References(35)
[1]
Routara B C, Bandyopadhyay A, Sahoo P. Roughness modeling and optimization in CNC end milling using response surface method: effect of work piece material variation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:1166–1180(2008)
[2]
Davim J P, Gaitonde V N, Karnik S R. Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel by ANN models. J Mater Process Technol 205:16–23(2007)
[3]
Bhardwaj B, Kumar R, Singh P K. Surface roughness (Ra) prediction model for turning of AISI 1019 steel using response surface methodology and Box-Cox transformation. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Eng Manuf 228(2):223–232(2013)
[4]
Sharma V S, Dogra M, Suri N M. Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tool Manu 49(6):435–453(2009)
[5]
Gupta M K, Sood P K, Sharma V S. Optimization of machining parameters and cutting fluids during nano-fluid based minimum quantity lubrication turning of titanium alloy by using evolutionary techniques. J Cleaner Production 135:1276–1288(2016)
[6]
Dureja JS, Singh R, Singh T, Singh P, Dogra M, Bhatti M S.. Performance evaluation of coated carbide tool in machining of stainless steel (AISI 202) under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2:123–129(2015)
[7]
Gupta M K, Sood P K, Sharma V S. Machining parameters optimization of titanium alloy using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization under minimum quantity lubrication environment. Mater Manuf Process 31:1671–1682(2016)
[8]
Sharma VS, Singh G, Sorby K. A review on minimum quantity lubrication for machining processes. Mater Manuf Process 30(8):935–953(2015)
[9]
Shen B, Malshe A P, Kalita P, Shih A J. Performance of novel MOS2 nano-particles based grinding fluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Trans NAMRI/SME 36:357–364(2008)
[10]
Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K. Surface roughness analysis in machining of titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 23(2):174–181(2008)
[11]
Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K. Fuzzy Modeling and analysis of machining parameters in machining titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 23(4):439–447(2008)
[12]
Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Senthilkumar V S, Palanikumar K. Experimental study on machining of titanium alloy (Ti64) by CVD and PVD coated carbide inserts. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 17(4):373–385(2009)
[13]
Sridharan U, Malkin S. Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) with nano-fluid on grinding behavior and thermal distortion. Trans NAMRI/SME 37:629–636(2009)
[14]
Kwon P, Drzal L T. Nanoparticle graphite-based minimum quantity lubrication method and composition. U.S. Patent 649:12–655, 2010.
[15]
Nam J S, Lee P H, Lee S W. Experimental characterization of micro-drilling process using nano-fluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 51(7–8):649–652(2011)
[16]
Samuel J, Rafiee J, Dhiman P, Yu Z Z, Koratkar N. Graphene colloidal suspensions as high performance semi-synthetic metal-working fluids. J Phys Chem C 115(8):3410–3415(2011)
[17]
Park K H, Ewald B, Kwon P Y. Effect of nano-enhanced lubricant in minimum quantity lubrication balling milling. J Tribol 133:031803(2011)
[18]
Vasu V, Reddy P K G. Effect of minimum quantity lubrication with Al2O3 nanoparticles on surface roughness, tool wear and temperature dissipation in machining Inconel 600 alloy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part N J Nanoeng and Nanosyst 225:3–16(2011)
[19]
Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K. Measurement and analysis of surface roughness in turning of aerospace titanium alloy (gr5). Measurement 45:1266-1276(2012)
[20]
Khandekar S, Sankar M R, Agnihotri V, Ramkumar J. Nano- cutting fluid for enhancement of metal cutting performance. Mater Manuf Process 27(9):963–967(2012)
[21]
Kalita P, Malshe A P, Arun Kumar S, Yoganath V G, Gurumurthy T. Study of specific energy and friction coefficient in minimum quantity lubrication grinding using oil-based nanolubricants. J Mater Process Technol 14:160–166(2012)
[22]
Nguyen T K, Do I, Kwon P. A tribological study of vegetable oil enhanced by nano-platelets and implication in MQL machining. Int J Prec Eng Manuf 13(7):1077–1083(2012)
[23]
Amrita M, Srikant R, Sitaramaraju A, Prasad M, Krishna P V. Experimental investigations on influence of mist cooling using nanofluids on machining parameters in turning AISI 1040 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 227:1334–1346(2013)
[24]
Paul P S, Varadarajan A S. Performance evaluation of hard turning of AISI 4340 steel with minimal fluid application in the presence of semi-solid lubricants. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 227:738–748(2013)
[25]
Srikiran S, Ramji K, Satyanarayana B, Ramana S. Investigation on turning of AISI 1040 steel with the application of nano- crystalline graphite powder as lubricant. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 228:1570–1580(2014)
[26]
Amrita M, Srikant R R, Sitaramaraju A V. Performance evaluation of nanographite-based cutting fluid in machining process. Mater Manuf Process 29:600–605(2014)
[27]
Sharma P, Sidhu B S, Sharma J. Investigation of effects of nanofluids on turning of AISI D2 steel using minimum quantity lubrication. J Cleaner Production 108:72–79(2015)
[28]
Su Y, Gong L, Li B, Liu Z, Chen D. Performance evaluation of nanofluid MQL with vegetable-based oil and ester oil as base fluids in turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9):2083–2089(2015)
[29]
Barzani M M, Sarhan A A D, Farahany S, Ramesh S, Maher I. Investigating the machinability of Al–Si–Cu cast alloy containing bismuth and antimony using coated carbide insert. Measurement 62:170–178(2015)
[30]
Barzani M M, Zalnezhad E, Sarhan A A D, Farahany S, Ramesh S. Fuzzy logic based model for predicting surface roughness of machined Al–Si–Cu–Fe die casting alloy using different additives-turning. Measurement 61:150–161(2015)
[31]
Unune DR, Barzani MM, Mohite SS, Mali HS. Fuzzy logic-based model for predicting material removal rate and average surface roughness of machined Nimonic 80A using abrasive-mixed electro-discharge diamond surface grinding. Neural Computing and Applications, in press, (2016)
[32]
Oudjene M, Ben-Ayed L, Delamézière A, Batoz J L. Shape optimization of clinching tools using the response surface methodology with Moving Least-Square approximation. J Mater Process Technol 209:289–296(2009)
[33]
Hewidy M S, El-Taweel T A, El-Safty M F. Modelling the machining parameters of wire electrical discharge machining of Inconel 601 using RSM. J Mater Process Technol 169:328–336(2005)
[34]
Montgomery D C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: Wiley, 2001.
[35]
Gupta M K, Sood P K, Sharma V S. Investigations on surface roughness measurement in minimum quantity lubrication turning of titanium alloys using response surface methodology and Box–Cox transformation. J Manuf Sci Product 16:75–88(2016)