Journal Home > Volume 7 , Issue 4

We propose a model based on extreme value statistics (EVS) and combine it with different models for single-asperity contact, including adhesive and elasto-plastic contacts, to derive a relation between the applied load and the friction force on a rough interface. We determine that, when the summit distribution is Gumbel and the contact model is Hertzian, we obtain the closest conformity with Amonton's law. The range over which Gumbel distribution mimics Amonton's law is wider than that of the Greenwood-Williamson (GW) model. However, exact conformity with Amonton's law is not observed for any of the well-known EVS distributions. Plastic deformations in the contact area reduce the relative change in pressure slightly with Gumbel distribution. Interestingly, when elasto-plastic contact is assumed for the asperities, together with Gumbel distribution for summits, the best conformity with Amonton's law is achieved. Other extreme value statistics are also studied, and the results are presented. We combine Gumbel distribution with the GW-McCool model, which is an improved version of the GW model, and the new model considers a bandwidth for wavelengths α. Comparisons of this model with the original GW-McCool model and other simplified versions of the Bush-Gibson-Thomas theory reveal that Gumbel distribution has a better conformity with Amonton's law for all values of α. When the adhesive contact model is used, the main observation is that there is some friction for zero or even negative applied load. Asperities with a height even less than the separation between the two surfaces are in contact. For a small value of the adhesion parameter, a better conformity with Amonton's law is observed. The relative pressure increases for stronger adhesion, which indicates that adhesion-controlled friction is dominated by load-controlled friction. We also observe that adhesion increases on a surface with a lower value of roughness.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Model of contact friction based on extreme value statistics

Show Author's information A. MALEKAN( )S. ROUHANI
Department of Physics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11165-9161, Iran

Abstract

We propose a model based on extreme value statistics (EVS) and combine it with different models for single-asperity contact, including adhesive and elasto-plastic contacts, to derive a relation between the applied load and the friction force on a rough interface. We determine that, when the summit distribution is Gumbel and the contact model is Hertzian, we obtain the closest conformity with Amonton's law. The range over which Gumbel distribution mimics Amonton's law is wider than that of the Greenwood-Williamson (GW) model. However, exact conformity with Amonton's law is not observed for any of the well-known EVS distributions. Plastic deformations in the contact area reduce the relative change in pressure slightly with Gumbel distribution. Interestingly, when elasto-plastic contact is assumed for the asperities, together with Gumbel distribution for summits, the best conformity with Amonton's law is achieved. Other extreme value statistics are also studied, and the results are presented. We combine Gumbel distribution with the GW-McCool model, which is an improved version of the GW model, and the new model considers a bandwidth for wavelengths α. Comparisons of this model with the original GW-McCool model and other simplified versions of the Bush-Gibson-Thomas theory reveal that Gumbel distribution has a better conformity with Amonton's law for all values of α. When the adhesive contact model is used, the main observation is that there is some friction for zero or even negative applied load. Asperities with a height even less than the separation between the two surfaces are in contact. For a small value of the adhesion parameter, a better conformity with Amonton's law is observed. The relative pressure increases for stronger adhesion, which indicates that adhesion-controlled friction is dominated by load-controlled friction. We also observe that adhesion increases on a surface with a lower value of roughness.

Keywords: friction, Amonton's law, contact mechanics, extreme value statistics

References(44)

