@article{LUO2026, 
author = {Yizhe LUO and Jiabao WANG and Xinde YU and Xudong CHEN and Zhao JIN and Shuo FENG and Yucheng SHI and Mingliang XU},
title = {Scheduling algorithm for carrier-based aircraft support operations based on deck environment model},
year = {2026},
journal = {Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica},
volume = {47},
number = {17},
keywords = {carrier-based aircraft, deck operations, complex job scheduling, reinforcement learning, deep learning},
url = {https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33180},
doi = {10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33180},
abstract = {In aircraft carrier flight deck scheduling operations, Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (MFRL) is constrained by the precision of physical environment modeling under dynamic deck conditions. In contrast, Model-Based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) faces challenges of high computational complexity and convergence difficulties due to the interdependent co-optimization between the environment model and the decision-making model during iterative training. To address these issues, This paper proposes a hybrid reinforcement learning framework that integrates Model-Based and Model-Free (MB-MF) characteristics. First, a deep neural network-based deck environment model is trained using historical scheduling data to accurately predict state transitions within a minimal tolerance range. Then, the converged environment model is embedded into the interactive environment in place of the real environment, where a scheduling agent is trained using the Deep Q-Network (DQN) algorithm, thereby decoupling environment model learning from policy optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to MFRL using the physical environment, the proposed method achieves a performance gap of only 4% without requiring precise modeling. Moreover, it reduces the aircraft sortie time by 34% relative to the MBRL baseline. In resource-constrained scenarios, the decision-making speed is nearly 300 times faster than that of heuristic methods, while the scheduling quality is reduced by only 17%.}
}