AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper

Development of a Four-Dimensional Diagnostic Analysis Model for Assessing Ensemble Forecast Uncertainty

Fei PENG1,2,3Yuejian ZHU1,2,3( )Jing CHEN1,2,3Xiaoli LI1,2,3Jian TANG4
CMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre, China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Beijing 100081
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Science and Technology, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
Key Laboratory of Earth System Modeling and Prediction, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
National Meteorological Centre, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
Show Author Information

Abstract

Evaluating whether an ensemble prediction system (EPS) can accurately represent forecast uncertainty is a key aspect of model development and ensemble forecast applications. In this study, a four-dimensional diagnostic analysis model for assessing ensemble forecast uncertainty is proposed, by analyzing the relationship between the ensemble spread and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the ensemble mean in terms of their temporal evolution (one-dimensional) and spatial distribution (three-dimensional), together with use of the linear variance calibration (LVC) method. Based on this model and the daily operational forecast data of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) global EPS (CMA-GEPS) in December 2022–November 2023, characteristics of the CMA-GEPS forecast uncertainty are diagnosed and analyzed, and compared against the state-of-the-art operational global EPS of ECMWF. Generally, there is a deficiency in CMA-GEPS, which underestimates the forecast uncertainty, especially in the tropics. However, at certain initialization times in some seasons and over some locations, the spread appears greater than the RMSE, indicating an overestimation of forecast uncertainty. Moreover, CMA-GEPS performs better in capturing the forecast uncertainty of lower-level variables than upper-level variables; and in comparison with the mass and thermal fields, the forecast uncertainty of the dynamic field is better represented. Diagnostic analysis using the LVC method reveals that the relevance between the ensemble variance and the ensemble mean error variance of CMA-GEPS increases with forecast lead time, and the problem of underestimated forecast uncertainty is continuously alleviated. In addition, ECMWF EPS behaves distinctly better than CMA-GEPS in representing the forecast uncertainty and its growth process, the reasons for which are discussed and elucidated from the perspective of shortcomings in the methods to generate the initial and model perturbations, the ensemble size, and the forecast model adopted by CMA-GEPS.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Meteorological Research
Pages 288-302

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
PENG F, ZHU Y, CHEN J, et al. Development of a Four-Dimensional Diagnostic Analysis Model for Assessing Ensemble Forecast Uncertainty. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2025, 39(2): 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-025-4184-4

752

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 24 September 2024
Published: 26 December 2024
© The Chinese Meteorological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2024