Journal Home > Volume 2 , Issue 2
Background

Uneven economic development has led to substantial health inequalities between Chinese provinces. The extent of, and factors underlying, between‐province health inequalities have received little attention.

Methods

Data from 15,278 respondents in Wave 2 (2013) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were used to investigate inequalities among people aged ≥50 years in five health outcomes between 27 Chinese province‐level administrative units. After characterizing the between‐province differences and the relevance of province effects, proportional change in variance between unadjusted and adjusted models was calculated to determine the percentage of between‐province variance in health outcomes explained by province‐level variables including measures of economic development and healthcare availability.

Results

Although province effects explained <10% of overall variance in health outcomes, they underpinned large between‐province inequalities among people aged ≥50 years. Gross Regional Product per capita was more important than doctor density in explaining between‐province variance in health outcomes, particularly depression symptoms and instrumental activities of daily living impairment.

Conclusion

Policy efforts, including more equal distribution of healthcare personnel, may be warranted to reduce between‐province health inequalities.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

To what extent do disparities in economic development and healthcare availability explain between‐province health inequalities among older people in China?

Show Author's information Sol Richardson ( )Zhihui Li
Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Background

Uneven economic development has led to substantial health inequalities between Chinese provinces. The extent of, and factors underlying, between‐province health inequalities have received little attention.

Methods

Data from 15,278 respondents in Wave 2 (2013) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were used to investigate inequalities among people aged ≥50 years in five health outcomes between 27 Chinese province‐level administrative units. After characterizing the between‐province differences and the relevance of province effects, proportional change in variance between unadjusted and adjusted models was calculated to determine the percentage of between‐province variance in health outcomes explained by province‐level variables including measures of economic development and healthcare availability.

Results

Although province effects explained <10% of overall variance in health outcomes, they underpinned large between‐province inequalities among people aged ≥50 years. Gross Regional Product per capita was more important than doctor density in explaining between‐province variance in health outcomes, particularly depression symptoms and instrumental activities of daily living impairment.

Conclusion

Policy efforts, including more equal distribution of healthcare personnel, may be warranted to reduce between‐province health inequalities.

Keywords: depression, China, overweight, inequalities, multilevel modelling, wellbeing, disability, lung function

References(38)

1

Lin JY. China's growth miracle in the context of Asian transformation. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU‐WIDER); 2018. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2018/534-3

DOI
2

Li S, Xu Z. The trend of regional income disparity in the People's Republic of China. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute; 2008.

3

Jain‐Chandra S, Khor H, Mano R, Schauer J, Wingender W, Zhuang J. Inequality in China‐trends, drivers and policy remedies. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2018.

DOI
4

Yang G, Kong L, Zhao W, Wan X, Zhai Y, Chen LC, et al. Emergence of chronic non‐communicable diseases in China. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1697–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61366-5

5

Campbell TC, Junshi C, Brun T, Parpia B, Yinsheng Q, Chumming C, et al. China: from diseases of poverty to diseases of affluence. policy implications of the epidemiological transition. Ecol Food Nutr. 1992;27(2):133–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1992.9991235

6

Zhou M, Wang H, Zhu J, Chen W, Wang L, Liu S, et al. Cause‐specific mortality for 240 causes in China during 1990–2013: a systematic subnational analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2016;387(10015):251–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00551-6

7

Fan S, Kanbur R, Zhang X. China's regional disparities: experience and policy. Rev Dev Finance. 2011;1(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2010.10.001

8

Chou WL, Wang Z. Regional inequality in China's health care expenditures. Health Econ. 2009;18(suppl 2):S137–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1511

9

Zhou K, Zhang X, Ding Y, Wang D, Lu Z, Yu M. Inequality trends of health workforce in different stages of medical system reform (1985–2011) in China. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0089-0

10

Qin X, Wang S, Hsieh CR. The prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms among adults in China: estimation based on a national household survey. China Econ Rev. 2018;51:271–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.04.001

11

Easterlin RA, Morgan R, Switek M, Wang F. China's life satisfaction, 1990‐2010. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(25):9775–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.04.001

