Journal Home > Volume 10 , Issue 4
Friction 2022, 10(4): 491-515 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-021-0502-8
Review Article | Open Access | Issue | Published: 05 April 2022

Drag reduction methods at solid-liquid interfaces

Show Author's Information Min LIU,  Liran MA( )
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Keywords:
microstructures, drag reduction, superhydrophobic surfaces, supercavitation, polymer additives
Cite this article:
LIU M, MA L. Drag reduction methods at solid-liquid interfaces. Friction, 2022, 10(4): 491-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-021-0502-8
Download citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTeX

1047

Views

118

Downloads

Citations

20

Crossref

22

WoS

22

Scopus

2

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Friction drag is a nonnegligible matter when relative motion happens between solid and liquid phase, which brings many inconveniences in ship navigation, fluid transportation, microfluid devices, etc. Thereby various methods have been developed focusing on friction drag reduction. In this article, a review of several widely studied drag reduction methods is given, specially, their advantages and limitations in practical applications are discussed. Besides, a comparison of different methods is made and the development prospect of drag reduction is concluded.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Drag reduction methods at solid-liquid interfaces

Show Author's information Min LIU, Liran MA( )
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract

Friction drag is a nonnegligible matter when relative motion happens between solid and liquid phase, which brings many inconveniences in ship navigation, fluid transportation, microfluid devices, etc. Thereby various methods have been developed focusing on friction drag reduction. In this article, a review of several widely studied drag reduction methods is given, specially, their advantages and limitations in practical applications are discussed. Besides, a comparison of different methods is made and the development prospect of drag reduction is concluded.

Keywords: microstructures, drag reduction, superhydrophobic surfaces, supercavitation, polymer additives

References(202)

