AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

The role of aromatic residues in controlling the supramolecular chirality of short amphiphilic peptides

Hao Qi1Kai Qi1Jie Li2Chunyong He3,4Mingrui Liao5Xuzhi Hu5Yurong Zhao1Yubin Ke3,4Chunqiu Zhang2Jun Zhang6Jiqian Wang1( )Jian R. Lu5Hai Xu1( )
Department of Biological and Energy Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Dongguan 523803, China
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Biological Physics Group, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
School of Material Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

The vital role of aromatic residues in regulating the supramolecular handedness of amphiphilic peptides is unveiled. The clockwise and anticlockwise stacking of L- and D-Phe side chains makes the β-sheets twist clockwise and anticlockwise, eventually leading to the formation of left- and right-handed nanofibrils, respectively, irrespective of the chirality of the C-terminal hydrophilic residue.

Abstract

Although the relationship between molecular and supramolecular chirality remains elusive, the existing results have demonstrated the vital role of hydrophilic motifs in controlling the supramolecular handedness of peptide nanofibrils compared with hydrophobic ones. However, unlike conventional hydrophobic residues, we speculate that aromatic hydrophobic residues are mostly likely to play a unique role in regulating the supramolecular handedness because the π–π stacking interactions of their side chains are directional like hydrogen bonding and can direct high levels of self-assembly due to the geometric confining of aromatic rings. To confirm this hypothesis, we here design a series of amphiphilic short peptides, with their hydrophobic motifs being composed of aromatic residues. Their short lengths not only favor their structural stability, synthesis, and sequence variation but also enable us to readily link their molecular and supramolecular structures. Through the combination of experiments and theoretical simulations, we demonstrate that the peptides containing L-form aromatic residues form left-handed nanofibrils while those containing D-form aromatic residues assemble into right-handed ones, irrespective of the chirality of their C-terminal hydrophilic residue. Theoretical calculations revealed that the stacking of aromatic side chains between β-strands directed the twisting direction of the β-sheets formed, with L- and D-form phenylalanine side chains stacking in a clockwise and anti-clockwise way, and more ordered and stronger aromatic stacking for homochiral peptides facilitated the formation of nanofibrils with a marked tubular feature. This study has bridged the knowledge gap in our understanding of how aromatic residues affect the supramolecular chirality of short peptides.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
12274_2023_5783_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7 MB)

References

[1]

Feringa, B. L.; van Delden, R. A. Absolute asymmetric synthesis: The origin, control, and amplification of chirality. 3.0.CO;2-V">Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3418–3438.

[2]

Liu, G. F.; Zhang, D.; Feng, C. L. Control of three-dimensional cell adhesion by the chirality of nanofibers in hydrogels. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7789–7793.

[3]

Harper, J. D.; Lieber, C. M.; Lansbury, P. T. Jr. Atomic force microscopic imaging of seeded fibril formation and fibril branching by the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-β protein. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 951–959.

[4]

Goldsbury, C. S.; Cooper, G. J. S.; Goldie, K. N.; Müller, S. A.; Saafi, E. L.; Gruijters, W. T. M.; Misur, M. P.; Engel, A.; Aebi, U.; Kistler, J. Polymorphic fibrillar assembly of human amylin. J. Struct. Biol. 1997, 119, 17–27.

[5]

Jiménez, J. L.; Nettleton, E. J.; Bouchard, M.; Robinson, C. V.; Dobson, C. M.; Saibil, H. R. The protofilament structure of insulin amyloid fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9196–9201.

[6]

Bedrood, S.; Li, Y. Y.; Isas, J. M.; Hegde, B. G.; Baxa, U.; Haworth, I. S.; Langen, R. Fibril structure of human islet amyloid polypeptide. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 5235–5241.

[7]

Schmidt, A.; Annamalai, K.; Schmidt, M.; Grigorieff, N.; Fändrich, M. Cryo-EM reveals the steric zipper structure of a light chain-derived amyloid fibril. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6200–6205.

[8]

Close, W.; Neumann, M.; Schmidt, A.; Hora, M.; Annamalai, K.; Schmidt, M.; Reif, B.; Schmidt, V.; Grigorieff, N.; Fändrich, M. Physical basis of amyloid fibril polymorphism. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 699.

[9]

Rubin, N.; Perugia, E.; Goldschmidt, M.; Fridkin, M.; Addadi, L. Chirality of amyloid suprastructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4602–4603.

