Zhang YW, Mei J, Yan C, et al. Bioinspired 2D nanomaterials for sustainable applications. Adv Mater 2020, 32: 1902806.
Sun ZQ, Liao T, Li WX, et al. Beyond seashells: Bioinspired 2D photonic and photoelectronic devices. Adv Funct Mater 2019, 29: 1901460.
Dai HL, Yin YR, Li XM, et al. A new Sc-doped La0.5Sr0.5MnO3−δ cathode allows high performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustain Mater Techno 2022, 32: e00409.
Iwahara H. Oxide-ionic and protonic conductors based on perovskite-type oxides and their possible applications. Solid State Ionics 1992, 52: 99–104.
Ling JR, Zhou YF, Xu WT, et al. Red-emitting YAG:Ce, Mn transparent ceramics for warm WLEDs application. J Adv Ceram 2020, 9: 45–54.
Zhang Y, Chen B, Guan DQ, et al. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. Nature 2021, 591: 246–251.
Zhang Y, Knibbe R, Sunarso J, et al. Recent progress on advanced materials for solid-oxide fuel cells operating below 500 ℃. Adv Mater 2017, 29: 1700132.
Liang MZ, He F, Zhou C, et al. Nickel-doped BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ as a new high-performance cathode for both oxygen-ion and proton conducting fuel cells. Chem Eng J 2021, 420: 127717.
Wu S, Xu X, Li XM, et al. High-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells using the first-generation Sr-doped LaMnO3 cathode tailored with Zn ions. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 675–682.
Zvonareva I, Fu XZ, Medvedev D, et al. Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic-electronic electrolytes. Energ Environ Sci 2022, 15: 439–465.
Xie D, Li K, Yang J, et al. High-performance La0.5(Ba0.75Ca0.25)0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2021, 46: 10007–10014.
Chen M, Xie XB, Guo JH, et al. Space charge layer effect at the platinum anode/BaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ electrolyte interface in proton ceramic fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 12566–12575.
Chen M, Chen DC, Wang K, et al. Densification and electrical conducting behavior of BaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ proton conducting ceramics with NiO additive. J Alloys Compd 2019, 781: 857–865.
Li J, Wang C, Wang XF, et al. Sintering aids for proton-conducting oxides—A double-edged sword? A mini review. Electrochem Commun 2020, 112: 106672.
Tian HC, Li WY, Ma L, et al. Deconvolution of water-splitting on the triple-conducting Ruddlesden–Popper-phase anode for protonic ceramic electrolysis cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020, 12: 49574–49585.
Yin YR, Yu SF, Dai HL, et al. Triggering interfacial activity of the traditional La0.5Sr0.5MnO3 cathode with Co-doping for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 1726–1734.
Zhang LL, Yin YR, Xu YS, et al. Tailoring Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−δ with Sc as a new single-phase cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 1485–1494.
Tarutin AP, Lyagaeva JG, Medvedev DA, et al. Recent advances in layered Ln2NiO4+δ nickelates: Fundamentals and prospects of their applications in protonic ceramic fuel and electrolysis cells. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 154–195.
Song YF, Chen YB, Wang W, et al. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. Joule 2019, 3: 2842–2853.
Zhang L, Lan R, Kraft A, et al. Cost-effective solid oxide fuel cell prepared by single step co-press–firing process with lithiated NiO cathode. Electrochem Commun 2010, 12: 1589–1592.
Yusoff WNAW, Somalu MR, Baharuddin NA, et al. Enhanced performance of lithiated cathode materials of LiCo0.6X0.4O2 (X = Mn, Sr, Zn) for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell applications. Int J Energ Res 2020, 44: 11783–11793.
Predoana L, Jitianu A, Voicescu M, et al. Study of formation of LiCoO2 using a modified Pechini aqueous sol–gel process. J Sol–Gel Sci Techn 2015, 74: 406–418.
Li L, Chen RJ, Zhang XX, et al. Preparation and electrochemical properties of re-synthesized LiCoO2 from spent lithium-ion batteries. Chinese Sci Bull 2012, 57: 4188–4194.
Han SJ, Xia YG, Wei Z, et al. A comparative study on the oxidation state of lattice oxygen among Li1.14Ni0.136Co0.136Mn0.544O2, Li2MnO3, LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 and LiCoO2 for the initial charge–discharge. J Mater Chem A 2015, 3: 11930–11939.
Xu X, Bi L, Zhao XS. Highly-conductive proton-conducting electrolyte membranes with a low sintering temperature for solid oxide fuel cells. J Membrane Sci 2018, 558: 17–25.
Xu X, Xu YS, Ma JM, et al. Tailoring electronic structure of perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J Power Sources 2021, 489: 229486.
Xu X, Wang HQ, Fronzi M, et al. Tailoring cations in a perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 20624–20632.
