AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home mLife Article
PDF (1.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Advances and challenges in experimental models for Epstein–Barr virus research

Gulimire Wufuer1,2,#Jiabao Tang1,2,#Tingdong Li1,2 ( )Shengxiang Ge1,2Jun Zhang1,2 ( )Ningshao Xia1,2
State Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center of Biologic Products, National Innovation Platform for Industry‐Education Integration in Vaccine Research, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Infectious Disease Diagnostic Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

#Gulimire Wufuer and Jiabao Tang contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), the first identified human oncovirus, is a ubiquitous γ‐herpesvirus etiologically linked to diverse malignancies, lymphoproliferative disorders, and autoimmune diseases. Experimental models are pivotal for unraveling the infection and pathogenesis mechanisms, life cycle regulation, as well as development and evaluation of antiviral vaccines and therapeutics. Traditional two‐dimensional (2D) cell lines (e.g., lymphoblastoid cell lines [LCLs] and NPC43) have provided foundational insights into viral latency and oncogenesis, but lack physiological complexity. Emerging three‐dimensional (3D) models, such as air–liquid interface (ALI) cultures, spheroids, and patient‐derived organoids (PDOs), better mimic tissue architecture and tumor microenvironments and yet face challenges in scalability, dynamic microenvironments, and immune component integration. Animal models, such as humanized mice, rabbits, and tree shrews, have been developed that over-come in vitro limitations by recapitulating systemic interactions, immune responses, and disease progression. Despite these advances, persistent challenges remain, including species‐specific constraints, incomplete modeling of the tumor microenvironment, partial immune system representation, and limited disease heterogeneity. This review systematically summarizes the technical features, applicability, and limitations of current models, provides guidance for selecting experimental models in further studies, and emphasizes the need for innovative, patient‐tailored platforms to unravel EBV's lifelong pathogenesis and facilitate the translation of EBV vaccines and therapeutics.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
mLife
Pages 401-416

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wufuer G, Tang J, Li T, et al. Advances and challenges in experimental models for Epstein–Barr virus research. mLife, 2026, 5(4): 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/mlf2.70081

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 May 2025
Accepted: 20 January 2026
Published: 11 August 2026
© 2026 The Author(s). mLife published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.