References(68)
[1]
Li HQ, Wang X, Xu JQ, et al. One-dimensional CdS nanostructures: A promising candidate for optoelectronics. Adv Mater 2013, 25: 3017–3037.
[2]
Tang ZR, Han B, Han C, et al. One dimensional CdS based materials for artificial photoredox reactions. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 2387–2410.
[3]
Utterback JK, Grennell AN, Wilker MB, et al. Observation of trapped-hole diffusion on the surfaces of CdS nanorods. Nat Chem 2016, 8: 1061–1066.
[4]
Shen RC, Ren DD, Ding YN, et al. Nanostructured CdS for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution: A review. Sci China Mater 2020, 63: 2153–2188.
[5]
Wu KF, Chen ZY, Lv HJ, et al. Hole removal rate limits photodriven H2 generation efficiency in CdS–Pt and CdSe/ CdS–Pt semiconductor nanorod-metal tip heterostructures. J Am Chem Soc 2014, 136: 7708–7716.
[6]
Khon E, Mereshchenko A, Tarnovsky AN, et al. Suppression of the plasmon resonance in Au/CdS colloidal nanocomposites. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 1792–1799.
[7]
Feng C, Chen ZY, Hou J, et al. Effectively enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production performance of one-pot synthesized MoS2 clusters/CdS nanorod heterojunction material under visible light. Chem Eng J 2018, 345: 404–413.
[8]
Li YL, Gao CL, Jiang WS, et al. A game-changing design of low-cost, large-size porous cocatalysts decorated by ultra-small photocatalysts for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. Appl Catal B: Environ 2021, 286: 119923.
[9]
Tan WY, Li YL, Jiang WS, et al. CdS nanospheres decorated with NiS quantum dots as nobel-metal-free photocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2020, 3: 8048–8054.
[10]
Liang ZZ, Shen RC, Ng YH, et al. A review on 2D MoS2 cocatalysts in photocatalytic H2 production. J Mater Sci Technol 2020, 56: 89–121.
[11]
Yuan JL, Wen JQ, Gao QZ, et al. Amorphous Co3O4 modified CdS nanorods with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2-production activity. Dalton Trans 2015, 44: 1680–1689.
[12]
Cao J, Sun JZ, Li HY, et al. A facile room-temperature chemical reduction method to TiO2@CdS core/sheath heterostructure nanowires. J Mater Chem 2004, 14: 1203–1206.
[13]
Peng TY, Li K, Zeng P, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production over graphene oxide–cadmium sulfide nanocomposite under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 22720–22726.
[14]
Ran JR, Yu JG, Jaroniec M. Ni(OH)2 modified CdS nanorods for highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic H2 generation. Green Chem 2011, 13: 2708–2713.
[15]
Shen RC, Lu XY, Zheng QQ, et al. Tracking S-scheme charge transfer pathways in Mo2C/CdS H2-evolution photocatalysts. Sol RRL 2021, 5: 2100177.
[16]
Liu FF, Zhou AG, Chen JF, et al. Preparation of Ti3C2 and Ti2C MXenes by fluoride salts etching and methane adsorptive properties. Appl Surf Sci 2017, 416: 781–789.
[17]
Li ZY, Wang LB, Sun DD, et al. Synthesis and thermal stability of two-dimensional carbide MXene Ti3C2. Mater Sci Eng B 2015, 191: 33–40.
[18]
Anasori B, Lukatskaya MR, Gogotsi Y. 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage. Nat Rev Mater 2017, 2: 16098.
[19]
Zhou AG, Liu Y, Li SB, et al. From structural ceramics to 2D materials with multi-applications: A review on the development from MAX phases to MXenes. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1194–1242.
[20]
Wu M, He Y, Wang LB, et al. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of V2C MXene by etching in opened/closed environments. J Adv Ceram 2020, 9: 749–758.
[21]
Seh ZW, Fredrickson KD, Anasori B, et al. Two-dimensional molybdenum carbide (MXene) as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. ACS Energy Lett 2016, 1: 589–594.
[22]
Lei JC, Kutana A, Yakobson BI. Predicting stable phase monolayer Mo2C (MXene), a superconductor with chemically-tunable critical temperature. J Mater Chem C 2017, 5: 3438–3444.
[23]
Kim H, Anasori B, Gogotsi Y, et al. Thermoelectric properties of two-dimensional molybdenum-based MXenes. Chem Mater 2017, 29: 6472–6479.
[24]
Wu M, He M, Hu QK, et al. Ti3C2 MXene-based sensors with high selectivity for NH3 detection at room temperature. ACS Sens 2019, 4: 2763–2770.
