@article{Hu2026, 
author = {Chengxi Hu and Sikai Chen and Samuel Labi and Hongliang Ding and Hyungchul Chung and Tiantian Chen},
title = {Do SAE levels reflect real-world capability? A supplemental environmental-situational-capability taxonomy for L3–L4 automated driving},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles},
keywords = {Autonomous vehicles, Automation level, Taxonomy, AV (Autonomous vehicle) situational capability, Operational design domain},
url = {https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/JICV.2026.9210100},
doi = {10.26599/JICV.2026.9210100},
abstract = {The widely adopted SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) taxonomy categorizes driving automation primarily based on the division of operational responsibilities between the human driver and the system. This has worked well for several applications. However, it fails to distinguish the requisite versatility of autonomous vehicle (AV) performance across diverse operational environments. This structural limitation has spawned critical challenges, including safety risks, commercialization barriers, regulation challenges, and inadequate Operational Design Domain (ODD) development guidelines toward Level 5 autonomy. To address these gaps, this paper proposes a supplemental taxonomy for SAE Levels 3 and 4 using an Environmental-Situational Capability (ESC) evaluation framework across three core dimensions: the built environment, natural environment, and ambient traffic conditions. Using a two-stage hierarchical classification strategy, the ESC framework maps expert evaluations of a specific automated driving system (ADS) to corresponding levels of the proposed taxonomy. This novel classification bridges the ADS level and the ODD by correlating environmental complexity with the minimum capabilities required for safe autonomous operation. Operating orthogonally to SAE standards, this taxonomy categorizes systems based on their actual operational capabilities rather than driving automation task responsibility alone. Consequently, it establishes a crucial alignment across researchers, manufacturers, regulators, and consumers, providing a practical reference for product benchmarking, safety validation, and policymaking.}
}