AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Computer Science and Technology Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Regular Paper

Multi-Attribute Preferences Mining Method for Group Users with the Process of Noise Reduction

College of Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
Research Base for Civilian-Military Integration Development in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 211106, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Traditional researches on user preferences mining mainly explore the user's overall preferences on the project, but ignore that the fundamental motivation of user preferences comes from their attitudes on some attributes of the project. In addition, traditional researches seldom consider the typical preferences combination of group users, which may have influence on the personalized service for group users. To solve this problem, a method with noise reduction for group user preferences mining is proposed, which focuses on mining the multi-attribute preference tendency of group users. Firstly, both the availability of data and the noise interference on preferences mining are considered in the algorithm design. In the process of generating group user preferences, a new path is used to generate preference keywords so as to reduce the noise interference. Secondly, the Gibbs sampling algorithm is used to estimate the parameters of the model. Finally, using the user comment data of several online shopping websites as experimental objects, the method is used to mine the multi-attribute preferences of different groups. The proposed method is compared with other methods from three aspects of predictive ability, preference mining ability and preference topic similarity. Experimental results show that the method is significantly better than other existing methods.

Keywords

preferences mininggroup usermulti-attributenoise reductionnoise interference

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
jcst-36-4-944-Highlights.pdf (126.5 KB)

References

[1]

Guo Y, Lu Z, Kuang H, Wang C. Information avoidance behavior on social network sites: Information irrelevance, overload, and the moderating role of time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 2020, 52: Article No. 102067. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102067.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]

Saxena D, Lamest M. Information overload and coping strategies in the big data context: Evidence from the hospitality sector. Journal of Information Science, 2018, 44(3): 287-297. DOI: 10.1177/0165551517693712.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]

Peng J, Wang T, Chen Y, Liu T, Xu W. User recommendation based on cross-platform online social networks. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(03): 147-158. DOI: 10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2018044. (in Chinese)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]

Tao L, Cao J, Liu F. Dynamic feature weighting based on user preference sensitivity for recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 149: 61-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.02.019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]

Chai H, Lei J, Fang M. Estimating Bayesian networks parameters using EM and Gibbs sampling. Procedia Computer Science, 2017, 111: 160-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.pro-cs.2017.06.023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]

Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3(4): 993-1022. DOI: 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]

Vu H Q, Li G, Law R. Discovering implicit activity preferences in travel itineraries by topic modeling. Tourism Management, 2019, 75: 435-446. DOI: 10.1016/j.tou-rman.2019.06.011.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]

Zhang Y, Wei H, Ran Y, Deng Y, Liu D. Drawing openness to experience from user generated contents: An inter-pretable data-driven topic modeling approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 144: Article No. 113073. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113073.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]

Schwarz C. Ldagibbs: A command for topic modeling in Stata using latent Dirichlet allocation. The Stata Journal, 2018, 18(1): 101-117. DOI: 10.1177/1536867X1801800107.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]

Abdar M, Yen N Y. Analysis of user preference and expectation on shared economy platform: An examination of correlation between points of interest on Airbnb. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 107: Article No. 105730. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.039.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]

Kim J E, Kessler L, McCauley Z, Niiyama I, Boyle L N. Human factors considerations in designing a personalized mobile dialysis device: An interview study. Applied Ergonomics, 2020, 85: 103003. DOI: 10.1016/j.ape-rgo.2019.103003.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]

Li Z, Hensher D A, Ho C. An empirical investigation of values of travel time savings from stated preference data and revealed preference data. Transportation Letters, 2020, 12(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.1080/19427867.2018.1546806.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]

Feng C, Liang J, Song P, Wang Z. A fusion collaborative filtering method for sparse data in recommender systems. Information Sciences, 2020, 521: 365-379. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.052.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]

Hong M, Jung J J. Multi-sided recommendation based on social tensor factorization. Information Sciences, 2018, 447: 140-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.03.019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]

Geng Y, Li Q, Liang M, Chi C Y, Tan J, Huang H. Local-density subspace distributed clustering for high-dimensional data. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2020, 31(8): 1799-1814. DOI: 10.1109/T-PDS.2020.2975550.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]

Mowlaei M E, Abadeh M S, Keshavarz H. Aspect-based sentiment analysis using adaptive aspect-based lexicons. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 148: Article No. 113234. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113234.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]

Pujahari A, Sisodia D S. Pair-wise preference relation based probabilistic matrix factorization for collaborative filtering in recommender system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 196: Article No. 105798. DOI: 10.1016/j.kn-osys.2020.105798.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]

Logesh R, Subramaniyaswamy V, Malathi D, Sivaramakr-ishnan N, Vijayakumar V. Enhancing recommendation stability of collaborative filtering recommender system through bio-inspired clustering ensemble method. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32: 2141-2164. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3891-5.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]

Yang X, Zhou S, Cao M. An approach to alleviate the sparsity problem of hybrid collaborative filtering based recommendations: The product-attribute perspective from user reviews. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2020, 25: 376-390. DOI: 10.1007/s11036-019-01246-2.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]

Li W, Li J, Liu X, Dong L. Two fast vector-wise update algorithms for orthogonal nonnegative matrix factorization with sparsity constraint. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2020, 375: Article No. 112785. DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.112785.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]

Lu H, Sang X, Zhao Q, Lu J. Community detection algorithm based on nonnegative matrix factorization and pairwise constraints. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 545: Article No. 123491. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123491.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]

