Review Article
Open Access
Issue
Published:
07 March 2017
Open Access
Issue
Published:
07 March 2017
A review of friction models in interacting joints for durability design
Zulfiqar A. KHAN(
),
),
Cite this article:
KHAN ZA, CHACKO V, NAZIR H.
A review of friction models in interacting joints for durability design.
Friction,
2017, 5(1): 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-017-0143-0
Download citation
754
Views
18
Downloads
Citations
41
Crossref
N/A
WoS
41
Scopus
0
CSCD
This paper presents a comprehensive review of friction modelling to provide an understanding of design for durability within interacting systems. Friction is a complex phenomenon and occurs at the interface of two components in relative motion. Over the last several decades, the effects of friction and its modelling techniques have been of significant interests in terms of industrial applications. There is however a need to develop a unified mathematical model for friction to inform design for durability within the context of varying operational conditions. Classical dynamic mechanisms model for the design of control systems has not incorporated friction phenomena due to non-linearity behaviour. Therefore, the tribological performance concurrently with the joint dynamics of a manipulator joint applied in hazardous environments needs to be fully analysed. Previously the dynamics and impact models used in mechanical joints with clearance have also been examined. The inclusion of reliability and durability during the design phase is very important for manipulators which are deployed in harsh environmental and operational conditions. The revolute joint is susceptible to failures such as in heavy manipulators these revolute joints can be represented by lubricated conformal sliding surfaces. The presence of pollutants such as debris and corrosive constituents has the potential to alter the contacting surfaces, would in turn affect the performance of revolute joints, and puts both reliability and durability of the systems at greater risks of failure. Key literature is identified and a review on the latest developments of the science of friction modelling is presented here. This review is based on a large volume of knowledge. Gaps in the relevant field have been identified to capitalise on for future developments. Therefore, this review will bring significant benefits to researchers, academics and industry professionals.
menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article
A review of friction models in interacting joints for durability design
Zulfiqar A. KHAN(
),
),
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive review of friction modelling to provide an understanding of design for durability within interacting systems. Friction is a complex phenomenon and occurs at the interface of two components in relative motion. Over the last several decades, the effects of friction and its modelling techniques have been of significant interests in terms of industrial applications. There is however a need to develop a unified mathematical model for friction to inform design for durability within the context of varying operational conditions. Classical dynamic mechanisms model for the design of control systems has not incorporated friction phenomena due to non-linearity behaviour. Therefore, the tribological performance concurrently with the joint dynamics of a manipulator joint applied in hazardous environments needs to be fully analysed. Previously the dynamics and impact models used in mechanical joints with clearance have also been examined. The inclusion of reliability and durability during the design phase is very important for manipulators which are deployed in harsh environmental and operational conditions. The revolute joint is susceptible to failures such as in heavy manipulators these revolute joints can be represented by lubricated conformal sliding surfaces. The presence of pollutants such as debris and corrosive constituents has the potential to alter the contacting surfaces, would in turn affect the performance of revolute joints, and puts both reliability and durability of the systems at greater risks of failure. Key literature is identified and a review on the latest developments of the science of friction modelling is presented here. This review is based on a large volume of knowledge. Gaps in the relevant field have been identified to capitalise on for future developments. Therefore, this review will bring significant benefits to researchers, academics and industry professionals.
Keywords:
friction, dynamics, joint clearance, numerical models, impact, durability
References(150)
[1]
Saha A, Wahi P, Bhattacharya B. Characterization of friction force and nature of bifurcation from experiments on a single-degree-of-freedom system with friction-induced vibrations. Tribol Int 98:. 220-228 (2016)
[2]
Drucker D C. Coulomb friction, plasticity and limit loads. J Appl Mech 21(1):71-74 (1953)
[3]
Mukras S M. Analysis and design of planar multibody systems with revolute joint wear. Dissertations & Theses-Gradworks 268(5–6): 643-652 (2009)
[4]
Tafazoli S, Lawrence P D, Salcudean S E. Identification of inertial and friction parameters for excavator arms. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 15(5): 966-971 (1999)
[5]
Jonker J B, Waiboer R R, Aarts R G K M. Modelling of joint friction in robotic manipulators with gear transmissions. In Computational Methods in Applied Sciences. Springer, 2005: 221-243.
