Journal Home > Online First
Nano Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-024-6621-6
Review Article | Online first | Published: 02 May 2024

Recent progress on the synthesis of defective UiO-66 for thermal catalysis

Show Author's Information Qing Feng1,2,§,  Caoyu Yang1,2,§,  Lin Chang1,2,  Guodong Li1,2( ),  Zhiyong Tang1,2( )
CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China
School of Nanoscience and Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

§ Qing Feng and Caoyu Yang contributed equally to this work.

Keywords:
characterization, de novo synthesis, defective UiO-66, post-synthetic treatment, thermal catalysis
Topics:
Catalysis Catalyst activityCatalyst selectivity CatalystsCatalytic oxidation Cost effectivenessCrystal defectsCrystal structureCrystallinityDoping (additives)FabricationMicroporosity MicrostructureMorphologyNanocatalystsNanoclustersNanocrystalline materials Nanocrystalline powdersNanocrystallization NanocrystalsNanoporesNanostructured materialsNanostructuresOxidationParticle sizePore sizePore structurePorosityPorous materialsReaction intermediatesReaction ratesReductionSelective catalytic reductionSelf assemblyStructural designStructural optimizationStructure (composition)Surface defectsSynthesis (chemical)Temperature
Cite this article:
Feng Q, Yang C, Chang L, et al. Recent progress on the synthesis of defective UiO-66 for thermal catalysis. Nano Research, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-024-6621-6
Download citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTeX

79

Views

11

Downloads

Citations

0

Crossref

0

WoS

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Zirconium terephthalate UiO-66 has aroused great interest in catalysis since it exhibits significant flexibility and compatibility for accommodating a high number of defects as well as exceptional thermal and chemical stability. Until now, many works have focused on the modulations of the Zr6-oxo clusters in UiO-66 in terms of diverse synthesis, advanced characterizations, and their catalytic applications. To achieve high catalytic efficiency, it is still highly desired for rationally constructing and modulating the Zr6-oxo clusters with exposed catalytic sites and diverse microenvironments for advanced catalysis. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of recent progress on the synthesis of defective UiO-66, qualitative and quantitative characterizations, as well as a logical overview of heterogeneous catalytic applications over the past few years. Finally, the outlooks for the research paradigm of defective UiO-66 are discussed.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Recent progress on the synthesis of defective UiO-66 for thermal catalysis

Show Author's information Qing Feng1,2,§, Caoyu Yang1,2,§, Lin Chang1,2, Guodong Li1,2( ), Zhiyong Tang1,2( )
CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China
School of Nanoscience and Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

§ Qing Feng and Caoyu Yang contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Zirconium terephthalate UiO-66 has aroused great interest in catalysis since it exhibits significant flexibility and compatibility for accommodating a high number of defects as well as exceptional thermal and chemical stability. Until now, many works have focused on the modulations of the Zr6-oxo clusters in UiO-66 in terms of diverse synthesis, advanced characterizations, and their catalytic applications. To achieve high catalytic efficiency, it is still highly desired for rationally constructing and modulating the Zr6-oxo clusters with exposed catalytic sites and diverse microenvironments for advanced catalysis. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of recent progress on the synthesis of defective UiO-66, qualitative and quantitative characterizations, as well as a logical overview of heterogeneous catalytic applications over the past few years. Finally, the outlooks for the research paradigm of defective UiO-66 are discussed.

Keywords: characterization, de novo synthesis, defective UiO-66, post-synthetic treatment, thermal catalysis

References(149)

[1]

Campos, K. R.; Coleman, P. J.; Alvarez, J. C.; Dreher, S. D.; Garbaccio, R. M.; Terrett, N. K.; Tillyer, R. D.; Truppo, M. D.; Parmee, E. R. The importance of synthetic chemistry in the pharmaceutical industry. Science 2019, 363, eaat0805.
DOI Google Scholar
[2]

Ni, L.; Yu, C.; Wei, Q. B.; Liu, D. M.; Qiu, J. S. Pickering emulsion catalysis: Interfacial chemistry, catalyst design, challenges, and perspectives. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202115885.
DOI Google Scholar
[3]

Klankermayer, J.; Wesselbaum, S.; Beydoun, K.; Leitner, W. Selective catalytic synthesis using the combination of carbon dioxide and hydrogen: Catalytic chess at the interface of energy and chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7296–7343.
DOI Google Scholar
[4]

Egorova, K. S.; Ananikov, V. P. Which metals are green for catalysis? Comparison of the toxicities of Ni, Cu, Fe, Pd, Pt, Rh, and Au salts. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 12150–12162.
DOI Google Scholar
[5]

Zhao, Y. F.; Gao, W.; Li, S. W.; Williams, G. R.; Mahadi, A. H.; Ma, D. Solar- versus thermal-driven catalysis for energy conversion. Joule 2019, 3, 920–937.
DOI Google Scholar
[6]

Li, Y. J.; Ding, Y. J.; Zhang, B.; Huang, Y. C.; Qi, H. F.; Das, P.; Zhang, L. Z.; Wang, X.; Wu, Z. S.; Bao, X. H. N,O symmetric double coordination of an unsaturated Fe single-atom confined within a graphene framework for extraordinarily boosting oxygen reduction in Zn-air batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 2629–2636
DOI Google Scholar
[7]

Wang, Y. H.; Tong, C. Z.; Liu, Q. L.; Han, R.; Liu, C. X. Intergrowth zeolites, synthesis, characterization, and catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 11664–11721.
DOI Google Scholar
[8]

Yao, Y. G.; Dong, Q.; Brozena, A.; Luo, J.; Miao, J. W.; Chi, M. F.; Wang, C.; Kevrekidis, I. G.; Ren, Z. J.; Greeley, J. et al. High-entropy nanoparticles: Synthesis–structure–property relationships and data-driven discovery. Science 2022, 376, eabn3103.
DOI Google Scholar
[9]

Zhao, S. L.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J. C.; He, C. T.; Yin, H. J.; An, P. F.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, X. F.; Gao, C.; Zhang, L. J. et al. Ultrathin metal-organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16184.
DOI Google Scholar
[10]