Khan Z, Iltaf N, Afzal H, Abbas H. Enriching non-negative matrix factorization with contextual embeddings for recommender systems. Neurocomputing, 2020, 380: 246-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.080.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]

Kim H, Kim H K, Cho S. Improving spherical k-means for document clustering: Fast initialization, sparse centroid projection, and efficient cluster labeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 150: Article No. 113288. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113288.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]

Zhou B, Funaki Y, Horiuchi H, Tohsaki A. Nonlocalized clustering and evolution of cluster structure in nuclei. Frontiers of Physics, 2020, 15(1): Article No. 14401. DOI: 10.1007/s11467-019-0917-0.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]

Luarn P, Kuo H C, Lin H W, Chiu Y P, Jhan Y C. Analyzing user preferences using Facebook fan pages. Interfaces, 2018, 48(2): 166-175. DOI: 10.1287/inte.2017.0919.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]

Zhang X, Liu H, Chen X, Zhong J, Wang D. A novel hybrid deep recommendation system to differentiate user's preference and item’s attractiveness. Information Sciences, 2020, 519: 306-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.044.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Guo W, Liu F. Research on collaborative filtering personalized recommendation algorithm based on deep learning optimization. In Proc. the 2019 International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System, June 2019, pp.90-93. DOI: 10.1109/ICRIS.2019.00031.
Crossref
[28]

Han J, Zheng L, Xu Y, Zhang B. Adaptive deep modeling of users and items using side information for recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2020, 31(3): 737-748. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2909432.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]

Chambua J, Niu Z, Zhu Y. User preferences prediction approach based on embedded deep summaries. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 132: 87-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.047.
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]

Laohakiat S, Phimoltares S, Lursinsap C. A Clustering algorithm for stream data with LDA-based unsupervised localized dimension reduction. Information Sciences, 2017, 381: 104-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.11.018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Kyaw N E E, Wai T T. Inferring user preferences using reviews for rating prediction. In Proc. the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Information Technologies, November 2019, pp.194-199. DOI: 10.1109/AI-TC.2019.8921179.
Crossref
[32]

Chen L, Yan D, Wang F. User perception of sentiment-integrated critiquing in recommender systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2019, 121: 4-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.09.005.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]

Lei X, Qian X, Zhao G. Rating prediction based on social sentiment from textual reviews. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2016, 18(9): 1910-1921. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2016.2575738.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]

Chen C T, Ren J T. Forum latent Dirichlet allocation for user interest discovery. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2017, 126: 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.04.006.
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]

Pu X, Wu G, Yuan C. User-aware topic modeling of online reviews. Multimedia Systems, 2019, 25(1): 59-69. DOI: 10.1007/s00530-017-0557-6.
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]

Liang S, Yilmaz E, Kanoulas E. Collaboratively tracking interests for user clustering in streams of short texts. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2018, 31(2): 257-272. DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2018.2832211.
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]

Li J, Ma X. Research on hot news discovery model based on user interest and topic discovery. Cluster Computing, 2019, 22(4): 8483-8491. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-018-1880-1.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]

Ma X, Lei X, Zhao G, Qian X. Rating prediction by exploring user's preference and sentiment. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2018, 77(6): 6425-6444. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-4550-z.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Chen Z, Liu B. Mining topics in documents: Standing on the shoulders of big data. In Proc. the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2014, pp.1116-1125. DOI: 10.1145/2623330.2623622.
Crossref
[40]
Hofmann T. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proc. the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 1999, pp.50-57. DOI: 10.1145/312624.312649.
Crossref
[41]
Ge B, Zheng W, Yang G M, Lu Y, Zheng H J. Microblog topic mining based on a combined TF-IDF and LDA topic model. In Proc. the 2018 International Conference on Automatic Control, Mechatronics and Industrial Engineering, October 2018, pp.29-31. DOI: 10.1201/9780429468605-40.
Crossref
[42]
Baek J W, Chung K Y. Multimedia recommendation using Word2Vec-based social relationship mining. Multimedia Tools and Applications. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-08607-9.
Crossref
[43]
Landauer T K, McNamara D S, Dennis S, Kintsch W. Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis (1st edition). Routledge, 2014.
[44]

Peng Y, Wan C X, Jiang T J, Liu D X, Liao G Q. Extracting product aspect and user opinions based on semantic constrained LDA model. Journal of Software, 2017, 28(03): 676-693. DOI: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.005154. (in Chinese)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]

Bu Y, Zou S, Liang Y, Venugopal V. Estimation of KL divergence: Optimal minimax rate. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2018, 64(4): 2648-2674. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2018.2805844.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]

Grosse I, Bernaola-Galván P, Carpena P, Román-Roldán R, Oliver J, Stanley, H E. Analysis of symbolic sequences using the Jensen-Shannon divergence. Physical Review E, 2002, 65(4): Article No. 041905. DOI: 10.1103/Phys-RevE.65.041905.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Volume 36 Issue 4,
July 2021
Pages 944-960
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-021-0102-0
Cite this article:
Tan Q-M, Wang X-N. Multi-Attribute Preferences Mining Method for Group Users with the Process of Noise Reduction. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2021, 36(4): 944-960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-021-0102-0

427

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 15 October 2019
Accepted: 09 June 2021
Published: 05 July 2021
©Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2021
Return