AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A comprehensive study on Li4Si1-xTixO4 ceramics for advanced tritium breeders

Yichao GONGa( )Lin LIUaJianqi QIbMao YANGcJunjie LIaHailiang WANGbHao GUObGuojun ZHANGa( )Tiecheng LUb( )
School of Materials Science & Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
College of Physical Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Hetero-element doped lithium orthosilicates have been considered as advanced tritium breeders due to the superior performances. In this work, Li4Si1-xTixO4 ceramics were prepared by proprietary hydrothermal process and multistage reactive sintering. The reaction mechanism of Li4Si1-xTixO4 was put forward. XRD and SEM analyses indicate that insertion of Ti leads to lattice expansion, which promotes the grain growth and changes the fracture mode. The compressive tests show that the crush load increases almost four times by increasing x from 0 to 0.2. However, the thermal conductivity and ionic conductivity are the best when x = 0.05 and x = 0.1, respectively. Thermal cycling stability of Li4Si1-xTixO4 pebbles was further appraised through investigating the changes of microstructure and crush load. After undergoing thermal cycling, the Li4Si1-xTixO4 still show higher crush load compared with Li4SiO4, despite Ti segregation in some samples. The x = 0.05 sample exhibits excellent thermal cycling stability. In summary, proper amount of Ti doping can improve the crush load, thermal and ionic conductivity, and thermal cycling stability of Li4SiO4.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
40145_2020_419_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (656.2 KB)