[6]
Simoni L, Beschi M, Legnani G, Visioli A. Friction modeling with temperature effects for industrial robot manipulators. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015: 3524-3529.
[7]
Piedboeuf J-C, de Carufel J, Hurteau R. Friction and stick-slip in robots: Simulation and experimentation. Multibody Sys Dyn 4(4): 341-354 (2000)
[8]
Yao B, Tomizuka M. Adaptive control of robot manipulators in constrained motion. In American Control Conference. 1993: 1128-1132.
[9]
Nguyen K D, Dankowicz H. Adaptive control of underactuated robots with unmodeled dynamics. Rob Auton Syst 64: 84-99 (2014)
[10]
Al-Ashoor R A, Khorasani K, Patel R V, Al-Khalili A J. Adaptive control of flexible joint manipulators. In 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings, 1990: 627-632.
[12]
Film thicknesses in lubricated Hertzian contacts (EHL). Part 1: Two-dimensional contacts (line contacts). Engineering Sciences Data Unit (ESDU) 85027, 2010.
[13]
Hess D P, Soom A. Friction at a lubricated line contact operating at oscillating sliding velocities. J Tribol 112(1): 147 (1990)
[14]
Tyfour W R, Beynon J H, Kapoor A. Deterioration of rolling contact fatigue life of pearlitic rail steel due to dry-wet rolling-sliding line contact. Wear 197(1): 255-265 (1996)
[15]
Bilandi S T. Identification of frictional effects and structural dynamics for improved control of hydraulic manipulators. Journal of Crystal Growth 180(180): 157-166 (1961)
[16]
Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M, Koshy C S. A study on dynamics of mechanical systems including joints with clearance and lubrication. Mech Mach Theory 41(3): 247-261 (2006)
[17]
Dupac M, Noroozi S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a rotating single link flexible robotic manipulator subject to quick stops. J Mech Eng 60(7–8): 475-482 (2014)
[18]
Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P. Dynamic analysis for planar multibody mechanical systems with lubricated joints. Multibody Syst Dyn 12(1): 47-74 (2004)
[19]
Askari E, Flores P, Dabirrahmani D, Appleyard R. Dynamic modeling and analysis of wear in spatial hard-on-hard couple hip replacements using multibody systems methodologies. Nonlinear Dyn 82(1–2): 1039-1058 (2015)
[20]
Flores P. Modeling and simulation of wear in revolute clearance joints in multibody systems. Mech Mach Theory 44(6): 1211-1222 (2009)
[21]
Flores P. A parametric study on the dynamic response of planar multibody systems with multiple clearance joints. Nonlinear Dyn 61(4): 633-653 (2010)
[22]
Flores P. Compliant contact force approach for forward dynamic modeling and analysis of biomechanical systems. Procedia IUTAM 2: 58-67 (2011)
[23]
Marques F, Flores P, Lankarani H M. On the frictional contacts in multibody system dynamics. In ECCOMAS Themat. Conf. Multibody Dyn., 2015: 565-576.
[24]
Lankarani H M, Nikravesh P E. Canonical impulse-momentum equations for impact analysis of multibody systems. J Mech Des 114(1): 180-186 (1992)
[25]
Koshy C S, Flores P, Lankarani H M. Study of the effect of contact force model on the dynamic response of mechanical systems with dry clearance joints: computational and experimental approaches. Nonlinear Dyn 73(1–2): 325-338 (2013)
[26]
Marques F, Flores P, Lankarani H M. Study of friction force model parameters in multibody dynamics. In The 4th Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, 2016.
