AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (430.9 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Analysis of Research Trends and Output Effectiveness in the Medical Field Based on the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Jin Hu1Hui Huang2Xinjie Bao1Hua Bai1 ( )
Department of Scientific Research, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Comprehensive Office, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

This study aims to analyze the trends in research focus and output effectiveness in the medical field supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) over the past 15 years, providing a basis for the optimal allocation of scientific research resources.

Methods

Based on the NSFC Big Data Knowledge Management Service Database, a retrospective approach was adopted to retrieve data on completed projects and output achievements from 2009 to 2023. Indicators, including compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and output‐to‐project ratio, were used to evaluate the growth of project completion and research productivity across 35 secondary medical categories.

Results

Over the 15‐year period, a total of 439,637 NSFC projects were completed, with the Division of Medical Science ranking first in both scale (23%) and growth rate (CAGR 11%). The 35 secondary categories (H01–H35) under the Division of Medical Science showed differentiated development characteristics, namely “a few growing rapidly, most growing steadily, and a small number lagging behind”: six directions including biomedical engineering had a CAGR of ≥ 15%; oncology and traditional chinese medicine contributed large output volumes but showed low output‐to‐project ratios, whereas neuroscience, imaging medicine, and biomedical engineering achieved high efficiency. Key Programs achieved the highest output‐to‐project ratios, followed by the General Program and then the Young Scientists Fund.

Conclusions

The completion and output of NSFC‐funded medical projects reflect national strategic orientations and disciplinary development laws, but imbalance remains between project scale and output efficiency across subfields. It is suggested to establish a dynamic evaluation mechanism, promote the “basic research‐application‐transformation” collaborative model, support small‐scale yet high‐efficiency fields, and conduct long‐term tracking of output achievements. These measures are expected to optimize the allocation of NSFC funding resources.

Graphical Abstract

The completion and output of NSFC‐funded medical projects reflect national strategic orientations and disciplinary development laws. It is suggested to establish a dynamic evaluation mechanism, promote the “basic research‐application‐transformation” collaborative model, support small‐scale yet high‐efficiency fields, and conduct long‐term tracking of output achievements. These measures are expected to optimize the allocation of NSFC funding resources.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Health Care Science
Pages 231-239

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Hu J, Huang H, Bao X, et al. Analysis of Research Trends and Output Effectiveness in the Medical Field Based on the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Health Care Science, 2026, 5(3): 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.70075

514

Views

44

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 08 November 2025
Revised: 20 March 2026
Accepted: 01 April 2026
Published: 10 May 2026
© 2026 The Author(s). Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.