References

[1]
M Xiang, C Wang, Y Zhang, et al. Research progress of fabrication process for solid state tritium breeders. Adv Ceram 2016, 37: 241-252.
[2]
S Konishi, M Enoeda, M Nakamichi, et al. Functional materials for breeding blankets—Status and developments. Nucl Fusion 2017, 57: 092014.
[3]
KM Feng, XY Wang, YJ Feng, et al. Current progress of Chinese HCCB TBM program. Fusion Eng Des 2016, 109-111: 729-735.
[4]
CE Johnson, K Noda, N Roux. Ceramic breeder materials: Status and needs. J Nucl Mater 1998, 258-263: 140-148.
[5]
A Ying, M Akiba, LV Boccaccini, et al. Status and perspective of the R&D on ceramic breeder materials for testing in ITER. J Nucl Mater 2007, 367-370: 1281-1286.
[6]
JG Li, YX Wan. Present state of Chinese magnetic fusion development and future plans. J Fusion Energ 2019, 38: 113-124.
[7]
T Hoshino. Pebble fabrication of super advanced tritium breeders using a solid solution of Li2+xTiO3+y with Li2ZrO3. Nucl Mater Energy 2016, 9: 221-226.
[8]
T Hoshino, Y Edao, Y Kawamura, et al. Pebble fabrication and tritium release properties of an advanced tritium breeder. Fusion Eng Des 2016, 109-111: 1114-1118.
[9]
T Hoshino, K Ochiai, Y Edao, et al. Evaluation of tritium release properties of advanced tritium breeders. Fusion Sci Technol 2015, 67: 386-389.
[10]
Y Wang, QL Zhou, LH Xue, et al. Synthesis of the biphasic mixture of Li2TiO3-Li4SiO4 and its irradiation performance. J Eur Ceram Soc 2016, 36: 4107-4113.
[11]
YW Zhai, J Hu, YB Duan, et al. Characterization of tritium breeding ceramic pebbles prepared by melt spraying. J Eur Ceram Soc 2020, 40: 1602-1612.
[12]
R Knitter, MHH Kolb, U Kaufmann, et al. Fabrication of modified lithium orthosilicate pebbles by addition of titania. J Nucl Mater 2013, 442: S433-S436.
[13]
MHH Kolb, R Knitter, T Hoshino. Li4SiO4 based breeder ceramics with Li2TiO3, LiAlO2 and LixLayTiO3 additions, part II: Pebble properties. Fusion Eng Des 2017, 115: 6-16.
[14]
K Tsuchiya, T Hoshino, H Kawamura, et al. Development of advanced tritium breeders and neutron multipliers for DEMO solid breeder blankets. Nucl Fusion 2007, 47: 1300-1306.
[15]
R Knitter, B Löbbecke. Reprocessing of lithium orthosilicate breeder material by remelting. J Nucl Mater 2007, 361: 104-111.
[16]
M Wang, MQ Xiang, YC Zhang. Fabrication and characterization of Li4SiO4 ceramic pebbles doped with Y2O3 and Nb2O5. Solid State Phenom 2018, 281: 28-33.
[17]
LJ Zhao, XG Long, XJ Chen, et al. Design, synthesis and characterization of the advanced tritium breeder: Li4+xSi1-x AlxO4 ceramics. J Nucl Mater 2015, 467: 911-916.
[18]
LJ Zhao, XG Long, SM Peng, et al. Tritium release In Li4SiO4 and Li4.2Si0.8Al0.2O4 ceramics. J Nucl Mater 2016, 482: 42-46.
[19]
MQ Xiang, YC Zhang, Y Zhang, et al. Preparation, performances and reaction mechanism of the Li4+xAlxSi1-xO4 pebbles for advanced tritium breeders. Fusion Eng Des 2017, 116: 17-23.
[20]
YC Gong, JJ Li, SH Yang, et al. Improvement of crushing strength and thermal conductivity by introduction of hetero- element Al into Li4SiO4. Ceram Int 2019, 45: 24564-24569.
[21]
Y Saito, T Asai, K Ado, et al. Ionic conductivity of Li+ ion conductors, Li4.2MxSi1-xO4 (M: B3+, Al3+, Ga3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+). Solid State Ionics 1990, 40-41: 34-37.
[22]
U Dash, S Sahoo, SKS Parashar, et al. Effect of Li+ ion mobility on the grain boundary conductivity of Li2TiO3 nanoceramics. J Adv Ceram 2014, 3: 98-108.
[23]
N Roux, G Hollenberg, C Johnson, et al. Summary of experimental results for ceramic breeder materials. Fusion Eng Des 1995, 27: 154-166.
[24]
N Roux, C Johnson, K Noda. Properties and performance of tritium breeding ceramics. J Nucl Mater 1992, 191-194: 15-22.
[25]
XW Wu, ZY Wen, XG Xu, et al. Synthesis and characterization of Li4SiO4 nano-powders by a water-based sol-gel process. J Nucl Mater 2009, 392: 471-475.
[26]
CE Johnson, T Kondo, N Roux, et al. Fabrication, properties, and tritium recovery from solid breeder materials. Fusion Eng Des 1991, 16: 127-139.
[27]
C Dang, M Yang, YC Gong, et al. A promising tritium breeding material: Nanostructured 2Li2TiO3-Li4SiO4 biphasic ceramic pebbles. J Nucl Mater 2018, 500: 265-269.
[28]
O Leys, MHH Kolb, A Pucci, et al. Study of lithium germanate additions to advanced ceramic breeder pebbles. J Nucl Mater 2019, 518: 234-240.
[29]
BL Dubey, AR West. Crystal chemistry of Li4XO4 phases: X = Si, Ge, Ti. J Inorg Nucl Chem 1973, 35: 3713-3717.
[30]
AR West. Ionic conductivity of oxides based on Li4SiO4. J Appl Electrochem 1973, 3: 327-335.
[31]
RC Chen, QW Shi, M Yang, et al. Microstructure and phase evolution of Li4TiO4 ceramics pebbles prepared from a nanostructured precursor powder synthesized by hydrothermal method. J Nucl Mater 2018, 508: 434-439.
[32]
AR West. Ionic conductivity of oxides based on Li4SiO4. J Appl Electrochem 1973, 3: 327-335.
[33]
MQ Xiang, YC Zhang, Y Zhang, et al. Grain growth behavior of Li4SiO4 pebbles fabricated by agar method for tritium breeder. Fusion Eng Des 2016, 112: 513-519.
[34]
FP Knudsen. Dependence of mechanical strength of brittle polycrystalline specimens on porosity and grain size. J Am Ceram Soc 1959, 42: 376-387.
[35]
QL Zhou, LH Xue, Y Wang, et al. Preparation of Li2TiO3 ceramic with nano-sized pores by ultrasonic-assisted solution combustion. J Eur Ceram Soc 2017, 37: 3595-3602.
[36]
SBRS Adnan, NS Mohamed. Effects of Sn substitution on the properties of Li4SiO4 ceramic electrolyte. Solid State Ionics 2014, 262: 559-562.
[37]
J Ortiz-Landeros, C Gómez-Yáñez, LM Palacios-Romero, et al. Structural and thermochemical chemisorption of CO2 on Li4+x(Si1-xAlx)O4 and Li4-x(Si1-xVx)O4 solid solutions. J Phys Chem A 2012, 116: 3163-3171.
[38]
H Tanigawa, Y Tanaka, M Enoeda, et al. Thermal conductivity measurement with silica-coated hot wire for Li4SiO4 pebble bed. J Nucl Sci Technol 2009, 46: 553-556.
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 629-640
Cite this article:
GONG Y, LIU L, QI J, et al. A comprehensive study on Li4Si1-xTixO4 ceramics for advanced tritium breeders. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2020, 9(5): 629-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-020-0419-0

931

Views

32

Downloads

19

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

21

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 08 June 2020
Revised: 30 August 2020
Accepted: 31 August 2020
Published: 21 September 2020
© The author(s) 2020

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return