Journal Home > Volume 10 , Issue 11

Single-nanoparticle electrochemistry has been established as a tool to characterize various nanomaterials based on the charge passed during their random impact at an electrode. Here it is demonstrated that the duration and shape of the resulting current peak can be used to quantify the reaction kinetics on a single-particle basis. Both the chemical rate constant and reaction mechanism for oxidation of single nanoparticles in different electrolytes can be determined directly from the duration of the current signal recorded in high-speed, high- sensitivity current measurements. Using 29-nm-sized Ag particles in four different electrolytes as a proof of concept for this general approach, hitherto inaccessible insights into single-particle reactivity are provided. While comparable rate constants were measured for the four electrolytes at low overpotentials, transport-limited impacts at high overpotentials were found to depend strongly on the type and quantity of anions present in solution.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
Electronic supplementary material
About this article

Time-resolved impact electrochemistry for quantitative measurement of single-nanoparticle reaction kinetics

Show Author's information En Ning SawMarkus KratzKristina Tschulik( )
Micro- & Nano-Electrochemistry and Centre for Electrochemical Sciences (CES)Ruhr-University BochumBochumD-44780Germany

Abstract

Single-nanoparticle electrochemistry has been established as a tool to characterize various nanomaterials based on the charge passed during their random impact at an electrode. Here it is demonstrated that the duration and shape of the resulting current peak can be used to quantify the reaction kinetics on a single-particle basis. Both the chemical rate constant and reaction mechanism for oxidation of single nanoparticles in different electrolytes can be determined directly from the duration of the current signal recorded in high-speed, high- sensitivity current measurements. Using 29-nm-sized Ag particles in four different electrolytes as a proof of concept for this general approach, hitherto inaccessible insights into single-particle reactivity are provided. While comparable rate constants were measured for the four electrolytes at low overpotentials, transport-limited impacts at high overpotentials were found to depend strongly on the type and quantity of anions present in solution.

Keywords: silver, single-particle reactivity, electrochemical kinetics, nano-impact method, reaction mechanism

References(27)

1

Xiao, X. Y.; Bard, A. J. Observing single nanoparticle collisions at an ultramicroelectrode by electrocatalytic amplification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9610-9612.

2

Kang, M.; Perry, D.; Kim, Y. -R.; Colburn, A. W.; Lazenby, R. A.; Unwin, P. R. Time-resolved detection and analysis of single nanoparticle electrocatalytic impacts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10902-10905.

3

Castañeda, A. D.; Robinson, D. A.; Stevenson, K. J.; Crooks, R. M. Electrocatalytic amplification of DNA-modified nanoparticle collisions via enzymatic digestion. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 6450-6457.

4

Zhou, Y. -G.; Rees, N. V.; Compton, R. G. The electrochemical detection and characterization of silver nanoparticles in aqueous solution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4219-4221.

5

Yakushenko, A.; Mayer, D.; Buitenhuis, J.; Offenhäusser, A.; Wolfrum, B. Electrochemical artifacts originating from nanoparticle contamination by Ag/AgCl quasi-reference electrodes. Lab Chip 2014, 14, 602-607.

6

Lim, C. S.; Tan, S. M.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Impact electrochemistry of layered transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 8474-8483.

7

Stuart, E. J. E.; Zhou, Y. -G.; Rees, N. V.; Compton, R. G. Determining unknown concentrations of nanoparticles: The particle-impact electrochemistry of nickel and silver. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 6879-6884.

8

Hao, R.; Zhang, B. Observing electrochemical dealloying by single-nanoparticle collision. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 8728-8734.

9

Holt, L. R.; Plowman, B. J.; Young, N. P.; Tschulik, K.; Compton, R. G. The electrochemical characterization of single core-shell nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 397-400.

10

Robinson, D. A.; Kondajji, A. M.; Castañeda, A. D.; Dasari, R.; Crooks, R. M.; Stevenson, K. J. Addressing colloidal stability for unambiguous electroanalysis of single nanoparticle impacts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 2512-2517.

11

Zhao, L. -J.; Qian, R. -C.; Ma, W.; Tian, H.; Long, Y. -T. Electrocatalytic efficiency analysis of catechol molecules for NADH oxidation during nanoparticle collision. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 8375-8379.

