AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Breast Modular Resection Surgery Teaching Model Improves the Effect of Teaching Under Regional Anesthesia for Breast Conserving Surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Day Surgery

Ru Yao1 , Aocheng Wu1, Jie Lian1, Linjuan Tan2, Lu Gao1, Bo Pan1 ( ), Qiang Sun1, Yidong Zhou1 ( )
Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
Department of Anesthesia and Operating Room, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Ru Yao, Aocheng Wu, Jie Lian and Linjuan Tan contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard treatment for early‐stage breast cancer. However, surgical variability and patient discomfort under regional anesthesia present challenges for training programs and consistent clinical outcomes. To address this, we implemented a breast modular resection (BMR) surgical teaching course designed to deconstruct BCS + SLNB into standardized modules and evaluated its impact on training effectiveness and patient outcomes in the day surgery setting under regional anesthesia.

Methods

A total of 273 patients underwent BCS with SLNB between 2019 and 2022, performed by six attending breast surgeons. Patients were divided into a classical procedure resection group (n = 124) and a BMR group (n = 149). All surgeries were performed under regional anesthesia. Clinical and subjective outcome indicators, such as re‐excision rate, pain scores, cosmetic satisfaction, and hospital stay, were analyzed.

Results

The BMR group showed significantly more favorable perioperative outcomes, including lower re‐excision rates (3.85% vs. 11.88%, p = 0.038), reduced intraoperative pain (p < 0.05), decreased seroma incidence (9.62% vs. 20.79%, p = 0.032), and enhanced breast symmetry satisfaction (p = 0.008). A substantially higher proportion of BMR patients were discharged on postoperative Day 1 (79.81% vs. 31.68%, p < 0.001), confirming the feasibility of safe, same‐day BCS + SLNB. There were no differences in long‐term complications or recurrence.

Conclusions

The BMR‐based teaching model improved surgical performance, standardized the technique, and enhanced the patient experience for BCS + SLNB under regional anesthesia. This structured modular approach provides a replaceable framework for surgical education and may facilitate broader adoption of day‐case breast cancer surgery without compromising oncologic safety or patient comfort.

Graphical Abstract

This study validates a novel Breast Modular Resection (BMR) teaching model for breast‐conserving surgery under regional anesthesia. The BMR approach significantly improves surgical proficiency, reduces re‐excision rates and pain, and facilitates safe day‐case discharge with superior cosmetic outcomes.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Health Care Science
Pages 461-472

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yao R, Wu A, Lian J, et al. Breast Modular Resection Surgery Teaching Model Improves the Effect of Teaching Under Regional Anesthesia for Breast Conserving Surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Day Surgery. Health Care Science, 2026, 5(5): 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.70093

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 25 February 2026
Revised: 18 June 2026
Accepted: 24 June 2026
Published: 13 August 2026
© 2026 The Author(s). Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.