@article{LUO2026, 
author = {Xian LUO and Zhixue QU and Chengwang GUO and Da YANG and Taiwei CHEN and Zhihua CAI},
title = {Design and impact response analysis of a novel thoracic physical model},
year = {2026},
journal = {Explosion and Shock Waves},
volume = {46},
number = {7},
keywords = {high-velocity impact, thoracic physical model, non-lethal kinetic projectile, viscous criterion, injury risk assessment},
url = {https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.11883/bzycj-2025-0216},
doi = {10.11883/bzycj-2025-0216},
abstract = {In order to systematically evaluate the impact safety of human chest impacted by non-lethal kinetic projectiles (NLKP), an integrated three-rib thoracic physical model with a configurable structure was developed, which was compatible with both simulation and experimental testing. The projectile representation was first validated through rigid-wall impacts at 29.0 and 61.0 m/s on a controllable gas-launch platform. The measured force–time histories agreed well with the NATO Allied Engineering Publication-99 (AEP-99), corridors, confirming the fidelity of the projectile model. Impact experiments on chest were then conducted using the validated projectile model at 56.0 and 86.5 m/s. The measured chest-wall displacements and the maximum value of the viscous criterion (VCmax, βvc,max) fell within the validation corridors specified in the AEP-99, demonstrating that the proposed model exhibits dynamic-response consistency and predictive accuracy under medium- and low-velocity impacts at or below 90.0 m/s. Among them, the maximum relative errors between simulated and experimental displacements at 56.0 and 86.5 m/s are 16% and 21%, respectively. A projectile hardness scan (soft/medium/hard) showed that VCmax increased from 0.298 m/s to 0.336 m/s at 56.0 m/s and from 0.765 m/s to 0.856 m/s at 86.5 m/s, indicating a more pronounced risk amplification at higher energies. When the rib spacing varies within the range of 80%−120% of the baseline rib spacing, its effect on the peak displacement and contact force is approximately ±6%, and VCmax fluctuates within 5.7%−6.2%, which is generally within the engineering acceptable range. Compared with the surrogate human thorax for impact model (SHTIM), the proposed model adhered more closely to the corridor mid-line at 56.0, 86.5 m/s, and yielded VCmax values of 0.308, 0.803 m/s (both within the recommended ranges), whereas the SHTIM slightly underestimated the high-energy case, confirming the model advantage in response fidelity and criterion consistency. A systematic simulation was conducted for impact responses by four typical projectiles (NS, CONDOR, SIR-X, and RB1FS) within the velocity range of 60.0–90.0 m/s, elucidating the influence mechanisms of projectile structure and material on thoracic injury risk. Under higher speed impact (100.0–120.0 m/s), the soft tissue layer of the model dominates energy absorption and dissipation, while the peak stress in the rib layer increases significantly with velocity and exceeds the yield limit, indicating a high risk of fracture. Thickness sensitivity analysis reveals that the thickness of the soft tissue layer plays the most prominent role in regulating energy absorption and deformation. These findings provide important theoretical and technical support for NLKP impact injury assessment and the optimization of protective equipment.}
}