AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Polypeptide analysis for nanopore-based protein identification

Mazdak Afshar Bakshloo1Safia Yahiaoui1Fabien Piguet1Manuela Pastoriza-Gallego1Régis Daniel2Jérôme Mathé2John J. Kasianowicz3,4Abdelghani Oukhaled1( )
CY Cergy Paris Université, CNRS, LAMBE, 95000, Cergy, France
Université Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, CNRS, LAMBE, 91025, Evry-Courcouronnes, France
University of South Florida, Dept. of Physics, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg 79104, Germany
Show Author Information

Abstract

Presently, proteins are identified by cleaving them with proteases, measuring the mass to charge ratio of the fragments with a mass spectrometer, and matching the fragments to segments within known proteins in databases. We earlier demonstrated that a nanometer-scale pore formed by aerolysin (AeL) can discriminate between, and therefore identify, three similar size proteins from their trypsin-cleaved polypeptide fragments. With this nanopore-protease method, the protein’s identity is instead determined from characteristic ionic current blockade patterns caused by the polypeptide fragments that enter the nanopore. The results also suggested that not all of the theoretically expected cleavage products partition into the pore. To better understand the mechanism by which polypeptide fragments are captured, and how different polypeptides reduce the pore’s ionic current, we studied the effects of 11 identical length polypeptides with different net charges and charge distributions. We show that under certain experimental conditions, negative, positive, and neutral polypeptides are driven into the AeL pore by the same applied voltage polarity. The capture rate and dwell time of polypeptides in the pore depend strongly on the ionic strength, the magnitude of the applied voltage, and the net charge and charge distribution of the polypeptides. The dwell time distribution depends non-monotonically on the applied voltage (regardless of the polymer’s net charge), and its maximum value depends on the polypeptide net charge and charge distribution. The maximum dwell time for different polypeptides does not occur at the same applied voltage amplitude, which conceivably might complicate the detection and discrimination of some polypeptide fragments. Although additional experiments, computer simulations, and artificial intelligence research are needed to better understand how to optimize the partitioning of enzymatically cleaved fragments into the AeL nanopore, the method is still capable of accurately identifying proteins.

Graphical Abstract

Under specific experimental conditions (relatively high ionic strength and high applied voltages), the aerolysin nanopore captures and discriminates between net negative, neutral, and positive charged polypeptides with the same voltage polarity, which partly simplifies protein identification by nanopores based on fragment-induced current blockade patterns.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
12274_2022_4610_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (469.9 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Nano Research
Pages 9831-9842

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Bakshloo MA, Yahiaoui S, Piguet F, et al. Polypeptide analysis for nanopore-based protein identification. Nano Research, 2022, 15(11): 9831-9842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4610-1
Topics:
Part of a topical collection:

2073

Views

28

Crossref

28

Web of Science

28

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 31 January 2022
Revised: 18 May 2022
Accepted: 01 June 2022
Published: 01 July 2022
© Tsinghua University Press 2022