[1]
Alben S, Shelley M, Zhang J. Drag reduction through self- similar bending of a flexible body. Nature 420(6915):479-481 (2002)
DOI Google Scholar
[2]
Fukuda K, Tokunaga J, Nobunaga T, Nakatani T, Iwasaki T, Kunitake Y. Frictional drag reduction with air lubricant over a super-water-repellent surface. J Mar Sci Technol 5(3):123-130 (2000)
DOI Google Scholar
[3]
Sun Y W, Yan X P, Yuan C Q, Bai X Q. Insight into tribological problems of green ship and corresponding research progresses. Friction 6(4):472-483 (2018)
DOI Google Scholar
[4]
Ushida A, Hasegawa T, Narumi T. Drag reduction for liquid flow through micro-apertures. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 165(21-22):1516-1524 (2010)
DOI Google Scholar
[5]
Wu L Y, Jiao Z B, Song Y Q, Liu C H, Wang H, Yan Y Y. Experimental investigations on drag-reduction characteristics of bionic surface with water-trapping microstructures of fish scales. Sci Rep 8(1):12186 (2018)
DOI Google Scholar
[6]
Xu M C, Grabowski A, Yu N, Kerezyte G, Lee J W, Pfeifer B R, Kim C J C. Superhydrophobic drag reduction for turbulent flows in open water. Phys Rev Applied 13(3):034056 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[7]
Daniello R J, Waterhouse N E, Rothstein J P. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 21(8):085103 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[8]
Bidkar R A, Leblanc L, Kulkarni A J, Bahadur V, Ceccio S L, Perlin M. Skin-friction drag reduction in the turbulent regime using random-textured hydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 26(8):085108 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[9]
Bixler G D, Bhushan B. Fluid drag reduction with shark-skin riblet inspired microstructured surfaces. Adv Funct Mater 23(36):4507-4528 (2013)
DOI Google Scholar
[10]
Pu X, Li G J, Liu Y H. Progress and perspective of studies on biomimetic shark skin drag reduction. ChemBioEng Rev 3(1):26-40 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[11]
Lang A W, Motta P, Hidalgo P, Westcott M. Bristled shark skin: a microgeometry for boundary layer control? Bioinspir Biomim 3(4):046005 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[12]
Dean B, Bhushan B. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: A review. Phil Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 368(1929):4775-4806 (2010)
DOI Google Scholar
[13]
Bechert D W, Bruse M, Hage W. Experiments with three- dimensional riblets as an idealized model of shark skin. Exp Fluids 28(5):403-412 (2000)
DOI Google Scholar
[14]
Wang D H, Sun Q Q, Hokkanen M J, Zhang C L, Lin F Y, Liu Q, Zhu S P, Zhou T F, Chang Q, He B, et al. Design of robust superhydrophobic surfaces. Nature 582(7810):55-59 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[15]
Lee C, Choi C H, Kim C J. Superhydrophobic drag reduction in laminar flows: A critical review. Exp Fluids 57(12):176 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[16]
Zhang X, Shi F, Niu J, Jiang Y G, Wang Z Q. Superhydrophobic surfaces: From structural control to functional application. J Mater Chem 18(6):621-633 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[17]
Nesteruk I. Drag effectiveness of supercavitating underwater hulls. In Supercavitation. Nesteruk I, Ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 79-106.
DOI
[18]
Savchenko Y N. Supercavitation-problems and perspectives. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cavitation, California, USA, 2001: 20-23.
Google Scholar
[19]
Amromin E L. Challenging problems on ventilated cavitation and paths to their computational solutions. J Marine Sci Appl 18(3):260-270 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[20]
Wang J D, Wang B, Chen D R. Underwater drag reduction by gas. Friction 2(4):295-309 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[21]
Ceccio S L. Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 42(1):183-203 (2010)
DOI Google Scholar
[22]
McCormick Dr M E, Bhattacharyya Dr R. Drag reduction of a submersible hull by electrolysis. Nav Eng J 85(2):11-16 (1973)
DOI Google Scholar
[23]
Madavan N K, Deutsch S, Merkle C L. Reduction of turbulent skin friction by microbubbles. Phys Fluids 27(2):356-363 (1984)
DOI Google Scholar
[24]
Skudarnov P V, Lin C X. Drag reduction by gas injection into turbulent boundary layer: Density ratio effect. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow 27(3):436-444 (2006)
DOI Google Scholar
[25]
Kumagai I, Takahashi Y, Murai Y. Power-saving device for air bubble generation using a hydrofoil to reduce ship drag: Theory, experiments, and application to ships. Ocean Eng 95:183-194 (2015)
DOI Google Scholar
[26]
Jagdish B N, Brandon T Z X, Kwee T J, Dev A K. Experimental study of air layer sustainability for frictional drag reduction. J Ship Res 58(1):30-42 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[27]
Kanai A, Miyata H. Direct numerical simulation of wall turbulent flows with microbubbles. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 35(5):593-615 (2001)
DOI
[28]
Min T, Yoo J Y, Choi H, Joseph D D. Drag reduction by polymer additives in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 486:213-238 (2003)
DOI Google Scholar
[29]
Toms B A. Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers. In Proceedings of the 1st the International Congress on Rheology, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1948: 135-138.
Google Scholar
[30]
Asidin M A, Suali E, Jusnukin T, Lahin F A. Review on the applications and developments of drag reducing polymer in turbulent pipe flow. Chinese J Chem Eng 27(8):1921-1932 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[31]
