AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Safety evaluation of nanodiamond-doxorubicin complexes in a Naïve Beagle canine model using hematologic, histological, and urine analysis

Liping Wang1,§Wenqiong Su1,§Khan Zara Ahmad1,§Xin Wang1,§Ting Zhang1Youyi Yu1Edward Kai-Hua Chow2,3,4,5,6( )Dean Ho3,4,5,6( )Xianting Ding1( )
State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Institute for Personalized Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456, Singapore
The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456, Singapore
Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117583, Singapore

§ Liping Wang, Wenqiong Su, Khan Zara Ahmad, and Xin Wang contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

While doxorubicin (DOX) is one of the most common chemotherapeutic drugs for treating cancer, use of DOX must be managed carefully due to dose-related toxicity. Nanodiamond (ND) drug delivery system conjugated with DOX (NDX) has been reported to enhance treatment efficacy and attenuate toxicity in murine cancer models. In addition, extensive biocompatibility studies indicate that NDs seem to be well tolerated in non-human primates. Before the clinical translation of NDX, it is necessary to verify the safety of ND in large mammals. Studies of nanomedicine drug safety for large animal are not commonly reported, and this work represents a key milestone in bridging earlier advances towards clinical assessment. Herein, NDs’ safety as a drug-delivery platform was evaluated in Naïve Beagle dogs. The study is performed with DOX, ND, and NDX in a dual-gender animal model using intravenous (IV) injection and hepatic portal vein (HPV) injection methods. The dogs are monitored for their health phenotype changes in continuous 5 days. Blood and urine obtained are for clinical pathology research. The results indicate that ND drug delivery platform significantly relieves DOX toxicity for Naïve Beagle dog model. This study provides guidance for the pre-clinical safety assessment of NDX therapy at large animal level.

Graphical Abstract

Male and female, intravenous injection and hepatic portal vain injection of nanodiamond (ND), doxorubicin (DOX), ND-based DOX (NDX), were comprehensively evaluated for their pathology, blood testing and urinalysis. 1, 2, and 3 in dotted circles indicated the synthesis process of NDX. A, B, and C in dotted circles indicated administration of DOX, ND, and NDX injection, respectively. A total of five groups of Naïve Beagle dogs were examined.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
12274_2021_3867_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (313.2 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Nano Research
Pages 3356-3366

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang L, Su W, Ahmad KZ, et al. Safety evaluation of nanodiamond-doxorubicin complexes in a Naïve Beagle canine model using hematologic, histological, and urine analysis. Nano Research, 2022, 15(4): 3356-3366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3867-0
Topics:

1445

Views

21

Crossref

24

Web of Science

19

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 29 June 2021
Revised: 24 August 2021
Accepted: 04 September 2021
Published: 18 September 2021
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021