Zhao, S. L.; Tan, C. H.; He, C. T.; An, P. F.; Xie, F.; Jiang, S.; Zhu, Y. F.; Wu, K. H.; Zhang, B. W.; Li, H. J. et al. Structural transformation of highly active metal-organic framework electrocatalysts during the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 881–890.
DOI Google Scholar
[11]

Trickett, C. A.; Popp, T. M. O.; Su, J.; Yan, C.; Weisberg, J.; Huq, A.; Urban, P.; Jiang, J. C.; Kalmutzki, M. J.; Liu, Q. N. et al. Identification of the strong Brønsted acid site in a metal-organic framework solid acid catalyst. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 170–176.
DOI Google Scholar
[12]

Li, J.; Huang, H. L.; Xue, W. J.; Sun, K.; Song, X. H.; Wu, C. R.; Nie, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, C. Y.; Pan, Y. et al. Self-adaptive dual-metal-site pairs in metal-organic frameworks for selective CO2 photoreduction to CH4. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 719–729.
DOI Google Scholar
[13]

Pascanu, V.; Miera, G. G.; Inge, A. K.; Martín-Matute, B. Metal-organic frameworks as catalysts for organic synthesis: A critical perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7223–7234.
DOI Google Scholar
[14]

Avci, C.; Imaz, I.; Carné-Sánchez, A.; Pariente, J. A.; Tasios, N.; Pérez-Carvajal, J.; Alonso, M. I.; Blanco, A.; Dijkstra, M.; López, C. et al. Self-assembly of polyhedral metal-organic framework particles into three-dimensional ordered superstructures. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 78–84.
DOI Google Scholar
[15]

Mallick, A.; El-Zohry, A. M.; Shekhah, O.; Yin, J.; Jia, J. T.; Aggarwal, H.; Emwas, A. H.; Mohammed, O. F.; Eddaoudi, M. Unprecedented ultralow detection limit of amines using a thiadiazole-functionalized Zr(IV)-based metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7245–7249.
DOI Google Scholar
[16]

Han, Z. S.; Wang, K. Y.; Min, H.; Xu, J.; Shi, W.; Cheng, P. Bifunctionalized metal-organic frameworks for pore-size-dependent enantioselective sensing. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202204066.
DOI Google Scholar
[17]

Freund, R.; Zaremba, O.; Arnauts, G.; Ameloot, R.; Skorupskii, G.; Dincă, M.; Bavykina, A.; Gascon, J.; Ejsmont, A.; Goscianska, J. et al. The current status of MOF and COF applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 23975–24001.
DOI Google Scholar
[18]

Cavka, J. H.; Jakobsen, S.; Olsbye, U.; Guillou, N.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Lillerud, K. P. A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13850–13851.
DOI Google Scholar
[19]

O’Keeffe, M.; Peskov, M. A.; Ramsden, S. J.; Yaghi, O. M. The reticular chemistry structure resource (RCSR) database of, and symbols for, crystal nets. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1782–1789.
DOI Google Scholar
[20]

Valenzano, L.; Civalleri, B.; Chavan, S.; Bordiga, S.; Nilsen, M. H.; Jakobsen, S.; Lillerud, K. P.; Lamberti, C. Disclosing the complex structure of UiO-66 metal organic framework: A synergic combination of experiment and theory. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1700–1718.
DOI Google Scholar
[21]

Wu, H.; Chua, Y. S.; Krungleviciute, V.; Tyagi, M.; Chen, P.; Yildirim, T.; Zhou, W. Unusual and highly tunable missing-linker defects in zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66 and their important effects on gas adsorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10525–10532.
DOI Google Scholar
[22]

Lv, X. L.; Yuan, S.; Xie, L. H.; Darke, H. F.; Chen, Y.; He, T.; Dong, C.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y. Z.; Li, J. R. et al. Ligand rigidification for enhancing the stability of metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 10283–10293.
DOI Google Scholar
[23]

Yuan, S.; Peng, J. Y.; Zhang, Y. R.; Shao-Horn, Y. Stability trend of metal-organic frameworks with heterometal-modified hexanuclear Zr building units. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 28266–28274.
DOI Google Scholar
[24]

Wang, L. J.; Li, X. T.; Yang, B.; Xiao, K.; Duan, H. B.; Zhao, H. Z. The chemical stability of metal-organic frameworks in water treatments: Fundamentals, effect of water matrix and judging methods. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138215.
DOI Google Scholar
[25]

Wu, H.; Yildirim, T.; Zhou, W. Exceptional mechanical stability of highly porous zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66 and its important implications. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 925–930.
DOI Google Scholar
[26]

Shearer, G. C.; Chavan, S.; Ethiraj, J.; Vitillo, J. G.; Svelle, S.; Olsbye, U.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Lillerud, K. P. Tuned to perfection: Ironing out the defects in metal-organic framework UiO-66. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4068–4071.
DOI Google Scholar
[27]

Furukawa, H.; Gándara, F.; Zhang, Y. B.; Jiang, J. C.; Queen, W. L.; Hudson, M. R.; Yaghi, O. M. Water adsorption in porous metal-organic frameworks and related materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4369–4381.
DOI Google Scholar
[28]

Kandiah, M.; Nilsen, M. H.; Usseglio, S.; Jakobsen, S.; Olsbye, U.; Tilset, M.; Larabi, C.; Quadrelli, E. A.; Bonino, F.; Lillerud, K. P. Synthesis and stability of tagged UiO-66 Zr-MOFs. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 6632–6640.
DOI Google Scholar
[29]

Bůžek, D.; Demel, J.; Lang, K. Zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66: Stability in an aqueous environment and its relevance for organophosphate degradation. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 14290–14297.
DOI Google Scholar
[30]

Howarth, A. J.; Liu, Y. Y.; Li, P.; Li, Z. Y.; Wang, T. C.; Hupp, J. T.; Farha, O. K. Chemical, thermal and mechanical stabilities of metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 15018.
DOI Google Scholar
[31]