Kenis P R. Drag reduction by bacterial metabolites. Nature 217(5132):940-942 (1968)
DOI Google Scholar
[32]
Jung W J, Mangiavacchi N, Akhavan R. Suppression of turbulence in wall-bounded flows by high-frequency spanwise oscillations. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 4(8):1605-1607 (1992)
DOI Google Scholar
[33]
Laadhari F, Skandaji L, Morel R. Turbulence reduction in a boundary layer by a local spanwise oscillating surface. Phys Fluids 6(10):3218-3220 (1994)
DOI Google Scholar
[34]
Baron A, Quadrio M. Turbulent drag reduction by spanwise wall oscillations. Appl Sci Res 55(4):311-326 (1995)
DOI Google Scholar
[35]
Choi K S, Clayton B R. The mechanism of turbulent drag reduction with wall oscillation. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 22(1):1-9 (2001)
DOI Google Scholar
[36]
Quadrio M, Ricco P. Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillations. J Fluid Mech 521:251-271 (2004)
DOI Google Scholar
[37]
Quadrio M, Ricco P, Viotti C. Streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity for turbulent drag reduction. J Fluid Mech 627:161-178 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[38]
Tamano S, Itoh M. Drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers by spanwise traveling waves with wall deformation. J Turbul 13:N9 (2012)
DOI Google Scholar
[39]
Muralikrishnan R, Kumaran V. Experimental study of the instability of the viscous flow past a flexible surface. Phys Fluids 14(2):775-780 (2002)
DOI Google Scholar
[40]
Pavlov V V. Dolphin skin as a natural anisotropic compliant wall. Bioinspir Biomim 1(2):31-40 (2006)
DOI Google Scholar
[41]
Sternberg J. A theory for the viscous sublayer of a turbulent flow. J Fluid Mech 13(2):241-271 (1962)
DOI Google Scholar
[42]
Liu E Y, Li L Y, Wang G, Zeng Z X, Zhao W J, Xue Q J. Drag reduction through self-texturing compliant bionic materials. Sci Rep 7(1):40038 (2017)
DOI Google Scholar
[43]
Choi K S, Yang X, Clayton B R, Glover E J, Atlar M, Semenov B N, Kulik V M. Turbulent drag reduction using compliant surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A Mat Phys Eng Sci 453(1965):2229-2240 (1997)
DOI Google Scholar
[44]
Gad-el-Hak M. Compliant coatings: A decade of progress. Appl Mech Rev 49(10):S147-S157 (1996)
DOI Google Scholar
[45]
Carpenter P W, Davies C, Lucey A D. Hydrodynamics and compliant walls: Does the dolphin have a secret? Curr Sci 79(6):758-765 (2000)
Google Scholar
[46]
Luo J B, Zhou X. Superlubricitive engineering-Future industry nearly getting rid of wear and frictional energy consumption. Friction 8(4):643-665 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[47]
Song Y M, Mandelli D, Hod O, Urbakh M, Ma M, Zheng Q S. Robust microscale superlubricity in graphite/hexagonal boron nitride layered heterojunctions. Nat Mater 17(10):894-899 (2018)
DOI Google Scholar
[48]
Hod O, Meyer E, Zheng Q S, Urbakh M. Structural superlubricity and ultralow friction across the length scales. Nature 563(7732):485-492 (2018)
DOI Google Scholar
[49]
Zhang J, Chen X C, Xu Q, Ma T B, Hu Y Z, Wang H, Tieu A K, Luo J B. Effects of grain boundary on wear of graphene at the nanoscale: A molecular dynamics study. Carbon 143:578-586 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[50]
Li J J, Li J F, Chen X C, Liu Y H, Luo J B. Microscale superlubricity at multiple gold-graphite heterointerfaces under ambient conditions. Carbon 161:827-833 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[51]
Klein J, Kumacheva E, Mahalu D, Perahia D, Fetters L J. Reduction of frictional forces between solid surfaces bearing polymer brushes. Nature 370(6491):634-636 (1994)
DOI Google Scholar
[52]
Li J J, Zhang C H, Luo J B. Superlubricity behavior with phosphoric acid-water network induced by rubbing. Langmuir 27(15):9413-9417 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[53]
Ge X Y, Halmans T, Li J J, Luo J B. Molecular behaviors in thin film lubrication-Part three: Superlubricity attained by polar and nonpolar molecules. Friction 7(6):625-636 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[54]
Han T Y, Zhang C H, Li J J, Yuan S H, Chen X C, Zhang J Y, Luo J B. Origins of superlubricity promoted by hydrated multivalent ions. J Phys Chem Lett 11(1):184-190 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[55]
Meng Y G, Xu J, Jin Z M, Prakash B, Hu Y Z. A review of recent advances in tribology. Friction 8(2):221-300 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[56]
Gray J. Studies in animal locomotion: VI. The propulsive powers of the dolphin. J Exp Biol 13(2):192-199 (1936)
DOI Google Scholar
[57]
Kramer Dr M O. Boundary layer stabilization by distributed damping. Nav Eng J 74(2):341-348 (1962)
DOI Google Scholar
[58]
Videler J J, Haydar D, Snoek R, Hoving H J T, Szabo B G. Lubricating the swordfish head. J Exp Biol 219(13):1953-1956 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[59]
Wen L, Weaver J C, Lauder G V. Biomimetic shark skin: Design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function. J Exp Biol 217(10):1656-1666 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[60]
Walsh M J, Weinstein L M. Drag and heat transfer on surfaces with small longitudinal fins. In Proceedings of the 11th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Seattle, USA, 1978: 1161.
DOI Google Scholar
[61]
Walsh M, Lindemann A. Optimization and application of riblets for turbulent drag reduction. In Proceedings of the AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, USA, 1984: 347.