[10]

Kurouski, D.; Dukor, R. K.; Lu, X. F.; Nafie, L. A.; Lednev, I. K. Normal and reversed supramolecular chirality of insulin fibrils probed by vibrational circular dichroism at the protofilament level of fibril structure. Biophys. J. 2012, 103, 522–531.

[11]

Kurouski, D.; Lu, X. F.; Popova, L.; Wan, W.; Shanmugasundaram, M.; Stubbs, G.; Dukor, R. K.; Lednev, I. K.; Nafie, L. A. Is supramolecular filament chirality the underlying cause of major morphology differences in amyloid fibrils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2302–2312.

[12]

Usov, I.; Adamcik, J.; Mezzenga, R. Polymorphism complexity and handedness inversion in serum albumin amyloid fibrils. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 10465–10474.

[13]

Rubin, N.; Perugia, E.; Wolf, S. G.; Klein, E.; Fridkin, M.; Addadi, L. Relation between serum amyloid A truncated peptides and their suprastructure chirality. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4242–4248.

[14]

Lara, C.; Reynolds, N. P.; Berryman, J. T.; Xu, A. Q.; Zhang, A. F.; Mezzenga, R. ILQINS hexapeptide, identified in lysozyme left-handed helical ribbons and nanotubes, forms right-handed helical ribbons and crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4732–4739.

[15]

Reynolds, N. P.; Adamcik, J.; Berryman, J. T.; Handschin, S.; Zanjani, A. A. H.; Li, W.; Liu, K.; Zhang, A. F.; Mezzenga, R. Competition between crystal and fibril formation in molecular mutations of amyloidogenic peptides. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1338.

[16]

Wang, M.; Zhou, P.; Wang, J. Q.; Zhao, Y. R.; Ma, H. C.; Lu, J. R.; Xu, H. Left or right: How does amino acid chirality affect the handedness of nanostructures self-assembled from short amphiphilic peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4185–4194.

[17]

Fu, Y. T.; Li, B. Z.; Huang, Z. B.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y. G. Terminal is important for the helicity of the self-assemblies of dipeptides derived from alanine. Langmuir 2013, 29, 6013–6017.

[18]

Gazit, E. A possible role for π-stacking in the self-assembly of amyloid fibrils. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 77–83.

[19]

Reches, M.; Gazit, E. Casting metal nanowires within discrete self-assembled peptide nanotubes. Science 2003, 300, 625–627.

[20]

Mehta, A. K.; Lu, K.; Childers, W. S.; Liang, Y.; Dublin, S. N.; Dong, J. J.; Snyder, J. P.; Pingali, S. V.; Thiyagarajan, P.; Lynn, D. G. Facial symmetry in protein self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9829–9835.

[21]

Smith, A. M.; Williams, R. J.; Tang, C.; Coppo, P.; Collins, R. F.; Turner, M. L.; Saiani, A.; Ulijn, R. V. Fmoc-diphenylalanine self assembles to a hydrogel via a novel architecture based on π–π interlocked β-sheets. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 37–41.

[22]

Li, J.; Wang, J. Q.; Zhao, Y. R.; Zhou, P.; Carter, J.; Li, Z. Y.; Waigh, T. A.; Lu, J. R.; Xu, H. Surfactant-like peptides: From molecular design to controllable self-assembly with applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 421, 213418.

[23]

Wang, M. H.; Zhao, Y. R.; Zhang, L. M.; Deng, J.; Qi, K.; Zhou, P.; Ma, X. Y.; Wang, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. Q. et al. Unexpected role of achiral glycine in determining the suprastructural handedness of peptide nanofibrils. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 10328–10341.

[24]

Wang, F. B.; Gnewou, O.; Solemanifar, A.; Conticello, V. P.; Egelman, E. H. Cryo-EM of helical polymers. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 14055–14065.

[25]

Usov, I.; Mezzenga, R. FiberApp: An open-source software for tracking and analyzing polymers, filaments, biomacromolecules, and fibrous objects. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 1269–1280.

[26]

Levine, H. Thioflavine T interaction with synthetic Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid peptides: Detection of amyloid aggregation in solution. Protein Sci. 1993, 2, 404–410.

[27]

Biancalana, M.; Makabe, K.; Koide, A.; Koide, S. Molecular mechanism of thioflavin-T binding to the surface of β-rich peptide self-assemblies. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 385, 1052–1063.

[28]

Pelton, J. T.; McLean, L. R. Spectroscopic methods for analysis of protein secondary structure. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 277, 167–176.

[29]

Marchesan, S.; Easton, C. D.; Kushkaki, F.; Waddington, L.; Hartley, P. G. Tripeptide self-assembled hydrogels: Unexpected twists of chirality. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 2195–2197.