Fang, Z. L.; Bueken, B.; De Vos, D. E.; Fischer, R. A. Defect-engineered metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7234–7254.
DOI Google Scholar
[32]

Dissegna, S.; Epp, K.; Heinz, W. R.; Kieslich, G.; Fischer, R. A. Defective metal-organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704501.
DOI Google Scholar
[33]

Cox, C. S.; Slavich, E.; Macreadie, L. K.; McKemmish, L. K.; Lessio, M. Understanding the role of synthetic parameters in the defect engineering of UiO-66: A review and meta-analysis. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 3057–3072.
DOI Google Scholar
[34]

Yuan, S.; Feng, L.; Wang, K. C.; Pang, J. D.; Bosch, M.; Lollar, C.; Sun, Y. J.; Qin, J. S.; Yang, X. Y.; Zhang, P. et al. Stable metal-organic frameworks: Design, synthesis, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704303.
DOI Google Scholar
[35]

Lázaro, I. A.; Forgan, R. S. Application of zirconium MOFs in drug delivery and biomedicine. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 380, 230–259.
DOI Google Scholar
[36]

Xiao, J. D.; Shang, Q. C.; Xiong, Y. J.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Yu, S. H.; Jiang, H. L. Boosting photocatalytic hydrogen production of a metal-organic framework decorated with platinum nanoparticles: The platinum location matters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9389–9393.
DOI Google Scholar
[37]

Liu, X. L.; Demir, N. K.; Wu, Z. T.; Li, K. Highly water-stable zirconium metal organic framework UiO-66 membranes supported on alumina hollow fibers for desalination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6999–7002.
DOI Google Scholar
[38]

Morris, W.; Briley, W. E.; Auyeung, E.; Cabezas, M. D.; Mirkin, C. A. Nucleic acid-metal organic framework (MOF) nanoparticle conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7261–7264.
DOI Google Scholar
[39]

Zheng, Z. L.; Nguyen, H. L.; Hanikel, N.; Li, K. K. Y.; Zhou, Z. H.; Ma, T. Q.; Yaghi, O. M. High-yield, green and scalable methods for producing MOF-303 for water harvesting from desert air. Nat. Protoc. 2023, 18, 136–156.
DOI Google Scholar
[40]

Stock, N.; Biswas, S. Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): Routes to various MOF topologies, morphologies, and composites. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 933–969.
DOI Google Scholar
[41]

Solís, R. R.; Peñas-Garzón, M.; Belver, C.; Rodriguez, J. J.; Bedia, J. Highly stable UiO-66-NH2 by the microwave-assisted synthesis for solar photocatalytic water treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107122.
DOI Google Scholar
[42]

Wei, J. Z.; Gong, F. X.; Sun, X. J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, X. J.; Zhang, F. M. Rapid and low-cost electrochemical synthesis of UiO-66-NH2 with enhanced fluorescence detection performance. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 6742–6747.
DOI Google Scholar
[43]

Zhang, J. T.; Shi, J. B.; Zhao, H.; Bai, J. B.; Li, X. L.; Leng, K. Y. Crystal growth blocking strategy enabling efficient solvent-free synthesis of hierarchical UiO-66 for large-molecule catalysis. Cryst. Growth Des. 2023, 23, 1205–1210.
DOI Google Scholar
[44]

Zhao, H. J.; Yi, B. L.; Si, X. M.; Bao, W. D.; Cao, L.; Su, L. X.; Wang, Y. L.; Chou, L. Y.; Xie, J. Insights into the solid-state synthesis of defect-rich Zr-UiO-66. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 6829–6836.
DOI Google Scholar
[45]

Ye, G.; Wan, L. L.; Zhou, J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Q. L. Solid-phase rapid synthesis of hierarchical UiO-type metal-organic frameworks as excellent solid acid catalysts for acetalization of benzaldehyde with alcohol. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 7695–7700.
DOI Google Scholar
[46]

Zhao, H. J.; Yi, B. L.; Si, X. M.; Cao, L.; Su, L. X.; Wang, Y. L.; Chou, L. Y.; Xie, J. Solid-state synthesis of defect-rich Zr-UiO-66 metal-organic framework nanoparticles for the catalytic ring opening of epoxides with alcohols. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 9752–9759.
DOI Google Scholar
[47]

Fu, Q. J.; Niu, W. J.; Yan, L. T.; Xie, W. P.; Jiang, H. M.; Zhang, S.; Yang, L. Z.; Wang, Y.; Xing, Y. L.; Zhao, X. B. A versatile microfluidic strategy using air–liquid segmented flow for continuous and efficient synthesis of metal-organic frameworks. Mater. Lett. 2023, 343, 134344.
DOI Google Scholar
[48]

Xu, H. L.; Chen, M. M.; Ji, M. Solid Lewis acid-base pair catalysts constructed by regulations on defects of UiO-66 for the catalytic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde. Catal. Today 2022, 402, 52–59.
DOI Google Scholar
[49]

Tatay, S.; Martínez-Giménez, S.; Rubio-Gaspar, A.; Gómez-Oliveira, E.; Castells-Gil, J.; Dong, Z. Y.; Mayoral, Á.; Almora-Barrios, N.; M Padial, N; Martí-Gastaldo, C. Synthetic control of correlated disorder in UiO-66 frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6962.
DOI Google Scholar
[50]

Semivrazhskaya, O. O.; Salionov, D.; Clark, A. H.; Casati, N. P. M.; Nachtegaal, M.; Ranocchiari, M.; Bjelić, S.; Verel, R.; van Bokhoven, J. A.; Sushkevich, V. L. Deciphering the mechanism of crystallization of UiO-66 metal-organic framework. Small 2023, 19, 2305771.
DOI Google Scholar
[51]

Shan, B. H.; James, J. B.; Armstrong, M. R.; Close, E. C.; Letham, P. A.; Nikkhah, K.; Lin, Y. S.; Mu, B. Influences of deprotonation and modulation on nucleation and growth of UiO-66: Intergrowth and orientation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2200–2206.
DOI Google Scholar
[52]