[27]
Mukras S, Kim N H, Mauntler N A, Schmitz T L, Sawyer W G. Analysis of planar multibody systems with revolute joint wear. Wear 268(5–6): 643-652 (2010)
[28]
Mukras S, Kim N H, Sawyer W G, Jackson D B, Bergquist L W. Numerical integration schemes and parallel computation for wear prediction using finite element method. Wear 266(7–8): 822-831 (2009)
[29]
Lingard H, Cooke T, Gharaie E. A case study analysis of fatal incidents involving excavators in the Australian construction industry. Eng Constr Archit Manag 20(5): 488-504 (2013)
[30]
Koivo A J. Kinematics of excavators (backhoes) for transferring surface material. J Aerosp Eng 7(1): 17-32 (1994)
[31]
Vähä P K, Skibniewski M J. Dynamic model of excavator. J Aerosp Eng 6(2): 148-158 (1993)
[32]
Koivo A J, Thoma M, Kocaoglan E, Andrade-Cetto J. Modeling and control of excavator dynamics during digging operation. J Aerosp Eng 9(1): 10-18 (1996)
[33]
Stentz A, Bares J, Singh S, Rowe P. Robotic excavator for autonomous truck loading. Auton Robots 7: 175-186 (1999)
[34]
Seward D, Margrave F. LUCIE the robot excavator-design for system safety. In Robotics and Automation, 1996. Proceedings., 1996 IEEE International Conference, 1996: 963-968.
[35]
Tafazoli S, Lawrence P D P, Chan D, Bachmann S, de Silva C. Parameter estimation and actuator friction analysis for a mini excavator. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996: 329-334.
[36]
Carlson J, Murphy R R. How UGVs physically fail in the field. IEEE Trans Robot 21(3): 423-437 (2005)
[37]
Liu Y, Nejat G. Robotic urban search and rescue: a survey from the control perspective. J Intell Robot Syst 72(2): 147-165 (2013)
[38]
Lioy P J, Weisel C P, Millette J R, Eisenreich S, Vallero D, Offenberg J, Buckley B, Turpin B, Zhong M, Cohen M D, Prophete C, Yang I, Stiles R, Chee G, Johnson W, Porcja R, Alimokhtari S, Hale R C, Weschler C, Chen L C. Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001. Environ Health Perspect 110(7): 703-714 (2002)
[40]
Khan Z A, Saeed A, Gregory O, Ghafoor A. Biodiesel performance within internal combustion engine fuel system─A review. Tribol Ind 38(2): 197-213 (2016)
[41]
Khan Z A, Hadfield M. Manufacturing induced residual stress influence on the rolling contact fatigue life performance of lubricated silicon nitride bearing materials. Mater Des 28(10): 2688-2693 (2007)
[42]
Khan Z A, Hadfield M, Tobe S, Wang Y. Ceramic rolling elements with ring crack defects─A residual stress approach. Mater Sci Eng A 404(1–2): 221-226 (2005)
[43]
Khan Z A, Hadfield M, Tobe S, Wang Y. Residual stress variations during rolling contact fatigue of refrigerant lubricated silicon nitride bearing elements. Ceram Int 32(7): 751-754 (2006)
[44]
Khan Z A, Hadfield M, Wang Y. Pressurised chamber design for conducting rolling contact experiments with liquid refrigerant lubrication. Mater Des 26(8): 680-689 (2005)
[45]
Armstrong-Hélouvry B, Dupont P, De Wit C C. A survey of models, analysis tools and compensations methods for the control of machines with friction. Automatica 30(7): 1083-1138 (1994)
[46]
Rahnejat H. Multi-body dynamics: Historical evolution and application. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 214(1): 149-173 (2000)
[47]
Schiehlen W. Multibody system dynamics: Roots and perspectives. Multibody Syst Dyn 1(2): 149-188 (1997)
[48]
Siciliano B, Khatib O. Springer Handbook of Robotics, 1st ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
[49]
Uicker J J, Pennock G R, Shigley J E, McCarthy J M. Theory of machines and mechanisms. J Mech Design 125(3): 650 (2003)
[50]
Groover M P Jr, Zimmers E W Jr. CAD/Cam: Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing, 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall PTR, 1997.