DOI Google Scholar
[62]
Bechert D W, Bruse M, Hage W, Van Der Hoeven J G T, Hoppe G. Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J Fluid Mech 338:59-87 (1997)
DOI Google Scholar
[63]
García-Mayoral R, Jiménez J. Drag reduction by riblets. Phil Trans R Soc A 369(1940):1412-1427 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[64]
McClure P D, Smith B, Baker W, Yagle P. Design, testing and analysis of 2-D and 3-D riblets. In Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Orlando, USA, 2020: 311
Google Scholar
[65]
Ran W, Zare A, Jovanović M R. Model-based design of riblets for turbulent drag reduction. J Fluid Mech 906:A7 (2021)
DOI Google Scholar
[66]
García-Mayoral R, Jiménez J. Hydrodynamic stability and breakdown of the viscous regime over riblets. J Fluid Mech 678:317-347 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[67]
Bechert D W, Hoppe G, Reif W E. On the drag reduction of the shark skin. In Proceedings of the AlAA 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, USA, 1985: 546-563.
DOI Google Scholar
[68]
Park S R, Wallace J M. Flow alteration and drag reduction by riblets in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 32(1):31-38 (1994)
DOI Google Scholar
[69]
Quintavalla S J, Angilella A J, Smits A J. Drag reduction on grooved cylinders in the critical Reynolds number regime. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 48:15-18 (2013)
DOI Google Scholar
[70]
Daeian M A, Moosavi A, Nouri-Borujerdi A, Taghvaei E. Drag reduction in a channel with microstructure grooves using the lattice Boltzmann method. J Phys D Appl Phys 50(10):105301 (2017)
DOI Google Scholar
[71]
Lee C, Lee G W, Choi W, Yoo C H, Chun B, Lee J S, Lee J H, Jung H W. Pattern flow dynamics over rectangular Sharklet patterned membrane surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 514:145961 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[72]
Chien H W, Chen X Y, Tsai W P, Lee M. Inhibition of biofilm formation by rough shark skin-patterned surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerf 186:110738 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[73]
Zhao D Y, Huang Z P, Wang M J, Wang T, Jin Y F. Vacuum casting replication of micro-riblets on shark skin for drag- reducing applications. J Mater Process Tech 212(1):198-202 (2012)
DOI Google Scholar
[74]
Schumacher J F, Carman M L, Estes T G, Feinberg A W, Wilson L H, Callow M E, Callow J A, Finlay J A, Brennan A B. Engineered antifouling microtopographies-effect of feature size, geometry, and roughness on settlement of zoospores of the green alga Ulva. Biofouling 23(1):55-62 (2007)
DOI Google Scholar
[75]
Martínez-Calderon M, Rodríguez A, Dias-Ponte A, Morant-Miñana M C, Gómez-Aranzadi M, Olaizola S M. Femtosecond laser fabrication of highly hydrophobic stainless steel surface with hierarchical structures fabricated by combining ordered microstructures and LIPSS. Appl Surf Sci 374:81-89 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[76]
Lee H, Lee B P, Messersmith P B. A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos. Nature 448(7151):338-341 (2007)
DOI Google Scholar
[77]
Büttner C C, Schulz U. Shark skin inspired riblet coatings for aerodynamically optimized high temperature applications in aeroengines. Adv Eng Mater 13(4):288-295 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[78]
Schlieter A, Shakhverdova I, Leyens C. Fabrication of riblet structures on a Ni-based superalloy (PWA1483) for potential drag reduction in high temperature applications based on laser optimization. Adv Eng Mater 17(7):1008-1016 (2015)
DOI Google Scholar
[79]
Oehlert K, Seume J R, Siegel F, Ostendorf A, Wang B, Denkena B, Vynnyk T, Reithmeier E, Hage W, Knobloch K, et al. Exploratory experiments on machined riblets for 2-D compressor blades. In Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Seattle, USA, 2007: 25-39.
DOI Google Scholar
[80]
Li Y R, Mao H C, Hu P, Hermes M, Lim H, Yoon J, Luhar M, Chen Y, Wu W. Bioinspired functional surfaces enabled by multiscale stereolithography. Adv Mater Technol 4(5):1800638 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[81]
Li F, Du M, Zheng Q. Dopamine/silica nanoparticle assembled, microscale porous structure for versatile superamphiphobic coating. ACS Nano 10(2):2910-2921 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[82]
Chen A F, Huang H X. Rapid fabrication of T-shaped micropillars on polypropylene surfaces with robust Cassie- Baxter state for quantitative droplet collection. J Phys Chem C 120(3):1556-1561 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[83]
Bechert D W, Bruse M, Hage W, Meyer R. Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and their technological application. Naturwissenschaften 87(4):157-171 (2000)
DOI Google Scholar
[84]
Bixlera G D, Bhushan B. Bioinspired micro/nanostructured surfaces for oil drag reduction in closed channel flow. Soft Matter 9(5):1620-1635 (2013)
DOI Google Scholar
[85]
Choi H, Moin P, Kim J. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J Fluid Mech 255:503-539 (1993)
DOI Google Scholar
[86]
Fu Y F, Yuan C Q, Bai X Q. Marine drag reduction of shark skin inspired riblet surfaces. Biosurf Biotribol 3(1):11-24 (2017)
DOI Google Scholar
[87]
Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot 79(6):667-677 (1997)
DOI Google Scholar
[88]
Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1-8 (1997)
DOI Google Scholar
[89]
