AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (15 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Enhanced giant dielectric properties and improved nonlinear electrical response in acceptor-donor (Al3+, Ta5+)-substituted CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics

Jakkree BOONLAKHORNaNarong CHANLEKbJedsada MANYAMcPornjuk SREPUSHARAWOOTa,dSriprajak KRONGSUKa,dPrasit THONGBAIa,d( )
Giant Dielectric and Computational Design Research Group (GD-CDR), Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Synchrotron Light Research Institute (Public Organization), 111 University Avenue, Muang District, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
Institute of Nanomaterials Research and Innovation for Energy (IN-RIE), NANOTEC-KKU RNN on Nanomaterials Research and Innovation for Energy, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Show Author Information

Abstract

The giant dielectric behavior of CaCu3Ti4O12 (CCTO) has been widely investigated owing to its potential applications in electronics; however, the loss tangent (tanδ) of this material is too large for many applications. A partial substitution of CCTO ceramics with either Al3+ or Ta5+ ions generally results in poorer nonlinear properties and an associated increase in tanδ (to ~0.29-1.15). However, first-principles calculations showed that self-charge compensation occurs between these two dopant ions when co-doped into Ti4+ sites, which can improve the electrical properties of the grain boundary (GB). Surprisingly, in this study, a greatly enhanced breakdown electric field (~200-6588 V/cm) and nonlinear coefficient (~4.8-15.2) with a significantly reduced tanδ (~0.010-0.036) were obtained by simultaneous partial substitution of CCTO with acceptor-donor (Al3+, Ta5+) dopants to produce (Al3+, Ta5+)-CCTO ceramics. The reduced tanδ and improved nonlinear properties were attributed to the synergistic effects of the co-dopants in the doped CCTO structure. The significant reduction in the mean grain size of the (Al3+, Ta5+)-CCTO ceramics compared to pure CCTO was mainly because of the Ta5+ ions. Accordingly, the increased GB density due to the reduced grain size and the larger Schottky barrier height (Φb) at the GBs of the co-doped CCTO ceramics were the main reasons for the greatly increased GB resistance, improved nonlinear properties, and reduced tanδ values compared to pure and single-doped CCTO. In addition, high dielectric constant values (ε′ ≈ (0.52-2.7) × 104) were obtained. A fine-grained microstructure with highly insulating GBs was obtained by Ta5+ doping, while co-doping with Ta5+ and Al3+ resulted in a high Φb. The obtained results are expected to provide useful guidelines for developing new giant dielectric ceramics with excellent dielectric properties.