[51]
Farhat N, Mata V, Diaz-Rodriguez M. Dynamic simulation of a parallel robot: Coulomb friction and stick slip in robot joints. Robotica 28: 35-45 (2014)
[52]
Hachkowski M R, Peterson L D, Lake M S. Friction model of a revolute joint for a precision deployable spacecraft structure. J Spacecr Rockets 36(4): 591-598 (1999)
[53]
Chacko V, Yu H. Multi-body simulation methods for rigid manipulators. Eurathlon/SHERPA, 2015.
[54]
Donald B, Spong M W. Chapter 3: Forward Kinematics: The Denavit-Hartenberg Convention.
[55]
Vähä P K, Skibniewski M J, Koivo A J. Excavator dynamics and effect of soil on digging. In Proc. 8th ISARC, Stuttgart, Ger., 1991: 297-306.
[56]
Baiges-Valentin and Ivan J. Baiges-Valentin. Dynamic modeling of parallel manipulators. University of Florida, 1996.
[57]
Visioli A, Legnani G. On the trajectory tracking control of industrial SCARA robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49(1): 224-232 (2002)
[58]
Patel B P, Prajapati J M. Dynamics of mini hydraulic backhoe excavator: A Lagrange-Euler (LE) approach. Int J Mech Aerospace Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng 8(1): 202-211 (2014)
[59]
Korayem M H, Shafei A M. Application of recursive Gibbs–Appell formulation in deriving the equations of motion of N-viscoelastic robotic manipulators in 3D space using Timoshenko Beam Theory. Acta Astronaut 83: 273-294 (2013)
[60]
Piedboeuf J C. Kane’s equations or Jourdain’s principle? In Proc. 36th Midwest Symp Circuits Syst, 1993: 1471-1474.
[61]
Šalinic S. Determination of joint reaction forces in a symbolic form in rigid multibody systems. Mech Mach Theory 46(11): 1796-1810 (2011)
[62]
Obermayr M, Vrettos C, Eberhard P, Däuwel T. A discrete element model and its experimental validation for the prediction of draft forces in cohesive soil. J Terramechanics 53: 93-104 (2014)
[63]
Yousefi Moghaddam R, Kotchon A, Lipsett M G. Method and apparatus for on-line estimation of soil parameters during excavation. J Terramechanics 49(3–4): 173-181 (2012)
[64]
Perumpral J V, Grisso R D, Desai C S, Perumpral J V, Grisso R D, Desai C S. A soil-tool model based on limit equilibrium analysis. Trans ASAE 26(4): 0991-0995 (1983)
[65]
Shmulevich I. State of the art modeling of soil-tillage interaction using discrete element method. Soil Tillage Res 111(1): 41-53 (2010)
[67]
Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M. Multibody systems formulation. Lecture Notes in Applied & Computational Mechanics 34: 47-66 (2008)
[68]
Olsson H, Åström K J, Canudas de Wit C, Gäfvert M, Lischinsky P. Friction models and friction compensation. European Journal of Control 4(3): 176-195 (1998)
[69]
Sohail T, Malik A M. Measuring Coulomb and viscous friction in revolute joint. NUST J Eng Sci 1(1): 112-116 (2008)
[70]
Berger E. Friction modeling for dynamic system simulation. Appl Mech Rev 55(6): 535 (2002)
[71]
Harrison J A, Gao G, Schall J D, Knippenberg M T, Mikulski P T. Friction between solids. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 366: 1469-1495 (2008)
[72]
Swevers J, Al-Bender F, Ganseman C G, Prajogo T. An integrated friction model structure with improved presliding behavior for accurate friction compensation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 45(4): 675-686 (2000)
[73]
Le Tien L, Albu-Schaeffer A, De Luca A, Hirzinger G. Friction observer and compensation for control of robots with joint torque measurement. In 2008 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. IROS, 2008: 3789-3795.
[74]
Archard J F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8): 981-988 (1953)
[75]
Jin Z, Fisher J. Tribology in joint replacement. Joint Replace Technol 2008: 31-55 (2008)
[76]
Tabor D. Friction─The present state of our understanding. J Lubr Technol 103(2): 169-179 (1981)
[77]
van Geffen V. A study of friction models and friction compensation. 2009.