12

Liang Y, Welmer A‐K, Möller J, Qiu C. Trends in disability of instrumental activities of daily living among older Chinese adults, 1997‐2006: population based study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016996. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016996

13

He Y, Pan A, Wang Y, Yang Y, Xu J, Zhang Y, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in 15.8 million men aged 15–49 years in rural China from 2010 to 2014. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5012. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04135-4

14

Fang L, Gao P, Bao H, Tang X, Wang B, Feng Y, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a nationwide prevalence study. Lancet Res Med. 2018;6(6):421–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30103-6

15

Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Feng Z, Vlachantoni A. Individual and province inequalities in health among older peoplein China: evidence and policy implications. Health Place. 2014;30:134–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.08.009

16

Feng Z, Wang WW, Jones K. A multilevel analysis of the role of the family and the state in self‐rated health of elderly Chinese. Health Place. 2013;30:148–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.001

17

Richardson S, Carr E, Netuveli G, Sacker A. Country‐level welfare‐state measures and change in wellbeing following work exit in early old age: evidence from 16 European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 48(2):389–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy205

18

Zhao Y, Hu Y, Smith JP, Strauss J, Yang G. Cohort profile: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):61–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys203

19

Chen H, Mui AC. Factorial validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale short form in older population in China. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213001701

20

Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES‐D. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(2):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6

21

Zhang W, O'Brien N, Forrest JI, Salters KA, Patterson TL, Montaner JSG, et al. Validating a shortened depression scale (10 item CES‐D) among HIV‐positive people in British Columbia, Canada. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040793

22

Tobias DK, Hu FB. Commentary: obesity and mortality in China: the shape of things to come. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(2):481–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys031

23

Nunn AJ, Gregg I. New regression equations for predicting peak expiratory flow in adults. BMJ. 1989;298(6680):1068–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.298.6680.1068

24

Perez‐Padilla R, Vollmer WM, Vázquez‐García JC, et al. Can a normal peak expiratory flow exclude severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(3):387393.

25

Seidel D, Brayne C, Jagger C. Limitations in physical functioning among older people as a predictor of subsequent disability in instrumental activities of daily living. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):463–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afr054

26

Gale CR, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Prevalence of frailty and disability: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing. 2015;44(1):162–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu148

27

Bloomberg M, Dugravot A, Landré B, et al. Sex differences in functional limitations and the role of socioeconomic factors: a multi‐cohort analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2(12): E780–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00249-X

28

National Bureau of Statistics. China 2014 Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: NBS; 2014.

29

OECD. PPPs and exchange rates. OECD National Accounts Statistics. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development; 2015.

30

StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2015.

31

Goldstein H, Browne W, Rasbash J. Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Understand Statist. 2002;1:223–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0104_02

32

Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Mawah, NJ: Earlbaum; 2002.

DOI
33

Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2006;60(4):290–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.029454

34

Merlo J, Chaix B, Yang M, Lynch J, Rastam L. A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2005;59(9):729–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023473

35

Enzmann D, Kohler U. MERESC: Stata module to rescale the results of mixed nonlinear probability models. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics; 2012.

36

Wang T, Zeng R. Addressing inequalities in China's health service. Lancet. 2015;386(10002):1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00402-X

37

Anand S, Fan VY, Zhang J, Zhang L, Ke Y, Dong Z, et al. China's human resources for health: quantity, quality, and distribution. Lancet. 2008;372(9651):1774–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61363-X

38

Chan KW, Wang M. Remapping China's regional inequalities, 1990‐2006: a new assessment ofde factoandde JurePopulation data. Eurasian Geogr Econ. 2008;49(1):21–55. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.49.1.21

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 24 July 2022
Accepted: 28 December 2022
Published: 09 March 2023
Issue date: April 2023

Copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Acknowledgements

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Shaoru Chen, Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, for her assistance in preparing the manuscript for publication. The authors received no specific funding for this work. CHARLS was supported by the Behavioral and Social Research division of the National Institute on Aging (grant numbers 1‐R21‐AG031372‐01, 1‐R01‐AG037031‐01, and 3‐R01AG037031‐03S1); the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 70910107022, 71130002 and 71273237); the World Bank (contract numbers 7145915 and 7159234); the China Medical Board, and Peking University.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return