Chen, X.; Li, Y. J.; Fu, Q.; Qin, H. Y.; Lv, J. N.; Yang, K.; Zhang, Q. C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M. An efficient modulated synthesis of zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 6083–6092.
DOI Google Scholar
[53]

Ou, R.; Zhu, W. J.; Li, L. L.; Wang, X. Y.; Wang, Q.; Gao, Q.; Yuan, A. H.; Pan, J. M.; Yang, F. Boosted capture of volatile organic compounds in adsorption capacity and selectivity by rationally exploiting defect-engineering of UiO-66(Zr). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 266, 118087.
DOI Google Scholar
[54]

Lee, T. H.; Jung, J. G.; Kim, Y. J.; Roh, J. S.; Yoon, H. W.; Ghanem, B. S.; Kim, H. W.; Cho, Y. H.; Pinnau, I.; Park, H. B. Defect engineering in metal-organic frameworks towards advanced mixed matrix membranes for efficient propylene/propane separation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 13081–13088.
DOI Google Scholar
[55]

Ma, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, H. L. Switching on the photocatalysis of metal-organic frameworks by engineering structural defects. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12175–12179.
DOI Google Scholar
[56]

Lázaro, I. A.; Popescu, C.; Cirujano, F. G. Controlling the molecular diffusion in MOFs with the acidity of monocarboxylate modulators. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 11291–11299.
DOI Google Scholar
[57]

Gibbons, B.; Bartlett, E. C.; Cai, M.; Yang, X. Z.; Johnson, E. M.; Morris, A. J. Defect level and particle size effects on the hydrolysis of a chemical warfare agent simulant by UiO-66. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 16378–16387.
DOI Google Scholar
[58]

Atzori, C.; Shearer, G. C.; Maschio, L.; Civalleri, B.; Bonino, F.; Lamberti, C.; Svelle, S.; Lillerud, K. P.; Bordiga, S. Effect of benzoic acid as a modulator in the structure of UiO-66: An experimental and computational study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 9312–9324.
DOI Google Scholar
[59]

Wang, K. Y.; Yang, Z. T.; Zhang, J. Q.; Banerjee, S.; Joseph, E. A.; Hsu, Y. C.; Yuan, S.; Feng, L.; Zhou, H. C. Creating hierarchical pores in metal-organic frameworks via postsynthetic reactions. Nat. Protoc. 2023, 18, 604–625.
DOI Google Scholar
[60]

Kim, M.; Cahill, J. F.; Fei, H. H.; Prather, K. A.; Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic ligand and cation exchange in robust metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 18082–18088.
DOI Google Scholar
[61]

Karagiaridi, O.; Bury, W.; Mondloch, J. E.; Hupp, J. T.; Farha, O. K. Solvent-assisted linker exchange: An alternative to the de novo synthesis of unattainable metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4530–4540.
DOI Google Scholar
[62]

Gutov, O. V.; Hevia, M. G.; Escudero-Adán, E. C.; Shafir, A. Metal-organic framework (MOF) defects under control: Insights into the missing linker sites and their implication in the reactivity of zirconium-based frameworks. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 8396–8400.
DOI Google Scholar
[63]

Taddei, M.; Wakeham, R. J.; Koutsianos, A.; Andreoli, E.; Barron, A. R. Post-synthetic ligand exchange in zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks: Beware of the defects! Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11706–11710.
DOI Google Scholar
[64]

Das, S.; Yang, D.; Conley, E. T.; Gates, B. C. 2-Propanol dehydration on the nodes of the metal-organic framework UiO-66: Distinguishing catalytic sites for formation of propene and di-isopropyl ether. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 14173–14188
DOI Google Scholar
[65]

Feng, L.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, L. L.; Tan, K.; Li, J. L.; Kirchon, A.; Liu, L. M.; Zhang, P.; Han, Y.; Chabal, Y. J. et al. Creating hierarchical pores by controlled linker thermolysis in multivariate metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2363–2372.
DOI Google Scholar
[66]

Bueken, B.; Van Velthoven, N.; Krajnc, A.; Smolders, S.; Taulelle, F.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Mali, G.; Bennett, T. D.; De Vos, D. Tackling the defect conundrum in UiO-66: A mixed-linker approach to engineering missing linker defects. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 10478–10486.
DOI Google Scholar
[67]

Feng, X.; Jena, H. S.; Krishnaraj, C.; Arenas-Esteban, D.; Leus, K.; Wang, G. B.; Sun, J. M.; Rüscher, M.; Timoshenko, J.; Roldan Cuenya, B. et al. Creation of exclusive artificial cluster defects by selective metal removal in the (Zn, Zr) mixed-metal UiO-66. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 21511–21518.
DOI Google Scholar
[68]

Sun, Y. W.; Yan, J. H.; Gao, Y. L.; Ji, T. T.; Chen, S. X.; Wang, C.; Lu, P.; Li, Y. S.; Liu, Y. Fabrication of highly oriented ultrathin zirconium metal-organic framework membrane from nanosheets towards unprecedented gas separation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202216697.
DOI Google Scholar
[69]

Zhai, X.; Cao, T. L.; Lu, X. Y.; Gao, N. J.; Li, L. L.; Liu, F. C.; Fu, Y.; Qi, W. Construction of hierarchically porous metal-organic frameworks via vapor atmosphere etching. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 65, 3062–3068.
DOI Google Scholar
[70]

Yang, X. Y.; Li, Z.; Tang, S. K. Tailored design of hierarchically porous UiO-66 with a controlled pore structure and metal sites. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 6092–6100.
DOI Google Scholar
[71]

Wang, P. M.; Sun, L. X.; Ye, J. H.; Liu, Q.; Fei, Z. Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z. X.; Tang, J. H.; Cui, M. F.; Qiao, X. Construction of crystal defect sites in UiO-66 for adsorption of dimethyl phthalate and phthalic acid. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 312, 110778.
DOI Google Scholar
[72]