Latthe S S, Terashima C, Nakata K, Sakai M, Fujishima A. Development of sol-gel processed semi-transparent and self-cleaning superhydrophobic coatings. J Mater Chem A 2(15):5548-5553 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[90]
Sun K, Yang H, Xue W, He A, Zhu D H, Liu W W, Adeyemi K, Cao Y. Anti-biofouling superhydrophobic surface fabricated by picosecond laser texturing of stainless steel. Appl Surf Sci 436:263-267 (2018)
DOI Google Scholar
[91]
Cao L L, Jones A K, Sikka V K, Wu J Z, Gao D. Anti-icing superhydrophobic coatings. Langmuir 25(21):12444-12448 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[92]
Zhang X, Huang Y L, Ma Z S, Niu L Y, Sun C Q. From ice superlubricity to quantum friction: Electronic repulsivity and phononic elasticity. Friction 3(4):294-319 (2015)
DOI Google Scholar
[93]
Zhang L H, Xu L D, Sun Y L, Yang N. Robust and durable superhydrophobic polyurethane sponge for oil/water separation. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(43):11260-11268 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[94]
Watanabe K, Udagawa Y, Udagawa H. Drag reduction of Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe with a highly water- repellent wall. J Fluid Mech 381:225-238 (1999)
DOI Google Scholar
[95]
Ou J, Perot B, Rothstein J P. Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 16(12):4635-4643 (2004)
DOI Google Scholar
[96]
Joseph P, Cottin-Bizonne C, Benoit J M, Ybert C, Journet C, Tabeling P, Bocquet L. Slippage of water past superhydrophobic carbon nanotube forests in microchannels. Phys Rev Lett 97(15):156104 (2006)
DOI Google Scholar
[97]
Choi C H, Kim C J. Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface. Phys Rev Lett 96(6):066001 (2006)
DOI Google Scholar
[98]
Park H, Sun G Y, Kim C J C. Superhydrophobic turbulent drag reduction as a function of surface grating parameters. J Fluid Mech 747:722-734 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[99]
Srinivasan S, Kleingartner J A, Gilbert J B, Cohen R E, Milne A J, McKinley G H. Sustainable drag reduction in turbulent Taylor-Couette flows by depositing sprayable superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 114(1):014501 (2015)
DOI Google Scholar
[100]
Tuo Y J, Zhang H F, Rong W T, Jiang S Y, Chen W P, Liu X W. Drag reduction of anisotropic superhydrophobic surfaces prepared by laser etching. Langmuir 35(34):11016-11022 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[101]
Erbil H Y, Cansoy C E. Range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter equations for superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 25(24):14135-14145 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[102]
Wenzel R N. Surface roughness and contact angle. J Phys Chem 53(9):1466-1467 (1949)
DOI Google Scholar
[103]
Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40(1):546-551 (1944)
DOI Google Scholar
[104]
Feng Y, Zhang Y N, Xi J M, Zhu Y, Wang N, Xia F, Jiang L. Petal effect: A superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. Langmuir 24(8):4114-4119 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[105]
Bhushan B, Her E K. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces with high and low adhesion inspired from rose petal. Langmuir 26(11):8207-8217 (2010)
DOI Google Scholar
[106]
Wang J D, Liu F B, Chen H S, Chen D R. Superhydrophobic behavior achieved from hydrophilic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 95(8):084104 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[107]
Ahmmed K M T, Patience C, Kietzig A M. Internal and external flow over laser-textured superhydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). ACS Appl Mater Inter 8(40):27411-27419 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[108]
Wang Y, Yang J, Guo X B, Zhang Q, Wang J Y, Ding J N, Yuan N Y. Fabrication and tribological properties of superhydrophobic nickel films with positive and negative biomimetic microtextures. Friction 2(3):287-294 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[109]
Liu Y B, Liu J, Tian Y, Zhang H, Wang R M, Zhang B L, Zhang H P, Zhang Q Y. Robust organic-inorganic composite films with multifunctional properties of superhydrophobicity, self-healing, and drag reduction. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(11):4468-4478 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[110]
Cheng M J, Zhang S S, Dong H Y, Han S H, Wei H, Shi F. Improving the durability of a drag-reducing nanocoating by enhancing its mechanical stability. ACS Appl Mater Inter 7(7):4275-4282 (2015)
DOI Google Scholar
[111]
Truesdell R, Mammoli A, Vorobieff P, Van Swol F, Brinker C J. Drag reduction on a patterned superhydrophobic surface. Phys Rev Lett 97(4):044504 (2006)
DOI Google Scholar
[112]
Choi C H, Ulmanella U, Kim J, Ho C M, Kim C J. Effective slip and friction reduction in nanograted superhydrophobic microchannels. Phys Fluids 18(8):087105 (2006)
DOI Google Scholar
[113]
Shi F, Niu J, Liu J, Liu F, Wang Z, Feng X Q, Zhang X. Towards understanding why a superhydrophobic coating is needed by water striders. Adv Mater 19(17):2257-2261 (2007)
DOI Google Scholar
[114]
Ybert C, Barentin C, Cottin-Bizonne C, Joseph P, Bocquet L. Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: Scaling laws for generic geometries. Phys Fluids 19(12):123601 (2007)
DOI Google Scholar
[115]
Neto C, Evans D R, Bonaccurso E, Butt H J, Craig V S J. Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: A review of experimental studies. Rep Prog Phys 68(12):2859-2897 (2005)
