AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (22.1 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Combined effect of boundary layer formation and surface smoothing on friction and wear rate of lubricated point contacts during normal running-in processes

Yazhao ZHANG, Alexander KOVALEV, Yonggang MENG( )
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The combined effect of boundary layer formation and surface smoothing on friction and wear rate of metallic surfaces under lubricated point contact condition was investigated. The double trend of friction coefficient variations was revealed during running-in and sub-running-in processes. The evolution of surface topography was measured on-site using white-light interference profilometer and analyzed using bearing area curves. Comprehensive theoretical equations that explicitly express the contributions of boundary friction, adhesive friction and wear have been derived, and results obtained by these equations were compared with experimental observations. It is concluded that the theoretical models are quantitatively adequate to describe the combined effect of surface smoothing due to mechanical wear and formation of boundary films on the changes in friction and wear rate during normal running-in processes.

Keywords

running-inbearing area curvesfriction modelingwear modelingmixed lubrication

References

[1]
Blau P J. Running-in. In Encyclopedia of Tribology. Wang Q J, Chung Y W, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer, 2013: 2967-2969.
Crossref
[2]
Blau P J. On the nature of running-in. Tribol Int 38(11–12):1007–1012(2005)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Williams J. Engineering Tribology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Crossref
[4]
Blau P J. Mechanisms for transitional friction and wear behavior of sliding metals. Wear 72(1):55–66(1981)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Blau P J. How common is the steady-state? The implications of wear transitions for materials selection and design. Wear 332–333:1120–1128(2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Blau P J. Embedding wear models into friction models. Tribol Lett 34(1):75–79(2009)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Goryacheva I G. Wear models. In Contact Mechanics in Tribology. Goryacheva I G, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 1998: 163-190.
Crossref
[8]
Meng H C, Ludema K C. Wear models and predictive equations: their form and content. Wear 181–183:443–457(1995)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Archard J. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8):981–988(1953)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Bowden F P, Leben L. The friction of lubricated metals. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 239(799):1–27(1940)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Bai L Q, Meng Y G, Khan Z A, Zhang V. The synergetic effects of surface texturing and MoDDP additive applied to ball-on-disk friction subject to both flooded and starved lubrication conditions. Tribol Lett 65(4):163(2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Raymond G B. Mechanical Wear Fundamentals and Testing. 2nd ed. New York (USA): Marcel Dekker Inc., 2004.
[13]
Kapoor A, Williams J A, Johnson K L. The steady state sliding of rough surfaces. Wear 175(1–2):81–92(1994)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Straffelini G. Wear processes. In Friction and Wear: Methodologies for Design and Control. Straffelini G, Ed. Cham: Springer, 2015: 115-158.
Crossref
[15]
Bair S S. High Pressure Rheology for Quantitative Elastohydrodynamics. Amsterdam (Netherlands), Boston (USA): Elsevier, 2007.
[16]
Bair S, Winer W O. A rheological model for elastohydrodynamic contacts based on primary laboratory data. J Lubr Technol 101(3):258–264(1979)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Hao L C, Meng Y G. Numerical prediction of wear process of an initial line contact in mixed lubrication conditions. Tribol Lett 60(2):31(2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Bhushan B, Israelachvili J N, Landman U. Nanotribology: friction, wear and lubrication at the atomic scale. Nature 374(6523):607–616(1995)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Wang W, Wong P L. Wear volume determination during running-in for PEHL contacts. Tribol Int 33(7):501–506(2000)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Abbott E J, Firestone F A. Specifying surface quality. Mech Eng, 55:569–572(1933)
Google Scholar
[21]
Sosa M, Sellgren U, Björklund S, Olofsson U. In situ running-in analysis of ground gears. Wear 352–353:122–129(2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Jiang X, Scott P J, Whitehouse D J, Blunt L. Paradigm shifts in surface metrology. Part II. The current shift. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci, 463(2085):2071–2099(2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
DIN 4776. Kenngrößen Rk, Rpk, Rvk, Mr1, Mr2 zur Beschreibug des Materialanteils im Rauheitsprofil— Meßbedingungen und Auswerteverfahren. In Deutsche Norm. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 1990.
[24]
ISO. ISO 25178–2: 2012 Geometrical Product Specifications GPS) – Surface texture: Areal – Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. ISO, Geneva, 2012.
[25]
Böhm H J. Parameters for evaluating the wearing behaviour of surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manu 32(1–2):109–113(1992)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Corral I B, Calvet J V, Salcedo M C. Use of roughness probability parameters to quantify the material removed in plateau-honing. Int J Mach Tools Manu 50(7):621–629(2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Franco L A, Sinatora A. 3D surface parameters (ISO 25178–2): Actual meaning of Spk and its relationship to Vmp. Precis Eng 40:106–111(2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Yusof N F M, Ripin Z M. A technique to measure surface asperities plastic deformation and wear in rolling contact. Wear 368–369:496–504(2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Podulka P, Pawlus P, Dobrzański P, Lenart A. Spikes removal in surface measurement. J Phys Conf Ser 483(1):012025(2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 6 Issue 3,
September 2018
Pages 274-288
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-018-0228-4
Cite this article:
ZHANG Y, KOVALEV A, MENG Y. Combined effect of boundary layer formation and surface smoothing on friction and wear rate of lubricated point contacts during normal running-in processes. Friction, 2018, 6(3): 274-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-018-0228-4

573

Views

23

Downloads

23

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

26

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 05 April 2018
Revised: 26 June 2018
Accepted: 29 June 2018
Published: 06 September 2018
© The author(s) 2018

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Return