@article{Zhao2026, 
author = {Bin Zhao and Yufeng Hu and Zhenlei Huang and Xiaotao Yin},
title = {Safety Risk Assessment Method and Application of Tunnel Water Inrush Based on Disturbance Zoning},
year = {2026},
journal = {Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering},
volume = {22},
number = {4},
pages = {1510-1519},
keywords = {tunnel water inrush, water-bearing structures, construction disturbance zoning, zoning limit values, danger coefficient, safety risk assessment},
url = {https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.04.38},
doi = {10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.04.38},
abstract = {A quantitative risk assessment method for tunnel water inrush disasters is developed to enhance safety risk prevention capabilities under the influence of water-bearing structures. Addressing the water inrush risks induced by the coupling effects of water-bearing structure spatial positioning and surrounding rock disturbance, an integrated evaluation methodology combining geological detection and mechanical analysis is proposed. The methodology comprises three core components: First, the transient electromagnetic method is employed for advanced water detection to accurately identify the three-dimensional spatial distribution of water-bearing structures. Second, graphical analysis is applied to partition the surrounding rock disturbance into failure zone Df, stress-disturbed elastic zone De, and natural stress zone, establishing a spatial superposition risk assessment model between water-bearing structures and disturbance zones. Finally, for medium or high-risk scenarios, a danger coefficient Kc calculation formula constrained by force equilibrium is derived to dynamically adjust risk levels. Engineering validation demonstrates: When a water-bearing structure in a tunnel case was 9.00 m from the tunnel wall, combined with disturbance boundary values of Df = 2.40 m and De = 12.65 m, the initial risk assessment identified medium risk. After recalculating Kc = 0.87, which is less than 1.00, the risk level was upgraded to high, consistent with subsequent actual water inrush incidents. Two key achievements are summarized as follows: a dual-level risk assessment framework of “preliminary determination-quantitative recheck” is established, achieving the transition from qualitative to quantitative risk grading, and the defined boundary values of the disturbance zone can provide a scientific basis for the minimum safe distance in advanced geological detection. The research outcomes form a complete technical system covering the entire process of “detection-analysis-evaluation-prevention” for tunnel water inrush risks, substantially improving assessment accuracy and offering innovative solutions for safe tunnel construction in complex geological conditions.}
}