Tao ZR, Xu X, Bi L. Density functional theory calculations for cathode materials of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: A mini-review. Electrochem Commun 2021, 129: 107072.
Munoz-Garcia AB, Tuccillo M, Pavone M. Computational design of cobalt-free mixed proton–electron conductors for solid oxide electrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 11825–11833.
Yin YR, Dai HL, Yu SF, et al. Tailoring cobalt-free La0.5Sr0.5FeO3−δ cathode with a nonmetal cation-doping strategy for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. SusMat 2022, .
Xu YS, Xu X, Bi L. A high-entropy spinel ceramic oxide as the cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 794–804.
Mei J, Liao T, Liang J, et al. Toward promising cathode catalysts for nonlithium metal–oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2020, 10: 1901997.
Zhang HZ, Yang WS. Highly efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem Commun 2007: 4215–4217.
Xie Y, Shi N, Huan DM, et al. A stable and efficient cathode for fluorine-containing proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem 2018, 11: 3423–3430.
Yang SJ, Wen YB, Zhang JC, et al. Electrochemical performance and stability of cobalt-free Ln1.2Sr0.8NiO4 (Ln = La and Pr) air electrodes for proton-conducting reversible solid oxide cells. Electrochim Acta 2018, 267: 269–277.
Chen JY, Li J, Jia LC, et al. A novel layered perovskite Nd(Ba0.4Sr0.4Ca0.2)Co1.6Fe0.4O5+δ as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2019, 428: 13–19.
Pikalova E, Kolchugin A, Koroleva M, et al. Functionality of an oxygen Ca3Co4O9+δ electrode for reversible solid oxide electrochemical cells based on proton-conducting electrolytes. J Power Sources 2019, 438: 226996.
Zhang YD, Zhu AK, Guo YM, et al. Electrochemical performance and effect of moisture on Ba0.5Sr0.5Sc0.175Nb0.025Co0.8O3−δ oxide as a promising electrode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Appl Energ 2019, 238: 344–350.
Ren RZ, Wang ZH, Meng XG, et al. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. ACS Appl Energ Mater 2020, 3: 4914–4922.
Wang Q, Hou J, Fan Y, et al. Pr2BaNiMnO7−δ double-layered Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite oxides as efficient cathode electrocatalysts for low temperature proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 7704–7712.
Cao D, Zhou MY, Yan XM, et al. High performance low-temperature tubular protonic ceramic fuel cells based on barium cerate–zirconate electrolyte. Electrochem Commun 2021, 125: 106986.
Ling YH, Guo TM, Guo YY, et al. New two-layer Ruddlesden–Popper cathode materials for protonic ceramics fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1052–1060.
Xie D, Ling A, Yan D, et al. A comparative study on the composite cathodes with proton conductor and oxygen ion conductor for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 2020, 344: 136143.
Kilner JA, Burriel M. Materials for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. Annu Rev Mater Res 2014, 44: 365–393.
Duan CC, Huang J, Sullivan N, et al. Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. Appl Phys Rev 2020, 7: 011314.
Boev AO, Fedotov SS, Abakumov AM, et al. The role of antisite defect pairs in surface reconstruction of layered AMO2 oxides: A DFT+U study. Appl Surf Sci 2021, 537: 147750.
Vallverdu G, Minvielle M, Andreu N, et al. First principle study of the surface reactivity of layered lithium oxides LiMO2 (M = Ni, Mn, Co). Surf Sci 2016, 649: 46–55.
Liu L, Xiao Y. Theoretical exploration electrocatalytic active of spinel M2CoO4 (M = Co, Fe and Ni) as efficient catalyst for water splitting. Comp Mater Sci 2021, 187: 110082.
Liu Q, Yu B, Liao XB, et al. Facet-dependent oxygen reduction reaction activity on the surfaces of Co3O4. Energy Environ Mater 2021, 4: 407–412.
Zhang XH, Pei CL, Chang X, et al. FeO6 octahedral distortion activates lattice oxygen in perovskite ferrite for methane partial oxidation coupled with CO2 splitting. J Am Chem Soc 2020, 142: 11540–11549.
Xu YS, Liu XH, Cao N, et al. Defect engineering for electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction at ambient conditions. Sustain Mater Techno 2021, 27: e00229.
Zhou MZ, Liu JP, Ye YJ, et al. Enhancing the intrinsic activity and stability of perovskite cobaltite at elevated temperature through surface stress. Small 2021, 17: 2104144.
Ding HP, Wu W, Jiang C, et al. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat Commun 2020, 11: 1907.
Fabbri E, Pergolesi D, Licoccia S, et al. Does the increase in Y-dopant concentration improve the proton conductivity of BaZr1−xYxO3−δ fuel cell electrolytes? Solid State Ionics 2010, 181: 1043–1051.