Journal Home > Volume 4 , Issue 2

Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is the most effective method for surface planarization in the semiconductor industry. Nanoparticles are significant for material removal and ultra-smooth surface formation. This research investigates the mechanical effects of the material removal in the CMP process. The various contact states of pad, individual particle, and wafer caused by the variations of working conditions and material properties are analyzed. Three different mechanical models for the material removal in the CMP process, i.e., abrasive wear, adhesive wear, and erosive wear are investigated, with a focus on the comparison of the results for different models. The conclusions and methods obtained could potentially contribute to the understanding and evaluation of the CMP process in further work.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Mechanical model of nanoparticles for material removal in chemical mechanical polishing process

Show Author's information Hao CHENDan GUO( )Guoxin XIEGuoshun PAN
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract

Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is the most effective method for surface planarization in the semiconductor industry. Nanoparticles are significant for material removal and ultra-smooth surface formation. This research investigates the mechanical effects of the material removal in the CMP process. The various contact states of pad, individual particle, and wafer caused by the variations of working conditions and material properties are analyzed. Three different mechanical models for the material removal in the CMP process, i.e., abrasive wear, adhesive wear, and erosive wear are investigated, with a focus on the comparison of the results for different models. The conclusions and methods obtained could potentially contribute to the understanding and evaluation of the CMP process in further work.

Keywords: nanoparticle, chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), contact theory, material removal

References(34)

[1]
Tong Z. Present situation and future development of chemical mechanical polishing. Equipment for Electronic Products 33(6): 1–6 (2004)
[2]
Gehman B L. In the age of 300mm silicon, tech standards are even more crucial. Solid State Technol 44(8): 128–130 (2001)
[3]
Dejule R. CMP challenges below a quarter micron. Semicond Int 20(13): 54–60 (1997)
[4]
Preston F. The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines. Soc Glass Technol 11: 214–256 (1927)
[5]
Warnock J. A two-dimensional process model for chemimechanical polish planarization. J Electrocheml Soc 138(8): 2398–2402 (1991)
[6]
Runnels S R, Eyman L M. Tribology analysis of chemical- mechanical polishing. J Electrochem Soc 141(6): 1698–1701 (1994)
[7]
Tseng W T, Wang Y L. Re-examination of pressure and speed dependence of removal rate during chemical-mechanical polishing process. J Electrochem Soc 144(2): 15–17 (1997)
[8]
Zhang F, Bunaina A. The role of particle adhesion and surface deformation in chemical mechanical polishing processes. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 1(4): 184–187 (1998)
[9]
Shi F G, Zhao B. Modeling of chemical-mechanical polishing with soft pads. Appl Phys A 67(2): 249–252 (1998)
[10]
Zhao B, Shi F G. Chemical mechanical polishing: Threshold pressure and mechanism. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 2(3): 145–147 (1999)
[11]
Yu Y, Yu C C, Orlowski M. A statistical polishing pad model for chemical-polishing. In IEEE IEDM, Washington DC, 1993: 865–868.
[12]
Liu C, Dai B, Tseng W. Modeling of the wear mechanism during chemical-mechanical polishing. J Electrochem Soc 143(2): 716–721 (1996)
[13]
Zhang L, Tanaka H. Atomic scale deformation in silicon monocrystals induced by two-body and three-body contact sliding. Tribol Int 31(8): 424–433 (1998)
[14]
Basse J L, Liang H. Probable role of abrasion in chemo chemical polishing of tungsten. Wear 233–235: 647–654 (1999)
[15]
Zhao Y, Maietta D M, Chang L. An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow. J Tribol 122(1): 86–92 (2000)
[16]
Luo J, Dornfled D A. Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: Theory and modeling. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 14(2): 112–132 (2001)
[17]
Zhao Y, Chang L. A micro-contact and wear model for chemical-mechanical polishing of silicon wafers. Wear 252(s3–4): 220–226 (2002)
[18]
Ahmadi G, Xia X. A model for mechanical wear and abrasive particle adhesion during the chemical mechanical polishing process. J Electrochem Soc 148(3): G99–G109 (2001)
[19]
Fu G, Chandra A, Guha S, Subhash G. A plasticity-based model of material removal in chemical-mechanical polishing. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 14(4): 406–416 (2001)
[20]
Wang Y, Zhao Y, An W, Wang J. Modeling the effects of cohesive energy for single particle on the material removal in chemical mechanical polishing at atomic scale. Appl Surf Sci 253(23): 9137–9141 (2007)
[21]
Jeng Y R, Huang P Y. Impact of abrasive particles on the material removal rate in CMP. Electrochemical and Solid- State Letters 7(2): 40–43 (2004)
[22]
Jeng Y R, Huang P Y. A material removal rate model considering interfacial micro-contact wear behavior for chemical mechanical polishing. J Tribol 127(1): 190–196 (2005)
[23]
Xu X, Luo J, Lu X, Zhang C, Guo D. Effect of nanoparticle impact on material removal. Tribol Trans 51(6): 718–722 (2008)
[24]
Xu X, Luo J. Marangoni flow in an evaporating water droplet. Appl Phys Lett 91(12): 124102 (2007)
[25]
Xu X, Luo J, Guo D. Nanoparticle-wall collision in a laminar cylindrical liquid jet. J Colloid Interf Sci 359(2): 334–338 (2011)
[26]
Xia X, Ahamdi G. Surface removal rate in chemical- mechanical polishing. Particulate Science and Technology 20(3): 187–196 (2002)
[27]
Si L, Guo D, Luo J, Lu X. Monoatomic layer removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing process: A molecular dynamics study. J Appl Phys 107(6): 064310 (2010)
[28]
Guo D, Li J N, Xie G X, Wang Y Y, Luo J B. Elastic properties of polystyrene nanosphere evaluated with atomic force microscopy: Size effect and error analysis. Langmuir 30(24): 7206–7212 (2014)
[29]
Zhou Y, Pan G. Effects of ultra-smooth surface atomic step morphology on chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) performances of sapphire and SiC wafers. Tribol Int 87: 145–150 (2015)
[30]
Rabinowicz E. Friction and Wear of Materials. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1995.
[31]
Lin G, Guo D, Xie G, Jia Q, Pan G. In situ observation of colloidal particle behavior between two planar surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces A-Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 482: 656–661 (2015)
[32]
Lei J, Guo D, Luo J, Pan G. Probing particle movement in cmp with fluorescence technique. J Electrocheml Soc 158(6): H681–H685 (2011)
[33]
Yao W, Chen B, Liu C. Energetic coefficient of restitution for planar impact in multi-rigid-body systems with friction. Int J Impact Eng 31: 255–265 (2005)
[34]
Seo J, Moon J, Bae J, Yoon K, Sigmund W, Paik U. Control of adhesion force between ceria particles and polishing pad in shallow trench isolation chemical mechanical planarization. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14: 4351–4356 (2014)
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 04 March 2016
Revised: 21 April 2016
Accepted: 05 May 2016
Published: 15 June 2016
Issue date: June 2021

Copyright

© The author(s) 2016

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51375255, 91223202, 51321092).

Rights and permissions

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return