Zhou, T.; Yang, D. H.; Wang, Y. J.; Cheng, J. S.; Chen, Q.; Liu, B. W.; Liu, Z. W. Low-pressure-RF plasma modification of UiO-66 and its application in methylene blue adsorption. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2023, 25, 085505.
DOI Google Scholar
[73]

Xiang, W. L.; Ren, J.; Chen, S.; Shen, C. Y.; Chen, Y. F.; Zhang, M. H.; Liu, C. J. The metal-organic framework UiO-66 with missing-linker defects: A highly active catalyst for carbon dioxide cycloaddition. Appl. Energy 2020, 277, 115560.
DOI Google Scholar
[74]

Yuan, S.; Zou, L. F.; Qin, J. S.; Li, J. L.; Huang, L.; Feng, L.; Wang, X.; Bosch, M.; Alsalme, A.; Cagin, T. et al. Construction of hierarchically porous metal-organic frameworks through linker labilization. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15356.
DOI Google Scholar
[75]

Bon, V.; Senkovskyy, V.; Senkovska, I.; Kaskel, S. Zr(IV) and Hf(IV) based metal-organic frameworks with reo-topology. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8407–8409.
DOI Google Scholar
[76]

Liu, L. M.; Chen, Z. J.; Wang, J. J.; Zhang, D. L.; Zhu, Y. H.; Ling, S. L.; Huang, K. W.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Adil, K.; Zhang, Y. X. et al. Imaging defects and their evolution in a metal-organic framework at sub-unit-cell resolution. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 622–628.
DOI Google Scholar
[77]

Thornton, A. W.; Babarao, R.; Jain, A.; Trousselet, F.; Coudert, F. X. Defects in metal-organic frameworks: A compromise between adsorption and stability. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 4352–4359.
DOI Google Scholar
[78]

Shan, Y.; Zhang, G. X.; Shi, Y. X.; Pang, H. Synthesis and catalytic application of defective MOF materials. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2023, 4, 101301.
DOI Google Scholar
[79]

Feng, Y.; Chen, Q.; Jiang, M. Q.; Yao, J. F. Tailoring the properties of UiO-66 through defect engineering: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 17646–17659.
DOI Google Scholar
[80]

Guo, B. B.; Cheng, X. Y.; Tang, Y.; Guo, W.; Deng, S. Q.; Wu, L.; Fu, X. Z. Dehydrated UiO-66(SH)2: The Zr-O cluster and its photocatalytic role mimicking the biological nitrogen fixation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202117244.
DOI Google Scholar
[81]

Dorneles de Mello, M.; Kumar, G.; Tabassum, T.; Jain, S. K.; Chen, T. H.; Caratzoulas, S.; Li, X. Y.; Vlachos, D. G.; Han, S. I.; Scott, S. L. et al. Phosphonate-modified UiO-66 brønsted acid catalyst and its use in dehydra-decyclization of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran to pentadienes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 13260–13266.
DOI Google Scholar
[82]

Wang, C.; Kosari, M.; Xi, S. B.; Zeng, H. C. Uniform Si-infused UiO-66 as a robust catalyst host for efficient CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2212478.
DOI Google Scholar
[83]

He, X. B.; Yin, F. X.; Yi, X. R.; Yang, T.; Chen, B. H.; Wu, X.; Guo, S.; Li, G. R.; Li, Z. C. Defective UiO-66-NH2 functionalized with stable superoxide radicals toward electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction with high faradaic efficiency. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 26571–26586.
DOI Google Scholar
[84]

Sannes, D. K.; Øien-Ødegaard, S.; Aunan, E.; Nova, A.; Olsbye, U. Quantification of linker defects in UiO-type metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 3793–3800.
DOI Google Scholar
[85]

Shearer, G. C.; Chavan, S.; Bordiga, S.; Svelle, S.; Olsbye, U.; Lillerud, K. P. Defect engineering: Tuning the porosity and composition of the metal-organic framework UiO-66 via modulated synthesis. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 3749–3761.
DOI Google Scholar
[86]

Shan, B. H.; McIntyre, S. M.; Armstrong, M. R.; Shen, Y. X.; Mu, B. Investigation of missing-cluster defects in UiO-66 and ferrocene deposition into defect-induced cavities. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 14233–14241.
DOI Google Scholar
[87]

Fu, Y.; Kang, Z. Z.; Cao, W. C.; Yin, J. L.; Tu, Y. Q.; Li, J. H.; Guan, H. X.; Wang, Y. R.; Wang, Q.; Kong, X. Q. Defect-assisted loading and docking conformations of pharmaceuticals in metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7719–7727.
DOI Google Scholar
[88]

Chevreau, H.; Liang, W. B.; Kearley, G. J.; Duyker, S. G.; D’Alessandro, D. M.; Peterson, V. K. Concentration-dependent binding of CO2 and CD4 in UiO-66(Zr). J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6980–6987.
DOI Google Scholar
[89]

Johnstone, D. N.; Firth, F. C. N.; Grey, C. P.; Midgley, P. A.; Cliffe, M. J.; Collins, S. M. Direct imaging of correlated defect nanodomains in a metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 13081–13089.
DOI Google Scholar
[90]

Kang, X. C.; Lyu, K.; Li, L. L.; Li, J. N.; Kimberley, L.; Wang, B.; Liu, L. F.; Cheng, Y. Q.; Frogley, M. D.; Rudić, S. et al. Integration of mesopores and crystal defects in metal-organic frameworks via templated electrosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4466.
DOI Google Scholar
[91]

Zhang, D. L.; Zhu, Y. H.; Liu, L. M.; Ying, X. R.; Hsiung, C. E.; Sougrat, R.; Li, K.; Han, Y. Atomic-resolution transmission electron microscopy of electron beam-sensitive crystalline materials. Science 2018, 359, 675–679.
DOI Google Scholar
[92]

Wang, J. J.; Liu, L. M.; Chen, C. L.; Dong, X. L.; Wang, Q.; Alfilfil, L.; AlAlouni, M. R.; Yao, K. X.; Huang, J. F.; Zhang, D. L. et al. Engineering effective structural defects of metal-organic frameworks to enhance their catalytic performances. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 4464–4472.
DOI Google Scholar
[93]