DOI Google Scholar
[116]
Zheng K Q, Zhang J D, Dodiuk H, Kenig S, Barry C, Sun H W, Mead J. Effect of superhydrophobic composite coatings on drag reduction in laminar flow. ACS Appl Polym Mater 2(4):1614-1622 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[117]
Dong H Y, Cheng M J, Zhang Y J, Wei H, Shi F. Extraordinary drag-reducing effect of a superhydrophobic coating on a macroscopic model ship at high speed. J Mater Chem A 1(19):5886-5891 (2013)
DOI Google Scholar
[118]
Bocquet L, Lauga E. A smooth future? Nat Mater 10(5):334-337 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[119]
Xu M C, Sun G Y, Kim C J. Infinite lifetime of underwater superhydrophobic states. Phys Rev Lett 113(13):136103 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[120]
Lee C, Kim C J. Underwater restoration and retention of gases on superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction. Phys Rev Lett 106(1):014502 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[121]
Panchanathan D, Rajappan A, Varanasi K K, McKinley G H. Plastron regeneration on submerged superhydrophobic surfaces using in situ gas generation by chemical reaction. ACS Appl Mater Inter 10(39):33684-33692 (2018)
DOI Google Scholar
[122]
Aljallis E, Sarshar M A, Datla R, Sikka V, Jones A, Choi C H. Experimental study of skin friction drag reduction on superhydrophobic flat plates in high Reynolds number boundary layer flow. Phys Fluids 25(2):025103 (2013)
DOI Google Scholar
[123]
Shirtcliffe N J, McHale G, Newton M I, Zhang Y. Superhydrophobic copper tubes with possible flow enhancement and drag reduction. ACS Appl Mater Inter 1(6):1316-1323 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[124]
Spurk J H. On the gas loss from ventilated supercavities. Acta Mech 155(3):125-135 (2002)
DOI Google Scholar
[125]
Kawakami E, Arndt R E A. Investigation of the behavior of ventilated supercavities. J Fluid Eng 133(9):091305 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[126]
Paik B G, Park I R, Kim K S, Lee K, Kim M J, Kim K Y. Design of a bubble collecting section in a high speed water tunnel for ventilated supercavitation experiments. J Mech Sci Technol 31(9):4227-4235 (2017)
DOI Google Scholar
[127]
Shafaghat R, Hosseinalipour S M, Derakhshani S M E. Derivation of a correlation for drag coefficient in two- dimensional bounded supercavitating flows, using artificial neural networks. Arch Appl Mech 80(7):771-784 (2010)
DOI Google Scholar
[128]
Karn A, Arndt R E A, Hong J R. Dependence of supercavity closure upon flow unsteadiness. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 68:493-498 (2015)
DOI Google Scholar
[129]
Meng Q C, Zhang Z H, Liu J B. Numerical calculation of supercavitating flows over the disk cavitator of a subsonic underwater projectile. J Marine Sci Appl 14(3):283-289 (2015)
DOI Google Scholar
[130]
Gągol M, Przyjazny A, Boczkaj G. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation-A review. Chem Eng J 338:599-627 (2018)
DOI Google Scholar
[131]
Singhal A K, Athavale M M, Li H Y, Jiang Y. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluid Eng 124(3):617-624 (2002)
DOI Google Scholar
[132]
Gevari M T, Abbasiasl T, Niazi S, Ghorbani M, Koşar A. Direct and indirect thermal applications of hydrodynamic and acoustic cavitation: A review. Appl Therm Eng 171:115065 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[133]
Gong B Z, Zhang B J, Zhang H. NEMD study for supercavitation mechanism with underwater object. Phys Lett A 372(47):7063-7067 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[134]
Dzielski J E. Longitudinal stability of a supercavitating vehicle. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 36(4):562-570 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[135]
Jiang C X, Li F C. Numerical study of natural supercavitation influenced by rheological properties of turbulent drag- reducing additives. Adv Mech Eng 6:275316 (2014)
DOI Google Scholar
[136]
Cameron P J K, Rogers P H, Doane J W, Gifford D H. An experiment for the study of free-flying supercavitating projectiles. J Fluid Eng 133(2):021303 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[137]
Spurk J H. Effect of gas temperature on the gas loss from ventilated cavities. Acta Mech 172(1):75-81 (2004)
DOI Google Scholar
[138]
Zhang X W, Wei Y J, Zhang J Z, Wang C, Yu K P. Experimental research on the shape characters of natural and ventilated supercavitation. J Hydrodyn 19(5):564-571 (2007)
DOI Google Scholar
[139]
Vanek B, Bokor J, Balas G J, Arndt R E A. Longitudinal motion control of a high-speed supercavitation vehicle. J Vib Control 13(2):159-184 (2007)
DOI Google Scholar
[140]
Lv Y P, Xiong T H, Yi W J. Multistability in a simplified underwater supercavity system. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 27(8):1750121 (2017)
DOI Google Scholar
[141]
Kuklinski R, Henoch C, Castano J. Experimental study of ventilated cavities on dynamic test model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cavitation, California, USA, 2001: 1-8.
Google Scholar
[142]
Lee Q Y, Xue L P, He Y S. Experimental study of ventilated supercavities with a dynamic pitching model. J Hydrodyn 20(4):456-460 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[143]
Hrubes J D. High-speed imaging of supercavitating underwater projectiles. Exp Fluids 30(1):57-64 (2001)
DOI Google Scholar
[144]
Zhang B, Zhang Y W, Yuan X L. Effects of the profile of a supercavitating vehicle’s front-end on supercavity generation. J Marine Sci Appl 8(4):323-327 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[145]