[25]
Guo ZL, Zhou J, Zhu LG, et al. MXene: a promising photocatalyst for water splitting. J Mater Chem A 2016, 4: 11446–11452.
[26]
Zhang H, Li YL, Li WM, et al. Designing large-sized cocatalysts for fast charge separation towards highly efficient visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46: 28545–28553.
[27]
Li WM, Zhuang CQ, Li YL, et al. Anchoring ultra-small TiO2 quantum dots onto ultra-thin and large-sized Mxene nanosheets for highly efficient photocatalytic water splitting. Ceram Int 2021, 47: 21769–21776.
[28]
Ran JR, Gao GP, Li FT, et al. Ti3C2 MXene co-catalyst on metal sulfide photo-absorbers for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nat Commun 2017, 8: 13907.
[29]
Bai JX, Shen RC, Chen WL, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution based on a Ti3C2/Zn0.7Cd0.3S/Fe2O3 Ohmic/S-scheme hybrid heterojunction with cascade 2D coupling interfaces. Chem Eng J 2022, 429: 132587.
[30]
Bai JX, Shen RC, Jiang ZM, et al. Integration of 2D layered CdS/WO3 S-scheme heterojunctions and metallic Ti3C2 MXene-based Ohmic junctions for effective photocatalytic H2 generation. Chin J Catal 2022, 43: 359–369.
[31]
Jiang ZM, Chen Q, Zheng QQ, et al. Constructing 1D/2D Schottky-based heterojunctions between Mn0.2Cd0.8S nanorods and Ti3C2 nanosheets for boosted photocatalytic H2 evolution. Acta Phys Chimi-Sin 2021, 37: 2010059.
[32]
Yin JJ, Zhan FK, Jiao TF, et al. Facile preparation of self-assembled MXene@Au@CdS nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production activity. Sci China Mater 2020, 63: 2228–2238.
[33]
Li KK, Jiao TF, Xing RR, et al. Fabrication of tunable hierarchical MXene@AuNPs nanocomposites constructed by self-reduction reactions with enhanced catalytic performances. Sci China Mater 2018, 61: 728–736.
[34]
Huang XX, Wang R, Jiao TF, et al. Facile preparation of hierarchical AgNP-loaded MXene/Fe3O4/polymer nanocomposites by electrospinning with enhanced catalytic performance for wastewater treatment. ACS Omega 2019, 4: 1897–1906.
[35]
Huang WX, Li ZP, Wu C, et al. Delaminating Ti3C2 MXene by blossom of ZnIn2S4 microflowers for noble-metal-free photocatalytic hydrogen production. J Mater Sci Technol 2022, 120: 89–98.
[36]
Li ZP, Huang WX, Liu JX, et al. Embedding CdS@Au into ultrathin Ti3−xC2Ty to build dual Schottky barriers for photocatalytic H2 production. ACS Catal 2021, 11: 8510–8520.
[37]
Du H, Zhang QP, Zhao B, et al. Novel hierarchical structure of MoS2/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx composites for dramatically enhanced electromagnetic absorbing properties. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1042–1051.
[38]
Hu C, Lai CC, Tao Q, et al. Mo2Ga2C: A new ternary nanolaminated carbide. Chem Commun 2015, 51: 6560–6563.
[39]
Jin S, Su TC, Hu QK, et al. Thermal conductivity and electrical transport properties of double-A-layer MAX phase Mo2Ga2C. Mater Res Lett 2020, 8: 158–164.
[40]
Jin S, Wang ZT, Du YQ, et al. Hot-pressing sintering of double-A-layer MAX phase Mo2Ga2C. J Inorg Mater 2020, 35: 41–45. (in Chinese)
[41]
He HT, Jin S, Fan GX, et al. Synthesis mechanisms and thermal stability of ternary carbide Mo2Ga2C. Ceram Int 2018, 44: 22289–22296.
[42]
Qi XX, Yin WL, Jin S, et al. Density-functional-theory predictions of mechanical behaviour and thermal properties as well as experimental hardness of the Ga-bilayer Mo2Ga2C. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 273–282.
[43]
Jin S, Shi ZH, Jing HJ, et al. Mo2C-MXene/CdS heterostructures as visible-light photocatalysts with an ultrahigh hydrogen production rate. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2021, 4: 12754–12766.
[44]
Guo YT, Jin S, Wang LB, et al. Synthesis of two-dimensional carbide Mo2CTx MXene by hydrothermal etching with fluorides and its thermal stability. Ceram Int 2020, 46: 19550–19556.
[45]
Lang D, Xiang QJ, Qiu GH, et al. Effects of crystalline phase and morphology on the visible light photocatalytic H2-production activity of CdS nanocrystals. Dalton Trans 2014, 43: 7245–7253.