Xu, Y.; Jiao, L.; Ma, J. L.; Zhang, P.; Tang, Y. F.; Liu, L. M.; Liu, Y.; Ding, H. H.; Sun, J. F.; Wang, M. M. et al. Metal-organic frameworks for nanoconfinement of chlorine in rechargeable lithium-chlorine batteries. Joule 2023, 7, 515–528.
DOI Google Scholar
[94]

Liu, G. Z.; Guo, Y. N.; Chen, C. L.; Lu, Y.; Chen, G. N.; Liu, G. P.; Han, Y.; Jin, W. Q.; Xu, N. P. Eliminating lattice defects in metal-organic framework molecular-sieving membranes. Nat. Mater. 2023, 22, 769–776.
DOI Google Scholar
[95]

Liu, B. Y.; Chen, X.; Huang, N.; Liu, S. X.; Wang, Y.; Lan, X. C.; Wei, F.; Wang, T. F. Imaging the dynamic influence of functional groups on metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4835.
DOI Google Scholar
[96]

Feldblyum, J. I.; Liu, M.; Gidley, D. W.; Matzger, A. J. Reconciling the discrepancies between crystallographic porosity and guest access as exemplified by Zn-HKUST-1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18257–18263.
DOI Google Scholar
[97]

Liu, M.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Vallery, R. S.; Frieze, W. E.; Schnobrich, J. K.; Gidley, D. W.; Matzger, A. J. Evolution of nanoscale pore structure in coordination polymers during thermal and chemical exposure revealed by positron annihilation. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1598–1601.
DOI Google Scholar
[98]

Yuan, L. Y.; Tian, M.; Lan, J. H.; Cao, X. Z.; Wang, X. L.; Chai, Z. F.; Gibson, J. K.; Shi, W. Q. Defect engineering in metal-organic frameworks: A new strategy to develop applicable actinide sorbents. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 370–373.
DOI Google Scholar
[99]

Mondal, S. S.; Dey, S.; Attallah, A. G.; Bhunia, A.; Kelling, A.; Schilde, U.; Krause-Rehberg, R.; Janiak, C.; Holdt, H. J. Missing building blocks defects in a porous hydrogen-bonded amide-imidazolate network proven by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 4320–4325.
DOI Google Scholar
[100]

Mitchell, S.; Gerchow, L.; Warringham, R.; Crivelli, P.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Shedding new light on nanostructured catalysts with positron annihilation spectroscopy. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800268.
DOI Google Scholar
[101]

Guo, P.; Dutta, D.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Gidley, D. W.; Matzger, A. J. Water sensitivity in Zn4O-based MOFs is structure and history dependent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2651–2657.
DOI Google Scholar
[102]

Wang, X.; Zhang, X. M.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, D.; Shui, L. L.; Li, Y. B.; Ma, G.; Zhu, Y. J.; Zhang, Y. G.; Zhou, G. F. et al. Accelerated multi-step sulfur redox reactions in lithium-sulfur batteries enabled by dual defects in metal-organic framework-based catalysts. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202306901.
DOI Google Scholar
[103]

Trickett, C. A.; Gagnon, K. J.; Lee, S.; Gándara, F.; Bürgi, H. B.; Yaghi, O. M. Definitive molecular level characterization of defects in UiO-66 crystals. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 127, 11314–11319.
DOI Google Scholar
[104]

Cliffe, M. J.; Wan, W.; Zou, X. D.; Chater, P. A.; Kleppe, A. K.; Tucker, M. G.; Wilhelm, H.; Funnell, N. P.; Coudert, F. X.; Goodwin, A. L. Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4176.
DOI Google Scholar
[105]

Bourikas, K.; Kordulis, C.; Lycourghiotis, A. Titanium dioxide (anatase and rutile): Surface chemistry, liquid solid interface chemistry, and scientific synthesis of supported catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9754–9823.
DOI Google Scholar
[106]

Klet, R. C.; Liu, Y. Y.; Wang, T. C.; Hupp, J. T.; Farha, O. K. Evaluation of Brønsted acidity and proton topology in Zr- and Hf-based metal-organic frameworks using potentiometric acid-base titration. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1479–1485.
DOI Google Scholar
[107]

DeStefano, M. R.; Islamoglu, T.; Garibay, S. J.; Hupp, J. T.; Farha, O. K. Room-temperature synthesis of UiO-66 and thermal modulation of densities of defect sites. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 1357–1361.
DOI Google Scholar
[108]

Hicks, K. E.; Wolek, A. T. Y.; Farha, O. K.; Notestein, J. M. The dependence of olefin hydrogenation and isomerization rates on zirconium metal-organic framework structure. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 13671–13680.
DOI Google Scholar
[109]

Kar, A. K.; Sarkar, R.; Manal, A. K.; Kumar, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Ahuja, R.; Srivastava, R. Unveiling and understanding the remarkable enhancement in the catalytic activity by the defect creation in UIO-66 during the catalytic transfer hydrodeoxygenation of vanillin with isopropanol. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2023, 325, 122385.
DOI Google Scholar
[110]

Evtushok, V. Y.; Larionov, K. P.; Lopatkin, V. A.; Stonkus, O. A.; Kholdeeva, O. A. What factors determine activity of UiO-66 in H2O2-based oxidation of thioethers. The role of basic sites. J. Catal. 2023, 427, 115099.
DOI Google Scholar
[111]

Tan, K.; Pandey, H.; Wang, H.; Velasco, E.; Wang, K. Y.; Zhou, H. C.; Li, J.; Thonhauser, T. Defect termination in the UiO-66 family of metal-organic frameworks: The role of water and modulator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6328–6332.
DOI Google Scholar
[112]

Fu, Y.; Kang, Z. Z.; Yin, J. L.; Cao, W. C.; Tu, Y. Q.; Wang, Q.; Kong, X. Q. Duet of acetate and water at the defects of metal-organic frameworks. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 1618–1624.
DOI Google Scholar
[113]