Wallner T. Supercavitation: A German status report. Naval Forces 24(5):97-102 (2003)
Google Scholar
[146]
Vanek B, Bokor J, Balas G. High-speed supercavitation vehicle control. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, 2006: 1-8.
DOI Google Scholar
[147]
Willke H, Blumenthal N. Supercavitation-A challenge for future underwater weapon systems. Naval Forces 22(3):50-53 (2001)
Google Scholar
[148]
Klein J, Raviv U, Perkin S, Kampf N, Chai L, Giasson S. Fluidity of water and of hydrated ions confined between solid surfaces to molecularly thin films. J Phys: Condens Matter 16(45):S5437-S5448 (2004)
DOI Google Scholar
[149]
Raviv U, Giasson S, Kampf N, Gohy J F, Jérôme R, Klein J. Lubrication by charged polymers. Nature 425(6954):163-165 (2003)
DOI Google Scholar
[150]
Chen M, Briscoe W H, Armes S P, Klein J. Lubrication at physiological pressures by polyzwitterionic brushes. Science 323(5922):1698-1701 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[151]
Burger E D, Munk W R, Wahl H A. Flow increase in the Trans Alaska Pipeline through use of a polymeric drag- reducing additive. J Petrol Technol 34(2):377-386 (1982)
DOI Google Scholar
[152]
Myska J, Mik V. Application of a drag reducing surfactant in the heating circuit. Energ Buildings 35(8):813-819 (2003)
DOI Google Scholar
[153]
Figueredo R C R, Sabadini E. Firefighting foam stability: The effect of the drag reducer poly(ethylene) oxide. Colloid Surface A Physicochem Eng Aspects 215(1-3):77-86 (2003)
DOI Google Scholar
[154]
El-azm M M A, Kassab S Z, Elshafie S A. Experimental and numerical study for turbulent flow drag reduction in district cooling systems. CFD Letters 6(3):113-125 (2014)
Google Scholar
[155]
Al-Sarkhi A. Drag reduction with polymers in gas-liquid/ liquid-liquid flows in pipes: A literature review. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2(1):41-48 (2010)
DOI Google Scholar
[156]
Marhefka J N, Marascalco P J, Chapman T M, Russell A J, Kameneva M V. Poly(N-vinylformamide)-A drag-reducing polymer for biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 7(5):1597-1603 (2006)
DOI Google Scholar
[157]
Kim N J, Kim S, Lim S H, Chen K, Chun W. Measurement of drag reduction in polymer added turbulent flow. Int Commun Heat Mass 36(10):1014-1019 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[158]
Al-Yaari M, Soleimani A, Abu-Sharkh B, Al-Mubaiyedh U, Al-Sarkhi A. Effect of drag reducing polymers on oil-water flow in a horizontal pipe. Int J Multiphase Flow 35(6):516-524 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[159]
Virk P S. Drag reduction fundamentals. AIChE J 21(4):625-656 (1975)
DOI Google Scholar
[160]
Shao X M, Lin J Z, Wu T, Li Y L. Experimental research on drag reduction by polymer additives in a turbulent pipe flow. Can J Chem Eng 80(2):293-298 (2002)
DOI Google Scholar
[161]
Pereira A S, Soares E J. Polymer degradation of dilute solutions in turbulent drag reducing flows in a cylindrical double gap rheometer device. J Non-Newton Fluid 179-180:9-22 (2012)
DOI Google Scholar
[162]
Benzi R, Ching E S C, Horesh N, Procaccia I. Theory of concentration dependence in drag reduction by polymers and of the maximum drag reduction asymptote. Phys Rev Lett 92(7):078302 (2004)
DOI Google Scholar
[163]
Shanshool J, Al-Qamaje H M. Effect of molecular weight on turbulent drag reduction with polyisobutylene. In Proceedings of the 1st Regional Conference of Engineering Sciences NUCEJ Spatial ISSUE, Baghdad, Iraq, 2008: 52-59.
Google Scholar
[164]
Vanapalli S A, Islam M T, Solomon M J. Scission-induced bounds on maximum polymer drag reduction in turbulent flow. Phys Fluids 17(9):095108 (2005)
DOI Google Scholar
[165]
Jubran B A, Zurigat Y H, Goosen M F A. Drag reducing agents in multiphase flow pipelines: Recent trends and future needs. Petrol Sci Technol 23(11-12):1403-1424 (2005)
DOI Google Scholar
[166]
Nakken T, Tande M, Nyström B. Effects of molar mass, concentration and thermodynamic conditions on polymer- induced flow drag reduction. Eur Polym J 40(1):181-186 (2004)
DOI Google Scholar
[167]
Kim O K, Little R C, Patterson R L, Ting R T. Polymer structures and turbulent shear stability of drag reducing solutions. Nature 250(5465):408-410 (1974)
DOI Google Scholar
[168]
Soares E J. Review of mechanical degradation and de-aggregation of drag reducing polymers in turbulent flows. J Non-Newton Fluid 276:104225 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[169]
Nguyen T Q, Kausch H H. Kinetics of polymer degradation in transient elongational flow. Macromol Chem Phys 190(6):1389-1406 (1989)
DOI Google Scholar
[170]
Zhang K, Hyun G H, Jin H J. Mechanical degradation of water-soluble acrylamide copolymer under a turbulent flow: Effect of molecular weight and temperature. J Ind Eng Chem 33:156-161 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[171]
Moussa T, Tiu C. Factors affecting polymer degradation in turbulent pipe flow. Chem Eng Sci 49(10):1681-1692 (1994)
DOI Google Scholar
[172]
Brostow W. Drag reduction and mechanical degradation in polymer solutions in flow. Polymer 24(5):631-638 (1983)
DOI Google Scholar
[173]
Brostow W, Ertepinar H, Singh R P. Flow of dilute polymer solutions: chain conformations and degradation of drag reducers. Macromolecules 23(24):5109-5118 (1990)
DOI Google Scholar
[174]
Liberatore M W, Baik S, McHugh A J, Hanratty T J. Turbulent drag reduction of polyacrylamide solutions: Effect of degradation on molecular weight distribution. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 123(2-3):175-183 (2004)
