AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Clinical Value of Metagenomic Next‐Generation Sequencing Versus Conventional Methods in Diagnosing Cryptococcal Infection After Kidney Transplantation

Luhao Liu , Rongxin Chen , Haonan Lin, Yuhe Guo, Guanghui Li, Jiali Fang, Zheng Chen ( )
Department of Organ Transplantation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Luhao Liu, Rongxin Chen and Haonan Lin contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for cryptococcal infection after kidney transplantation by comparing its positivity rate, turnaround time, and impact on clinical decision-making with those of conventional diagnostic methods, including India ink staining, culture, and capsular antigen testing.

Methods

This retrospective study included 16 kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with cryptococcal infection between January 2017 and July 2025. Among them, 11 had isolated pulmonary infection, 1 had isolated central nervous system (CNS) infection, and 4 had combined pulmonary and CNS involvement. Cerebrospinal fluid and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were analyzed using mNGS and conventional assays. Positivity rates, sensitivity, specificity, and turnaround times were compared using McNemar's exact test for paired data. Confidence intervals (CIs) at 95% were calculated using the Clopper‐Pearson method.

Results

The overall mNGS positivity rate was 93.8% (15/16, 95% CI: 69.8%–99.8%), exceeding the 62.5% (10/16, 95% CI: 35.4%–84.8%) achieved using conventional methods (paired difference, 31.3%; 95% CI: 4.1%–54.6%; McNemar's exact test, p = 0.031). The median turnaround time was significantly shorter for mNGS than for fungal culture (24 vs. 120 h, p < 0.001). In the CNS infection subgroup, mNGS was positive in 4 of 5 cases (80.0%), compared with four of five cases (80.0%) using conventional testing. In the pulmonary infection subgroup, mNGS detected all 15 cases (100%), whereas conventional methods identified 9 of 15 (60.0%). Six patients who tested negative using all conventional methods were diagnosed using mNGS, and all patients received targeted antifungal therapy guided by mNGS results.

Conclusions

In this small exploratory study, mNGS was associated with a higher early detection rate than conventional methods. In six patients with negative results across all conventional tests, mNGS results directly guided antifungal therapy. These findings suggest that mNGS plays an important role in diagnosing cryptococcal infection after kidney transplantation, particularly when conventional tests are negative.

Graphical Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) against conventional methods (India ink, culture, antigen) for diagnosing cryptococcal infection in 16 kidney transplant recipients. mNGS showed a significantly higher positivity rate (93.8% vs 62.5%, p = 0.031) and shorter turnaround time (24 vs. 120 h, p < 0.001). In 6 patients negative by all conventional tests, mNGS provided the sole microbiological evidence and informed guided antifungal therapy. mNGS also detected unsuspected CMV and Aspergillus co-infections in two severe cases. The findings suggest that mNGS offers a potential diagnostic advantage in this immunocompromised population, particularly when conventional tests are negative, though larger prospective studies are needed to confirm its clinical impact and cost-effectiveness.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Organ Medicine
Pages 130-138

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu L, Chen R, Lin H, et al. Clinical Value of Metagenomic Next‐Generation Sequencing Versus Conventional Methods in Diagnosing Cryptococcal Infection After Kidney Transplantation. Organ Medicine, 2026, 3(3): 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/orm2.70046

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 27 April 2026
Revised: 02 June 2026
Accepted: 03 June 2026
Published: 14 July 2026
© 2026 The Author(s).

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.