816
Views
41
Downloads
0
Crossref
N/A
WoS
0
Scopus
N/A
CSCD
This study aimed to investigate the symmetry of the Chinese pelvis.
Computed tomography scan images of each of 50 Chinese pelvises were converted to 3D models and the left sides of the pelvises were reflected on Mimics software. Then, the reflected left side model was aligned with the right side using the closest point algorithm function of Geomagic software to perform symmetry analysis. The volume and surface area of either side of the pelvises were also calculated. The mean standard deviation (SD), the mean percentage of permissible deviations within the ±2 mm range, the percentage differences in volume and surface area were measured to compare pelvic symmetry. In addition, the distribution of pelvic bilateral symmetry associated with both age and sex were compared.
The mean SD was 1.15 ± 0.16 mm and the mean percentage of permissible deviations was 90.82% ± 4.67%. The deviation color maps showed that the specific areas of asymmetry were primarily localized to major muscle or ligament attachment sites and the sacroiliac joint surfaces. There was no significant difference between the bilateral sides of the pelvis in either volume or surface area. Additionally, no difference in any indexes was exhibited in relation to sex and age distribution.
Our results demonstrated that the pelvis has high bilateral symmetry, which confirmed the potential of using contralateral pelvic models to create fully patient‐specific and custom‐made pelvic implants applicable for the treatment of fracture and bony destruction.
This study aimed to investigate the symmetry of the Chinese pelvis.
Computed tomography scan images of each of 50 Chinese pelvises were converted to 3D models and the left sides of the pelvises were reflected on Mimics software. Then, the reflected left side model was aligned with the right side using the closest point algorithm function of Geomagic software to perform symmetry analysis. The volume and surface area of either side of the pelvises were also calculated. The mean standard deviation (SD), the mean percentage of permissible deviations within the ±2 mm range, the percentage differences in volume and surface area were measured to compare pelvic symmetry. In addition, the distribution of pelvic bilateral symmetry associated with both age and sex were compared.
The mean SD was 1.15 ± 0.16 mm and the mean percentage of permissible deviations was 90.82% ± 4.67%. The deviation color maps showed that the specific areas of asymmetry were primarily localized to major muscle or ligament attachment sites and the sacroiliac joint surfaces. There was no significant difference between the bilateral sides of the pelvis in either volume or surface area. Additionally, no difference in any indexes was exhibited in relation to sex and age distribution.
Our results demonstrated that the pelvis has high bilateral symmetry, which confirmed the potential of using contralateral pelvic models to create fully patient‐specific and custom‐made pelvic implants applicable for the treatment of fracture and bony destruction.
Boudissa M, Courvoisier A, Chabanas M, Tonetti J. Computer assisted surgery in preoperative planning of acetabular fracture surgery: state of the art. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15:81–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2017.1413347
Danışman M, Mermerkaya MU, Bekmez Ş, Ayvaz M, Atilla B, Tokgözoğlu AM. Reconstruction of periacetabular tumours with saddle prosthesis or custom‐made prosthesis, functional results and complications. Hip Int. 2016;26:e14–8. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000306
Wei R, Guo W, Ji T, Zhang Y, Liang H. One‐step reconstruction with a 3D‐printed, custom‐made prosthesis after total en bloc sacrectomy: a technical note. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1902–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4871-z
Nieminen J, Pakarinen TK, Laitinen M. Orthopaedic reconstruction of complex pelvic bone defects. Evaluation of various treatment methods. Scand J Surg. 2013;102:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749691310200108
Chen X, Xu L, Wang Y, Hao Y, Wang L. Image‐guided installation of 3D‐printed patient‐specific implant and its application in pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction surgery. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;125:66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.020
Chana Rodriguez F, Perez Mananes R, Narbona Carceles FJ, Gil Martinez P. 3D printing utility for surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2018;62(4):231–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2018.02.007
Ead MS, Duke KK, Jaremko JL, Westover L. Investigation of pelvic symmetry using CAD software. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020;58:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-02068-w
Lima B, Dur O, Chuang J, Chamogeorgakis T, Farrar DJ, Sundareswaran KS, et al. Novel cardiac coordinate modeling system for three‐dimensional quantification of inflow cannula malposition of HeartMate II LVADs. ASAIO J. 2018;64:154–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000628
Ramin J, Maureen S, Yuanlong Z, Terry A, Cullen F, Parisa H, et al. Using 3D‐Printed Mesh‐Like brain cortex with deep structures for planning intracranial EEG electrode placement. J Digit Imaging. 2020;33:324–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00275-3
Huang F, Chen Y, Li T, Liu H, Mai Q, Fan S. A novel approach for posterior acetabular fractures: surgical technique. Math Biosci Eng. 2019;16:7950–62. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2019400
Choi JW, Ahn JJ, Son K, Huh JB. Three‐dimensional evaluation on accuracy of conventional and milled gypsum models and 3D printed photopolymer models. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213499
Wang L, Tian D, Liu X, Zhang J, Zhao L, He X, et al. Morphological measurement of supracondylar femur based on digital technology in Chinese han population. Orthop Surg. 2019;11:294–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12443
Yin D, Xin X, Yang R, Shi Y, Shen H. Biomechanical stability of lower cervical spine immediately after discectomy with grafting. Orthop Surg. 2011;3:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00132.x
Kulczyk T, Rychlik M, Lorkiewicz‐Muszyńska D, Abreu‐Głowacka M, Czajka‐Jakubowska A, Przystańska A. Computed tomography versus optical scanning: a comparison of different methods of 3D data acquisition for tooth replication. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4985121
Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:648–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12853
Wang C, Liu H, Lin X, Chen J, Li T, Mai Q, et al. A single lateral rectus abdominis approach for the surgical treatment of complicated acetabular fractures: a clinical evaluation study of 59 patients. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:7285–94. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.911009
Chen J, Liu H, Wang C, Lin X, Gu C, Fan S. Internal fixation of acetabular fractures in an older population using the lateral‐rectus approach: short‐term outcomes of a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1039-z
Wen X, Huang H, Wang C, Dong J, Lin X, Huang F, et al. Comparative biomechanical testing of customized three‐dimensional printing acetabular‐wing plates for complex acetabular fractures. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020;29:459–68. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/116749
Liu Y, Zhan X, Huang F, Wen X, Chen Y, Yang C, et al. The application of lateral‐rectus approach on toddlers' unstable pelvic fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3172-1
Wang C, Chen Y, Wang L, Wang D, Gu C, Lin X, et al. Three‐dimensional printing of patient‐specific plates for the treatment of acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral plate disruption. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:451. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03370-7
Boulay C, Tardieu C, Benaim C, Hecquet J, Marty C, Prat‐Pradal D, et al. Three‐dimensional study of pelvic asymmetry on anatomical specimens and its clinical perspectives. J Anat. 2006;208:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00513.x
Osterhoff G, Petersik A, Sprengel K, Pape HC. Symmetry matching of the medial acetabular surface–a quantitative analysis in view of patient‐specific implants. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:e79–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001373
Ead MS, Westover L, Polege S, McClelland S, Jaremko JL, Duke KK. Virtual reconstruction of unilateral pelvic fractures by using pelvic symmetry. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15:1267–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02140-z
We thank International Science Editing (
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.