AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Regular Paper

Evaluating and Improving Linear Regression Based Profiling: On the Selection of Its Regularization

School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
ZhiXun Crypto Testing and Evaluation Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200240, China
Department of Microelectronics and Nanoelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Beijing Smartchip Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100082, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Side-channel attacks (SCAs) play an important role in the security evaluation of cryptographic devices. As a form of SCAs, profiled differential power analysis (DPA) is among the most powerful and efficient by taking advantage of a profiling phase that learns features from a controlled device. Linear regression (LR) based profiling, a special profiling method proposed by Schindler et al., could be extended to generic-emulating DPA (differential power analysis) by on-the-fly profiling. The formal extension was proposed by Whitnall et al. named SLR-based method. Later, to improve SLR-based method, Wang et al. introduced a method based on ridge regression. However, the constant format of L-2 penalty still limits the performance of profiling. In this paper, we generalize the ridge-based method and propose a new strategy of using variable regularization. We then analyze from a theoretical point of view why we should not use constant penalty format for all cases. Roughly speaking, our work reveals the underlying mechanism of how different formats affect the profiling process in the context of side channel. Therefore, by selecting a proper regularization, we could push the limits of LR-based profiling. Finally, we conduct simulation-based and practical experiments to confirm our analysis. Specifically, the results of our practical experiments show that the proper formats of regularization are different among real devices.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
jcst-35-5-1175-Highlights.pdf (859.8 KB)
jcst-35-5-1175_ESM.pdf (285.6 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Pages 1175-1197

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Lu X-J, Zhang C, Gu D-W, et al. Evaluating and Improving Linear Regression Based Profiling: On the Selection of Its Regularization. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2020, 35(5): 1175-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-020-9669-0

938

Views

1

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 24 April 2019
Revised: 09 February 2020
Published: 30 September 2020
©Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2020