[30]

Marchesan, S.; Easton, C. D.; Styan, K. E.; Waddington, L. J.; Kushkaki, F.; Goodall, L.; McLean, K. M.; Forsythe, J. S.; Hartley, P. G. Chirality effects at each amino acid position on tripeptide self-assembly into hydrogel biomaterials. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5172–5180.

[31]

Lee, N. R.; Bowerman, C. J.; Nilsson, B. L. Effects of varied sequence pattern on the self-assembly of amphipathic peptides. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 3267–3277.

[32]

Lin, S. W.; Li, Y.; Li, B. Z.; Yang, Y. G. Control of the handedness of self-assemblies of dipeptides by the chirality of phenylalanine and steric hindrance of phenylglycine. Langmuir 2016, 32, 7420–7426.

[33]

Behanna, H. A.; Donners, J. J. J. M.; Gordon, A. C.; Stupp, S. I. Coassembly of amphiphiles with opposite peptide polarities into nanofibers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1193–1200.

[34]

Knaapila, M.; Almásy, L.; Garamus, V. M.; Ramos, M. L.; Justino, L. L. G.; Galbrecht, F.; Preis, E.; Scherf, U.; Burrows, H. D.; Monkman, A. P. An effect of side chain length on the solution structure of poly(9, 9-dialkylfluorene)s in toluene. Polymer 2008, 49, 2033–2038.

[35]

Zhao, Y. R.; Hu, X. Z.; Zhang, L. M.; Wang, D.; King, S. M.; Rogers, S. E.; Wang, J. Q.; Lu, J. R.; Xu, H. Monolayer wall nanotubes self-assembled from short peptide bolaamphiphiles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 583, 553–562.

[36]

Ma, X. Y.; Zhao, Y. R.; He, C. Y.; Zhou, X.; Qi, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C. X.; Wang, D.; Li, J.; Ke, Y. B. et al. Ordered packing of β-sheet nanofibrils into nanotubes: Multi-hierarchical assembly of designed short peptides. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 10199–10207.

[37]

Lu, K.; Jacob, J.; Thiyagarajan, P.; Conticello, V. P.; Lynn, D. G. Exploiting amyloid fibril lamination for nanotube self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6391–6393.

[38]

Zhao, Y. R.; Yang, W.; Wang, D.; Wang, J. Q.; Li, Z. Y.; Hu, X. Z.; King, S.; Rogers, S.; Lu, J. R.; Xu, H. Controlling the diameters of nanotubes self-assembled from designed peptide bolaphiles. Small 2018, 14, 1703216.

[39]

da Silva, E. R.; Alves, W. A.; Castelletto, V.; Reza, M.; Ruokolainen, J.; Hussain, R.; Hamley, I. W. Self-assembly pathway of peptide nanotubes formed by a glutamatic acid-based bolaamphiphile. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11634–11637.

[40]

Sunde, M.; Blake, C. C. F. From the globular to the fibrous state: Protein structure and structural conversion in amyloid formation. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1998, 31, 1–39.

[41]

Pashuck, E. T.; Stupp, S. I. Direct observation of morphological tranformation from twisted ribbons into helical ribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8819–8821.

[42]

Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1–19.

[43]

Jorgensen, W. L.; Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1657–1666.

[44]

Jorgensen, W. L.; Maxwell, D. S.; Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225–11236.

[45]

Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Straatsma, T. P. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269–6271.

[46]

Mayans, E.; Casanovas, J.; Gil, A. M.; Jiménez, A. I.; Cativiela, C.; Puiggalí, J.; Alemán, C. Diversity and hierarchy in supramolecular assemblies of triphenylalanine: From laminated helical ribbons to toroids. Langmuir 2017, 33, 4036–4048.

[47]

Lu, T.; Chen, Q. X. Independent gradient model based on Hirshfeld partition: A new method for visual study of interactions in chemical systems. J. Comput. Chem. 2022, 43, 539–555.

[48]

Lu, T.; Chen, F. W. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592.

Nano Research
Pages 12230-12237
Cite this article:
Qi H, Qi K, Li J, et al. The role of aromatic residues in controlling the supramolecular chirality of short amphiphilic peptides. Nano Research, 2023, 16(10): 12230-12237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-023-5783-y
Topics:
Part of a topical collection:

745

Views

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 01 March 2023
Revised: 17 April 2023
Accepted: 25 April 2023
Published: 13 June 2023
© Tsinghua University Press 2023
Return