DOI Google Scholar
[175]
Cox L R, Dunlop E H, North A M. Role of molecular aggregates in liquid drag reduction by polymers. Nature 249(5454):243-245 (1974)
DOI Google Scholar
[176]
Zhang X, Duan X L, Muzychka Y. Degradation of flow drag reduction with polymer additives-A new molecular view. J Mol Liq 292:111360 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[177]
Shanshool J, Jabbar M F A, Slaiman I N. The influence of mechanical effects on degradation of polyisobutylene as drag reducing agents. Pet Coal 53(3):218-222 (2011)
Google Scholar
[178]
Berman N S. Evidence for molecular interactions in drag reduction in turbulent pipe flows. Polym Eng Sci 20(7):451-455 (1980)
DOI Google Scholar
[179]
Brostow W. Drag reduction in flow: Review of applications, mechanism and prediction. J Ind Eng Chem 14(4):409-416 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[180]
Lumley J L. Drag reduction by additives. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1:367-384 (1969)
DOI Google Scholar
[181]
Lumley J L. Drag reduction in two phase and polymer flows. Phys Fluids 20(10):S64-S70 (1977)
DOI Google Scholar
[182]
De Gennes P G. Introduction to Polymer Dynamics. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
DOI
[183]
Rabin Y, Zielinska B J A. Scale-dependent enhancement and damping of vorticity disturbances by polymers in elongational flow. Phys Rev Lett 63(5):512-515 (1989)
DOI Google Scholar
[184]
Van Dama P H J, Wegdam G H, Van Der Elsken J. The structure of turbulence in a dilute polymer solution. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 53:215-225 (1994)
DOI Google Scholar
[185]
Den Toonder J M J, Hulsen M A, Kuiken G D C, Nieuwstadt F T M. Drag reduction by polymer additives in a turbulent pipe flow: numerical and laboratory experiments. J Fluid Mech 337:193-231 (1997)
DOI Google Scholar
[186]
Pu X, Li G J, Huang H L. Preparation, anti-biofouling and drag-reduction properties of a biomimetic shark skin surface. Biol Open 5(4):389-396 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[187]
Viswanath P R. Aircraft viscous drag reduction using riblets. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(6-7):571-600 (2002)
DOI Google Scholar
[188]
Aoki K, Muto K, Okanaga H. Aerodynamic characteristics and flow pattern of a golf ball with rotation. Procedia Eng 2(2):2431-2436 (2010)
DOI Google Scholar
[189]
Alam F, Steiner T, Chowdhury H, Moria H, Khan I, Aldawi F, Subic A. A study of golf ball aerodynamic drag. Procedia Eng 13:226-231 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[190]
Wang W, He Y Y, Zhao J, Mao J Y, Hu Y T, Luo J B. Optimization of groove texture profile to improve hydrodynamic lubrication performance: Theory and experiments. Friction 8(1):83-94 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[191]
Monfared M, Alidoostan M A, Saranjam B. Experimental study on the friction drag reduction of superhydrophobic surfaces in closed channel flow. J Appl Fluid Mech 12(1):69-76 (2019)
DOI Google Scholar
[192]
Bhambri P, Narain R, Fleck B A. Thermo-responsive polymers for drag reduction in turbulent Taylor-Couette flow. J Appl Polym Sci 133(46):44191 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
[193]
Min T, Choi H, Yoo J Y. Maximum drag reduction in a turbulent channel flow by polymer additives. J Fluid Mech 492:91-100 (2003)
DOI Google Scholar
[194]
Li F C, Kawaguchi Y, Yu B, Wei J J, Hishida K. Experimental study of drag-reduction mechanism for a dilute surfactant solution flow. Int J Heat Mass Tran 51(3-4):835-843 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[195]
Wei J J, Kawaguchi Y, Li F C, Yu B, Zakin J L, Hart D J, Zhang Y. Drag-reducing and heat transfer characteristics of a novel zwitterionic surfactant solution. Int J Heat Mass Tran 52(15-16):3547-3554 (2009)
DOI Google Scholar
[196]
Abdulbari H A, Yunus R M, Abdurahman N H, Charles A. Going against the flow-A review of non-additive means of drag reduction. J Ind Eng Chem 19(1):27-36 (2013)
DOI Google Scholar
[197]
Merkle C L, Deutsch S. Microbubble drag reduction. In Frontiers in Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Gad-el-Hak M, Ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1989: 291-335.
DOI
[198]
Quadrio M. Drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers by in-plane wall motion. Phil Trans R Soc A 369(1940):1428-1442 (2011)
DOI Google Scholar
[199]
Xia Q J, Huang W X, Xu C X. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent boundary layer over a compliant wall. J Fluid Struct 71:126-142 (2017)
DOI Google Scholar
[200]
Cai S P, Jin G Y, Li D M, Yang L. Drag reduction effect of coupling flexible tubes with turbulent flow. J Hydrodyn 20(1):96-100 (2008)
DOI Google Scholar
[201]
Han T Y, Zhang C H, Li J J, Yuan S H, Chen X C, Zhang J Y, Luo J B. Origins of superlubricity promoted by hydrated multivalent ions. J Phys Chem Lett 11(1):184-190 (2020)
DOI Google Scholar
[202]
Saranadhi D, Chen D Y, Kleingartner J A, Srinivasan S, Cohen R E, McKinley G H. Sustained drag reduction in a turbulent flow using a low-temperature Leidenfrost surface. Sci Adv 2(10):e1600686 (2016)
DOI Google Scholar
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 03 August 2020
Revised: 05 January 2021
Accepted: 14 February 2021
Published: 05 April 2022
Issue date: April 2022

Copyright

© The author(s) 2021

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51527901 and 51922058).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return