[46]
Halim J, Kota S, Lukatskaya MR, et al. Synthesis and characterization of 2D molybdenum carbide (MXene). Adv Funct Mater 2016, 26: 3118–3127.
[47]
Sun YM, Hu XL, Luo W, et al. Self-assembled hierarchical MoO2/graphene nanoarchitectures and their application as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 7100–7107.
[48]
Lai CC, Meshkian R, Dahlqvist M, et al. Structural and chemical determination of the new nanolaminated carbide Mo2Ga2C from first principles and materials analysis. Acta Mater 2015, 99: 157–164.
[49]
Halim J, Cook KM, Naguib M, et al. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of select multi-layered transition metal carbides (MXenes). Appl Surf Sci 2016, 362: 406–417.
[50]
Xie X, Lin L, Liu RY, et al. The synergistic effect of metallic molybdenum dioxide nanoparticle decorated graphene as an active electrocatalyst for an enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 2015, 3: 8055–8061.
[51]
Ovári L, Kiss J, Farkas AP, et al. Surface and subsurface oxidation of Mo2C/Mo(100): Low-energy ion-scattering, auger electron, angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron, and mass spectroscopy studies. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109: 4638–4645.
[52]
Benchakar M, Natu V, Elmelegy TA, et al. On a two-dimensional MoS2/Mo2CTx hydrogen evolution catalyst obtained by the topotactic sulfurization of Mo2CTx MXene. J Electrochem Soc 2020, 167: 124507.
[53]
Xu J, Cao XJ. Characterization and mechanism of MoS2/CdS composite photocatalyst used for hydrogen production from water splitting under visible light. Chem Eng J 2015, 260: 642–648.
[54]
Sing KSW. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 1985, 57: 603–619.
[55]
Zhou MH, Yu JG, Yu HG. Effects of urea on the microstructure and photocatalytic activity of bimodal mesoporous titania microspheres. J Mol Catal A Chem 2009, 313: 107–113.
[56]
Li YJ, Ding L, Yin SJ, et al. Photocatalytic H2 evolution on TiO2 assembled with Ti3C2 MXene and metallic 1T-WS2 as co-catalysts. Nano Micro Lett 2020, 12: 6.
[57]
Schvartzman M, Sidorov V, Ritter D, et al. Surface passivation of (100) InP by organic thiols and polyimide as characterized by steady-state photoluminescence. Semicond Sci Tech 2001, 16: L68–L71.
[58]
Zhang C, Zhou YM, Bao JH, et al. Structure regulation of ZnS@g-C3N4/TiO2 nanospheres for efficient photocatalytic H2 production under visible-light irradiation. Chem Eng J 2018, 346: 226–237.
[59]
Liu J, Liu Y, Liu NY, et al. Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science 2015, 347: 970–974.
[60]
Reza Gholipour M, Dinh CT, Béland F, et al. Nanocomposite heterojunctions as sunlight-driven photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water splitting. Nanoscale 2015, 7: 8187–8208.
[61]
Li X, Yu JG, Low JX, et al. Engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting. J Mater Chem A 2015, 3: 2485–2534.
[62]
Zhang Z, Yates JT. Band bending in semiconductors: Chemical and physical consequences at surfaces and interfaces. Chem Rev 2012, 112: 5520–5551.
[63]
Hu ZF, Liu G, Chen XQ, et al. Enhancing charge separation in metallic photocatalysts: A case study of the conducting molybdenum dioxide. Adv Funct Mater 2016, 26: 4445–4455.
[64]
Bai S, Li XY, Kong Q, et al. Toward enhanced photocatalytic oxygen evolution: Synergetic utilization of plasmonic effect and Schottky junction via interfacing facet selection. Adv Mater 2015, 27: 3444–3452.
[65]
Osterloh FE. Inorganic nanostructures for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 2013, 42: 2294–2320.
[66]
Zhang PY, Song T, Wang TT, et al. In-situ synthesis of Cu nanoparticles hybridized with carbon quantum dots as a broad spectrum photocatalyst for improvement of photocatalytic H2 evolution. Appl Catal B: Environ 2017, 206: 328–335.
[67]
Yuan YJ, Tu JR, Ye ZJ, et al. MoS2-graphene/ZnIn2S4 hierarchical microarchitectures with an electron transport bridge between light-harvesting semiconductor and cocatalyst: A highly efficient photocatalyst for solar hydrogen generation. Appl Catal B: Environ 2016, 188: 13–22.
[68]
Xu QL, Cheng B, Yu JG, et al. Making co-condensed amorphous carbon/g-C3N4 composites with improved visible-light photocatalytic H2-production performance using Pt as cocatalyst. Carbon 2017, 118: 241–249.