Journal Home > Volume 2 , issue 2

A comparative study was carried out on the load-dependent indentation behavior with respect to hardness and induced cracks of β-SiAlON and α-silicon carbide ceramics. It is observed that silicon carbide (SiC) exhibits lower transition load, early cracking and severely crushed indentation sites, whereas β-SiAlON shows higher transition load and damage-free indentation zone even at the maximum applied load (294.19 N). Crack density is higher for α-SiC with comparison to β-SiAlON at each load. SiC exhibits both main and secondary radial types of cracking from low indentation load (0.98 N). Cracks are often associated with branching at higher load (> 9.80 N) for α-SiC. β-SiAlON exhibits cracks which are mainly radial types initiated at 4.90 N load. These opposing behaviors of β-SiAlON and α-SiC are attributed to their difference in hardness, toughness, and brittleness index. Higher brittleness of α-SiC results in early and severe cracking around its indentations. β-SiAlON shows less cracking due to its lower brittleness and higher toughness. The increased size of indentation-induced cracks of α-SiC is higher than that of β-SiAlON due to the rapid crack propagation in α-SiC with transgranular fracture behavior.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Load-dependent indentation behavior of β-SiAlON and α-silicon carbide

Show Author's information Prasenjit BARICK*( )Dulal Chandra JANABhaskar Prasad SAHA
Centre for Non-Oxide Ceramics, International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials, PO: Balapur, RCI Road, Hyderabad 500005, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

A comparative study was carried out on the load-dependent indentation behavior with respect to hardness and induced cracks of β-SiAlON and α-silicon carbide ceramics. It is observed that silicon carbide (SiC) exhibits lower transition load, early cracking and severely crushed indentation sites, whereas β-SiAlON shows higher transition load and damage-free indentation zone even at the maximum applied load (294.19 N). Crack density is higher for α-SiC with comparison to β-SiAlON at each load. SiC exhibits both main and secondary radial types of cracking from low indentation load (0.98 N). Cracks are often associated with branching at higher load (> 9.80 N) for α-SiC. β-SiAlON exhibits cracks which are mainly radial types initiated at 4.90 N load. These opposing behaviors of β-SiAlON and α-SiC are attributed to their difference in hardness, toughness, and brittleness index. Higher brittleness of α-SiC results in early and severe cracking around its indentations. β-SiAlON shows less cracking due to its lower brittleness and higher toughness. The increased size of indentation-induced cracks of α-SiC is higher than that of β-SiAlON due to the rapid crack propagation in α-SiC with transgranular fracture behavior.

Keywords:

SiAlON, silicon carbide (SiC), indentation, hardness, crack
Received: 23 January 2013 Revised: 31 March 2013 Accepted: 04 April 2013 Published: 04 June 2013 Issue date: June 2013
References(23)
[1]
McColm IJ. Ceramic Hardness. New York: Plenum Press, 1990.
[2]
Rice RW, Wu CC, Boichelt F. Hardness-grain-size relations in ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1994, 77: 2539–2553.
[3]
Wilantewicz T, Cannon WR, Quinn G. The indentation size effect (ISE) for Knoop hardness in five ceramic materials. In Advances in Ceramic Armor II: A Collection of Papers Presented at the 30th International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites. Franks LP, Wereszczak A, Lara-Curzio E, Eds. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2006: 237–250.
[4]
Gong JH, Li Y. An energy-balance analysis for the size effect in low-load hardness testing. J Mater Sci 2000, 35: 209–213.
[5]
Dusza J, Steen M. Microhardness load size effect in individual grains of a gas pressure sintered silicon nitride. J Am Ceram Soc 1998, 81: 3022–3024.
[6]
Quinn GD, Green P, Xu K. Cracking and the indentation size effect for Knoop hardness of glasses. J Am Ceram Soc 2003, 86: 441–448.
[7]
Peng ZJ, Gong JH, Miao HZ. On the description of indentation size effect in hardness testing for ceramics: Analysis of the nanoindentation data. J Eur Ceram Soc 2004, 24: 2193–2201.
[8]
Sangwal K. Review: Indentation size effect, indentation cracks and microhardness measurement of brittle crystalline solids—Some basic concepts and trends. Crys Res Technol 2009, 44: 1019–1037.
[9]
Li H, Bradt RC. The indentation load/size effect and the measurement of the hardness of vitreous silica. J Non-Cryst Solids 1992, 146: 197–212.
[10]
Quinn JB, Quinn GD. Indentation brittleness of ceramics: A fresh approach. J Mater Sci 1997, 32: 4331–4346.
[11]
Patel PJ, Swab JJ, Staley M, et al. Indentation size effect (ISE) of transparent AlON and MgAl2O4. Available at .
[12]
Huang ZH, Jia DC, Zhou Y, et al. Effect of a new additive on mechanical properties of hot-pressed silicon carbide ceramics. Mater Res Bull 2002, 37: 933–940.
[13]
Zhang XF, Yang Q, De Jonghe LC. Microstructure development in hot-pressed silicon carbide: Effects of aluminum, boron, and carbon additives. Acta Mater 2003, 51: 3849–3860.
[14]
Karandikar PG, Evans G, Wong S, et al. A review of ceramics for armor applications. In Advances in Ceramic Armor IV: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. Franks LP, Obji T, Wereszczak A, Eds. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2008: 163–175.
[15]
Suyama S, Kameda T, Itoh Y. Development of high-strength reaction-sintered silicon carbide. Diam Relat Mater 2003, 12: 1201–1204.
[16]
Fernández JM, Muñoz A, de Arellano López AR, et al. Microstructure–mechanical properties correlation in siliconized silicon carbide ceramics. Acta Mater 2003, 51: 3259–3275.
[17]
Ghosh G, Vaynman S, Fine ME, et al. Microstructure and ambient properties of a SiAlON composite prepared by hot pressing and reactive sintering of β-Si3N4 coated with Al2O3. J Mater Res 1999, 14: 881–890.
[18]
da Silva CRM, de Melo FCL, de Macedo Silva OM. Mechanical properties of SiAlON. Mat Sci Eng A 1996, 209: 175–179.
[19]
Abo-Naf SM, Dulias U, Schneider J, et al. Mechanical and tribological properties of Nd- and Yb-SiAlON composites sintered by hot isostatic pressing. J Mater Process Tech 2007, 183: 264–272.
[20]
Hou X-M, Chou K-C, Li F-S. Some new perspectives on oxidation kinetics of SiAlON materials. J Eur Ceram Soc 2008, 28: 1243–1249.
[21]
Lin MT, Shi JL, Jiang DY, et al. High temperature creep of a hot-pressed β-SiAlON. Mat Sci Eng A 2001, 300: 61–67.
[22]
Bull SJ, Page TF, Yoffe EH. An explanation of the indentation size effect in ceramics. Phil Mag Lett 1989, 59: 281–288.
[23]
Mukhopadhyay NK, Paufler P. Micro- and nanoindentation techniques for mechanical characterisation of materials. Int Mater Rev 2006, 51: 209–245.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 23 January 2013
Revised: 31 March 2013
Accepted: 04 April 2013
Published: 04 June 2013
Issue date: June 2013

Copyright

© The author(s) 2013

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to acknowledge Dr. G. Sundararajan, Director-ARCI, and Dr. Shrikant V. Joshi, Associate Director-ARCI, for their constant inspiration towards the completion of this work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permission requests may be sought directly from editorial office.

Return