AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper

Evaluation of FY-4A/4B GIIRS Atmospheric Temperature Profile Products Using Radiosonde Observations through a Per-Level Collocation Method

Xiaoyue ZHANG1,2,3, Yuanyuan WANG4,5( ), Qiang GONG1,2,3, Ying WANG1,2,3, Yudi SHI1,2,3, Linlin LI1,2,3, Guochun LI6
Liaoning Ecological Meteorology and Satellite Remote Sensing Centre, Shenyang 110166
Liaoning Data and Application Centre for High-Resolution Earth Observation System, Shenyang 110166
Panjin National Climate Observatory, Panjin 124010
National Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environmental Satellites, National Satellite Meteorological Centre (National Centre for Space Weather), China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
Innovation Centre for Fengyun Meteorological Satellite (FYSIC), Beijing 100081
Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866
Show Author Information

Abstract

Fengyun-4A (FY-4A) and Fengyun-4B (FY-4B) are the first two geostationary satellites equipped with an infrared hyperspectral sounder known as the Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder (GIIRS). This paper validates the FY-4A/4B GIIRS atmospheric temperature profile (ATP) products by comparing them with routine radiosonde data collected from 89 stations across China between February 2023 and January 2024. To mitigate the effects of balloon drift, a collocation strategy was implemented for each pressure level to identify the nearest temperature retrieval within 1800 s and 0.2° of the actual observation time and location of the radiosonde. This strategy enhances the agreement between radiosonde observations and satellite retrievals, particularly under clear-sky condition. Utilizing the per-level collocation strategy, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the GIIRS ATP products and analyzed how the evaluation results vary in relation to sensors (FY-4A/4B GIIRS), sky conditions (cloudy/clear), months, times (morning/evening), pressure levels, and regions. The results indicate that the FY-4A/4B GIIRS ATP products demonstrate a strong consistency with radiosonde observations, achieving high coefficients of determination (0.990–0.997), favorable biases (−0.92 to 0.06 K), and low RMSE (root-mean-square error) values (1.58–2.57 K). In comparison to cloudy conditions, the evaluation results are significantly improved and exhibit more pronounced variations across months and pressure levels under clear-sky conditions. The summer months demonstrate better performance than the winter months, and the retrievals in the evening are slightly better than those in the morning. Near the top of the atmospheric boundary layer (850 hPa) and the tropopause (200 hPa), the RMSE shows higher values and increased spatial heterogeneity compared to the mid-tropospheric level (500 hPa). FY-4B demonstrates significant superiority over FY-4A under clear-sky conditions; however, this trend does not persist under cloudy conditions due to the large negative biases associated with FY-4B, highlighting the need for further improvement in the retrieval method.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Meteorological Research
Pages 1652-1668

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHANG X, WANG Y, GONG Q, et al. Evaluation of FY-4A/4B GIIRS Atmospheric Temperature Profile Products Using Radiosonde Observations through a Per-Level Collocation Method. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2025, 39(6): 1652-1668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-025-5047-8

738

Views

3

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 16 February 2025
Published: 30 December 2025
© The Chinese Meteorological Society 2025