Journal Home > Volume 6 , Issue 3

In 1953 Archard formulated his general law of wear stating that the amount of worn material is proportional to the normal force and the sliding distance, and is inversely proportional to the hardness of the material. Five years later in 1958, Rabinowicz suggested a criterion determining the minimum size of wear particles. Both concepts became very popular due to their simplicity and robustness, but did not give thorough explanation of the mechanisms involved. It wasn’t until almost 60 years later in 2016 that Aghababaei, Warner and Molinari (AWM) used quasi-molecular simulations to confirm the Rabinowicz criterion. One of the central quantities remained the “asperity size”. Because real surfaces have roughness on many length scales, this size is often ill-defined. The present paper is devoted to two main points: First, we generalize the Rabinowicz-AWM criterion by introducing an “asperity-free” wear criterion, applicable even to fractal roughness. Second, we combine our generalized Rabinowicz criterion with the numerical contact mechanics of rough surfaces and formulate on this basis a deterministic wear model. We identify two types of wear: one leading to the formation of a modified topography which does not wear further and one showing continuously proceeding wear. In the latter case we observe regimes of least wear, mild wear and severe wear which have a clear microscopic interpretation. The worn volume in the region of mild wear occurs typically to be a power law of the normal force with an exponent not necessarily equal to one. The method provides the worn surface topography after an initial settling phase as well as the size distribution of wear particles. We analyse different laws of interface interaction and the corresponding wear laws. A comprehensive parameter study remains a task for future research.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Adhesive wear and particle emission: Numerical approach based on asperity-free formulation of Rabinowicz criterion

Show Author's information Valentin L. POPOV1,2( )Roman POHRT1( )
 Institute of Mechanics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin 10623, Germany
 National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk 634050, Russia

Abstract

In 1953 Archard formulated his general law of wear stating that the amount of worn material is proportional to the normal force and the sliding distance, and is inversely proportional to the hardness of the material. Five years later in 1958, Rabinowicz suggested a criterion determining the minimum size of wear particles. Both concepts became very popular due to their simplicity and robustness, but did not give thorough explanation of the mechanisms involved. It wasn’t until almost 60 years later in 2016 that Aghababaei, Warner and Molinari (AWM) used quasi-molecular simulations to confirm the Rabinowicz criterion. One of the central quantities remained the “asperity size”. Because real surfaces have roughness on many length scales, this size is often ill-defined. The present paper is devoted to two main points: First, we generalize the Rabinowicz-AWM criterion by introducing an “asperity-free” wear criterion, applicable even to fractal roughness. Second, we combine our generalized Rabinowicz criterion with the numerical contact mechanics of rough surfaces and formulate on this basis a deterministic wear model. We identify two types of wear: one leading to the formation of a modified topography which does not wear further and one showing continuously proceeding wear. In the latter case we observe regimes of least wear, mild wear and severe wear which have a clear microscopic interpretation. The worn volume in the region of mild wear occurs typically to be a power law of the normal force with an exponent not necessarily equal to one. The method provides the worn surface topography after an initial settling phase as well as the size distribution of wear particles. We analyse different laws of interface interaction and the corresponding wear laws. A comprehensive parameter study remains a task for future research.

Keywords: wear, adhesion, plasticity, Archard’s law of wear, Rabinowicz criterion, wear particle emission, surface topography, boundary element method (BEM)

References(37)