[1]
J A Hurtado, K S Kim. Scale effects in friction of single-asperity contacts. I. From concurrent slip to single-dislocation-assisted slip. Proc Roy Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 455(1989): 3363-3384 (1999)
[2]
B Bhushan, M Nosonovsky. Comprehensive model for scale effects in friction due to adhesion and two-and three-body deformation (plowing). Acta Mater 52(8): 2461-2474 (2004)
[3]
M Nosonovsky, B Bhushan. Multiscale friction mechanisms and hierarchical surfaces in nano-and bio-tribology. Mater Sci Eng: R: Rep 58(3-5): 162-193 (2007)
[4]
G G Adams, S Müftü, N M Azhar. A scale-dependent model for multi-asperity contact and friction. J Tribol 125(4): 700-708 (2003)
[5]
B Bhushan, M Nosonovsky. Scale effects in dry and wet friction, wear, and interface temperature. Nanotechnology 15(7): 749-761 (2004)
[6]
V L Popov. Contact Mechanics and Friction: Physical Principles and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg (Germany): Springer, 2010.
DOI
[7]
C A Coulomb. Theorie des Machines Simple (Theory of Simple Machines). Paris: Bachelier, 1821.
[8]
D M Tolstoi. Significance of the normal degree of freedom and natural normal vibrations in contact friction. Wear 10(3): 199-213 (1967)
[9]
B N J Persson. Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications. Berlin Heidelberg (Germany): Springer, 2013.
[10]
N V Gitis, L Volpe. Nature of static friction time dependence. J Phys D: Appl Phys 25(4): 605-612 (1992)
[11]
C A Brockley, H R Davis. The time-dependence of static friction. J Lubr Technol 90(1): 35-41 (1968)
[12]
W F Hosford. Solid Mechanics. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2010.
DOI
[13]
J H Dieterich. Time-dependent friction in rocks. J Geophys Res 77(20): 3690-3697 (1972)
[14]
F P Bowden, D Tabor. Friction and Lubrication of Solids, vol. I. Oxford (UK): Clarendon, 1950.
DOI
[15]
E Rabinowicz. Friction and Wear of Materials. New York (USA): John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1966.
[16]
A Tiwari, L Dorogin, B Steenwyk, A Warhadpande, M Motamedi, G Fortunato, V Ciaravola, B N J Persson. Rubber friction directional asymmetry. EPL 116(6): 66002 (2017)
[17]
G He, M H Müser, M O Robbins. Adsorbed layers and the origin of static friction. Science 284(5420): 1650-1652 (1999)
[18]
A Volmer, T Nattermann. Towards a statistical theory of solid dry friction. Z Phys B Conden Matter 104(2): 363-371 (1997)
[19]
J A Greenwood, J B P Williamson. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc Roy Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci. 295(1442): 300-319 (1966)
[20]
J F Archard. Elastic deformation and the laws of friction. Proc Roy Soc A: Math, Phys and Eng Sci 243(1233): 190-205 (1957)
[21]
A W Bush, R D Gibson, T R Thomas. The elastic contact of a rough surface. Wear 35(1): 87-111 (1975)
[22]
M S Longuet-Higgins. The statistical analysis of a random, moving surface. Philos Trans Roy Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 249(966): 321-387 (1957)
[23]
P R Nayak. Random process model of rough surfaces. J Lubr Technol 93(3): 398-407 (1971)
[24]
B N J Persson. Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces. Surf Sci Rep 61(4): 201-227 (2006)
[25]
S Coles. An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. Vol. 208. London (UK): Springer, 2001.
DOI
[26]
H Hertz. On the contact of elastic solids. J Reine Angew Math 92: 156-171 (1882)
[27]
D Maugis. Adhesion of spheres: The JKR-DMT transition using a Dugdale model. J Colloid Interface Sci 150(1): 243-269 (1992)
[28]
W R Chang, I Etsion, D B Bogy. An elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. J Tribol 109(2): 257-263 (1987)
[29]
K Bury. Statistical Distributions in Engineering. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1999.
DOI
[30]
J T de Oliveira. Statistical Extremes and Applications. Vol. 131. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer, 1984.
DOI
[31]
M Al-Hasan, R R Nigmatullin. Identification of the generalized Weibull distribution in wind speed data by the Eigen-coordinates method. Renew Energy 28(1): 93-110 (2003)
[32]
T Huillet, H F Raynaud. Rare events in a log-Weibull scenario-Application to earthquake magnitude data. Eur Phys J B-Conden Matter Complex Syst 12(3): 457-469 (1999)
[33]
B Gnedenko. Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une serie aleatoire. Ann Math 44(3): 423-453 (1943)
[34]
R A Fisher, L H C Tippett. Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Math Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 24(2): 180-190 (1928)
[35]
H J Einmahl, L de Haan. Empirical processes and statistics of extreme values, 1 and 2. AIO Course, available at www.few.eur.nl/few/people/ldehaan/aio/aio1.ps, www.few.eur.nl/few/people/ldehaan/aio/aio2.ps.
[36]
S N Majumdar, A Comtet. Exact maximal height distribution of fluctuating interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 92(22): 225501 (2004)
[37]
S N Majumdar, A Comtet. Airy distribution function: From the area under a Brownian excursion to the maximal height of fluctuating interfaces. J Stat Phys 119(3-4): 777-826 (2005)
[38]
K A Nuri, J Halling. The normal approach between rough flat surfaces in contact. Wear 32(1): 81-93 (1975)
[39]
J Pullen, J B P Williamson. On the plastic contact of rough surfaces. Proc Roy Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 327(1569): 159-173 (1972)
[40]
J A Greenwood. A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact. Wear 261(2): 191-200 (2006)
[41]
T R Thomas. Rough surfaces. 2nd ed. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998.
DOI
[42]
J I McCool. Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces. Wear 107(1): 37-60 (1986)
[43]
G Carbone, F Bottiglione. Asperity contact theories: Do they predict linearity between contact area and load? J Mech Phys Solids 56(8): 2555-2572 (2008)
[44]
A W Bush, R D Gibson, G P Keogh. The limit of elastic deformation in the contact of rough surfaces. Mech Res Commun 3(3): 169-174 (1976)
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 29 November 2017
Revised: 28 January 2018
Accepted: 10 March 2018
Published: 14 December 2018
Issue date: August 2019

Copyright

© The author(s) 2018

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Daniel Bonn and Bart Weber for many detailed discussions on tribology.

Rights and permissions

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return