AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Is tumor cell specificity distinct from tumor selectivity in vivo? A quantitative NIR molecular imaging analysis of nanoliposome targeting

Girgis Obaid1,2,†,§, Kimberley Samkoe3,§, Kenneth Tichauer4, Shazia Bano1, Yeonjae Park3, Zachary Silber1, Sassan Hodge3, Susan Callaghan1, Mina Guirguis2, Srivalleesha Mallidi1,‡, Brian Pogue3, Tayyaba Hasan1,5( )
Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 037551, USA
Armour College of Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

The significance and ability for receptor targeted nanoliposomes (tNLs) to bind to their molecular targets in solid tumors in vivo has been questioned, particularly as the efficiency of their tumor accumulation and selectivity is not always predictive of their efficacy or molecular specificity. This study presents, for the first time, in situ near-infrared (NIR) molecular imaging-based quantitation of the in vivo specificity of tNLs for their target receptors, as opposed to tumor selectivity, which includes influences of enhanced tumor permeability and retention. Results show that neither tumor delivery nor selectivity (tumor-to-normal ratio) of cetuximab and IRDye conjugated tNLs correlate with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in U251, U87, and 9L tumors, and in fact underrepresent their imaging-derived molecular specificity by up to 94.2%. Conversely, their in vivo specificity, which we quantify as the concentration of tNL-reported tumor EGFR provided by NIR molecular imaging, correlates positively with EGFR expression levels in vitro and ex vivo (Pearson’s r = 0.92 and 0.96, respectively). This study provides a unique opportunity to address the problematic disconnect between tNL synthesis and in vivo specificity. The findings encourage their continued adoption as platforms for precision medicine, and facilitates intelligent synthesis and patient customization in order to improve safety profiles and therapeutic outcomes.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
12274_2020_3178_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (4.6 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Nano Research
Pages 1344-1354

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Obaid G, Samkoe K, Tichauer K, et al. Is tumor cell specificity distinct from tumor selectivity in vivo? A quantitative NIR molecular imaging analysis of nanoliposome targeting. Nano Research, 2021, 14(5): 1344-1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-3178-x
Topics:

1177

Views

10

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 31 July 2020
Revised: 01 October 2020
Accepted: 11 October 2020
Published: 27 November 2020
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature