AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper

Impacts of the Initial Perturbation Scale and Magnitude on Convection-Allowing Ensemble Forecasts over Eastern China

Yanan MA1,2Jing CHEN3,4,5( )Jingzhuo WANG3,4,5Fajing CHEN3,4,5Jing WANG6Zhizhen XU3,4,5
Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Beijing 100081
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100081
CMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
Key Laboratory of Earth System Modeling and Prediction, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081
Tianjin Meteorological Observatory, Tianjin 300074
Show Author Information

Abstract

Given the chaotic nature of the atmosphere and inevitable initial condition errors, constructing effective initial perturbations (IPs) is crucial for the performance of a convection-allowing ensemble prediction system (CAEPS). The IP growth in the CAEPS is scale- and magnitude-dependent, necessitating the investigation of the impacts of IP scales and magnitudes on CAEPS. Five comparative experiments were conducted by using the China Meteorological Administration Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction System (CMA-MESO) 3-km model for 13 heavy rainfall events over eastern China: smaller-scale IPs with doubled magnitudes, larger-, meso-, and smaller-scale IPs; and a chaos seeding experiment as a baseline. First, the constructed IPs outperform unphysical chaos seeding in perturbation growth and ensemble performance. Second, the daily variation of smaller-scale perturbations is more sensitive to convective activity because smaller-scale perturbations during forecasts reach saturation faster than meso- and larger-scale perturbations. Additionally, rapid downscaling cascade that saturates the smallest-scale perturbation within 6 h for larger- and meso-scale IPs is stronger in the lower troposphere and near-surface. After 9–12 h, the disturbance development of large-scale IPs is the largest in each layer on various scales. Moreover, thermodynamic perturbations, concentrated in the lower troposphere and near-surface with meso- and smaller-scale components being dominant, are smaller and more responsive to convective activity than kinematic perturbations, which are concentrated on the middle–upper troposphere and predominantly consist of larger- and meso-scale components. Furthermore, the increasing magnitude of smaller-scale IPs enables only their smaller-scale perturbations in the first 9 h to exceed those of larger- and meso-scale IPs. Third, for forecast of upper-air and surface variables, larger-scale IPs warrant a more reliable and skillful CAEPS. Finally, for precipitation, larger-scale IPs perform best for light rain at all forecast times, whereas meso-scale IPs are optimal for moderate and heavy rains at 6-h forecast time. Increasing magnitude of smaller-scale IPs improves the probability forecast skills for heavy rains during the first 3–6 h.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Meteorological Research
Pages 132-153

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
MA Y, CHEN J, WANG J, et al. Impacts of the Initial Perturbation Scale and Magnitude on Convection-Allowing Ensemble Forecasts over Eastern China. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2025, 39(1): 132-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-025-4172-8

1128

Views

3

Crossref

6

Web of Science

6

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 07 September 2024
Published: 20 November 2024
© The Chinese Meteorological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2025