[78]
Lischinsky P, Canudas de Wit C, Morel G. Friction compensation for an industrial hydraulic robot. IEEE Control Syst Mag 19(1): 25-32 (1999)
[79]
Dahl P R. A solid friction model. Aerospace Corp El Segundo CA, No. TOR-0158 (3107-18)-1, 1968.
[80]
Piatkowski T. Dahl and LuGre dynamic friction models─The analysis of selected properties. Mech Mach Theory 73: 91-100 (2014)
[81]
Karnopp D. Computer simulation of stick-slip friction in mechanical dynamic systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 107(1): 100-103 (1985)
[82]
Kikuuwe R, Takesue N, Sano A, Mochiyama H, Fujimoto H. Fixed-step friction simulation: From classical coulomb model to modern continuous models. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. IROS, 2005: 3910-3917.
[83]
Kikuuwe R, Takesue N, Sano A, Mochiyama H, Fujimoto H. Admittance and impedance representations of friction based on implicit Euler integration. IEEE Trans Robot 22(6): 1176-1188 (2006)
[84]
Awrejcewicz J, Kudra G. Regular and chaotic dynamics of three coupled physical pendulums. In the International Conference of Applied Mechanics, Sacam, 2000.
[85]
Wojewoda J, Stefański A, Wiercigroch M, Kapitaniak T. Hysteretic effects of dry friction: modelling and experimental studies. Philos Trans R Soc London A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1866): 747-765 (2008)
[86]
Romano R A, Garcia C. Karnopp friction model identification for a real control valve. IFAC Proc 17(1): 14906-14911 (2008)
[87]
Bliman P A, Sorine M. Easy-to-use realistic dry friction models for automatic control. In Proceedings of 3rd European Control Conference, 1995: 267-272.
[88]
Gafvert M. Comparisons of two dynamic friction models. In IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 1997: 386-391.
[89]
Freidovich L, Robertsson A, Shiriaev A, Johansson R. LuGre-model-based friction compensation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 18(1): 194-200 (2010)
[90]
Lampaert V, Swevers J, Al-Bender F. Modification of the Leuven integrated friction model structure. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 47(4): 683-687 (2002)
[91]
The Mathworks Inc. UK. Loaded-contact rotational friction. Mathworks Doc 2016: 2-4.
[92]
The Mathworks Inc. UK. Translational friction. Mathworks Documentation, 2015.
[93]
Bona B, Indri M. Friction compensation in robotics: An overview. In Proc. 44th IEEE Conf Decis Control Eur Control Conf CDC-ECC ’05, 2005: 4360-4367.
[94]
De Wit C C, Olsson H, Astrom K J, Lischinsky P. A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 40(3): 419-425 (1995)
[95]
Haessig D A, Friedland B. On the modeling and simulation of friction. In Am Control Conf, 1990: 1256-1261.
[96]
Dubowsky S, Freudenstein F. Dynamic analysis of mechanical systems with clearances—Part 1: Formation of dynamic model. J Eng Ind 93(1) 305 (1971)
[97]
Bauchau O A, Rodriguez J. Modeling of joints with clearance in flexible multibody systems. Int J Solids Struct 39(1): 41-63 (2001)
[98]
Bai Z F, Zhao Y. A hybrid contact force model of revolute joint with clearance for planar mechanical systems. Int J Non Linear Mech 48: 15-36 (2013)
[99]
Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M, Koshy C S. Lubricated revolute joints in rigid multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 56(3): 277-295 (2009)
[100]
Wang Y. Simulation of mechanical systems with multiple frictional contacts. J Mech Des 116(2): 571 (1994)
[101]
Haines R S. Survey: 2-dimensional motion and impact at revolute joints. Mech Mach Theory 15(5): 361-370 (1980)
[102]
Machado M, Costa J, Seabra E, Flores P. The effect of the lubricated revolute joint parameters and hydrodynamic force models on the dynamic response of planar multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 69(1–2): 635-654 (2012)