He, Y. Q.; Li, C. G.; Chen, X. B.; Shi, Z.; Feng, S. H. Visible-light-responsive UiO-66(Zr) with defects efficiently promoting photocatalytic CO2 reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 28977–28984.
DOI Google Scholar
[114]

Yin, J. L.; Kang, Z. Z.; Fu, Y.; Cao, W. C.; Wang, Y. R.; Guan, H. X.; Yin, Y.; Chen, B. B.; Yi, X. F.; Chen, W. et al. Molecular identification and quantification of defect sites in metal-organic frameworks with NMR probe molecules. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5112.
DOI Google Scholar
[115]

Peng, W. L.; Liu, F. Q.; Yi, X. F.; Sun, S. G.; Shi, H.; Hui, Y.; Chen, W.; Yu, X.; Liu, Z. Q.; Qin, Y. C. et al. Structural and acidic characteristics of multiple Zr defect sites in UiO-66 metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 9295–9302.
DOI Google Scholar
[116]

Kong, X. Q.; Deng, H. X.; Yan, F. Y.; Kim, J.; Swisher, J. A.; Smit, B.; Yaghi, O. M.; Reimer, J. A. Mapping of functional groups in metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 882–885.
DOI Google Scholar
[117]

Zhao, M. T.; Yuan, K.; Wang, Y.; Li, G. D.; Guo, J.; Gu, L.; Hu, W. P.; Zhao, H. J.; Tang, Z. Y. Metal-organic frameworks as selectivity regulators for hydrogenation reactions. Nature 2016, 539, 76–80.
DOI Google Scholar
[118]

Feng, Y. M.; Xu, Y.; Liu, S. C.; Wu, D.; Su, Z. Q.; Chen, G.; Liu, J. H.; Li, G. L. Recent advances in enzyme immobilization based on novel porous framework materials and its applications in biosensing. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 459, 214414.
DOI Google Scholar
[119]

Feng, X.; Jena, H. S.; Krishnaraj, C.; Leus, K.; Wang, G. B.; Chen, H.; Jia, C. M.; Van Der Voort, P. Generating catalytic sites in UiO-66 through defect engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 60715–60735.
DOI Google Scholar
[120]

Wu, J. C.; Liang, D.; Song, X. B.; Liu, T. S.; Xu, T. Y.; Wang, S. Y.; Zou, Y. Q. Sulfonic groups functionalized Zr-metal organic framework for highly catalytic transfer hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 71, 411–417.
DOI Google Scholar
[121]

Liang, Y.; Li, C. H.; Chen, L. J.; Huo, J.; Loubidi, M.; Zhou, Y. Y.; Liu, Y. B. Microwave-assisted acid-induced formation of linker vacancies within Zr-based metal organic frameworks with enhanced heterogeneous catalysis. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 787–790.
DOI Google Scholar
[122]

Liu, X. T.; Hu, C. H.; Wu, J. J.; Cui, P.; Wei, F. Y. Defective NH2-UiO-66 (Zr) effectively converting CO2 into cyclic carbonate under ambient pressure, solvent-free and co-catalyst-free conditions. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 43, 222–229.
DOI Google Scholar
[123]

Rapeyko, A.; Rodenas, M.; Llabrés i Xamena, F. X. Zr-containing UiO-66 metal-organic frameworks as highly selective heterogeneous acid catalysts for the direct ketalization of levulinic acid. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2022, 6, 2100451.
DOI Google Scholar
[124]

Feng, X.; Hajek, J.; Jena, H. S.; Wang, G. B.; Veerapandian, S. K. P.; Morent, R.; De Geyter, N.; Leyssens, K.; Hoffman, A. E. J.; Meynen, V. et al. Engineering a highly defective stable UiO-66 with tunable lewis- brønsted acidity: The role of the hemilabile linker. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 3174–3183.
DOI Google Scholar
[125]

Dai, J.; Wang, D. Z.; Yang, J.; Tian, R.; Wang, Q.; Li, Y. Construction of imidazole@defective hierarchical porous UiO-66 and fibrous composites for rapid and nonbuffered catalytic hydrolysis of organophosphorus nerve agents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 652, 1156–1169.
DOI Google Scholar
[126]

Cirujano, F. G.; Llabrés i Xamena, F. X. Tuning the catalytic properties of UiO-66 metal-organic frameworks: From lewis to defect-induced brønsted acidity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 4879–4890.
DOI Google Scholar
[127]

Kalaj, M.; Momeni, M. R.; Bentz, K. C.; Barcus, K. S.; Palomba, J. M.; Paesani, F.; Cohen, S. M. Halogen bonding in UiO-66 frameworks promotes superior chemical warfare agent simulant degradation. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3481–3484.
DOI Google Scholar
[128]

Ma, P.; Ding, M. L.; Rong, W.; Liu, X.; Yao, J. F. Acetic acid-assisted polyhydroxy acid modification of a zirconium-based MOF for synergistic CO2 fixation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108739.
DOI Google Scholar
[129]

Ai, Z. W.; Jiao, L.; Wang, J. X.; Jiang, H. L. Generation of hierarchical pores in metal-organic frameworks by introducing rigid modulator. CCS Chem. 2022, 4, 3705–3714.
DOI Google Scholar
[130]

Wu, Y. F.; Xiao, Y.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, Z. Q.; Shi, S. B.; Wei, R. P.; Gao, L. J.; Xiao, G. M. Imidazolium ionic liquid functionalized UiO-66-NH2 as highly efficient catalysts for chemical fixation of CO2 into cyclic carbonates. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 310, 110578.
DOI Google Scholar
[131]

Zou, Y. H.; Huang, Y. B.; Si, D. H.; Yin, Q.; Wu, Q. J.; Weng, Z. X.; Cao, R. Porous metal-organic framework liquids for enhanced CO2 adsorption and catalytic conversion. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 20915–20920.
DOI Google Scholar
[132]

