatigue in rail steels? Eng Fail Anal 66: 8–18 (2016)
[31]
Zhou L, Wang W J, Hu Y, Marconi S, Meli E, Ding H H, Liu Q Y, Guo J, Rindi A. Study on the wear and damage behaviors of hypereutectoid rail steel in low temperature environment. Wear 456–457: 203365 (2020)
[32]
Song J D, Shi L B, Ding H H, Galas R, Omasta M, Wang W J, Guo J, Liu Q Y, Hartl M. Effects of solid friction modifier on friction and rolling contact fatigue damage of wheel–rail surfaces. Friction 10(4): 597–607 (2022)
[33]
Zhang S Y, Spiryagin M, Ding H H, Wu Q, Guo J, Liu Q Y, Wang W J. Rail rolling contact fatigue formation and evolution with surface defects. Int J Fatigue 158: 106762 (2022)
[34]
Li Z L, Zhao X, Dollevoet R. An approach to determine a critical size for rolling contact fatigue initiating from rail surface defects. Int J Rail Transp 5(1): 16–37 (2017)
[35]
Lyu K K, Wang K Y, Ling L, Sun Y, Shi Z Y, Zhai W M. Influence of wheel diameter difference on surface damage for heavy-haul locomotive wheels: Measurements and simulations. Int J Fatigue 132: 105343 (2020)
[36]
Karttunen K, Kabo E, Ekberg A. The influence of track geometry irregularities on rolling contact fatigue. Wear 314(1–2): 78–86 (2014)
[37]
Spangenberg U, Fröhling R D, Els P S. Long-term wear and rolling contact fatigue behaviour of a conformal wheel profile designed for large radius curves. Vehicle Syst Dyn 57(1): 44–63 (2019)
[38]
Khan S A, Persson I, Lundberg J, Stenström C. Prediction of top-of-rail friction control effects on rail RCF suppressed by wear. Wear 380–381: 106–114 (2017)
[39]
Ma X C, Wang P, Xu J M, Chen R, Wang J. Assessment of non-Hertzian wheel–rail contact models for numerical simulation of rail damages in switch panel of railway turnout. Wear 432–433: 102912 (2019)
[40]
Dirks B, Enblom R, Berg M. Prediction of wheel profile wear and crack growth—Comparisons with measurements. Wear 366–367: 84–94 (2016)
[41]
Butini E, Marini L, Meacci M, Meli E, Rindi A, Zhao X J, Wang W J. An innovative model for the prediction of wheel—Rail wear and rolling contact fatigue. Wear 436–437: 203025 (2019)
[42]
Spiryagin M, Lee K S, Yoo H H. Control system for maximum use of adhesive forces of a railway vehicle in a tractive mode. Mech Syst Signal Pr 22(3): 709–720 (2008)
[43]
Spiryagin M, Persson I, Wu Q, Bosomworth C, Wolfs P, Cole C. A co-simulation approach for heavy haul long distance locomotive–track simulation studies. Vehicle Syst Dyn 57(9): 1363–1380 (2019)
[44]
Shrestha S, Spiryagin M, Wu Q. Friction condition characterization for rail vehicle advanced braking system. Mech Syst Signal Pr 134: 106324 (2019)
[45]
Yang Y F, Ling L, Zhang T, Wang K Y, Zhai W M. An advanced antislip control algorithm for locomotives under complex friction conditions. J Comput Nonlin Dyn 16(10): 101004 (2021)
[46]
Shrestha S, Spiryagin M, Wu Q. Experimental prototyping of the adhesion braking control system design concept for a mechatronic bogie. Railway Eng Sci 29(1): 15–29 (2021)
[47]
Tao G Q, Wen Z F, Guan Q H, Zhao X, Luo Y, Jin X S. Locomotive wheel wear simulation in complex environment of wheel–rail interface. Wear 430–431: 214–221 (2019)
[48]
Zhu B, Zeng J, Zhang D F, Wu Y. A non-Hertzian wheel–rail contact model considering wheelset yaw and its application in wheel wear prediction. Wear 432–433: 202958 (2019)
[49]
Ye Y G, Sun Y, Shi D C, Peng B, Hecht M. A wheel wear prediction model of non-Hertzian wheel–rail contact considering wheelset yaw: Comparison between simulated and field test results. Wear 474–475: 203715 (2021)
[50]
Zhai W M. Vehicle–track Coupled Dynamics: Theory and Applications. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020.
DOI
[51]
Zhai W M. Two simple fast integration methods for large-scale dynamic problems in engineering. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39(24): 4199–4214 (1996).
DOI
[52]
Zhai W M, Wang K Y, Cai C B. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dyn 47(11): 1349–1376 (2009)
[53]
Sun Y, Zhai W M, Guo Y. A robust non-Hertzian contact method for wheel–rail normal contact analysis. Vehicle Syst Dyn 56(12): 1899–1921 (2018)
[54]
Sun Y, Zhai W M, Ye Y G, Zhu L M, Guo Y. A simplified model for solving wheel–rail non-Hertzian normal contact problem under the influence of yaw angle. Int J Mech Sci 174: 105554 (2020)
[55]
Yang Y F, Guo X R, Sun Y, Ling L, Zhang T, Wang K Y, Zhai W M. Non-Hertzian contact analysis of heavy-haul locomotive wheel/rail dynamic interactions under changeable friction conditions. Vehicle Syst Dyn 60(6): 2167–2189 (2022)
[56]
Sh Sichani M, Enblom R, Berg M. An alternative to FASTSIM for tangential solution of the wheel–rail contact. Vehicle Syst Dyn 54(6): 748–764 (2016)
[57]
Sh Sichani M, Enblom R, Berg M. A fast wheel–rail contact model for application to damage analysis in vehicle dynamics simulation. Wear 366–367: 123–130 (2016)
[58]
Dirks B, Enblom R, Ekberg A, Berg M. The development of a crack propagation model for railway wheels and rails. Fatigue Fract Eng M 38(12): 1478–1491 (2015)
[59]
Wang W J, Lewis S R, Lewis R, Beagles A, He C G, Liu Q Y. The role of slip ratio in rolling contact fatigue of rail materials under wet conditions. Wear 376–377: 1892–1900 (2017)
Friction
Pages 1470-1492
Cite this article:
YANG Y, LING L, WANG J, et al. A numerical study on tread wear and fatigue damage of railway wheels subjected to anti-slip control. Friction, 2023, 11(8): 1470-1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-022-0684-8

439

Views

24

Downloads

10

Crossref

5

Web of Science

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 April 2022
Revised: 14 July 2022
Accepted: 15 August 2022
Published: 10 February 2023
© The author(s) 2022.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return