References

[1]
Guo BC, Liu P, Cui X, et al. Enhancement of breakdown electric field and DC bias of (In0.5Nb0.5)0.005(Ti1-xZrx)0.995O2 colossal permittivity ceramics. J Alloys Compd 2018, 740: 1108-1115.
[2]
Liang P, Wang X, Chao X, et al. Electric response and improved dielectric properties in BiCu3Ti3FeO12. J Alloys Compd 2018, 734: 9-15.
[3]
Wang XW, Jia PB, Sun LY, et al. Improved dielectric properties in CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics modified by TiO2. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 2018, 29: 2244-2250.
[4]
Hu W, Liu Y, Withers RL, et al. Electron-pinned defect-dipoles for high-performance colossal permittivity materials. Nat Mater 2013, 12: 821-826.
[5]
Boonlakhorn J, Kidkhunthod P, Chanlek N, et al. (Al3+, Nb5+) co-doped CaCu3Ti4O12: An extended approach for acceptor-donor heteroatomic substitutions to achieve high-performance giant-dielectric permittivity. J Eur Ceram Soc 2018, 38: 137-143.
[6]
Wen A, Yuan D, Zhu X, et al. Electrical and dielectric properties of aluminum/niobium co-doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. Ferroelectrics 2016, 492: 1-9.
[7]
Boonlakhorn J, Kidkhunthod P, Thongbai P. Effects of co-doping on dielectric and electrical responses of CaCu3Ti4-x(Nb1/2In1/2)xO12 ceramics. J Phys: Conf Ser 2017, 901: 012078.
[8]
Boonlakhorn J, Srepusharawoot P, Thongbai P. Distinct roles between complex defect clusters and insulating grain boundary on dielectric loss behaviors of (In3+/Ta5+) co-doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. Results Phys 2020, 16: 102886.
[9]
Sun J, Xu C, Zhao X, et al. Improved dielectric properties of indium and tantalum co-doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramic prepared by spark plasma sintering. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 2020, 27: 1400-1408.
[10]
Hasan MK, Shant SH, Islam MZ, et al. Influence of Nb and Zr co-doping on the structural, morphological and dielectric properties of CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2021, 1045: 012004.
[11]
Mao P, Wang J, Xiao P, et al. Colossal dielectric response and relaxation behavior in novel system of Zr4+ and Nb5+ co-substituted CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. Ceram Int 2021, 47: 111-120.
[12]
Xu Z, Qiang H, Chen Y, et al. Microstructure and enhanced dielectric properties of yttrium and zirconium co-doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. Mater Chem Phys 2017, 191: 1-5.
[13]
Bai L, Wu Y, Zhang L. Influence of FeNb codoping on the dielectric and electrical properties of CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J Alloys Compd 2016, 661: 6-13.
[14]
Qu Y, Wu Y, Wu J, et al. Simultaneous epsilon-negative and mu-negative property of Ni/CaCu3Ti4O12 metacomposites at radio-frequency region. J Alloys Compd 2020, 847: 156526.
[15]
Qu Y, Du Y, Fan G, et al. Low-temperature sintering Graphene/CaCu3Ti4O12 nanocomposites with tunable negative permittivity. J Alloys Compd 2019, 771: 699-710.
[16]
Qu Y, Lin J, Wu J, et al. Graphene-carbon black/CaCu3Ti4O12 ternary metacomposites toward a tunable and weakly ε-negative property at the radio-frequency region. J Phys Chem C 2020, 124: 23361-23367.
[17]
Hu W, Lau K, Liu Y, et al. Colossal dielectric permittivity in (Nb+Al) codoped rutile TiO2 ceramics: Compositional gradient and local structure. Chem Mater 2015, 27: 4934-4942.
[18]
Song Y, Wang X, Zhang X, et al. Colossal dielectric permittivity in (Al + Nb) co-doped rutile SnO2 ceramics with low loss at room temperature. Appl Phys Lett 2016, 109: 142903.
[19]
Wu J, Nan CW, Lin Y, et al. Giant dielectric permittivity observed in Li and Ti doped NiO. Phys Rev Lett 2002, 89: 217601.
[20]
Peng Z, Liang P, Wang X, et al. Fabrication and characterization of CdCu3Ti4O12 ceramics with colossal permittivity and low dielectric loss. Mater Lett 2018, 210: 301-304.
[21]
Jumpatam J, Somphan W, Boonlakhorn J, et al. Non-ohmic properties and electrical responses of grains and grain boundaries of Na1/2Y1/2Cu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2017, 100: 157-166.
[22]
Peng Z, Wu D, Liang P, et al. Grain boundary engineering that induces ultrahigh permittivity and decreased dielectric loss in CdCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2020, 103: 1230-1240.
[23]
Peng Z, Liang P, Wang J, et al. Interfacial effect inducing thermal stability and dielectric response in CdCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. Solid State Ion 2020, 348: 115290.
[24]
Winkler E, Rivadulla F, Zhou JS, et al. Evolution of polaron size in La2-xSrxNiO4. Phys Rev B 2002, 66: 094418.
[25]
Wang CC, Zhang LW. Surface-layer effect in CaCu3Ti4O12. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 042906.
[26]
Lunkenheimer P, Fichtl R, Ebbinghaus S, et al. Nonintrinsic origin of the colossal dielectric constants in CaCu3Ti4O12. Phys Rev B 2004, 70: 172102.
[27]
Sun L, Zhang R, Wang Z, et al. Microstructure and enhanced dielectric response in Mg doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J Alloys Compd 2016, 663: 345-350.