[1]
Holmberg K, Erdemir A. Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions. Friction 5(3):263–84(2017)
[2]
Wilkinson J M. Why do implants fail? In 15th EFORT Congress: A combined programme in partnership with the BOA, London, 4-6 June, 2014
[3]
Wik A, Dave G. Occurrence and effects of tire wear particles in the environment─A critical review and an initial risk assessment. Environmental Pollution 157:1–11(2009)
[4]
Cook L M. Chemical processes in glass polishing. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 120(1–3):152–71(1990)
[5]
Godet M. Third-bodies in tribology. Wear 136(1):29–45(1990)
[6]
Reye Th. Zur Theorie der Zapfenreibung. Der Civilingenieur 4:235–255(1860)
[7]
Kruschov M M. Resistance of metals to wear by abrasion, as related to hardness. London: Proc. Conf. Lubrication and wear, Institution Mech. Eng. 655–659 (1957)
[8]
Krushchov M M, Babichev M A. Investigation of wear of metals. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 1960
[9]
Archard J F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics 24:981–988(1953)
[10]
Archard J F, Hirst W. The wear of metals under unlubricated conditions. Proc. R. Soc. London A 236:397–410(1956)
[11]
Rabinowicz E. Friction and Wear of Materials. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, inc., 1995
[12]
Kragelski I V. Friction and Wear. Butter Worth, 1965
[13]
Akbarzadeh S, Khonsari M M. On the applicability of miner’s rule to adhesive wear. Tribology Letters 63(2):1–10(2016)
[14]
Meng H C, Ludema K C. Wear models and predictive equations: their form and content. Wear 181:443–457(1995)
[15]
Aghababaei R, Warner D H, Molinari J-F. Critical length scale controls adhesive wear mechanisms. Nature Communications 7:11816(2016)
[16]
Dimaki A, Shilko E, Psakhie S, Popov V L. Simulation of fracture using a mesh-dependent fracture criterion in the discrete element method. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 16(1):41–50(2018)
[17]
Rabinowicz E. The effect of size on the looseness of wear fragments. Wear 2:4–8(1958)
[18]
Dmitriev A I, Nikonov, A Y, Österle W. MD sliding simulations of amorphous tribofilms consisting of either SiO2 or carbon. Lubricants 4(3):1–24(2016)
[19]
Pohrt R, Li Q. Complete Boundary element formulation for normal and tangential contact problems. Physical Mesomechanics 17:334–340(2014)
[20]
Aghababaei R, Warner D H, Molinari J-F. On the debris- level origins of adhesive wear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(30):7935–7940(2017)
[21]
Frérot L, Aghababaei R, Molinari J-F. A mechanistic understanding of the wear coefficient: From single to multiple asperities contact. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 114:172–84(2018)
[22]
Aghababaei R, Brink T, Molinari J-F. Asperity-level origins of transition from mild to severe wear, Physical Review Letters (2018), accepted paper, https://journals.aps.org/prl/ accepted/af070Y7eUba1b565e38540803364791de29e63f77.
[23]
Li Q, Popov V L. On the possibility of frictional damping with reduced wear: A note on the applicability of Archard s law of adhesive wear under conditions of fretting. Physical Mesomechanics 20(5):91–95(2017)
[24]
Popov V L. Adhesive wear: Generalized Rabinowicz' criteria. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 16(1):29–39(2018)
[25]
Popov V L. Contact Mechanics and Friction. Physical Principles and Applications. 2nd Edition. Berlin: Springer, 2017
DOI
[26]
Bowden F P, Tabor D. The Friction and Lubrication of Solids. Clarendon Press, 2001
[27]
Ciavarella M, Papangelo A. Discussion of “Measuring and understanding contact area at the nanoscale: A review” (Jacobs T D B, Ashlie Martini A, ASME Appl. Mech. Rev. 69(6): 060802 (2017)). Applied Mechanics Reviews. ASME International. 69(6): 065502 (2017)
[28]
Pohrt R, Popov V L. Contact mechanics of rough spheres: Crossover from fractal to Hertzian behavior. Advances in Tribology 2013:1–4(2013)
[29]
Popov V L, Pohrt R, Li Q. Strength of adhesive contacts: Influence of contact geometry and material gradients. Friction 5(3):308–25(2017)
[30]
Popov V L. Generalized Rabinowicz’ criterion for adhesive wear for elliptic micro contacts, AIP Conference Proceedings 1909:020178(2017)
[31]
Popov V L, Smolin I Yu, Gervé A, Kehrwald B. Simulation of wear in combustion engines. Computational Materials Science 19:285–291(2000)
[32]
Popov V L, Psakhie S G. Numerical simulation methods in tribology. Tribology International 40(6):916–23(2007)
[33]
Scherge M, Shakhvorostov D, Pöhlmann K. Fundamental wear mechanism of metals. Wear 255:395–400(2003)
[34]
Popov V L. Analytic solution for the limiting shape of profiles due to fretting wear. Scientific Reports 4:3749(2014).
[35]
Dmitriev A I, Voll L B, Psakhie S G, Popov V L. Universal limiting shape of worn profile under multiple-mode fretting conditions: theory and experimental evidence. Scientific Reports 6:23231(2016)
[36]
Rhee S K. Wear equation for polymers sliding against metal surfaces. Wear 16(6):431–45 (1970)
[37]
Rabinowicz E. The least wear. Wear 100:533–541(1984).
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 05 April 2018
Revised: 02 July 2018
Accepted: 31 July 2018
Published: 20 August 2018
Issue date: September 2018

Copyright

© The author(s) 2018

Acknowledgements

This work has been conducted under partial financial support from the German Ministry for Research and Education BMBF (No. 13NKE011A).

Rights and permissions

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return