AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper

Contrasting Environments and Triggering Mechanisms of Disastrous Downbursts from Isolated versus Linear-Embedded Storms in the Jianghuai Region of China

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Severe Storm Disaster Risk, Nanjing 210041
Jiangsu Meteorological Observatory, Nanjing 210041
CMA Key Laboratory of Transportation Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Nanjing 210041
Nanjing Joint Institute for Atmospheric Sciences, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Nanjing 210041
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology (LaSW), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
Show Author Information

Abstract

Downbursts in the Jianghuai region of East China are primarily caused by two storm types: isolated storms (ISs) and linear-embedded storms (LSs). However, systematic differences in their synoptic backgrounds, convective environments, and downburst formation mechanisms remain poorly understood, limiting the accuracy of downburst warnings. This study aims to quantify these differences and identify storm-type-specific triggering mechanisms for associated downbursts. Based on 18 downburst events (9 ISs and 9 LSs) from 2011 to 2024, we performed composite analysis using ERA5 reanalysis data (0.25°, hourly) and examined two representative downburst cases with S-band Doppler radar, automatic weather station (AWS; minute-resolution), and sounding data. Statistical significance of environmental differences was tested with t-tests. The results are as follows. (1) LSs form ahead of upper-level troughs near the 850-hPa front with strong synoptic forcing, whereas ISs develop along the subtropical high edge under weak forcing but with higher convective available potential energy (CAPE: ~3000 vs. ~2000 J kg−1). LSs exhibit significantly stronger low-to-mid-level vertical wind shear (surface to 500 hPa: ~18 vs. ~7 m s−1; 0–1 km: ~21 vs. ~6 m s−1; p < 0.05). (2) For ISs, downburst initiation is dominated by negative buoyancy from hail melting and hydrometeor evaporation, driving a mid-level rear-inflow jet (RIJ) and a rapidly descending weak-echo gap. For LSs, a low-level RIJ, intensified by the surface cold pool and a developing mesocyclone (which generates a downward perturbation pressure gradient force), combines with hydrometeor drag to produce the downburst. (3) Surface observations show that ISs cause a larger pre-downburst temperature drop (mean 5.1 vs. 4.6°C in LSs) and a distinct dewpoint drop (3.7 vs. 1.0°C) within 10 min before the gust. In general, the two storm types develop under fundamentally different environmental controls (instability-dominated vs. shear-dominated) and rely on different primary mechanisms (thermodynamic cooling vs. dynamic forcing from RIJ and mesocyclone). These findings provide specific pre-downburst signatures (e.g., rapid temperature/dewpoint drops within 5–10 min ahead of peak winds) that can support storm-type-specific nowcasting of disastrous downbursts in the Jianghuai region of East China.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Meteorological Research
Pages 1639-1656

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WU H, SUN J, ZHANG L, et al. Contrasting Environments and Triggering Mechanisms of Disastrous Downbursts from Isolated versus Linear-Embedded Storms in the Jianghuai Region of China. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2026, 40(5): 1639-1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-026-5179-5

11

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 11 July 2025
Revised: 01 April 2026
Accepted: 30 April 2026
Published: 20 October 2026
© The Chinese Meteorological Society 2026