@article{WANG2025, 
author = {Guiqiang WANG},
title = {Forensic Paradigm Development. Part 6: Paradigm Shift and Implementation Path},
year = {2025},
journal = {Forensic Science and Technology},
volume = {50},
number = {3},
pages = {221-234},
keywords = {forensic science, Bayesian, likelihood ratio paradigm, paradigm shift, implementation path},
url = {https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.16467/j.1008-3650.2024.0033},
doi = {10.16467/j.1008-3650.2024.0033},
abstract = {The forensic science is undergoing a paradigm shift from the traditional paradigm to the features LR paradigm and the similarity scores LR paradigm, in an era of parallel three paradigms. Given the advantages and development opportunities brought by Bayesian LR paradigm, paradigm shift has become a major trend in forensic science in the global. However, paradigm shifts have not yet been fully realized on a global scale, and the development of the forensic paradigm is imbalance in various forensic discipline and in different countries and regions. The main reasons that hinder the paradigm shift of forensic science include limitation of the technology methods of new paradigm, misconceptions of some personnel about the new paradigms, insufficient abilities related the new paradigms, and legal application issues. Except for DNA evidence identification, the application of new paradigms and paradigm shift in China are relatively lagging behind. This article proposes an implementation path for the paradigm shift of forensic science in China, including scholars and practitioners conducting scientific research on new paradigms, regulatory authorities making paradigm shift strategies and plans, forensic lab developing and confirming LR methods, developing LR verbal scales, collecting data, training examiner and taking proficiency tests, decision-makers receiving relevant education, and legislators adjusting relevant regulations.}
}