[28]
Tuichai W, Thongyong N, Danwittayakul S, et al. Very low dielectric loss and giant dielectric response with excellent temperature stability of Ga3+ and Ta5+ co-doped rutile-TiO2 ceramics. Mater Des 2017, 123: 15-23.
[29]
Boonlakhorn J, Kidkhunthod P, Thongbai P. A novel approach to achieve high dielectric permittivity and low loss tangent in CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics by co-doping with Sm3+ and Mg2+ ions. J Eur Ceram Soc 2015, 35: 3521-3528.
[30]
Silva Junior E, La Porta FA, Liu MS, et al. A relationship between structural and electronic order-disorder effects and optical properties in crystalline TiO2 nanomaterials. Dalton Trans 2015, 44: 3159-3175.
[31]
Boonlakhorn J, Chanlek N, Thongbai P, et al. Strongly enhanced dielectric response and structural investigation of (Sr2+, Ge4+) co-doped CCTO ceramics. J Phys Chem C 2020, 124: 20682-20692.
[32]
Subramanian MA, Li D, Duan N, et al. High dielectric constant in ACu3Ti4O12 and ACu3Ti3FeO12 phases. J Solid State Chem 2000, 151: 323-325.
[33]
Thongbai P, Jumpatam J, Yamwong T, et al. Effects of Ta5+ doping on microstructure evolution, dielectric properties and electrical response in CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2012, 32: 2423-2430.
[34]
Moulson AJ, Herbert JM. Electroceramics: Materials, Properties, Applications, 2nd edn. New York; Wiley, 2003: 243-337
[35]
Xu Z, Qiang H. Enhanced dielectric properties of Zn and Mn co-doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 2017, 28: 376-380.
[36]
Li M, Liu Q, Li CX. Study of the dielectric responses of Eu-doped CaCu3Ti4O12. J Alloys Compd 2017, 699: 278-282.
[37]
Adams T, Sinclair D, West A. Characterization of grain boundary impedances in fine- and coarse-grained CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. Phys Rev B 2006, 73: 094124.
[38]
Moreno H, Cortés JA, Praxedes FM, et al. Tunable photoluminescence of CaCu3Ti4O12 based ceramics modified with tungsten. J Alloys Compd 2021, 850: 156652.
[39]
Shannon RD. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst Sect A 1976, 32: 751-767.
[40]
Rahaman MN. Ceramic Processing and Sintering, 2nd edn. CRC Press, 2017.
[41]
Yu R, Xue H, Cao Z, et al. Effect of oxygen sintering atmosphere on the electrical behavior of CCTO ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2012, 32: 1245-1249.
[42]
Lee SY, Kim HE, Yoo SI. Subsolidus phase relationship in the CaO-CuO-TiO2 ternary system at 950 ℃ in air. J Am Ceram Soc 2014, 97: 2416-2419.
[43]
Rahaman MN, Manalert R. Grain boundary mobility of BaTiO3 doped with aliovalent cations. J Eur Ceram Soc 1998, 18: 1063-1071.
[44]
Chiang YM, Takagi T. Grain-boundary chemistry of Barium titanate and strontium titanate: I, high-temperature equilibrium space charge. J Am Ceram Soc 1990, 73: 3278-3285.
[45]
Li M, Sinclair DC, West AR. Extrinsic origins of the apparent relaxorlike behavior in CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics at high temperatures: A cautionary tale. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 084106.
[46]
Nachaithong T, Thongbai P, Maensiri S. Colossal permittivity in (In1/2Nb1/2)xTi1-xO2 ceramics prepared by a glycine nitrate process. J Eur Ceram Soc 2017, 37: 655-660.
[47]
Hong SH, Kim DY, Park HM, et al. Electric and dielectric properties of Nb-doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2007, 90: 2118-2121.
[48]
Chung SY, Choi JH, Choi JK. Tunable current-voltage characteristics in polycrystalline calcium copper titanate. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 091912.
[49]
Mao P, Wang J, Liu S, et al. Improved dielectric and nonlinear properties of CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics with Cu-rich phase at grain boundary layers. Ceram Int 2019, 45: 15082-15090.
[50]
Cortés JA, Moreno H, Orrego S, et al. Dielectric and non-ohmic analysis of Sr2+ influences on CaCu3Ti4O12-based ceramic composites. Mater Res Bull 2021, 134: 111071.
[51]
Cotrim G, Cortés JA, Moreno H, et al. Tunable capacitor- varistor response of CaCu3Ti4O12/CaTiO3 ceramic composites with SnO2 addition. Mater Charact 2020, 170: 110699.
[52]
Sinclair DC, Adams TB, Morrison FD, et al. CaCu3Ti4O12: One-step internal barrier layer capacitor. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 80: 2153.
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 1243-1255
Cite this article:
BOONLAKHORN J, CHANLEK N, MANYAM J, et al. Enhanced giant dielectric properties and improved nonlinear electrical response in acceptor-donor (Al3+, Ta5+)-substituted CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2021, 10(6): 1243-1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-021-0499-5

1505

Views

139

Downloads

60

Crossref

59

Web of Science

58

Scopus

3

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 27 February 2021
Revised: 20 April 2021
Accepted: 09 May 2021
Published: 26 July 2021
© The Author(s) 2021

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return