AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (570 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Implementation of an Improvement Cycle in the Compounding of Antineoplastic Therapy in a University Hospital

Luciana Moreira Dantas Barreto1 Joyce Karolayne dos Santos Dantas2 Tâmara Taynah Medeiros da Silva3 Louise Constancia de Melo Alves Silva3 Kauanny Vitoria Gurgel dos Santos3 Laura Lima Souza4 Daniele Vieira Dantas3 Rodrigo Assis Neves Dantas3 ( )
Program of Quality Management in Health Services, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Program of Cardiology Nursing, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Postgraduate Program in Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Nursing Undergraduate Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Improving medication safety, particularly for high‐risk drugs, was identified as the third Global Patient Safety Challenge by the World Health Organization in 2017. Antineoplastic agents are included in the list of high‐risk medications because of their high potential to cause adverse events. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a project that was implemented to improve the antineoplastic therapy compounding process at a university hospital.

Methods

This study had a quasi‐experimental before‐and‐after design and used a quantitative approach to investigate the effects of implementation of this project in a centralized intravenous admixture service. The compounding of antineoplastic therapy was evaluated using five quality criteria at three time points: an initial evaluation and two post‐intervention re‐evaluations. The results of the intervention were subjected to statistical analysis and are presented in a Pareto chart.

Results

All five quality criteria for correct compounding of antineoplastic therapy improved after implementation of the intervention, with an increase in compliance values for all criteria after the second evaluation. Improvements in criteria 1, 3, and 4 were statistically significant.

Conclusions

The implementation of the improvement project enhanced the quality criteria and caused a cultural shift in the team, with an improved view towards quality management in work processes.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Health Care Science
Pages 103-109

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Barreto LMD, Dantas JKdS, Silva TTMd, et al. Implementation of an Improvement Cycle in the Compounding of Antineoplastic Therapy in a University Hospital. Health Care Science, 2025, 4(2): 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.70013

852

Views

73

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 17 September 2024
Revised: 13 January 2025
Accepted: 20 February 2025
Published: 25 March 2025
© 2025 The Author(s). Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.