[103]
Dubowsky S, Freudenstein F. Dynamic analysis of mechanical systems with clearances-Part2: Dynamic response. J Eng Ind 93(1): 305-309 (1971)
[104]
Hunt K H, Crossley F R E. Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J Appl Mech 42(2): 440 (1975)
[105]
Lankarani H M, Nikravesh P E. A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. J Mech Des 112(3): 369-376 (1990)
[106]
Rhee J, Akay A. Dynamic response of revolute joint with clearance. Mech Mach Theory 31(1): 121-134 (1996)
[107]
Pereira M S, Nikravesh P E. Impact dynamics of multibody systems with frictional contact using joint coordinates and canonical equations of motion. Nonlinear Dyn 9(1–2): 53-71 (1996)
[108]
Machado M, Moreira P, Flores P, Lankarani H M. Compliant contact force models in multibody dynamics: Evolution of the Hertz contact theory. Mech Mach Theory 53: 99-121 (2012)
[109]
Flores P, Koshy C S, Lankarani H M, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P. Numerical and experimental investigation on multibody systems with revolute clearance joints. Nonlinear Dyn 65(4): 383-398 (2011)
[110]
Ravn P. A continuous analysis method for planar multibody systems with joint clearance. Multibody Syst Dyn 2(1): 1-24 (1998)
[111]
Dupac M. Dynamical analysis of a constrained flexible extensible link with rigid support and clearance. J Theoret Appl Mech 52(3): 665-676 (2014)
[112]
Azimi Olyaei A, Ghazavi M R. Stabilizing slider-crank mechanism with clearance joints. Mech Mach Theory 53: 17-29 (2012)
[113]
Zhao B, Zhang Z-N, Fang C, Dai X-D, Xie Y-B. Modeling and analysis of planar multibody system with mixed lubricated revolute joint. Tribol Int 98: 229-241 (2016)
[114]
Furuhashi T, Morita N, Matsuura M. Research on dynamics of four-bar linkage with clearances at turning pairs: 1st report, general theory using continuous contact model. Bull JSME 21(153): 518-523 (1978)
[115]
Farahanchi F, Shaw S W. Chaotic and periodic dynamics of a slider-crank mechanism with slider clearance. J Sound Vib 177(3): 307-324 (1994)
[116]
Khulief Y A, Shabana A A. A continuous force model for the impact analysis of flexible multibody systems. Mech Mach Theory 22(3): 213-224 (1987)
[117]
Dubowsky S, Gardner T N. Dynamic interactions of link elasticity and clearance connections in planar mechanical systems. J Eng Ind 97(2): 652-661 (1975)
[118]
Earles S W E, Wu C L S. Motion analysis of a rigid link mechanism with clearance at a bearing using Lagrangian mechanics and digital computation. J Mech 83-89 (1973)
[119]
Yaqubi S, Dardel M, Daniali H M, Hassan M, Ghasemi M H. Modeling and control of crank-slider mechanism with multiple clearance joints. Multibody Syst Dyn 36(2): 143-167 (2016)
[120]
Li P, Chen W, Li D, Yu R. A novel transition model for lubricated revolute joints in planar multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 36(3): 279-294 (2016)
[121]
Flores P, Leine R, Glocker C. Modeling and analysis of planar rigid multibody systems with translational clearance joints based on the non-smooth dynamics approach. Multibody Syst Dyn 23(2): 165-190 (2010)
[122]
Flores P, Ambrósio J. Revolute joints with clearance in multibody systems. Comput Struct 82(17–19): 1359-1369 (2004)
[123]
Chytka T M, Brown R W, Shih A T, Reeves J D, Dempsey J A. An integrated approach to life cycle analysis. In 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidiscip Anal Optim Conf, 2006: 1360-1374.
[124]
Carlson J, Murphy R R. Reliability analysis of mobile robots. In 2003 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom, 2003: 274-281.
[125]
Wang Z. Design study of an earthquake rescue robot. Durham University, 2004.