Vermoortele, F.; Vandichel, M.; Van de Voorde, B.; Ameloot, R.; Waroquier, M.; Van Speybroeck, V.; De Vos, D. E. Electronic effects of linker substitution on lewis acid catalysis with metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4887–4890.
DOI Google Scholar
[133]

Fang, G. Q.; Hu, J. N.; Tian, L. C.; Liang, J. X.; Lin, J.; Li, L.; Zhu, C.; Wang, X. D. Zirconium-oxo nodes of MOFs with tunable electronic properties provide effective ·OH species for enhanced methane hydroxylation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202205077.
DOI Google Scholar
[134]

Jrad, A.; Hmadeh, M.; Awada, G.; Chakleh, R.; Ahmad, M. Efficient biofuel production by MTV-UiO-66 based catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 410, 128237.
DOI Google Scholar
[135]

Jiménez-Osés, G.; Osuna, S.; Gao, X.; Sawaya, M. R.; Gilson, L.; Collier, S. J.; Huisman, G. W.; Yeates, T. O.; Tang, Y.; Houk, K. N. The role of distant mutations and allosteric regulation on LovD active site dynamics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 431–436.
DOI Google Scholar
[136]

Bunzel, H. A.; Anderson, J. L. R.; Hilvert, D.; Arcus, V. L.; van der Kamp, M. W.; Mulholland, A. J. Evolution of dynamical networks enhances catalysis in a designer enzyme. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 1017–1022.
DOI Google Scholar
[137]

Zhang, X. F.; Yang, C. Y.; An, P. F.; Cui, C. Q.; Ma, Y. M.; Liu, H. T.; Wang, H.; Yan, X. Y.; Li, G. D.; Tang, Z. Y. Creating enzyme-mimicking nanopockets in metal-organic frameworks for catalysis. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eadd5678.
DOI Google Scholar
[138]

Yin, J.; Fu, W. D.; Zhang, J. R.; Liu, X. Y.; Zhang, X. M.; Wang, C.; He, J.; Jiang, W.; Li, H. P.; Li, H. M. UiO-66(Zr)-based porous ionic liquids for highly efficient extraction coupled catalytic oxidative desulfurization. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 144290.
DOI Google Scholar
[139]

Dai, Q. Q.; Yang, Z. F.; Li, J.; Cao, Y.; Tang, H. B.; Wei, X. C. Zirconium-based MOFs-loaded ionic liquid-catalyzed preparation of biodiesel from Jatropha oil. Renew. Energy 2021, 163, 1588–1594.
DOI Google Scholar
[140]

Zhang, X. L.; Sun, Y. X.; Liu, Y. F.; Zhai, Z. Y.; Guo, S. Q.; Peng, L. C.; Qin, Y.; Li, C. J. UiO-66-NH2 fabrics: Role of trifluoroacetic acid as a modulator on MOF uniform coating on electrospun nanofibers and efficient decontamination of chemical warfare agent simulants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 39976–39984.
DOI Google Scholar
[141]

de Azambuja, F.; Loosen, A.; Conic, D.; van den Besselaar, M.; Harvey, J. N.; Parac-Vogt, T. N. En route to a heterogeneous catalytic direct peptide bond formation by Zr-based metal-organic framework catalysts. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 7647–7658.
DOI Google Scholar
[142]

Ronaghi, N.; Shade, D.; Moon, H. J.; Najmi, S.; Cleveland, J. W.; Walton, K. S.; France, S.; Jones, C. W. Modulation and tuning of UiO-66 for lewis acid catalyzed carbohydrate conversion: Conversion of unprotected aldose sugars to polyhydroxyalkyl and C-glycosyl furans. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 11581–11595.
DOI Google Scholar
[143]

Maksimchuk, N. V.; Lee, J. S.; Solovyeva, M. V.; Cho, K. H.; Shmakov, A. N.; Chesalov, Y. A.; Chang, J. S.; Kholdeeva, O. A. Protons make possible heterolytic activation of hydrogen peroxide over Zr-based metal-organic frameworks. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 9699–9704.
DOI Google Scholar
[144]

Melillo, A.; Franconetti, A.; Alvaro, M.; Ferrer, B.; Garcia, H. Metal nodes of metal-organic frameworks can activate molecular hydrogen. Chem.—Eur. J. 2023, 29, e202202625.
DOI Google Scholar
[145]

Jiang, Y. Y.; Zhou, R. R.; Ye, B. Y.; Hou, Z. Y. Acetalization of glycerol over sulfated UiO-66 under mild condition. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 110, 357–366.
DOI Google Scholar
[146]

Zheng, Z. L.; Rong, Z. C.; Rampal, N.; Borgs, C.; Chayes, J. T.; Yaghi, O. M. A GPT-4 reticular chemist for guiding MOF discovery. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202311983.
DOI Google Scholar
[147]

Zheng, Z. L.; Zhang, O. F.; Borgs, C.; Chayes, J. T.; Yaghi, O. M. ChatGPT chemistry assistant for text mining and the prediction of MOF synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 18048–18062.
DOI Google Scholar
[148]

Zheng, Z. L.; Alawadhi, A. H.; Chheda, S.; Neumann, S. E.; Rampal, N.; Liu, S. C.; Nguyen, H. L.; Lin, Y. H.; Rong, Z. C.; Siepmann, J. I. et al. Shaping the water-harvesting behavior of metal-organic frameworks aided by fine-tuned GPT models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 28284–28295.
DOI Google Scholar
[149]

Boiko, D. A.; MacKnight, R.; Kline, B.; Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 2023, 624, 570–578.
DOI Google Scholar
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 28 January 2024
Revised: 05 March 2024
Accepted: 07 March 2024
Published: 02 May 2024

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press 2024

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFA1500403, G. D. L.; Nos. 2021YFA1200302 and 2022YFA1205400, Z. Y. T.), Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB36000000, Z. Y. T. and G. D. L.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 92356304 and 92056204, Z. Y. T.; Nos. 52372079 and 22173024, G. D. L.; No. 52003066, L. C.), and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (G. D. L.).

Return