AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (779.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Rapid Communication | Open Access

Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of polymer infiltrated sodium aluminum silicate restorative composites

Huining WANGaBencang CUIbJing LIbShu LIa( )Yuanhua LINbDeping LIUcMing LIb
Department of Periodontology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing 100730, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

A new type of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network composites (PICNs) was fabricated by infiltrating methacrylate-based monomers into partially sintered porous ceramics. The mechanical properties (flexural strength, flexural modulus, elastic modulus, Vickers hardness, fracture toughness) were investigated and compared with that of the natural tooth and common commercial CAD/CAM blocks. Our results indicated that sintering temperature and corresponding density of porous ceramics have an obvious influence on the mechanical properties, and PICNs could highly mimic the natural tooth in mechanical properties. The biocompatibility experiments evaluated through in vitro cell attachment and proliferation of BMSCs showed good biocompatibility. The mechanical properties and biocompatibility confirmed that PICN could be a promising candidate for CAD/CAM blocks for dental restoration.

References

[1]
Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res 2011, 90: 402-416.
[2]
Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013, 29: 419-426.
[3]
Swain MV, Coldea A, Bilkhair A, et al. Interpenetrating network ceramic-resin composite dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016, 32: 34-42.
[4]
Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001, 26: 535-576.
[5]
Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.
[6]
Schmalz G, Arenholt-Bindslev D. Biocompatibility of Dental Materials. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.
[7]
Moharamzadeh K, Brook IM, Van Noort R. Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials. Materials 2009, 2: 514-548.
[8]
Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci 1998, 106: 696-706.
[9]
Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010, 89: 549-560.
[10]
Cuy JL, Mann AB, Livi KJ, et al. Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2002, 47: 281-291.
[11]
Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr., et al. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 2001, 46: 173-183.
[12]
Xu HHK, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, et al. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1998, 77: 472-480.
[13]
Craig RG, Peyton FA. The microhardness of enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1958, 37: 661-668.
[14]
Plotino G, Grande NM, Bedini R, et al. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. Dent Mater 2007, 23: 1129-1135.
[15]
Ziskind D, Hasday M, Cohen SR, et al. Young’s modulus of peritubular and intertubular human dentin by nano-indentation tests. J Struct Biol 2011, 174: 23-30.
[16]
Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: A critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol M 2003, 14: 13-29.
[17]
Meredith N, Sherriff M, Setchell DJ, et al. Measurement of the microhardness and Young’s modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. Arch Oral Biol 1996, 41: 539-545.
[18]
Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, et al. Hardness and Young’s modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1996, 41: 9-13.
[19]
Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crownlike layer structures: A review. J Prosthet Dent 2001, 86: 495-510.
[20]
Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, et al. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent 2015, 7: e495-e500.
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 73-79
Cite this article:
WANG H, CUI B, LI J, et al. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of polymer infiltrated sodium aluminum silicate restorative composites. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2017, 6(1): 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-016-0214-0

873

Views

60

Downloads

16

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

16

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 09 October 2017
Revised: 11 February 2017
Accepted: 11 June 2017
Published: 02 March 2017
© The author(s) 2016

Open Access The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return