AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Perspective

Caging AI

School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Ont. N2L 3G1, Canada
Central China Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Zhengzhou 450046, China
Wuhan Biobank, Wuhan 430073, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

As we celebrate the success of AI, it is necessary to investigate the boundaries of AI, a la Karl Popper, so that our society does not fall for misleading commercial claims, and prevent dangers of misusing AI. We chat with our readers casually on several frontier questions from if AI will replace human beings, to AI consciousness, self and nonself awareness, and to our jobs and education. While some things in this essay are speculative, some other things are mathematically proved. We argue why AI and AI generated content should be segregated, and why AGI (artificial general intelligence) cannot make innovations about things independent to human knowledge without external experiments.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Pages 1-5

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li M. Caging AI. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2025, 40(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-024-5036-x

719

Views

2

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 22 November 2024
Accepted: 08 December 2024
Published: 23 February 2025
© Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2025