12

Albrecht, T.; MacPherson, J.; Magnussen, O.; Fermin, D.; Crooks, R.; Gooding, J.; Hersbach, T.; Kanoufi, F.; Schuhmann, W.; Bentley, C. et al. Electrochemistry of single nanoparticles: General discussion. Faraday Discuss. 2016, 193, 387-413.

13

Kätelhön, E.; Tanner, E. E. L.; Batchelor-McAuley, C.; Compton, R. G. Destructive nano-impacts: What information can be extracted from spike shapes? Electrochim. Acta 2016, 199, 297-304.

14

Bentley, C. L.; Kang, M.; Unwin, P. R. Time-resolved detection of surface oxide formation at individual gold nanoparticles: Role in electrocatalysis and new approach for sizing by electrochemical impacts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12755-12758.

15

Chen, C. H.; Ravenhill, E. R.; Momotenko, D.; Kim, Y. R.; Lai, S. C. S.; Unwin, P. R. Impact of surface chemistry on nanoparticle-electrode interactions in the electrochemical detection of nanoparticle collisions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 11932-11942.

16

Wan, Y.; Guo, Z. R.; Jiang, X. L.; Fang, K.; Lu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N. Quasi-spherical silver nanoparticles: Aqueous synthesis and size control by the seed-mediated Lee-Meisel method. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 394, 263-268.

17

Lees, J. C.; Ellison, J.; Batchelor-McAuley, C.; Tschulik, K.; Damm, C.; Omanović, D.; Compton, R. G. Nanoparticle impacts show high-ionic-strength citrate avoids aggregation of silver nanoparticles. ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 3895-3897.

18

Rostek, A.; Mahl, D.; Epple, M. Chemical composition of surface-functionalized gold nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 4809-4814.

19

Zhou, Y. -G.; Haddou, B.; Rees, N. V.; Compton, R. G. The charge transfer kinetics of the oxidation of silver and nickel nanoparticles via particle-electrode impact electrochemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14354-14357.

20

Samson, E.; Marchand, J.; Snyder, K. A. Calculation of ionic diffusion coefficients on the basis of migration test results. Mat. Struct. 2003, 36, 156-165.

21

Ma, W.; Ma, H.; Chen, J. -F.; Peng, Y. -Y.; Yang, Z. -Y.; Wang, H. -F.; Ying, Y. -L.; Tian, H.; Long, Y. -T. Tracking motion trajectories of individual nanoparticles using time- resolved current traces. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1854-1861.

22

Ustarroz, J.; Kang, M.; Bullions, E.; Unwin, P. R. Impact and oxidation of single silver nanoparticles at electrode surfaces: One shot versus multiple events. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1841-1853.

23

Oja, S. M.; Robinson, D. A.; Vitti, N. J.; Edwards, M. A.; Liu, Y. -W.; White, H. S.; Zhang, B. Observation of multipeak collision behavior during the electro-oxidation of single Ag nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 708-718.

24

Ngamchuea, K.; Eloul, S.; Tschulik, K.; Compton, R. G. Advancing from rules of thumb: Quantifying the effects of small density changes in mass transport to electrodes. Understanding natural convection. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 7226-7234.

25

Brasiliense, V.; Patel, A. N.; Martinez-Marrades, A.; Shi, J.; Chen, Y.; Combellas, C.; Tessier, G.; Kanoufi, F. Correlated electrochemical and optical detection reveals the chemical reactivity of individual silver nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3478-3483.

26

Hodson, H.; Li, X. T.; Batchelor-McAuley, C.; Shao, L. D.; Compton, R. G. Single nanotube voltammetry: Current fluctuations are due to physical motion of the nanotube. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 6281-6286.

27

Shimizu, K.; Tschulik, K.; Compton, R. G. Exploring the mineral-water interface: Reduction and reaction kinetics of single hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1408-1414.

File
nr-10-11-3680_ESM.pdf (3.5 MB)
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 04 January 2017
Revised: 06 March 2017
Accepted: 09 March 2017
Published: 08 July 2017
Issue date: November 2017

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Bernhard Wolfrum (TU Munich) for fruitful discussion and Sandra Schmidt for assistance in the SEM imaging. This work was financially supported by the Cluster of Excellence RESOLV (EXC 1069) funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and by a NRW Rückkehrer Fellowship.

Return