[127]
Chang S-H, Huang K-T, Wang Y-H. Effects of thermal erosion and wear resistance on AISI H13 tool steel by various surface treatments. Mater Trans 53(4): 745-751 (2012)
[128]
Wakuda M, Yamauchi Y, Kanzaki S, Yasuda Y. Effect of surface texturing on friction reduction between ceramic and steel materials under lubricated sliding contact. Wear 254(3–4): 356-363 (2003)
[129]
Bajwa R S, Khan Z A, Bakolas V, Braun W. Water-lubricated Ni-based composite (Ni–Al2O3, Ni–SiC and Ni–ZrO2) thin film coatings for industrial applications. Acta Metall Sin 29(1): 8-16 (2016)
[130]
Saeed A. Sustainable methodology of conserving historic military vehicles. Bournemouth University, 2013.
[131]
Nazir M H, Khan Z A, Stokes K R. A holistic mathematical modelling and simulation for cathodic delamination mechanism—A novel and an efficient approach. J Adhes Sci Technol 29(22): 2475-2513 (2015)
[132]
Nazir M H, Khan Z A, Stokes K R. Optimisation of interface roughness and coating thickness to maximise coating– substrate adhesion – a failure prediction and reliability assessment modelling. J Adhes Sci Technol 29(14): 1415-1445 (2015)
[133]
Bhushan B. Contact mechanics of rough surfaces in tribology: multiple asperity contact. Tribol Lett 4(1): 1-35 (1998)
[134]
Totik Y, Sadeler R, Altun H, Gavgali M. The effects of induction hardening on wear properties of AISI 4140 steel in dry sliding conditions. Mater Des 24(1): 25-30 (2003)
[136]
De Laurentis N, Kadiric A, Lugt P, Cann P M E. The influence of bearing grease composition on friction in rolling/sliding concentrated contacts. Tribol Int 94: 624-632 (2016)
[137]
Cann P M E. Understanding grease lubrication. Tribol Ser 31: 573-581 (1996)
[138]
Donnet C, Erdemir A. Historical developments and new trends in tribological and solid lubricant coatings. Surf Coat Technol 180–181: 76-84 (2004)
[139]
Erdemir A, Eryilmaz O L, Fenske G. Synthesis of diamondlike carbon films with superlow friction and wear properties. J Vac Sci Technol A 18(4): 1987-1992 (2000)
[140]
Koike H, Kanemasu K, Itakura K,. Wear and transmission error between PEEK bush and 7075 aluminium alloy cam plate components in robot joints. Appl Mech Mater 307: 3-8 (2013)
[141]
Erdemir A. Review of engineered tribological interfaces for improved boundary lubrication. Tribol Int 38(3): 249-256 (2005)
[142]
Sahoo P, Das S K. Tribology of electroless nickel coatings— A review. Mater Des 32(4): 1760-1775 (2011)
[143]
Zhang J, Meng Y, Tian Y, Zhang X. Effect of concentration and addition of ions on the adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate on stainless steel surface in aqueous solutions. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 484: 408-415 (2015)
[144]
Choi S H, Cheung H H. A versatile virtual prototyping system for rapid product development. Comput Ind 59(5): 477-488 (2008)
[145]
Schlotter M. Multibody system simulation with simmechanics. University of Canterbury, 2003.
[146]
Tuominen M. Multibody simulations as a product development tool: Introduction to ADAMS and two analyses. Aalto University School of Engineering, 2015.
[147]
Ben Abdallah M A, Khemili I, Aifaoui N. Numerical investigation of a flexible slider-crank mechanism with multijoints with clearance. Multibody System Dynamics 38(2): 173-199 (2016)
[148]
Ambrósio J, Verissimo P. Improved bushing models for general multibody systems and vehicle dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 22(4): 341-365 (2009)
[149]
Khurshid A, Zulfiqar K, Chacko V, Ghafoor A, Malik M A, Ayaz Y. Modelling and simulation of a manipulator with stable viscoelastic grasping incorporating friction. Tribol Ind 38(4): 559-574 (2016)
[150]
Chacko V, Yu H, Cang S, Vladareanu L. State of the art in excavators. In International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, ICAMechS, 2014: 481-488.
Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions
Publication history
Received: 31 July 2016
Revised: 26 October 2016
Accepted: 16 December 2016
Published:
07 March 2017
Issue date: March 2017
Copyright
© The author(s) 2017
Rights and permissions
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
FEEDBACK 
TOP