AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (688 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Could the Altmetric Score Be an Alternative Approach to Traditional Bibliometrics for Evaluating Influential Articles in Pediatric Robotic Surgery?

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Traditional bibliometrics have been used to estimate the scientific impact of research across various fields. However, citation analysis is not without limitations. With the rapid development of social media, the Altmetric score has become popular for evaluating scientific work. This study aimed to determine whether the Altmetric score could replace traditional bibliometrics for assessing influential papers in pediatric robotic surgery.

Methods

The Web of Science database was searched for the 50 top‐cited publications in pediatric robotic surgery, and the characteristics of each article were recorded and identified. Conventional bibliometric variables included the citation count and impact factor (IF) of the publishing journal. The Altmetric score database was used to identify the Altmetric score and details for each article. Statistical analysis, including Spearman's correlation coefficients, was performed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad PRISM.

Results

The top 50 publications with the most citations were obtained and analyzed. A significant negative relationship was identified between the impact index and the Altmetric score (r = −0.42, p < 0.01, R2 = 0.18), and no correlations were observed for the number of citations (r = −0.12, p = 0.40, R2 = 0.01) and IF (r = −0.09, p = 0.53, R2 = 0.01). X/Twitter (68%) was the most popular social media source for Altmetric score details.

Conclusions

This study did not identify a statistically significant correlation between Altmetric scores and conventional bibliometric variables in the 50 top‐cited publications. Furthermore, the Altmetric score is susceptible to manipulation because its calculation mechanism is unknown. Thus, the Altmetric score does not currently deliver an alternative approach to traditional bibliometrics. A combination of traditional bibliometrics and the Altmetric score can provide a more comprehensive method for evaluating influential articles in pediatric robotic surgery.

Graphical Abstract

In the top 50 cited pediatric robotic surgery publications, a marked negative correlation existed between impact index and Altmetric score, with no significant relationships for citations or impact factor. Altmetric scores should complement rather than replace conventional metrics, their integration offering a multidimensional evaluation framework.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
med-3-3-171_ESM.docx (28.1 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medicine Advances
Pages 171-176

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Shu B. Could the Altmetric Score Be an Alternative Approach to Traditional Bibliometrics for Evaluating Influential Articles in Pediatric Robotic Surgery?. Medicine Advances, 2025, 3(3): 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/med4.70026

801

Views

41

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 18 March 2025
Revised: 06 May 2025
Accepted: 26 May 2025
Published: 20 October 2025
© 2025 The Author(s). Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.